Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-050 - Addendum to the Final Environment Imapct Report No. 2006-01ROH — 10/21/13 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING THE ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2006 -01 AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1901 EAST FIRST STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Applicant is requesting approval of an addendum to a final environmental impact report, an amendment to a development agreement, a vesting tentative tract map, and a site plan review to allow the construction of a new multi- family residential development at 1901 East First Street. B. The Planning Commission has, following a duly noticed public hearing, on August 26, 2013, recommended the approval of the following items: 1. Adopt a resolution approving the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2006 -01 and approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. Adopt an ordinance approving the first amendment to Development Agreement No. 2007 -01. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2013 -04 as conditioned. 4. Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2013 -03 as conditioned. C. On September 16, 2013 the City Council of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing to consider all testimony, written and oral. After the public hearing, the City Council continued the matter to October 21, 2013. On October 21, 2013, the City Council further considered all testimony, written and oral, pertaining to the applicant's request for approval of the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2006 -01 and request for approval of the first amendment to Development Agreement No. 2007 -01. Resolution No. 2013 -050 Page 1 of 3 Section 2. The City Council previously approved and adopted Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2006 -01. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2006 -01 and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program was prepared for this project. Based upon the studies, the City Council determines that there are no new significant impacts or any increases in the severity of the impacts previously identified in the original Environmental Impact Report. The City Council hereby approves the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2006 -01 and approves the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. Section 3. These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated September 16, 2013, and exhibits attached thereto; the Request for Council Action dated October 21, 2013, and exhibits attached thereto; the public testimony, written and oral; and, the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2006 -01 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that was previously approved and adopted by the City Council, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. This Resolution shall not be effective unless and until Ordinance No. NS -2850 becomes effective. If said ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or otherwise does not go into effect for any reason, then this resolution shall be null and void and have no further force and effect. Section 5. Applicant has requested the approval of the above entitlements which are incompatible with previously granted entitlements. As such, any and all previously approved inconsistent entitlements are hereby null and void and of no further force and effect. Section 6. This decision rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana is final and is subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. The Planning Department shall give direct notice to the applicant of the Council's decision and these findings. ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 2013. Resolution No. 2013 -050 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Rya C Assista AYES: Councilmembers: Amezcua, Benavides Martinez Pulido Sarmiento Tinaiero (6) NOES: Councilmembers: None (0) ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None (0) NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Revna (1) CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2013 -050 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on October 21, 2013. Date: /0/,;2 3 Giir� /i Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2013 -050 Page 3 of 3 Addendum 1901 East First Street Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone, First and Cabrillo Towers Project - Environmental Impact Report Lead Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 Contact: Vince rregoso, Principal Planner 714- 667 -2713 Project Proponent Lyon Communities, Inc. 4901 Birch Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Cynthia Eppledauer, Vice President 949 -838 -1234 Environmental Consultant Phil Martin & Associates 3002 Dow Avenue, Suite 122 Tustin, CA 92780 Phil Martin - President 949 -454 -1800 August 14, 2013 EXHIBIT A TABLE of CONTENTS Section I. Introduction and Summary .................................................. . II. Purpose of an Addendum ....................... ............................... III. Proposed Project and Environmental Determination ...... IV. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts . ............................... V. Summary of Findings .............................. ............................... Appendices Appendix A — Addendum Checklist Appendix B —Air Quality /GHG Report Appendix C — Traffic Report 1901 List Lies[ Street — Addendum August 14, 2013 Rage ............................. 1 ............................. ] ........................... 5 ...I ......................... 5 Page i I. Introduction and Summary This Addendum is to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified on March 19, 2007 (Resolution 2007 -26, Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2006031041) and Mitigation Monitoring Plan ( "MNIP ")) for The Metro East Nfixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers project (Project) and analyzes the potential environmental effects of a less intense development for the same site between the approved Project and the proposed 1901 E. First Street project (Proposed Project). The proposed 1901 East First Street project proposes the development of 343,675 square feet of residential use (254 units) and 2,424 square feet of retail space on a 5.1 acre site at the northeast corner of First Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. An existing 4 level parking structure with 664 existing parking spaces will be incorporated into the project. The project proposes to construct two five -story low -rise buildings totaling 240 units on the west side of the existing 4 level parking structure. Fourteen three -story townhomes will be constructed along the south and east sides of the parking structure. A 5,000 square foot club house and recreation deck with a swimming pool will be constructed over the southern half of the existing parking structure that will eliminate approximately 137 of the existing spaces in the parking structure. Other recreational amenities that are proposed for the recreation deck on the parking structure include a spa, fitness center, billiards and game room, outdoor fireplaces, berbeques, etc. Once completed, the project will provide a total of 555 parking spaces, including 527 spaces in the existing parking structure and 28 surface parking spaces throughout the site. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 1. Project Background The City approved the First and Cabrillo Towers project along with the Metro East Overlay Zone on March 19, 2007. The Metro East Overlay Zone FIR includes an area over 200 acres and includes the 5.1 acre First and Cabrillo Towers project site. The First and Cabrillo Towers project is approved for the development of up to 435,000 square feet of residential areas in a 22 -stoty and 23- story building, approximately 8,900 square feet of retail /commercial areas, and approximately 774 parking spaces, 661 of which are located in an existing garage. The Proposed Project, as described in this Addendum, involves the proposed development of a less intense project on the same site as the approved First and the Cabrillo Towers project. The Proposed Project does not result in any new potentially significant environmental impacts or cause a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts that were identified in the Final EIR that was certified March 19, 2007 and no substantial circumstances under which the Project is undertaken have occurred. Thus, this Addendum to the certified Final F.IR on March 19, 2007 is appropriate Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, el Seel. (CLQA), and 14 Cal. Code Regulations, section 15000, e/ Seel. (CEQA Guidelines). II. Purpose of an Addendum Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency is required to determine whether its discretionary approvals have the potential to result in significant environmental impacts. In the case of the 1901 East First Street — Addendum Page I August 14, 2013 H w w vi vi V) f� w V) Q w r 0 rn a 0 N Q .c G Q d TWV W,b ,YlItel �OkltaNg]YU]fV Kh]K G:ON k 3Htll 3HI1 HIHON I � . !w m 61Y- a6�y _1 I it, I "1 i $ rill I r iL 5 �-L .e 133tl1S 1Stl8 �� Ipryil.YyA)YIl ]SLL Wn3PYJUYA]!U K "AH W Nli C v � LL tt tl V A Q U v k a z h 6E Proposed Project, the City of Santa Ana (City) is the lead agency and prepared and adopted the Final EIR for the Project on March 19, 2007. As the Proposed Project is a reduced development compared to the Project (96,687 square feet of residential and 6,476 square feet of retail less), the City must review the Proposed Project and the approved Project in accordance with Sections 15162 and 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. CEQA Guidelines §15162 (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the Previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR or negative declaration was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous RIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives (Pub. Res. Code §21166; CEQA Guidelines §15162. Given that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a Subsequent EIR (CEQA Guidelines §15162) are present and only special study upgrades to the previous EIR are necessary to reflect the development proposed for the site, an [Addendum to the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report is proper and complies with CEQA Guidelines §15164. CEQA Guidelines 515164(x) states, "The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." In the case of the proposed project, none of the conditions in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Therefore, the City exercises the right to prepare all Addendum in this case and not a subsequent EIR. 1901 East First Street — Addendum Page 3 August 14, 2013 The City finds that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines §15162 requires the preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. Specifically, the City has determined the following: No Substantial Changes in Gkmns/mrres. There are no substantial changes with respect to the existing conditions or circumstances under which the site was evaluated in The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and Cabrillo Towers EIR. The site has remained in its existing condition approximately seven years after the preparation of The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers EIR. There have not been any substantial changes in the existing environmental setting on the site since the project was approved in 2007. No Nero Iifoizva ion of Sohganfial Importance. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was adopted that shows the project will have one or more significant effects or substantially more severe effects not discussed iu the Environmental Impact Report. Except for the new site specific environmental information regarding the proposed development of 254 residential units and 2,424 square feet of retail space on 5.1 acres, the project and its associated impacts all remain the same as contemplated and evaluated in the Environmental Impact Report. There are no mitigation measures that were considerably different from those analyzed in The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers project FIR. Consequently, there is no new information indicating that new significant or substantially more severe environmental effects would result from the development of the project than identified in The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First an(] Cabrillo Towers EIR. CEQA Guidelines §15164 Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15164, the City, as the lead agency, has prepared this Addendum to the previously adopted Final Environmental impact Report. The Addendum Checklist is included in Appendix A. As described above, the City has determined the information provided herein will result in none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines §15162 requiring the preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report. Given that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a Subsequent EIR (CEQA Guidelines §15162) are present and only special study upgrades to the previous EIR are necessary to reflect the development proposed for the site, an Addendum to the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report is proper and complies with CEQA Guidelines §15164. CEQA Guidelines §15164(a) states, "The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare au addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." ht the case of the proposed project, none of the conditions in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent FIR have occurred. Therefore, the City exercises the right to prepare an Addendum in this case and not a subsequent EIR. CEQA requires that the decision making body consider the Addendum along and it) conjunction with The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers Final F.IR prior to making a decision on whether or not to approve true Proposed Project. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15162 1901 East First Street — Addendum Page 4 August 14, 2013 should be included in an Addendum or elsewhere in the record and must be supported by substantial evidence. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines 515164 the City of Santa Ana (tile "City ") has prepared this Addendum in response to the request by the project applicant (Lyon Communities) to allow the development of a total of 254 homes, including 240 homes in two 5 -story buildings west of an existing 4 level parking structure and 14, three -story townhomes along the south and east project boundaries, 2,424 square feet of retail space and recreational facilities approximately 5.1 acres at rile northeast corner of First Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. The proposed amenities for the recreation deck on the top level of the parking structure includes a 5,000 square foot club house, swimming pool, spa, fitness center, billiards and game room, outdoor fireplaces, barbeques, etc. Once completed, the project will provide a total of 555 parking spaces, including 527 spaces in the existing 4level parking structure and 28 surface parking spaces throughout the site. CEQA authorizes a lead or responsible agency to prepare an Addendum to a previously adopted FIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines 515162 requiring the preparation of a Subsequent FIR. III. Proposed Project and Environmental Documentation The proposed 1901 East First Street project proposes the development of 343,675 square feet of residential use (254 units) and 2,424 square feet of retail space on the same 5.1 acre site. The Proposed Project proposes 96,687 less square feet of residential and 6,476 square feet less of retail development than allowed by the approved First and Cabrillo Towers Project. 'Pile Proposed Project is consistent with and less dense than the square footage of residential and retail /commercial space allowed by the previously approved Project. All of the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project were determined to result in no impacts or less- than - significant impacts, or impacts were determined to be reduced to less - than - significant levels with the incorporation of the same mitigation measures that were recommended for incorporation into the approved Project. Impacts to Aesthetics, Agricultural, Biological, Cultural Resources, Geology, Hazards /Hazardous Materials, Hydrology, Land Use, MPineral Resources, Population /Housing, Public Services, Utilities and Recreation will have no impacts. Air Quality, Noise and Traffic impacts will be positive because they will be less impact than the Project. IV. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 'I'be scope of this Addendum is to provide information in support of the development of 254 homes, including 240 homes in two 5 -story buildings west of the existing 4 level parking structure and 14, three -story townhomes along the south and east project boundaries, 2,424 square feet of retail space and recreational facilities on approximately 5.1 acres at the northeast corner of First Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. The proposed amenities for the recreation deck on the top level of the parking structure includes a 5,000 square foot club house, swimming pool, spa, fitness center, billiards and game room, outdoor fireplaces, barbeques, etc. Once completed, the project will provide a total of 555 parking spaces, including 527 spaces in the existing parking structure and 28 surface parking spaces throughout the site. Together, The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers project FIR and this Addendum serve as due environmental review of the Proposed Project, as required pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The 1901 East First Street — Addendum Page 5 August 14, 2013 Proposed Project's impacts were largely covered in The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers F,IR. This analysis addresses any changes to the impacts that were identified in The Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers EIR that could potentially occur with the less intense Proposed Project. Aesthetics The Proposed Project is less dense and will result in less development on the 5.1 acre site than the Approved Project. The approved First and Cabrillo Towers project allows the construction of 627,547 square feet of residential use within two towers (22 story "North Tower" and a 23 story "South Tower" with 374 residential units), whereas the Project proposes 240 residential units in a five -story building and a three -story building and 14 ground level townhomes. The Proposed Project would improve the line of sight across the site from surrounding areas as the height of the proposed five -story and three -story buildings are lower in height than the 23 and 22 story buildings that are approved for the site. The Proposed Project would not negatively impact the aesthetics of the site because it proposes less density than the approved Project. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would generate less light and glare than the approved Project since there will be less development. The Proposed Project would have no aesthetic impacts compared to the approved Project. Agiiatka- al Resonrres Like the approved Project, the Proposed Project will not have any agricultural resource impacts because there is no agricultural activity on or adjacent to the site. The Proposed Project will have no impact to agricultural resources consistent with the analysis for the Project. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 19, 2007 FIR. AirQnnfity The Proposed Project will reduce operational air emissions compared to the approved Project because there will be less development. As a result, the Proposed Project will have a positive air quality impact because fewer air emissions will be generated throughout the life of the project. The short -term construction emissions will also be less because there is less development and the tune to construct the project will be less. The Local Significant Thresholds (LST) generated during project construction will not exceed thresholds and therefore, the LST emissions will not be significant. The Proposed Project will not exceed any South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds and will have a positive impact on air quality compared to the approved Project because fewer air emissions will be generated. The main source of potential odors by the Proposed Project, like the approved Project, will be trash receptacles within the project. The incorporation of Mitigation Measure VIM -OZ 4.2 -1 of the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone, First and Cabrillo Towers Volume II RIR will reduce odor impacts by the Proposed Project to less than significant. The Proposed Project will have less than significant air quality impacts. 1901 East Fist Street— Addendum Page G August 14, 2013 Biological Resources The Proposed Project will not result in any new or changed impacts to biological resources compared to the approved Project. The project site is developed and there are no native biological resources on the property. The vegetation that exists on the site includes introduced non -native urban plant species and will not be impacted by its removal to construct the Proposed Project. As with the approved Project, the Proposed Project will not have any biological resource impacts. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR. Cultural Resonn -es The Proposed Project will not result in any new or changed impacts to cultural or paleontological resources compared to the approved Project. The project site is developed and there are no known cultural or paleontological resources on the property. Mitigation measures associated with the approved Project are in place to protect any cultural or paleontological resources that may be uncovered during project construction. The Proposed Project will not have any cultural resource impacts. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR. Geology vud Soils The Proposed Project would not result in any ne%v or increased geology or soil impacts compared to the approved Project. Like the approved Project, the Proposed Project would be exposed to potential liquefaction. And like the Project, the incorporation of the same applicable mitigation measures to mitigate potential seismic event, liquefaction and soil erosion impacts will be applicable to the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project will not have any new or added geological and soils impacts compared to the approved Project. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis and mitigation measures in the March 19, 2007 FIR. Grreuboase Gas Embsious Because a greenhouse gas emission analysis was not required by CEQA at the time of the approval of the Project, a greenhouse gas analysis was conducted for the Proposed Project. A copy of the greenhouse gas analysis is attached as Appendix B. Based on the greenhouse gas analysis, the Proposed Project will not have any significant greenhouse gas impacts and no mitigation measures are recommended. Hazards and 1 faZardms r14aieriols The Proposed Project will not result in any significant hazards or hazardous material impacts. The potential hazards and hazardous materials of the approved Project will be the same for the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project will not result in any new or increased hazards compared to those identifled with the Project. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis and mitigation measures in the March 19, 2007 MR. 1901 East Rust Street — Addendum Page 7 Aubmst 14, 2013 Hjdrology and ll %ales Qualm, The Proposed Project will not have any significant hydrology or water quality iinpacts. The amount and the quality of the surface water generated by the Proposed Project will be the same as the approved Project. The Proposed Project is consistent xvith the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR. I-and Use and Planning The Proposed Project proposes 120 less residential units than the approved Project. As a result, there will be less density and the building heights will be less than the approved Project. The Proposed Project, like the approved Project, meets all applicable design and development standards for development in the Active Urban District the project. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 17, 2007 EIR and there will be no land use impacts. MineralResoinres The Proposed Project will not have any mineral impacts. Based on the approved Project EIR there are no mineral resources on or adjacent to the project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis and mitigation measures in the 1 -larch 19, 2007 EIR. Noise The Proposed Project will not result in any new or significant noise impacts compared to the approved Project. The project proposes 120 fewer residential units than the approved Project and as a result the time of construction will be less. Because the Proposed Project will have less development there will less traffic and less traffic noise. The Proposed Project will have a positive noise impact compared to the approved Project because there will be less noise generated during project construction and the life of the project. Populalion and Holt ring The Proposed Project will have 120 foxver residential units than the approved Project. As a result, the project will generate fewer people than the approved Project. Like the Project, the Proposed Project will not eliminate any evsting housing and require the construction of replacement housing. Vfith fewer project residents the Proposed Project will have a less growth inducement. The Proposed Project will not have any population or housing impacts. Public Senores The Proposed Project will have it positive impact to public services compared to the Project because the Proposed Project will have 120 fewer residential units. With fewer residents the demand for public services will be less with a positive impact on the public services that serve the project. The Proposed Project will have a positive impact to public services compared to the Project. 1901 Fast First Street— Addendum Page 8 August 14, 2013 Remotion Like the approved Project the residents of the Proposed Project Nvill most likely use the recreational facilities that will be provided by the project. The Proposed Project residents, like the residents of the approved Project, are not anticipated to use existing city recreational facilities and significantly impact existing city recreational facilities. The Proposed Project will be required to pay parkland fees that will be used to provide additional park and recreational facilities in Santa Ana. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR and mill not have any recreational impacts. Twlnportntion/Trnfc The Proposed Project will generate approximately 894 fewer daily trips, including 67 fewer AM peak hour trips and 77 fewer PM peak hour trips than the approved Project. The proposed 2,424 square feet of retail space will mainly serve the project residents and is not anticipated to generate additional trips. The Proposed Project would have a positive traffic impact because there will be a net traffic trip reduction compared to the approved Project. Utilities and Serino Systems The Proposed Project will have a positive impact to the utilities and service systems that serve the project because there will be 120 fewer residential units. As a result, there will be less consumption of water and less generation of wastewater and solid waste. The Proposed Project will have a positive impact on utilities and service systems compared to the approved Project. V. Summary of Findings Based on the environmental analysis, the Proposed Project will not result in any new or significant impacts that were not previously analyzed and adequately addressed in the Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers EIR and adopted March 19, 2007, The Proposed Project will provide 120 less residential units and 6,476 square feet of retail space less than the approved Project. As demonstrated by this Addendum: • The Proposed Project does not constitute substantial changes that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously significant effects; • The Proposed Project does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previous identified significant effects; and • The Proposed Project does not constitute new information of substantial importance that show that the Proposed Project will have one of more significant effects not discussed in the 1901 East First Street — Addendum Page 9 August 14, 2013 previous FIR or that the previously examined significant effects Nvill be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15164, the March 19, 2007 Final FIR and this Addendum are appropriate to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Proposed Project. Considered together, the March 19, 2007 Final FIR and this Addendum satisfy the City's obligation under CEQA to evaluate and address the potential significant environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The facts cited above and provided in this Addendum allow the City to use an Addendum in accordance Nvith Section 15164(x) of the State of California CEQA Guidelines for this project. The Santa Ana City Council serves as the CEQA Lead Agency for this project. It is recommended that the Addendum be adopted as the appropriate CEQA environmental determination for the development of 254 homes and 2,424 squire feet of retail space on 5.1 acres. 1901 East First Stmet— Addendum Page 10 August 14, 2013 APPENDIX A Addendum Checklist Environmental Checklist CEC!A Compliance PLANNING DIVISION Project Title: 1901 East First Street II. Project Numbers: III, Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 IV. Contact and Phone Number: Cynthia Evveldauer 949.838 -1234 Project Location: 1901 East First Street - northeast corner of First Street and Cabrillo Park Drive Vi. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Lyon Communities, 4901 Birch Street, Newport Beach, CA 92660 VI. General Plan Designation: DC 3.0 — District Center VII. Zoning: CS Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone 1 VIII. Description of Project: The project proposes the development of 254 multi- family units and 2,424 square feet of retail space on a 5.1 acre site. An existing 4 level parking structure with 664 existing parking spaces will be incorporated into the project. The project proposes to construct a five -story low -rise building with 240 units against the west side of the existing parking structure. A three -story building with 14 townhomes will be constructed along the south and east sides of the parking structure. A 5,000 square foot club house and recreation deck with a swimming pool will be constructed over the southern half of the existing parking structure and eliminate approximately 137 of the existing spaces in the parking structure. Once completed, the project will provide a total of 555 parking spaces, including 527 spaces in the existing parking structure and 28 surface parking spaces throughout the site. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 1. IX. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Multi- tenant office buildings including Kaiser Permanente medical offices, a 2 -story parking structure, vacant land, multi - family housing, Cabrillo Park and single - family residences. South: Office, a private elementary school, a soccer field, and Interstate 5. West: Cabrillo Park Drive and west of Cabrillo Park Drive is the 15 -story Xerox Centre office building, Interstate 5, and further west is vacant land and commercial development. East: Low rise office building adjacent to and east of the site and further east are commercial uses, including restaurants. X. Other agencies whose approval is required. The only project approvals are a development agreement amendment, vesting tentative tract map and a site plan by the City of Santa Ana. Page 1 w w Lnl/l Ln LL Q w r C) ON r- d `o 0 C C 4 IY'p] WFYb TY V ll IpyyllxFH41 Y aNA: K^A18 Mp19 g 1flfl r- - - - -- - b %1- 311111 31111 H1HON - - -° - -� �F - °d •ode , 1 •. i ♦ S - m 1 1 ,. dY - ,ij I. lit aanx 1 H •I i.+ III li''frrNJt+YIII I p m., 1 i !k° -.. - ; -71-1 -,- -_. :t 133HIS ISHII j Fmltay -a5lr ri ltu V � � WmY..r:YOreim tr!UN BON I I I C d � Ma lL M Ml. cl Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by that project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Agricultural Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Air Quality ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Recreation ❑ Geology and Soils ❑ Transportation and Traffic ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ Land Use and Planning Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that: A. ❑ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. B. ❑ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect In this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. C. ❑ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D. ❑ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR (EIR No. - ) pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures thatare imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. E. ❑ Pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. - ) has been prepared earlier; however, subsequent proposed changes in the project and /or new information of substantial importance will cause one or more significant effects no previously discussed. A SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared. F. ❑ Pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. - ) has been prepared earlier, however, subsequent proposed changes in the project and /or new information of substantial importance will cause one or more significant effects no previously discussed. A SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepare Signature Phil Marlin Printed Name Page 3 Auqusl8 2013 Date '101 Environmental Checklist CEQA Coinpliauce Issues & Supporting Information Sources I. Aesthetics —Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significantwth Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non- B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and ❑ ❑ trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a ❑ ❑ ❑ m stale highway? Agency, Department of Conservation maintains C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or El El El IN B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a quality of the site and its surroundings? ❑ ❑ Williamson Contract? D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare C. Involve other changes in the existing environment which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in ❑ ❑ ❑ ED El the area? or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non- II. Agricultural Resources — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing Impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non- agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and ❑ ❑ ❑ Monitoring Program in the California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation maintains detailed maps of these and other farmland categories) B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually E] E] El or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non- agricultural use? III. Air Quality — Where available, the significant criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management ❑ ❑ ❑ Plan? B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 4 t�� r Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance Issues S Supporting Information Sources Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact contribute to an existing or proposed air quality through habitat modifications, on any species violation? identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status ❑ C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ❑ species In local or regional plans, policies or criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- regulations or by the California Department of Fish and attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient ❑ ❑ ❑ B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian air quality standard (including releasing emission which habitat or natural community identified in local or exceeds quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the ❑ ❑ D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ❑ El concentrations? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ❑ ❑ ❑ of people? coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with ❑ El IV. Biological Resources —Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status ❑ ❑ ❑ species In local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the ❑ ❑ ❑ California Department of fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with ❑ El ❑ the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree O ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? E. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in a potential reduction in nesting opportunities for ❑ ❑ ❑ resident and migratory avian species of special concern? Page 5 IN Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance Less Than Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significantwith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact V. Cultural Resources —Would the project: A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance El El El adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? death involving: B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to define ❑ ❑ ❑ Section 15064.5? ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique El ❑ El evidence of a known fault? paleontological resource or site? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ D. Disturb any human remains, Including those Interred El El ❑ E] El outside of formal cemeteries? liquefaction? VI. Geology and Soils— Would the project: A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquisl- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the Slate ❑ ❑ ❑ Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Seismic - related ground failure, Including El E] El liquefaction? 4. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the El El El loss of topsoil? C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique El 11 El geologic feature? D. Is the project located on strata or soil that Is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project ❑ El ❑ and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 6 r�� r Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality — Would the project: A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water ❑ ❑ ❑ quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Page 7 Less Than Issues tf, Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significantwith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact wastewater, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? VII. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials —Would the project: A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or ❑ ❑ ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance or waste ❑ ❑ ❑ ED within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, ❑ ❑ ❑ would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles where of a public airport or public use airport, ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? E. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or ❑ ❑ ❑ working in the project area? F. Would the project expose people or structures to a significant loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized ❑ ❑ ❑ areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? G. Would the project impair implementation of or physically Interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency evacuation plan? VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality — Would the project: A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water ❑ ❑ ❑ quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Page 7 Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance Less Than Issues 8 Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production ❑ ❑ ❑ rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the El 11 El course of stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site? D. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the ❑ ❑ ❑ rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off- site? E. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage El ❑ ❑ systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run -off? F. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ G. Place housing within a 100 -year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood El 1:1 1:1 Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? H. Place within a 100 -year floodplain structures which ❑ ❑ ❑ would impede or redirect flood flows? I. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as ❑ ❑ ❑ a result of failure of a levee or dam? J. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ IX. Land Use and Planning — Would the project: A. Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or El El ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Page 8 r�� t Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance X. Mineral Resources — Wouldtheproject: A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. Noise —Would the project result in: Less Than Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Significanlwith Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact project (including, but not limited to the general plan, ❑ ❑ specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an agencies? environmental effect? B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ❑ ❑ groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? or natural community conservation plan? C. X. Mineral Resources — Wouldtheproject: A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Page 9 XI. Noise —Would the project result in: A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels In excess of standards established in the local general ❑ ❑ ❑ plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ❑ ❑ ❑ project? D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ❑ ❑ ❑ without project? E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. Population and Housing — Would the project: A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and F1 El 13 business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 necessitating the construction of replacement housing Page 9 Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance XIII. Public Services A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical Less Than Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact elsewhere? C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ 11 El construction of replacement housing elsewhere? environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable XIII. Public Services A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: 1. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ XIV. Recreation A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational ❑ El El such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational El El El facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. Transportation/ Traffic A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in ❑ ❑ ❑ either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Page 10 t�� t Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance Less Than Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact incorporated Impact No Impact B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion ❑ ❑ ❑ management agency for designated roads or highways? C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that ❑ ❑ ❑ results in substantial safety risks? D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ❑ ❑ ❑ incompatible uses (e.g., fain equipment)? E. Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ F. Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑ ❑ ❑ transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. Utilities and Service Systems A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ❑ ❑ project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the ❑ ❑ project that it has adequate capacity to serve the ❑ project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ❑ ❑ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's sold Page 11 N Environmental Checklist CEQA Compliance XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the Less Than Issues & Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant with Less Than threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, Significant Mitigation Significant endangered plant or animal or eliminate important Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact waste disposal needs? B. Does the project have impacts that are individually G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and ❑ El El related to solid waste? with the effects of past projects, effects of other current XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, ❑ ❑ ❑ reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a ❑ El ❑ project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ❑ ❑ ❑ IR either directlyor indirectly? References A. Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone, Final EIR, March 2007, Volume I. B. Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone, First and Cabrillo Towers Project, Final EIR, March 2007, Volume II. Page 12 APPENDIX B Air Quality/ Greenhouse Gas Report AIR QUALITY and GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IMPACT ANALYSIS 1901 EAST FIRST STREET CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Giroux & Associates 1820 E Garry St., #211 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Prepared for: Phil Martin & Associates Attn: Phil Martin 3002 Dow Avenue, Suite 122 Tustin, CA 92780 Date: August 8, 2013 Project No.: P13 -024 A INTRODUCTION The proposed 1901 East First Street project proposes the development of 343,675 square feet of residential use (254 units) and 2,424 square feet of retail space on a 5.1 acre site at the northeast corner of First Street and Cabrillo Park Drive. The project proposes to construct two five -story low -rise buildings totaling 240 units on the west side of the existing 4 level parking structure. Fourteen three -story townhomes will be constructed along the south and east sides of the parking structure. This report calculates the air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the proposed action using the currently approved California Emissions Model (CaIEEMod). Air pollution emissions from project construction and operation are compared to SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds. There are no adopted GHG significance thresholds for CEQA purposes and the City of Santa Ana has not yet adopted a climate action plan (CAP). The SCAQMD has developed advisory thresholds which are used as a benchmark for analyzing GHG emissions significance. As noted in the following analysis, the limited scope of the proposed project does not cause any significance thresholds to be exceeded for either construction of operations. However, because of the non - attainment status of the air basin for photochemical smog and particulate matter, the use of reasonably available control measures is recommended for project construction activities. AIR QUALITY IMPACT STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Air quality impacts are considered "significant' if they cause clean air standards to be violated where they are currently met, or if they "substantially" contribute to an existing violation of standards. Any substantial emissions of air contaminants for which there is no safe exposure, or nuisance emissions such as dust or odors, would also be considered a significant impact. Appendix G of the California CEQA Guidelines offers the following five tests of air quality impact significance. A project would have a potentially significant impact if it: a. Conflicts with or obstructs implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b. Violates any air quality standard or contributes substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. c. Results in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). d. Exposes sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e. Creates objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. IA EI - SlAQ '2' Primary Pollutants Air quality impacts generally occur on two scales of motion. Near an individual source of emissions or a collection of sources such as a crowded intersection or parking lot, levels of those pollutants that are emitted in their already unhealthful form will be highest. Carbon monoxide (CO) is an example of such a pollutant. Primary pollutant impacts can generally be evaluated directly in comparison to appropriate clean air standards. Violations of these standards where they are currently met, or a measurable worsening of an existing or fitture violation, would be considered a significant impact. Many particulates, especially fugitive dust emissions, are also primary pollutants. Because of the non - attainment status of the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) for PM -10, an aggressive dust control program is required to control fugitive dust during project construction. Secondary Pollutants Many pollutants, however, require time to transform from a more benign form to a more unhealthful contaminant. Their impact occurs regionally far from the source. Their incremental regional impact is minute on an individual basis and cannot be quantified except through complex photochemical computer models. Analysis of significance of such emissions is based upon a specified amount of emissions (pounds, tons, etc.) even though there is no way to translate those emissions directly into a corresponding ambient air quality impact. Because of the chemical complexity of primary versus secondary pollutants, the SCAQMD has designated significant emissions levels as surrogates for evaluating regional air quality impact significance independent ofchemmical transformation processes. Projects with daily emissions that exceed any of the following emission thresholds are recommended by the SCAQMD to be considered significant tinder CEQA guidelines. Daily Emissions Thresholds Pollutant Construction Operations ROG 75 55 NOx 100 55 CO 550 550 PM -10 150 150 PM -2.5 55 55 Sox 150 150 Lead 3 3 Source: SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, November, 1993 Rev. I -All E I -S. AQ CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTS Dust is typically the primary concern during construction of new homes and infrastructure. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called "fugitive emissions." Emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). These parameters are not known with any reasonable certainty prior to project development and may change from day to day. Any assignment of specific parameters to an unknown future date is speculative and conjectural. Because of the inherent uncertainty in the predictive factors for estimating fugitive dust generation, regulatory agencies typically use one universal "default" factor based on the area disturbed assuming that all other input parameters into emission rate prediction fall into midrange average values. This assumption may or may not be totally applicable to site - specific conditions on the proposed project site. As noted previously, emissions estimation for project - specific fugitive dust sources is therefore characterized by a considerable degree of imprecision. Average daily PM -10 emissions during site grading and other disturbance average about 10 pounds per acre. This estimate presumes the use of reasonably available control measures (RACMs). The SCAQMD requires the use of best available control measures (BACMs) for fugitive dust from construction activities. With the use of BACMs, fugitive dust emissions can be reduced to 1-2 pounds per day per acre disturbed. Current research in particulate - exposure health suggests that the most adverse effects derive from ultra -small diameter particulate matter comprised of chemically reactive pollutants such as sulfates, nitrates or organic material. A national clean air standard for particulate matter of 2.5 microns or smaller in diameter (called "PM -2.5 ") was adopted in 1997. A limited amount of construction activity particulate matter is in the PM -2.5 range. PM -2.5 emissions are estimated to comprise 10 -20 percent of PM- 10. In addition to fine particles that remain suspended in the atmosphere semi - indefinitely, construction activities generate many larger particles with shorter atmospheric residence times. This dust is comprised mainly of large diameter inert silicates that are chemically non - reactive and are further readily filtered out by human breathing passages. These fugitive dust particles are therefore more of a potential soiling nuisance as they settle out on parked cars, outdoor furniture or landscape foliage rather than any adverse health hazard. Exhaust emissions will result from on and off -site heavy equipment. The types and numbers of equipment will vary among contractors such that such emissions cannot be quantified with certainty. Demolition and grading activities will shift towards construction and paving, etc. The CalEEMod was developed by the SCAQMD and provides a model to calculate both construction emissions and operational emissions from a residential land use project. It calculates both the daily maximum and annual average emissions for criteria pollutants as well as total or annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The CalEEMod 2011. 1.1 computer model was YAI"P SI, aQ '4 used to calculate emissions from the prototype construction equipment fleet and schedule anticipated by CalEEMod for a residential land use consisting of 254 condo /townhouse units and 2,400 square feet of retail space as shown below. The equipment fleet shown is CalEEMOd's default fleet a project of this size. CaIEEMod Equipment Fleet Demolition 72,000 sf (20 Days) 2 Excavators 2 Dozers I Concrete Saw Grading 2,017 CY Export (30 days) 1 Excavator 1 Dozer 1 Grader 3 Tractor /Loader /Backhoes Construction (230 (lays) I Crane 3 Forklifts t Generator Set 3 Tractor /Loader /Backhoes I Welder Paving (20 (lays) 2 Pavers 2 Paving equipment 2 Rollers Utilizing this indicated equipment fleet the following worst case daily emissions were calculated by CalEEMod. The off-road equipment emissions load factors were adjusted in CalEEMod to account for a 33 percent reduction attributable to overestimation of load factors, which CARB has indicated to be appropriate.) Construction Activity Emissions Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds /(Iay) Maximal Catstrncflmr Emissions ROG NOx CO SOz PM -10 PM -2.5 2014 Unmitigated 6.1 49.3 32.9 0.1 14.2 5.2 Mitigated 6.1 49.3 32.9 0.1 11.6 3.2 2015 Unmitigated 51.6 27.4 31.6 0.1 4.7 2.0 ' In September 2010, the CARB announced that its methods used to estimate the load factor for off -road equipment were incorrect and led to an overestimate of emissions by a factor of 33 percent. CARB is currently revising their emissions model, a modified OFFROAD which has not yet been released. CalEEMod is based on the historical OFFROAD. IWI E r sk aQ .,. Mitigated 51.6 27.4 1 31.6 0.1 4.7 2.0 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Peak daily construction activity emissions are estimated be below SCAQMD CEQA thresholds without the need for added mitigation. The only model -based mitigation measured applied for this project was watering exposed dirt surfaces at least three times per day as required per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), to minimize the generation of fugitive dust. LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS The SCAQMD has developed analysis parameters to evaluate ambient air quality on a local level in addition to the more regional emissions -based thresholds of significance. These analysis elements are called Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). LSTs were developed in response to Governing Board's Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative 1 -4 and the LST methodology was provisionally adopted in October 2003 and formally approved by SCAQMD's Mobile Source Committee in February 2005. Use of an LST analysis for a project is optional. For the proposed project, the primary source of possible LST impact would be during construction. LSTs are applicable for a sensitive receptor where it is possible that an individual could remain for 24 hours such as a residence, hospital or convalescent facility. LST screening tables are available for 25, 50, 100, 200 and 500 meter source- receptor distances. For this project the nearest sensitive use would be the residences southeast of the project site at approximately 1200 feet from the closest site perimeter along Moir Court, and therefore, as a conservative approach, the receptor distance of 200 meters was selected for analysis. LSTs are only applicable to the following criteria pollutants: oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM -10 and PM -2.5). LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD has issued guidance on applying CaIEEMod to LSTs. LST pollutant screening level concentration data is currently published for 1, 2 and 5 acre sites for varying distances. Since CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily soil disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment, the following tables should be used to determine the maximum daily disturbed- acreage for comparison to LSTs. Maximum Daily Disturbed Acreage ni mnemt Type Acres/8-hr-day ractor r 0.5 raders 0,5 rem e r S% np -6 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.5 Scrapers I Based on this table, the proposed will result in a maximum of 1 acre disturbed during peak construction grading activity (1 dozer x 0.5 + I grader x 0.5 = I acres disturbed). Per LST guidance, only on -site construction activity is considered in the LST analysis. On -site construction emissions are provided in the CalEEMod output files and do not include sources such as on -road haul, worker commuting or vendor delivery emissions. Therefore, the following thresholds and emissions are determined (pounds per day). LST and Project Emissions CalEEMod Output in Appendix (maximum mitigated emissions from on -site construction) LSTs were compared to the maximum daily construction activities. As seen above, emissions are below the LST for construction. The only mitigation measure applied was the following dust suppression measure: • Water exposed surfaces at least 3 times per day for fugitive dust suppression Facilities such as churches are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because church employees do not typically remain on site for a fiill 24 hours, but are present for shorter periods of time, such as eight hours. However, by applying a 24 -hour standard for pollutants with shorter averaging periods, such as NO2 and CO, LSTs could also be applied to these receptors since it is reasonable to assume that an employee at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours. The Orange County Southern Baptist Church is immediately east of the site. Therefore, comparing LSTs for CO and NOx for a source receptor distance of 25 meters would provide the comparison (pounds per day). Again, LST emissions are much less than significance thresholds. 19111 E 1'SSAQ CO NOx PM -10 PM -2.5 LST Thresholds Central Orange County 1 acre, 200 meters 2,109 123 60 22 Max On -Site Emissions Demolition Unmitigated 25 42 6 2 Mitigated 25 42 3 2 Grading Unmitigated 20 31 8 5 Mitigated 20 31 4 3 Construction Unmitigated 19 25 2 2 Mitigated 19 25 2 2 CalEEMod Output in Appendix (maximum mitigated emissions from on -site construction) LSTs were compared to the maximum daily construction activities. As seen above, emissions are below the LST for construction. The only mitigation measure applied was the following dust suppression measure: • Water exposed surfaces at least 3 times per day for fugitive dust suppression Facilities such as churches are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because church employees do not typically remain on site for a fiill 24 hours, but are present for shorter periods of time, such as eight hours. However, by applying a 24 -hour standard for pollutants with shorter averaging periods, such as NO2 and CO, LSTs could also be applied to these receptors since it is reasonable to assume that an employee at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours. The Orange County Southern Baptist Church is immediately east of the site. Therefore, comparing LSTs for CO and NOx for a source receptor distance of 25 meters would provide the comparison (pounds per day). Again, LST emissions are much less than significance thresholds. 19111 E 1'SSAQ LST and Project Emissions Church Uses (pounds /day) Allowable LST Emissions 25 meters, I acre CO NOx 485 81 Max On -Site Emissions S02 PM -10 Demolition CO2 Area Unmitigated 25 42 Mitigated 25 42 Grading Energy 0.2 Unmiti ated 20 31 _ Mitigated 20 31 Construction 7.3 13.2 Unmitigated 19 25 Mitigated 19 1 25 CaIEEMod Output in Appendix (maximum mitigated emissions from on -site construction) OPERATIONAL IMPACTS Project uses would generate 1,067 daily trips utilizing trip generation numbers provided by the project traffic consultant. Uses with a residential component also generate small quantities of area source emissions derived from organic compounds from cleaning products, landscape maintenance, etc. The contribution of this source is small and is incorporated in the analysis below. Operational emissions for proposed uses were calculated using CaIEEMod2011.1.1 for an assumed project build -out year of 2016. The table below shows operational emissions for the proposed residential and retail uses and assumes inclusion of gas hearths rather than wood burning fireplaces. The project would not cause any operational emissions to exceed their respective SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds. Operational emissions impacts are judged to be less than significant. Daily Operational Impacts (254 Units and 2,400 square feet Retail use, 1,067 Daily Trips) Source: CaIEEMod Output in Appendix 1501 F. I- St AQ -9- O erational Emissions lbs /da Source ROG NOx CO S02 PM -10 PM -2.5 CO2 Area 6.8 0.3 21.5 0.0 0.4 0.4 4,909.4 Energy 0.2 1.6 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 2,112.0 Mobile 7.3 13.2 71.7 0.2 17.7 1.3 14,066.6 Total 14.3 15.1 94.1 0.2 18.2 1.8 21,088.0 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 - Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA Source: CaIEEMod Output in Appendix 1501 F. I- St AQ -9- CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MITIGATION As identified above, construction activities are not anticipated to cause dust emissions to exceed SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. Nevertheless, mitigation through enhanced dust control measures is recommended for use because of the non- attainment status of the air basin. Recommended mitigation includes: Fugitive Dust Control • Apply soil stabilizers or moisten inactive areas. • Prepare a high wind dust control plan. • Address previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed. • Water exposed surfaces as needed to avoid visible dust leaving the construction site (typically 3 times/day). • Cover all stock piles with tarps at the end of each day or as needed. • Provide water spray during loading and unloading of earthen materials. • Minimize in -out traffic from construction zone • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or loose material and require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard • Sweep streets daily if visible soil material is carried out from the construction site Similarly, construction activity ozone precursor emissions (ROG and NOx) are calculated to be below SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. However, because of the non - attainment for photochemical smog, the use of reasonably available control measures for diesel exhaust is recommended. Combustion emissions control includes: Exhaust Emissions Control • Utilize well -tuned off -road construction equipment. • Establish a preference for contractors using Tier 3 or better heavy equipment. • Enforce 5- minute idling limits for both on -road trucks and off -road equipment. OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MITIGATION Operational emissions would not exceed their respective SCAQMD significance thresholds with the following mitigation measure: • Utilize gas hearths rather than wood burning fireplaces for any residential use. 19x1 a 1- 5, AQ GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS "Greenhouse gases" (so called because of their role in trapping heat near the surface of the earth) emitted by human activity are implicated in global climate change, commonly referred to as "global warming." These greenhouse gases contribute to an increase in the temperature of the earth's atmosphere by transparency to short wavelength visible sunlight, but near opacity to outgoing terrestrial long wavelength heat radiation in some parts of the infrared spectrum. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor. For purposes of planning and regulation, Section 15364.5 of the California Code of Regulations defines GHGs to include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrolluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexatluoride. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on -road motor vehicles, off - highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG emissions with about one - fourth of total emissions. California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding greenhouse gases. GHG statues and executive orders (EO) include AB 32, SB 1368, EO S- 03 -05, EO S -20 -06 and EO S- 01 -07. AB 32 is one of the most significant pieces of environmental legislation that California has adopted. Among other things, it is designed to maintain California's reputation as a "national and international leader on energy conservation and environmental stewardship." It will have wide- ranging effects on California businesses and lifestyles as well as far reaching effects on other states and countries. A unique aspect of AB 32, beyond its broad and wide- ranging mandatory provisions and dramatic GHG reductions are the short time frames within which it must be implemented. Major components of the AB 32 include: • Require the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions beginning with sources or categories of sources that contribute the most to statewide emissions. • Requires immediate "early action" control programs on the most readily controlled GHG sources. • Mandates that by 2020, California's GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels. • Forces an overall reduction of GHG gases in California by 25 -40 %, from business as usual, to be achieved by 2020. • Must complement efforts to achieve and maintain federal and state ambient air quality standards and to reduce toxic air contaminants. Statewide, the framework for developing the implementing regulations for AB 32 is under way. Maximum GHG reductions are expected to derive from increased vehicle fuel efficiency, from greater use of renewable energy and From increased structural energy efficiency. Additionally, through the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR now called the Climate Action Reserve), ]%I E V S%rQ - IU- general and industry- specific protocols for assessing and reporting GHG emissions have been developed. GHG sources are categorized into direct sources (i.e. company owned) and indirect sources (i.e. not company owned). Direct sources include combustion emissions from on -and off -road mobile sources, and fugitive emissions. Indirect sources include off -site electricity generation and non - company owned mobile sources. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Significance Thresholds In response to the requirements of S1397, the State Resources Agency developed guidelines for the treatment of GHG emissions under CEQA. These new guidelines became state laws as part of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations in March, 2010. The CEQA Appendix G guidelines were modified to include GHG as a required analysis element. A project would have a potentially significant impact if it: • Generates GHG emissions, directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or, • Conflicts with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted to reduce GHG emissions. Section 15064.4 of the Code specifies how significance of GHG emissions is to be evaluated. The process is broken down into quantification of project - related GHG emissions, making a determination of significance, and specification of any appropriate mitigation if impacts are found to be potentially significant. At each of these steps, the new GHG guidelines afford the lead agency with substantial flexibility. Emissions identification may be quantitative, qualitative or based on performance standards. CEQA guidelines allow the lead agency to "select the model or methodology it considers most appropriate." The most common practice for transportation/combustion GHG emissions quantification is to use a computer model such as CalEEMod, as was used in the ensuing analysis. The significance of those emissions then must be evaluated; the selection of a threshold of significance must take into consideration what level of GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable. The guidelines are clear that they do not support a zero net emissions threshold. If the lead agency does not have sufficient expertise in evaluating GHG impacts, it may rely on thresholds adopted by an agency with greater expertise. On December 5, 2008 the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted an Interim quantitative GHG Significance Threshold for industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency (e.g., stationary source permit projects, rules, plans, etc.) of 10,000 Metric Tons (MT) COZ equivalentlyear. In September 2010, the Working Group released revisions which recommended a threshold of 3,500 MT COze for residential projects. This 3,500 MT /year recommendation has been used as a guideline for this analysis. Some jurisdictions have adopted a numerical annual GHG emissions level as a CEQA threshold of significance. Others have taken the numerical threshold to be an indicator level that signals a requirement for incorporating reasonable and feasible enhanced "greed' building practices without formal adoption of an absolute significance standard. Ium a rs, AQ .H- Construction Activity GHG Emissions The build -out timetable for this project is estimated by CalEEMod to be between 1 and 2 years. During project construction, the CalEEMod computer model predicts that the construction activities will generate the annual CO2(e) emissions identified below. Construction Emissions (Metric Tons CO2(e)) 'CaIEEMod Output provided in appendix SCAQMD GHG emissions policy from construction activities is to amortize emissions over a 30 -year lifetime. The amortized level is also provided. GHG impacts from construction are considered individually less- than - significant. Project Operational GHG Emissions The input assumptions for operational GHG emissions calculations, and the GHG conversion from consumption to annual regional CO2(e) emissions are summarized in the CalEEMod output files found in the appendix of this report. The total operational and annualized construction emissions are identified below. Operational Emissions Consumption Source CO2 e Year 2014 690.3 Year 2015 95.2 Overall Total 785.5 Amortized 26.2 'CaIEEMod Output provided in appendix SCAQMD GHG emissions policy from construction activities is to amortize emissions over a 30 -year lifetime. The amortized level is also provided. GHG impacts from construction are considered individually less- than - significant. Project Operational GHG Emissions The input assumptions for operational GHG emissions calculations, and the GHG conversion from consumption to annual regional CO2(e) emissions are summarized in the CalEEMod output files found in the appendix of this report. The total operational and annualized construction emissions are identified below. Operational Emissions Consumption Source MT CO2(e) tons ear Area Sources 172.1 Ener Utilization 673.4 Mobile Source 1644.1 Solid Waste Generation 54.3 Water Consumption 112.9 Annualized Construction 26.2 Total 2,683.0 Total project GHG emissions are less than the proposed significance threshold of 3,500 MT. GHG emissions for the proposed project are less than significant. rem a 1- 54 AP '12' APPENDIX CalEEMod2011.1.1 Computer Model Output I'M C 0 SI AQ . 13 ; \ § \ � E a \ : / ( f! }/ � § LL \a\ . k 2 . f k \#\ ° cc 3 w\ Lo 3(\ § y , 2 ; |§ (D w ) k j ) \ \ ' z§ ¥` V ; \ § \ N a N O m d N O J M N U) N N C .L IL M C U c Z N C U G N E W m 0 0 Lb U (V rn N m ii G� N LL O n 0 E v E O O A C C O U . vi p • w •n w° ^ Z E O n H � U � O o � a 7 N C C •N w N G U _ d O O (y :c fV F N O GI O U . vi p • w •n w° Z O 4 O � O N U d :c ry F u n ZU a N U o '8 o ;o at .° ry S f LL¢, 0 4a: W � p d � LL p •$ O w o 4• N O GI C 0 Its V N C U O N C O N 01 CL O m r W E O c N 7 N q ;A O U m ;w ° •o c °o O i rb rr? rN O U ;o •y� � yU 11 .� rr r� •rC 'N 'OA1 (.� w F . N q r N ro N ZQ. ZV w •vi rq o •o m A S N U b= m. Um d 4q rnj( ry WN 0 A d r0 Ng ZN 2N 0 LL o ..4...4._.4. 'o w �eol �^ �n r r 'O A q ;O R 6f a� �a •O •O °� y Y 4 4 S }�o a •o n °tea 1L :0 4 0 yyn m ®m LL 4 4 $ rg m d Y q n q Z U a m O z r r r Q a A O! •O '0 � d� g ° A r C O N 01 CL O m r W E O c N 7 N N 0 M q ;A U rb rr? rN re •y� � yU 11 .� rr r� •rC 'N 'OA1 (.� w F . N ZV Um •S 'S •'°" m A V Ng n1- o ..4...4._.4. 'o �eol �n r r 'O q a� P •O •O °� y Y 4 4 S yyn o ®m LL 4 4 $ rg m q n q U ro r_ r r r•'t rR m O z r r r O! •O '0 � d� 3 w ;7 N 0 M m C W CL O m Q. 0 C w U 7 N c 0 ►I c O u N C O V d N d c i3 OI F M N Q d xa W d 3 N O .....Y o o y (J O 6 ,n .q 0 w At 0 Al 'N N a N aH o ;o d O O tlN LLv O •'O O �� O 'O 'O ;O O LL NS U ni Yl z. O K 'g g: ,w Q. 0 C w U 7 N c 0 ►I c O u N C O V d N d c i3 OI F M N Q d xa W d 3 N O a 0 N C O r O E N MI N U -E e Y G O u C U Ja �E c u- O U' F m o yu ;v N" 0 mU Z ry N m of o ,o vi �� ' ° {2UN O W.d.. yya ° 'O 'O g :0� jN O LLJLL O 4 IL 6 u"7 LL o as Il o ,$ N Nue ; H ......... O 'Y U zJ '° ,o LL o O p � O' ;o rc Y G O u C U Ja �E c N N w O J u- U' N mU Z ry N m W.d.. ° 'O 'O g jN i O 4 IL 6 ;Q O tao ;O LL ......... '° o LL o O p � 0 N N w O J 0 N C O a 0 E d O N 0 CI O u a O U cA_ 6 N 0 6 o ci U o e ;o N N U ft p •ry ry ry YQ m 2V S ;a N e N V b c 'm C ° o ;o N m $ .......... O m 6 u �n a LL Q ;c '$ 4 LL c ° O O O q f u aF- :o gg b� m�. L -- ' °o •OO rnLL c d 4 LL ;$ O N �O o ; ci Z ;o -M a a ° E LL CI O u a O U cA_ 6 n N O Ll Z 0 6 o ci F bO. 2V N .° N o ;o m $ .......... O m 6 O ;c '$ 4 LL c ° O O O q f u aF- :o m�. ' °o •OO q u.0.. .L . o ; ci Z ;o n N O Ll 01 C {h M O C 1'. G U �E G Sw U` U •a e •0 0 U Z G ,O O O U S O' � ' O iP O mU Z ;o Na .. y .. e N` nF m •0 S ,o �� o 0 O 'e 0 ci ti67 n W y. e o qq 0 tL O' :O :O O a �o i"ae m'g N 4 LLa U. 0 e � N` 2 U- 'e o K O. ;4 e � o P O C 1'. G U �E G N O a Sw U` .......... 'O O U S O' mU Z ;o Na e 4 nF o S ,o O 'e LLd ci W y. qq LLf :O :O N U. 0 0 :,s ;o e 2 0 K .......... N O a V N OI C 'v C7 M M G G U IE b: N a U o 4 g O U ° Y a. f .q 2V � S e N U d ;o N. m •Q e m ;o ° a df `N p ,O n. 1pN o e o N O yzd 6 C{ �d O 4 $ N 09 m� 'e Gf. LL d 4 LLd ° 0 N ;O „o U •� •� a S 2 .......... o p °o 0 rc • • 8 u :z U' •O u G G U IE b: N U o 4 N ° �N f N. U •Q e m ;o �g df p ,O n. p@'A IL d O Ct �a g oII ZF 4 - Gc Gf. o �o •OO 4 LLd p .......... °o p'o rc • • 8 w ° O N C 0 U c 0 U of c_ Ma .7 m a ri m H h Q N N U S S N z d V r- - Zs � $ N U S o d m r Wy_ 2 � LLd Oa tl 5m� W a S A wf! u' a( O Jy 'p D O U{ . p 0 Z N rc, A rc Li F O C c U U N S � S • S U S Y. N O ZU O tl N m {{6yy{{r N O O O ;O O tl LL � 1 a� 52 o S N d O 4 p S S S e • e V ,o Z ;O ;O ci .r . � g •o �r IS N O it O Jy 'p D N O it a O N C F v b C U rn c 9 is a M %i y V N •N �H h o0 0 0 {oy o $ o Z ° O N U F ZU e � � f � N x m d z N u Yjlp 22a a m oa o 0 p � b2a P fNq�` Ild 6H m�. 4 ° O Lyxi° a W F PS Qo IL N m U U z e S n S o a d a °s $z. e C5 6 R r .. ... (3 0 %i y V N •N �H �S .......... S O 0 O Z o $ o i U N F ZU Fn `� N m Yjlp 22a m oa o 0 LL 6H 4 ° O IL N U ,o z ° e °s C5 6 .. ... �- U N N O d N N C yO i1 j. r U o� c v OD a ai N N O r o y 0 U •O 'O NO p N o U Z c U o e H O U N H rn{ N U f e �o 'O O mQ �F a N U°o ;0 ........ 0 o m LLLLy m p o O e N N Ci O O a C�xO y o ° W q R u'a yJ5 2N W� N O 'g IL 4 O C z o ; e ; o SLL � O p a •8 0 0 LL 4' g O N N O O O � a r' B 0 N N O r o y e •O 'O NO U H O $V •N N N U ° •8 'S e m 'O O mQ �F a �p ;0 ........ 0 m LLLLy p o O e Ci O O C�xO y o ° W u'a N O 'g O z o ; e ; o p a •8 0 0 a x �> N N O r N N c Q U N c 0 U OI c 'O m M V 1p� N O N o $ N O U ' .♦ Cl u ;c 0 O F E ♦ ♦ m U o ry ry f ~ � N ry m0 ZO N ZV U o N m N N Q 6� o IL Q pp ° �p �Q e N CN LLQ O �� O Oa o �g µa s�° 0 8 ..Y.. N p e 8 ° 'g o ILL Q N N � ? R O a ° ° N N O N O V O N .♦ u ;c 0 F E ♦ ♦ m N o ~ ..♦... ° ;8 i< g MO MO ZV N d ;o 6� o pp ° �p �Q e N CN LLQ O �� O Oa O s�° C 8 ..Y.. p b1 8 ° 'g o ILL Q � g a u .... y. c g o U N N O N N O N Ol c a 91 G �E C H n •g n (J N N Z °° •Oo d U- ,o ,c O O N N N o iV 2U,. ° 8 • °o Ri 'e ULq N G m 'e n FL N 'OO 0 W d22' O �O 11 �` Y 09 a 0.. � , Aoj o °e o ° °e 9 io us u' d' O C O N LL6 ' O o� U o H z ° R 2! rc r ,a 0 c O F U E c N O th U Z °o °o U- ,o ,c N N o iV N U b' m- 'e IL Zdl 0 O T 0.. , R o o ° °e °° ,o ,o ° LL6 ' O G Nr ° R 2! N O th N 0 N OI c IL �k D a V C O U N O •O N o Ir $ t. 'O i O yZ U o F U 8 'S •� r •°° w° zc�i' eN N ZU' w r o N N U°O sR �Oa 9 o w 8 •. o° N ;00 N w O �O Q •$ O O� LL� Ul _ a o e o' °o C NYLw w o °e O V Y ;o O o Ka o ;o .. ... �f 4 a � S LLd N 00 N U N e 2 O o E 3 a r „ C O U N O •O N •.Y p i o F 8 'S •� zc�i' N w O $ sR �Oa 9 8 •. o° �b w �O Q •$ O O� LL� a o e o' °o w o °e O V ;o .. ... N O a N O N Of C O U m u w L (O Cl) H O •- u o ,o Z a °° :g °o f -d. N O g .o ,r BUJ t S •O •O F; dN ° ° 11 ZU N N m yF m, d L oeff Ii LL Q UbP1 LLFN 09 <5�n ;C ;O O s p p O •O •O a° O� as ate- N N 'o O z ;o IL d o •$ •o LOii •3 S a" U- ;o O 8 .g •g 2 :rc e u go G C O V N C u E c QO v01 p..... S 'O •O N f -d. ,r n t S •O •O dN O ... .. N m, a h 6 O ;O O •O •O 14 LV Q UbP1 LLFN <5�n ;C ;O O LL p p O •O •O O� R ate- IL d o •$ •o LOii •3 S o U- ;o O 8 .g •g 2 2• a g N O Lb O N OI C N V cu ate.. U P. T C a U N � V �o O 2 U � O 0 �h h F r f Zu ig0: zU n N ' O N U R m O 8 f a y. .. .y. Q � L O 2ffim 90� LN N. li LL O m o ILa O_ .y . 8 •S 's s of �o 'e 6a. c o a QLL LL o S :8'8 O m G y N �G 0 U ;0 z ..y y e O � m $ € ' U Z .> n U C U iE f N d :n 0 O .4 71 7 A O m CD a N 0 a V U 0 f ig0: zU n y- .y. N U c m Ci ;o :R N� R a y. .. .y. Q � L LN N. O m ILa .y . 8 •S 's s of 6a. c o QLL LL o S :8'8 O m G y ..y y $ € ' U Z .> N d :n 0 O .4 71 7 A O m CD a N 0 a Y O r$0 ,g Z O U U QQ N. 60 •' hN O O aa yzN r O a M12 2 n� IL d o Q O y 22 :m .F 'a Y $35 C a N E E E 0 N a 1� N a C 0 m C d a f' a F M v IOp ' O M= rv' °o o:o .rrr h,4 'O O.M r:ro r:o �r °OCp; U; N D ly LM C w U) 7 A m Q O F W O yj N u �m 02y ;o ;o z e ;o o 1=' QQ o � ;O Ne ;o a ;o ........... IL d �b 1p3 •O •g Z b� ad Q Y IL ;o ;o z .ice N N O aD ) 2 a 2 ] ( Lo I /) §) 2 \ %§}! /! \! R §\ �\\ \ } }} 6< � }\ � ! \§ .} ¥f 2 2<!; � \ \!: � .�. /� /� I 2 \ %§}! �\\ � }\ / ! \§ .} ¥f 2 2<!; � /� /� V V V N W d N 7 G A J OTI d W M N d O chi a O 10 d a v A d C O cb N ID C m mD L 10 2 c 0 w w N 0 0 N U N N N 2 Z G ; G o � �' to 2 U m r- N - O M w �a 0 w U 0 U p x Z Z, Or O o• �C j N W � 1 . ry 3 ' $ ; U t4 d O chi a O 10 d a v A d C O cb N ID C m mD L 10 2 c 0 w w N 0 0 N O U o O F e�i N 2 G ; G ci � 1 2 U N r- M w U Z, Or �C !q W � 1 . $ ; U d O chi a O 10 d a v A d C O cb N ID C m mD L 10 2 c 0 w w N 0 0 N N r O •� 2 U O 2 a , U QZ Z ,o 0 O U 0 o R o m b g •R �O n ° 2 �6Cj •O o Q z fin, •o j !N 2dZ: LL LL O �N o� .... .. qN �ppi ° •g O S O 2 S° �Q Q Z IL CI Vx NI ° �QQ 2 o S o ° 0 O LLd •S �S O � N: 2O.1 9 Y N e C O U E H i .j t, O m U a U) a a d Q ,C N w N O a O •� U , O U o R o m m .... .. qN ° •g O S O CI LL4 U o ° O LLd •S �S O � N: • O �CRI N N O a ±1 O d A U a T a d a N fD u Z U o O H ZU- -4- N U m= 0.F' '° •° p .4p ° •o ,o 'O �N 111111 �e IL d 4 �O y O Ct s - �e 5.4 ud -4- 'o O N ,o •g U � 0 2 O rc •m 'o N d Y O n am. d 7 N A F c 0 N V G n N 0 N N N m U Z U Z Z Qa N N U g 0 o W P U _�f O N O Q U - F 2 Q O O O N K. QZ Q U $ p J n� z b � _ 0 U E EI b 9 C J a 3 e c N 7 N b U Z Z N N U o 0 o W P r _�f O N Q U - 2 O O K. p J n� b � _ U N N 0 M N k } � g � Cl .{A /. a§ «! {y /( \/\ «4 ;E k } � g � Cl � ) .{A /. a§ «! {y /( \/\ � ) 0 N OI O M N Vt i a a 's y, N' P Ti 0 P A 0 O G� O x n O O � u N � i N N H 3 o' z N O u O O VI � i a 3 3 co N M 0) m tr CL N m 's y, P A 0 G� O x n O O i N H N V� N 3 3 co N M 0) m tr CL N m fu �E CD 0 ){ ƒ0 ) \ \ § » \ 7 � E cq ~. \ k L \ . . ) D ] k ( § \£s §; \�\ § » \ 7 � cq ~. \ k L . . ) D » CL , k ( § \£s §; § § u $ ƒ;& • � ! \ {!; ] } \ k ) \ C) eq CL k § § § \% \) } \ � \ ) \ 2 / / { / _ ) @[ee k \]kkk \ \ » % k $ k { M § k c { z \ { / k 0 \ / 0 `w v 3 N D Y m d l0 J M d W C7 N LL M ai T U C U C O c E a W 0 0 I Y 0 U r 0 N m m m v J LL N O 0 E d 0 c 0 E d 0 F L O E E o � y 'y O Y1 � N a �E a w C E w T O E 7 E .X C C O p v N c c 0 U Lo ma C E N N 0 N N •m U �. ry L: p U o O U Q 9 z 4N � Z N U d- o 'OO m N ' yy6 V LL4 a ,o u'a o n ..� a •N o Q z z N 0 N N N A CL d_ n n cr i q c w r O 7 3 m x 3 c 3 d m 3 o' Q p d OO � N Y pO 'O C C 3.S D w' 'c o� • n Nd y:v n �u — N cm 0 N n Z Z N O cOp} n O� O O C n O A N N A CL d_ n n cr i q c w r O 7 3 m x 3 c 3 d m 3 o' w �r S O N C O CD i A O N 3 O " u r 0 a C im A m 'n N O H O ZO NN p+1 a NN O d O O O N O' 5, N S N T 1 Om Q TC N Opt• '$O 9yS 1 b `C O PW O� Oy� + V� p �9 9� �O 9T ?: bo 9� IlN 0 N O' O 0• N� 1 o' 0 3N N+ m b •o m_ Y > b •N � •A O V O OZ n 4 W NQ i fir; .p • W a O n � N 8 O o' Ci J .... .. O' O Z S' `O N• A i ° A � O CI O Od O b 3 O 7 3 N N N d N Q d A O• N 'n a NN O d O O O N T sm. Om Q O 9yS 9� 9� N �a G111 m b Y > O •N � •A O V •A � m OZ V W a In N � r O .... .. O' O Z S' `O •N N A � O � Od O 7 3 N N N d N Q d C N C U 7 A W c O R m M m d Q v N n W v m 9� V N G O O D N M v N C U F E c 0 c U -E :a N V. O .d v 0 u i 9 O Ui 'a v U � X N � U 0 p p d' e iV ;id .d d p WQ ......... 6 m- O O Q Fo . $ NN o LLa `qJN b N - P� O Y i M n �O af' LL a. N x 'm °O z rc F ; p . lL 0 c U -E N O N O i u 9 O Ui Fyy � X N � N p p d' m'111ppp WQ ......... Fo $ o LLa N - Y i M n N O N O N C O .L O E v a N M C C C U Nw 0 C 2 C U v m f 'q c s" U .o a O i O' i U U O, U O U Fo .. . ••N • O! r N P O N O U N •O° 4 m • 0 � � u •J N �p 55 a m •O ���ggjjN W� n N• O •1 O �. R W LL `o :N q $G$q O V Sf e 1L o' o •o e ss�o N •N •n N P O •a a Z � K rc o ;o .......... 9 : o LL Nw 0 C 2 C U v m f 0 1 c O' i U O U r O N a m n N• O •1 O �. R W `o ;o e 1L ss�o N' Z � rc o ;o .......... 0 1 a N OI e 'v M d C C E c t 0 c O F c 0 U .4 A F E c y N � U O O 2 y2 T' U ;o S O U U 8 0 O U !- a o Y1 bbY m� 2 F_ m N O O O 2U` �h �ri r N O n U ' O d m �N LL O O � j d LL fl 09 f ;O Y 6 O ti o $� LL g 'N u LLxAx WLL O ; �yyzz p >d LL �O N wa! m' q 1L V °ry � q O N G a 2 o a LL t 0 c O F c 0 U .4 A F E c y N � U O ,o y2 T' U ;o O U 0 a o Y1 bbY m� 2 •n1 N O O m n O i� �N LLa f ;O Y O $� LL � O �yyzz p >d LL N m' cryi '8 'm V °ry � q O a N O r V N OI G v M M J i .h °p A NO i ♦ 1� A V O z' O U 'FI -•LO 0 3 _ d •O U bN F O SN U O O ri .4 n N Nm a U 'e w N 0 d Lea 2 » mE e ry p N LLa- IL d a ° : e 8f ° 4 a LL N b :g L O e+ Cn n .n z , r a U LL J i N O m O i V O U F _ d •O bN O U b` m' A 'bv Nm a a N 0 d e �d IL d N e r a N O m k G k k \/! \ \d!! ........... : 0 ƒ� \\ ƒ \/ ! \ \ ! /\ d \\.......... \§ } \! K d \ \ �( /§! \// \! \ § \\§ / \ \8G ) \ \ \/A k \/! ........... : 0 ! \ \ ! / \\.......... \§ } \! K d \ \ i2 \ § \\§ / \ \ \/A O N C O U L N c 0 U OI C v m a ai C C U N O O :g P N W V a a ry O Z U d n U -yjaa O U O. D J' a F N dN � �N N N V g q l'I m _ n y' m h y�gN Wd 6 �N w LL M1 LLd Li? N ' �e 9 LL6 h N °LL q � N m W O- O •O �O e N U ,G °O � h z N 8 X � N U (7 ; r' z° o � c� o N O O :g P N V ry Z U d O U a N �N N N d 0 n y' m h y�gN Wd w LLd �e °LL � N W O •O �O e N ,G 0 N 8 X m U !r N O O LO N C O r C U m c V in a ri N O � v y • °.j N N YI O Z $ N O ' Z o Y1 M U a F N O y O ZV •v o A . hl h : N O 4N m Z U � •'( m N: O U �H ry �g 4 g e v k6 N a- •m O 10 _O -9 gF 0. :o LL d O-� Sa ;o a . Fo 5a �a ;mN m4 ag IL d p o m n � p a U ;o .......... ON z 5 � O. a o B U O N O .a O • °.j U O Z $ U o O U F _ 'a y O ZV •v o A . hl lY N O U b m N O o �H ry �g 4 g k6 •m O 10 _O -9 gF 0. :o Go H Sa ;o $e �a ;mN m4 a ;o .......... 5 N O G Ul 2 ; � <4� § \ < § # m<£ -33- ) / /�� zo �\ \ §! �� \!! �� / \ } \� � m<£ -33- ) / /�� zo - �� / \ } \� N O N m C .j m a y. i N N C U �E C N o U a O o Z U U F ° $O N N 2U c •n n o O`c U 5 e` m O a r' . JN 'o ° « fj r N �•�'! O o 'OO 'o LL U' .4 m- �O N g w0. �O of h 1p6 � a a a 2 c �M ate{ 11 4 rc ....... $ :s q $O$B S1= U' 3 4n g s o e U In a a Z l7 n • g r K N ri n m E i N N C U �E C N O M r a o U F ° $O N N 2U •n n N U e` m O a r' . JN ° n �•�'! o 'OO 'o LL �O w0. e h 1p6 U 'o 2 c rc ....... U' N O M N 0 N rn c A CL .t O O O e O U ry N O o N m .0 O U O Z O 2 U O U' O U O h N N U N $ O b o 0- ym. a m- a 6f � Sry N fifi0� W° e. ;o Yp a §' IL �' .1 s 05.9 o m o W U vi 'o �O N ry a « ^ .4 . 8 '8 •A p � •$ n a LL m V 'a .t O O O e O U ry N •N ° N Or Y - ... O 2 U o O U N O 0- m- N 6f N IL �' 05.9 'o �O ° 8 '8 •A LL m O a .. ... N O N C1 N m C i� O V y� U L Q m ri C 0 C ry �E e NO °o o- •e -L -• v V 2 O U' qT O _ ri - YO - -YO aU S N 0 1 do mu U r Z '3 0 N O U .A O m ZU •� ar N O O O Ur- 0 e m � h •R O 0 O �N Zg :ry ry ° �o iil Y mN LL d ° y3 gF 6 LL ° g O M1 u7 � i Yo z E3 e U N ° ;o 'q- a R � S v � e 'o C 0 C ry �E e NO °o u" •e -L -• v 2 U' qT O _ ri - YO - -YO aU S do mu n Z '3 J N O U m ar O O 0 LLyd � h •R O O 6g ° �o iil Y LL ° N N �C z e U � ° ;o 'q- R � S v � e N O N N O N CD C A U U C t Q m ri c O C i C O F c O V ad: 0 2 d d a O 0 v W O d 7 m C O A O/ f a N O o ; o O ° � ° • N . V O 2 U r e c�, i O U m 6 V n q� o oa F ;o Rio a� ; R a o ; o u Oa N g .S •o O V oo o" Yi ; o rc d d a O 0 v W O d 7 m C O A O/ f a N O ;o ;a y. o n r m�N O 01� S (J 0 N O� • S b' Vy • .b bl o,o r A.N a ono n' e Ah [b�PO 0 OHO � S O_ N A W m 3 O lu O 7 A IJ 1 3 m 7 O Q 7 c� b 0 3' e a n x Z O • T 2 w 3m' J V� � w b o� �9 Z e N m 0 A� P N nZ 0 z 8 D 'O N ' � O nT D O D � � w: w O1 O N 3 m fa 14 v r d C CL N N Z w C d 0 d N 0 $a a ie v ° � o w 0 N� J • p "c N TIT z 3m GOi .1 2 9 T 0 N o Z ° v GN A °n O • 1 N• N Z D �• Qm NI o O �O $ D O 03 T* ° z vIMF Z N D N g• w �R T n • 1• N N �n Ow O Jm� OC C n o S Ho 3 m fa 14 v r d C CL N N Z w C d 0 d N N 3 C O N c N m m N O O � Z:i $a a ie v ° � o 0 TIT z 3m 9 T N Z ° v GN A O • 1 N• N Z D �• Qm NI O �O $ D ° z Z N D N N 3 C O N c N m m N O O N A Z N 7 C J a LM d c W N N a� d O d Q O co yN C Q to A Cd i to c 0 m m i7 /D r GI I9 m 7 Z c 0 D 0 U lV N i U N U Z V q 1 2 F Ol •W YN m 'N ml ZQ O ' U ` �v A o m m N. nm F p M Z d 2 b� O a T �- g $ ry�ry �F' oP p 6 �p �O a �d i p R y u0i o e Z ;e K N ;O r 'O t -9 o° 8 a� d O d Q O co yN C Q to A Cd i to c 0 m m i7 /D r GI I9 m 7 Z c 0 D N O rn U � 6 � p f U N Z U q 1 2 F Ol •W Qa ZQ e ;e O �v A o m nm F p M Z d 2 b� O 62: T IL �' W w oP io &S- i 'N �QQ u0i N O rn S O m A a 0 a d Q N w a �E 1 � W .W U •b • • L L L N Z- U ;G B }�} tl L O � U. .........L.. bN •W ZU p �� •r°i .e .N 2U b �� .a •Y a J Y �Q 0.� `O ••V 'O m �6 pp a P� �h. LLyLL 44: �x� LL d o t�1 l •N b y 5 F .L . Q O 0 n •V O N b LLa: U .n N ..L N z ;o n OE �. F-I 2 R e h: 1 N w 0 0 N � W .W U •n ! L•. q .L •O m° Y U ;G B ................. O U .........L.. bN •W ZU �� •r°i .e n d 4 b m Y �Q 0.� `O ••V 'O O �6 P� LLyLL �x� o WLL LLa. •V O N b p U .n n Cl n OE N w 0 0 N w d d 3 0 d A 3 N 7 Vl N d C R d QI '. of d N A 3 Y1 7 Ul A d C N O1 Cd 0 N O N APPENDIX C Traffic Report FIRST STREET APARTMENTS CITY OF SANTA ANA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 2nd SUBMITTAL CASE NUMBER: Prepared for: Lyon Communities 4901 Birch Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 252 -9101 M Pirzadeh & Associates, Inc. 30 Executive Park, Suite 270 hvine, California 92614 -4726 (949) 851 -1367 August 12, 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY ....................................................... ............................... 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................. ............................... 1 TRIPGENERATION .............................................................. ............................... 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION/TRIP ASSIGNMENT ............................. ............................... 6 SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION ........................................ ............................... 6 GateStacking Analysis ................................................ ............................... 9 Parking.................................................................... ............................... 12 REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES AND /OR RECOMMENDATIONS ................. 12 CONCLUSIONS..................................................................... .............................12 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison — First and Cabrillo Towers vs. First Street Apartments., ......................................................................................... 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location ...................................................... ............................... 2 Figure 2 Project Site Plan ........... ..................... . .............................. I.................... Figure 3 Driveway Lane Configuration .................................. ............................... 4 Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution .......................................... ............................... 7 Figure 5 Project Driveway Peak Hour Volumes ........................ ............................... 8 Figure6 Gated Entry 1 ....................................................... ............................... 10 Figure7 Gated Entry 2 ....................................................... ............................... 11 Figure 8 On- Street Parallel Parking Detail ............................ ............................... 13 APPENDIX AppendixA ......................................................... ............................... Scope of Work EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Traffic Analysis is prepared in order to evaluate the operational and design characteristics of the proposed First Street Apartments project at 1901 East lot Street in the City of Santa Ana and to evaluate the project's potential impacts at the project access locations. The project is situated on an approximately 5 acre site located at the northeast corner of Cabrillo Park Drive and East 18t Street in the City�s Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone, see Figure 1. The site is developed with a 3 -story commercial building and a 4 -story parking garage. The project includes the demolition of the existing 3 -story commercial building and construction of 254 residential apartment units and 2,424 square feet of support service retail, see Figure 2. The project site was previously approved for development of the First and Cabrillo Towers project consisting of 374 residential dwelling units and 8,957 square feet of specialty retail. The proposed project will be developing fewer units thereby generating fewer peak hour trips. Therefore per the scope of work only the project access driveways are analyzed in this report. A copy of the Scope of Work is provided in the Appendix for reference. The findings of the traffic analysis with the proposed project did not indicate any significant project impacts at the project access locations, The proposed project will utilize two existing driveways and will be stop sign controlled. There will be two project entries to the existing parking garage and both are gated. The findings of the gate stacking analysis shows that there is adequate storage capacity at the two (2) gated entries to accommodate the expected residential and visitor stacking needs without backing onto the adjacent public and/or private street. It should be noted that the gates will be open during the day and closed at night. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of a Traffic Analysis conducted for the proposed development of 254 residential apartment units and 2,424 square feet of support service retail at 1901 East lot Street in the City of Santa Ana, see Figure 1. The project site is approximately 5 acres and has an existing 3 -story commercial building and existing 4 -story parking garage. The site is located at the northeast corner of Cabrillo Park Drive and East lot Street in the City's Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The site is bounded by Kaiser Permanente to the north, existing church and office building to the east, East 15t Street to the south, and Cabrillo Park Drive to the west. The existing lane configuration at the project driveways is shown in Figure 3. The site is accessed by an existing driveway on Cabrillo Park Drive approximately 530' north of East lot Street that connects to an east -west drive aisle along the northern property line. There is an existing driveway on East 151 Street approximately 270' east of Cabrillo Park Drive that connects to a north -south drive aisle in the middle of the site. There is another existing driveway on East let Street approximately 475' east of Cabrillo Park Drive that connects to a north -south drive aisle along the eastern property line. To accommodate the proposed project the existing 3 -story commercial building, the driveway on East lot Street approximately 270 feet east of Cabrillo Park Drive, and the LSEVE TEENTH L 0 0 0 3 z J r o: m FRUIT 5 FOURTH FIRST a1ivis Figure 1 WELLIN Project Location N.T.S. Project Location First Street Apartments, Santa Ana I C- Z_ uJ U Z O U) J O � C� Ml Q M 0: 0 r IRVINE FR w Y k' Pirzadeh N ;cMmnsNVr)NI frtmrwtN r+�u r; n:e e<ma I � � �, - � I p 3NYliYid NItlAN 6 II �' �I g f i FO , F ,�' • ' � a n:' re i � gl 1. ,_ i � f ;n I I 133HISISWU hu'aeneWY4lul Wy) 4Yu \1 DT1 N[OY vi Z !O N a 3 a/ivia Figure 3 Driveway Lane Configuration First Street Apartments, Santa Ana /. Pirzadeh middle drive aisle will be demolished. The existing 4 -story parking garage, the northern drive aisle and the eastern drive aisle will remain. The project will have restricted right -turn in/right -turn out access from the existing driveway (Driveway 1) on Cabrillo Park Drive that connects to the drive aisle along the northern property line, see Figure 2. As a project feature, the drive aisle will be turned into a fire lane with decorative paving. The north fire lane will include a drop - offloading area approximately 80 feet east of Cabrillo Park Drive. Cabrillo Park Drive is a four -lane arterial street with a raised median. The project will have restricted right and left -turn in/right -turn out access from the existing driveway (Driveway 2) on East lot Street approximately 475' east of Cabrillo Park Drive that connects to the drive aisle along the eastern property line, see Figure 2. As a project feature, the drive aisle will be turned into a fire lane with decorative paving. There is also a covered loading area at the northeast corner of the project site that can be accessed by both fire lanes. The left -turn in access is provided by an existing left -turn lane. East let Street is a six -lane major arterial with a raised median along the project frontage. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the operational characteristics and design features of the site access locations based on the projected inbound and outbound peak hour volumes. The impact of the decrease in the number of residential apartment units from the previously analyzed 374 units to the proposed 254 units will be documented. TRIP GENERATION The proposed project will develop the same parcel as the previously approved First and Cabrillo Towers project except it will contain 120 fewer residential dwelling units and changing the 8,957 square feet of retail/commercial use into 2,424 square feet of support service retail use. Also, the project will have two (2) access locations; a restricted right -turn in/right -turn out access on Cabrillo Park Drive that is presently operational and a restricted right and left -turn in/right -turn out access on East Ia' Street that is presently operational. Consistent with the Traffic Analysis Scope of Work the trip generation rates for the proposed project were calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 80, Edition for a high -rise apartment development. To determine the potential level of project impact, the trips being generated by the previously approved project based on the approved First and Cabrillo Towers Project Traffic Impact Study dated March 2007 prepared by EIP Associates were compared to the trips being generated by the proposed project. As shown in Table 3 the First and Cabrillo Towers project was projected to generate 1,961 daily trips with 143 and 166 trips occurring during the AM and PM peak hours. The proposed First Street Apartments project is projected to generate 1,067 daily drips with 76 and 89 trips occurring during the AM and PM peak hours. By comparison, the proposed project is projected to generate 894 fewer daily trips, 67 fewer AM peak hour trips and 77 fewer PM peak hour trips than the First and Cabrillo Towers project. It should be stated that the small accessory/support retail service provided on -site in intended mainly for the project residents. This use is not expected to generate any additional trips, and in fact could reduce project trips. Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison - First and Cabrillo Towers vs. First Street Apartments Land Use Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT In I Out I Total In I Out Total First and Cabrillo Towers High -Rise Condominium 374 DU 1 24 1 1031 127 1 881 54 1421 1,563 Specialty Retail 8,957 SF 1 10 1 6 1 16 1 10 1 14 24 398 Totals 1 34 1 1091 143 1 98 1 681 166 1,961 First Street Apartments High -Rise Apartments 264 DU 1 19 57 L 76 64 1 361 89 1,067 Project Differential (120) DU 1 (15) (52) (67) (44) (33) (77) (894) Trip Generation Rates Land Use ITC Land Use Code Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT In Out Total In Out Total High -Rise Condominium 232 DU 0.06 0.28 1 0.34 0.24 0.14 0.38 4.18 Specialty Retail 814 SF 0.99�r. 0.77a) 1 1.76(11 1.19 1.52 2.71 44.32 High -Rise Apartments 222 DU 1 0.07 1 0.29 1 0.30 0.21 0.14 0.35 4.20 (1) ITE Trip Generation Manual 8� Edition does not provide a trip generation rate for calculating AM trips. Therefore, the trip generation rate that was used in the approved First and Cabrillo Towers Project Traffic Impact Study dated March 2007 was used in this report. Based on the trip generation comparison the proposed project will reduce 67 AM and 77 PM peak hour trips at the project access locations and to the adjacent roadway network. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/TRIP ASSIGNMENT The project trips were manually distributed at the proposed access locations based on its design features, proposed land uses, available turn movements, accessibility to residence and visitor parking areas/parking structure and, proximity to the local and regional roadway network. The project trip distribution is shown in Figure 4 and is consistent with the approved First and Cabrillo Towers Project Traffic Impact Study dated March 2007. The AM and PM peak hour volumes for Driveway 1 and Driveway 2 is shown in Figure 5. SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The project will have two (2) access locations. Driveway 1 is an existing driveway located off of Cabrillo Park Drive. The driveway is restricted to right -turns in/right -turns out and is stop sign controlled. 3 AM and 6 PM inbound peak hour trips and 30 AM and 19 PM outbound peak hour trips are projected. The driveway will access a 20' wide fire lane along the northern property line and consists of one (1) inbound lane and one (1) outbound lane. A new gated entry into the existing parking garage will be installed approximately 305 feet east of Cabrillo Park Drive. As shown on the proposed site plan, this distance is also the effective driveway throat. Therefore, Driveway 1 will be able to accommodate the projected trips. f W12113 Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution Pirzadeh First Street Apartments, Santa Ana 8/12113 Figure 5 Project Driveway Peak Hour Volumes First Street Apartments, Santa Ana / �� Pad ' irzeh Driveway 2 is an existing driveway located off of East 1st Street. The driveway is restricted to right and left -turns in/right -turns out and is stop sign controlled. A total of 16 AM and 48 PM inbound peak hour trips and 27 AM and 16 PM outbound peals hour trips are projected. The projected eastbound left -turn movement, 6 AM and 19 PM peak hour trips, will utilize the existing 140' left -turn lane. The existing signal at East 181 Street and North Golden Circle Drive will provide adequate gaps for the left -turn movement. The driveway will access a 20' wide fire lane along the eastern property line and consists of one (1) inbound lane and one (1) outbound lane. A new gated entry into the existing parking garage will be installed approximately 260 feet north of East 15t Street. As shown on the proposed site plan, this distance is also the effective driveway throat. Therefore, Driveway 2 will be able to accommodate the projected trips. Both access drives provide direct access to the existing parking garage for the project that will accommodate resident and visitors parking needs. The north fire lane connects with the east fire lane to enable site circulation from Driveway 1 to Driveway 2. A drop - off/loading area is provided on the north fire lane approximately 80 feet east of Cabrillo Park Dative and a covered loading area is provided at the northeast corner of the project site. It should be noted that the existing Driveway 1 and Driveway 2 serves an existing 3- story commercial building and the project site was previously approved for 374 residential dwelling units and 8,957 square feet of specialty retail. The proposed project will generate fewer trips and have less impact at the existing driveways. Gate Stacking Analysis The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency (EMA) Standard Plan No. 1107 criteria is being utilized for determining the amount of vehicle storage length behind the garage entry gates for the proposed residential project. This standard requires that gates be set back between the prolongation of the near curb of any public street and the gate to provide one (1) foot per dwelling unit or a minimum of 100 feet of storage for entering vehicles to stack without interfering with the through movement along the adjacent public street. The project is served by two (2) parking garage entries that will be gated. Entry 1 is located off of the northern fire lane approximately 305 feet east of Cabrillo Park Drive. The gate is located at the face of the parking garage and is 22 feet wide that provides one 11 -foot inbound lane and one 11 -foot outbound lane. The entry widens to a 24 -foot parking aisle inside the parking garage, see Figure 6. It should be noted that the parking garage is existing. The only modification is a project feature that will install the gate at the face of the parking garage. Driveway 1 is projected to have 3 AM and 6 PM peak hour trips. The distance between the prolongation of the near curb along Cabrillo Park Drive and the gate is approximately 317 feet. Entry 2 is located off of the eastern fire lane approximately 260 feet north of East 1st Street. The gate is located approximately 38 feet inside the parking garage and is 24 feet wide that provides one 12 -foot inbound lane and one 12 -foot outbound lane, see Figure 7. The parking garage is existing and the only modification is a project feature that will install the gate inside the garage. Driveway 2 is projected to have 16 AM and 48 PM peak hour trips. The distance between the prolongation of the near curb along East 18t Street is approximately 290 feet. 11 E R)Y f P B7a'�9 ELEC 20'. 4 LOBBY A3B1 t \ ^ . 1 A ?65• l �� ' w gvhl m a N.T.S. C la 8.7�� BB j I A iv A A EIEC o SWITCH °N! — GEAR — IVY 7. �— — UUAAUU �YITO(ICY,,'L'� RESIOENTIAL PARKING _ P Is 63 SPACES 8112113 Figure 6 Gated Entry 1 First Street Apartments, Santa Ana 10 Z. Pirzadeh cc TIIC7= Ir lid End Ilm go 11 The proposed gate operation at Entry 1 is a 22 -foot wide security gate that will open from one end and at Entry 2 is a 24 -foot side security gate that will open from one end. Both of the gates will be open during the day and closed at night. There is another rolling gate inside the parking garage that will separate the visitor parking and the residential parking. Therefore, based on the entry design shown on the plans, the operational characteristics of the gate mechanisms, and the setback of each gate from the adjacent public street we have determined that the vehicle stacking area at the gated entries provides adequate storage capacity that will allow vehicles to enter the site without interfering with the traffic flow on the adjacent public street. Parking The proposed project will modify the existing 4 -story 664 space parking garage to provide 531 shared parking spaces (including 51 visitor parking spaces) and 28 private parking spaces for a total of 559 parking spaces. In addition, a curb cutout will be provided along Cabrillo Park Drive for on- street parallel parking. The cutout is approximately 95 feet long and 8 feet wide. Based on the City requirement of 20 feet long parallel space and 5 feet of buffer, a total of 4 vehicles can be accommodated at the cutout (see Figure 8). These parking spaces will also provide short term parking close to the support service retail which may be used by project visitors or by pass -by traffic. The design of the cutout is not expected to impact the thru movement on Cabrillo Park Drive. Furthermore, the cutout ends approximately 260 feet south of Driveway 1 and is not expected to impact the operation of the driveway. REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the Traffic Analysis there are no required mitigation measures needed to support the project. It should be noted that the proposed first Street Apartments project will continue to provide its fair share for the mitigations identified in the approved First and Cabrillo Towers Project Traffic Impact Study dated March 2007 prepared by EIP Associates. CONCLUSIONS This report presented the findings of a Traffic Analysis carried out for the proposed First Street Apartments project, 254 residential apartment units and 2,424 square feet of support service retail, which is located at the northeast corner of Cabrillo Park Drive and East 1st Street in the City of Santa Ana's Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The design characteristics of the existing access driveways proposed to serve the site were evaluated based on projected entry and exit peak hour volumes. Based on this evaluation it is concluded that the project access driveways have adequate carrying capacity for the projected demand and pose no significant impact to the adjacent roadway system. It should be noted that the proposed project will be develop 120 fewer residential dwelling units and changing the 8,957 square feet of retail/commercial use into 2,424 square feet of support service retail use. Therefore, the proposed project will reduce 67 AM peak hour trips and 77 PM peak hour trips at the project access locations and to the adjacent roadway network. 12 1 8' RED CURB T N.T.S. �o x b N 1' TYP. o N CURB 100' Project N sne 1' TYP. - 8' RED CURB 70' w 0 A U Past 1st Street 8112/13 Figure 8 On- Street Parallel Parking Detail Pirzadeh First Street Apartments, Santa Ana 13 Appendix A Scope of Work FIRST STREET APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCOPE OF WORK July 1, 2013 The proposed project, First Street Apartments, consists of 250 residential apartment units and about 2,000 square feet of support service retail to be located at the intersection of First and Cabrillo in the City of Santa Ana. The area -wide traffic impacts of the proposed project site were previously analyzed for a 374 unit Residential Condominium and 8,957 square foot specialty retail project that was previously approved for this site. The proposed project trip generation is significantly less that the previously approved project. Therefore it is proposed that a focused Traffic Analysis be conducted to provide the evaluate the design of the project circulation and access drive elements and to further evaluate any required traffic control measures at the project access drives. This analysis will also provide a comparison of the project trip generation to the trip generation of the previously approved project for the site. It should be noted that the proposed project will continue to provide its fair share funding of the mitigation measures identified at the two impacted intersections identified in the March 2007 First and Cabrillo Towers Project Traffic Study. The study will include the following sections: I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section will provide a short, clear and concise description of the Project, background, and the Traffic Analysis findings. Also, included in this section will be a general description of all data, conclusions, mitigation measures and/or recommendations. II. INTRODUCTION III. This section of the report will include a comprehensive description of the Project and key elements of the Traffic Analysis including the project site location, existing uses, proposed project, study area, and existing description of the adjacent roadway network will be discussed. The Traffic Analysis will evaluate the proposed access driveways. The trip generation for the proposed project will be based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Manual, 8m Edition for a high -rise apartment development. The trips being generated by the proposed project will be compared to the trips contained in the approved First and Cabrillo Towers Project Traffic Impact Study dated March 2007 prepared by EIP Associates. The comparison will demonstrate that the decrease in the number of units will result in Approved: Date: Page 1 significantly fewer peak hour and daily trips being generated by the proposed project than were previously analyzed with the underlying approved project. rV. SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The operational characteristics and design features of the proposed site access on First Street will be evaluated based on the projected inbound and outbound volumes at the driveway. The on -site circulation will be examined to ensure that there is adequate maneuvering area available for residents and visitors to access the parking structure. A gate stacking analysis will be conducted for the gated entries using the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency (EMA) Standard Plan No. 1107 to determine the vehicle stacking requirements for the proposed project. VII. REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES AND /OR RECOMMENDATIONS VIII. Based upon the results of the Traffic Analysis physical, operational improvements, and/or identifying fair share costs required in order to mitigate any potentially adverse Project impacts will be identified in the Traffic Analysis. A summary of the results of the Traffic Analysis and recommended improvements, if any, will be provided. PAI 14316(1)-FiratStr tApts0 70 12013- TralEcAnalysis3copeanisc.pkp Approved: Date: Page 2 CHAPTER 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4.1 INTRODUCTION The Cal:farnia EnvrrnnmentalQuality Art (CEQA) requires the adoption of feasible mitigation measures to reduce the severity and magnitude of potentially significant environmental impacts associated with project development. The Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the proposed Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone EIR (State Clearinghouse No.2006031041) located within the City of Santa Ana (City), includes program and project - specific mitigation measures to reduce the potential environmental effects of the Overlay Zone, as well as the First and Cabrillo Towers Project. Monitoring of the implementation of adopted mitigation measures is required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. The Final EIR for the proposed project provides a list of mitigation measures, and describes the process whereby the mitigation measures would be monitored. Following certification of the Final EIR and approval of this Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) by the City, the mitigation measures included in the Final FIR would be monitored as described in this MMP. It should be noted that because this EIR contained program- and project -level components, two separate MMP tables are presented as part of this MMP for the Overlay Zone and for the First and Cabrillo Towers project. 4.2 PURPOSE The purpose of the proposed Overlay Zone EIR MMP is to ensure compliance with all mitigation measures to mitigate or avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts resulting from the proposed project that were identified in the Final EIR. Implementation of this MMP shall be accomplished by the City of Santa Ana. Mitigation measures will be implemented (1) as part of design development of the project, (2) during project construction, or (3) as part of project operations. 4.3 RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES In general, monitoring will consist of demonstrating that mitigation measures were implemented, and that the responsible unit monitored the implementation of the measures. The responsible unit for determining compliance with all mitigation measures will be the City. Monitoring will consist of determining whether • The specific issues identified in the mitigation measures were considered in the design development phase • Construction contracts included the provisions specified in the mitigation measures • The required actions specified in the mitigation measures occurred prior to or during construction • Ongoing administrative activities included the provisions identified in the mitigation measures Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone (Volume III) 4-1 1 of 18 Chapter 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Any concerns between monitors and construction personnel shall be addressed by the City of Santa Ana, Planning Department. 4.4 LIST OF MITIGATION MEASURES As mentioned above, due to the program- and project -level components of this EIR, the MMP has been divided into two parts to address each component separately. The mitigation measures that pertain to implementation of the Overlay Zone and their method of implementation are listed in Table 4 -1. The mitigation measures, which include several mitigation measures from the program -level component, that pertain to the First and Cabrillo Towers project are listed in Table 4-2. All project - specific mitigation measures included in the Final EIR for this project would be monitored as described above. The mitigation monitoring matrix on the following pages is formatted to parallel the format of the Executive Summary table contained in the Final EIR. The matrix identifies the required mitigation measures, the time frame for monitoring, and the responsible monitoring agencies. It should be noted that the mitigation measures from Volume I that are contained within Table 4 -2 have been modified slightly so as to directly apply to the First and Cabrillo Towers project. The content and action required by each mitigation measure have not been modified. 42 City of Santa Ma 2of18 a m O �c O h � V t U ul m c m 1 3 o 18 O Lo d O 0 10 U a d .Q a T U a w rn � c ?_ m � am N O V A _ � N d Np� N O t N C O C O 0 0 N d ° U E d d d � c d ° a N � W Oi N d d o ¢ C C O L d N N•� m C y � O N C N o L v p L C > C `d c 1O ~ U O v r v $ ¢ ME ZE a a 15 d co Pa c m c � v v y 2 a o O N 0 a d O V l0 d N O O o c �ma ` E o Q3 ao 0 � O d U d is c c E C y C C C p'mC) m aina � C C U V U d m d a a 0 V>, C L a d C a d a c rn m Q ° S'S !o'er �•� am am am .S y t0 d O L N yy N N O U N 1d J y d V E u �coa w °�Nd a�i of oc �'�Lrivc `E v d N m v'S v c E E u `o U V? > m e Idil a .� m T o d r rn°° y y N 0° d 2•'K O d> N p V N N d a L C a N 10 > d C Old d ill >> • N FL L U O O' O N O d= y Ls m O. 6 O g y Y ._ o N °l c° o s d o o oc m °' 3 .E o `o a E 1 of y e .E & m a a`� E ,o o cvi a` c !E m n u m d -u u .E e •y >¢ lv Z, n U E N. w o 6 E c = O c o t ,N o> m m p d N N a m a d N A O° N •_ o in d vl 'O N U d C ;p •L p l0 d O aNw p 7 C •_ d a N mil. o �.>t yL L mU'o C V m t; N E v E m L 3 o 18 O Lo d O 0 10 U a d .Q a T U a w rn � c ?_ m � am N O V A _ � N d Np� N O t N C O C O 0 0 N d ° U E d d d � c d ° a N � W Oi N d d o ¢ C C O L d N N•� m C y � O N C N o L v p L C > C `d c 1O ~ U O v r v $ ¢ ME ZE a a 15 d co Pa c m c � v v y 2 a o O N 0 a d O V l0 d N O O o c �ma ` E o Q3 ao 0 C C C aC C C V U U U U O C O 'C O 'p O 'C O •C O C O � aU D_U dU o_U 0-U a c a°i c d d a a a 0 a m Crn '3 m'5 U d m d m m d m d m a m Cc N y. N OI >. L O bwd a 2 N L 10O C G O O = m z3�. End EEU ut Ndo Ep1 Ntm a WI a 'c :camw °9 E'c°ao Ma«Ei� N 1OZ c °o° o aci A 6 3 19 m ,`o_ .�° m E E • .O O c V� C C. a N d m0 N 01 O U ..OP S C N V N a C A's N y > • c .N c 'mmG Pi 0- - rn Ymma a .� m Ua° c a G o 'AiJ' ��� � O1w ca C O. O rno O v o y m my E °m �"O °nc vam o > E u,° co iu '5� ° c oEa wa c6 m e u -° w Q �' L" y a o a W u c v 5 5 N a aq O a L O C O T N O o ti Op�� 'L 4 .0 O NoO1 jgl o E `I 'c £ .� ° o.r n L as .> m'C LD E,2 a L pd C y E 'S UI �j y C U E N N O �T O .-> c O N y ° o 01 a N m U m a y c N S+ u c U N FN@ VINO V N1-raB WNVd� NCB • o E' � aiQ£uo� a`. a«"ma'���dc °g�o�c N w ioo >0,�.. -� « «o �1._myco acma)i vim > O m O U N 07 N C L UI m m2`a'O -y coo ES ac•a EcmE� E aE _ U� N N N $ C ou N U 6 10 n != E > a 3 c °I H a g s i1 a m o rn d m� mo- d 10 N 41 Ir °dx d N ^' ^! Si m N N 1) N y O N - C O E o f] W m C y e VIZ U E m V OI U v u N m a1 N 3 c N m °� N 2 v u N Fi E �o `OO m'2Gi 'c O<°a S. 4Tn d'FL Q.bn cc a�TOn `�`? �a 3 ° O C O UI 6 J O C._ L ° C d O C n m u a m i •° o� N L B. u a M .°.. m Q N 'i u ..2, N 3 h o m ' m q N O m C U w 3¢ c x$ E c O N y 0 O Q N N U y 1O m e 0 N w U C C IO O_"' � c 4 of 18 ri w 0 C N O w t U 5 of 18 m o= d O C O VNCI O C O C O C O 'C O ry m `m m c 1cp U_ U a a a a a ae • T U • MM Cc U d V � U V U a V � O a C C(Tj � a:2 'S C :S EL m rn oCl° 0 m Q 3 a m Q 3 l ° a m o`�C 'b er a Q m rtdl ° eL.. U 'OT OIEOyd OJ'IjL dLNfO O�.�d NdO� NdL'�10 y U 10 U p U 't 'q U d� [J Gyi N> N C .t] O �1 ._ 6�l lO �Iy y d b C T t C d °C COIUN O C !G d .mod yl E_ � ONN'OO 'D d :y d p —ONd � (O p y d Y L T— O. O C N 10 J d U V1 1U p O O.t y O A c 10 p .o y b d QU'C b N ' T b 0 d Cryy N.O o CU(Ep:Zom mod.. pp ts y d N']N'P� d.7 p9 S 10 y C C y e.9 C pCCp,a L "d" U L 2 J C U 10 • d'O 9 CO'l_r Ld n tM1_O'O t5 E. dC ¢U 11010 �U1 4 J A V y d° U (D b .2 & L d 44 E rn v) p iO i S �,� y 3 'cd ° a`uC i n • ] C d d VN i ?C �.N r$ f ' .'o i N 0 d aU . i1�J. - G 'UO "�O' � O= p p O tN _ d £ pU b — d C U Q < • N 1� Q N U BE y 9 U U �a 4? 'D O d 2 LS= CO N O ud C ° ''rm Q L p fJ T) E c o a`� d u m$ J o E O t $ • U L m U£ O.d po° p U O! j aL1 y dVJ O> C >U2 Ql OT a 'UO 10 ° N C Q 1U 9 N 10 d .p 2 U 01 VI O OI O C E� 'r0+'F... d d� lO j( (OJ OI O1 d C .O C� O V d 1B O. � C L d Q O O) � C� N TJ C O C O n J— t .c °I T+ 2 .� .� cv and d m E n m ° 15.= F ` m a p ._ s E ° 'O „d O— d -`rj ,L F' N O d U O N d d N U OI 6 a a ' Nj O U ry N rrl.. 0 0 o a t0 J N O O C d T p :5 "- fV C p p O N 0 0 d r C C 1p N O° .= d C .0 d lye C p d _O p ot U �' d y Q c o ,1�_o N 1? a> C; N" 2 ^> u '° d N m o d N m E p e � N N m m G_ C _N o 0 C i N E O O wc L 2 � U U N 1O }�0 O U T ~2 A B E O E q � U O U w y O N d fn � 'D E w 'nS O 1� N> O d J O IS 5 of 18 6 Of 18 d E Z m w 0 v n n • aE !} �y q O C an a,a �a p • C C C OI 4 c o c 2 c 0 sE � V_ y 8 acs a c o &d � C 2 i� a w_L C d g C C O C C T Y> 6 Of 18 d E Z m w 0 v n n • aE !} �y q O C an a,a �a p • C C C OI t N J N j 6 Of 18 d E Z m w 0 v n n aE _Z � V_ y 5 mud a' o &d O CUUO i� N LD w_L C O C C O C C T Y> U E A T> d rn.ncda S+c M 1 9 o—°' —ma c m10 O 10 C- E J E O a N N d -Z OL w U N m N R 10 d U N N ° 0,0 L .•C 10� o 22 E y'N C'A d U O� g d ry- C '� d T N L d d y OI N C C O d U d d C ° N S A O G 2 D! N d l0 0 .. >>E`s .a� U9 a2iQd° U o'�uwtiE d omiu c me�1' jy C S C .:: .r O y S N J b d O1 V E N N p'^' • o w Yo ° c .� o m a E m -o c a t y ax+ d o v L N 2 �'3 �� °aUC acid d �� ° °Ew °—°�c 1b'aci9 U V! 5-5 d Q O V • E—:5 v 1. �, v u o d m d rn y y a s c« d2 w c 3 o .° aNi a !a c C O y ` _ o v N n C • 1 N 'TA N 2 Q E d 2 Y U m O C C 2 m J � E C q mC od E o ° E° d C d 0'S Q O N O L F 10 C A F o O O la C° b U L 0 U n y N N d OI jp C .�J O. = an O .O 3_ o L N F m 0 ° o [+'_� V 0I C C C U Y C C C 210 dc`d C N v�N'� N 1p « l N Q Ea,2_^ uc obi 'aN do �vv Nly d.dc udddJ E ° —lp is» `d-' >'pM dU N'C nN N�B �i jt°�JQa33ii�Q°.Ndi°i N 2 E =d MOd E N Q . . 6 Of 18 d E Z m w 0 v n b C N c c c � ._ re a m d b c d c � n o 'c Q ¢ d m ¢ o� 0 d 0 o�= aci a=ci aac� c c c � ._ re a m d b c d c � n o 'c Q ¢ d m ¢ a�i m d 0 ?;� ill� c c L N .� C ._ re a m d b c d c � c 'c a m d m n a = C � 10 ¢ m 01 - C amc� 10 a E� E y E o n v 8 w m o o 0 Wvm a�$•a0O C1B h2 a— rnca Fi N O j 7 N 7 J >ro N,£ ✓ d$ j d p g I T5 ,2^5 w C� a d 'C A •,a O ''U • C V G VI ° N d LLF$d 0 C >aai 5 -o 01 E d N F ow cc= Wa a d A a'u3 o>.d E 1v Ern.=2� om d N W p — c c W aLyp c C N L L O E T O m o A I— E 0 �' L m °c -,WOW d m a c v a p.c �'��a Lrnv nm rn$L°�au m�y .Nn H N m d N d 5 C° > CD tO� N= "O f0 1!I OI r..• d v V N d 2 O L N� O LL d 6 V S -q'u in °3 dd��E�ioa na c>�UZ Q N ° N C d C a N d � 3 5 � R E ; N c W d N d N E a aO wag' C; o O a 0 E< N N a d — 7 of 18 ry= O G L N .� C ._ re a m d b c d E G d 'c O C � u °nom di N V 7 O y d N Ld�'741 N�/aN y' N' N C • a� d �� o c N p� E •� d aCL¢ V d d = d L Z Q fn O mo n a = C � 10 ¢ m 01 - C amc� 10 a E� E y E o n v 8 w m o o 0 Wvm a�$•a0O C1B h2 a— rnca Fi N O j 7 N 7 J >ro N,£ ✓ d$ j d p g I T5 ,2^5 w C� a d 'C A •,a O ''U • C V G VI ° N d LLF$d 0 C >aai 5 -o 01 E d N F ow cc= Wa a d A a'u3 o>.d E 1v Ern.=2� om d N W p — c c W aLyp c C N L L O E T O m o A I— E 0 �' L m °c -,WOW d m a c v a p.c �'��a Lrnv nm rn$L°�au m�y .Nn H N m d N d 5 C° > CD tO� N= "O f0 1!I OI r..• d v V N d 2 O L N� O LL d 6 V S -q'u in °3 dd��E�ioa na c>�UZ Q N ° N C d C a N d � 3 5 � R E ; N c W d N d N E a aO wag' C; o O a 0 E< N N a d — 7 of 18 G N .O D 8 of 18 m Z m c N N N C C C a U � � m� rn2 rn$' C N C C C y C G C N C C O U 0 U 00 c c c U V V d d d d d 6 1 Q Q Q • N N W o Q o 1 • C T T LL@ • U o � c v U v c � Q � Q � Q \ C 9 C O C U am am am m �o E£ oc _o. -2 o� u c L � m V and •�Oi EI a�i o. •' ^o a m .L m «' 5 -mo m E N d E c ai �_ °o 17,; • O U -.F N .0 a` M f0 C a N �- - N 10 D ? d K '� m.0 O\ y O N 10 q T pp (O .E N Mg fU « E N 15 O \ O �S VOiq �mGCW N$E.O .r V'x 'pyN • N y l0 C N C U m� a w � N •� ry •1 y N>p�N �4N d U OI O Y�Y�� O��Oq�1� N ��a�iQ J �L T�aI .0 C • >" 5 O) N C io ti v ° �K m IV m C ¢-' m E O �O o �-' � a M m° L° m c_ m N CyN Nm� N rL (O .O CN NV'OCNN £' E 2 �C Od' c wm E�`{„l • YJ > C C J m m t5 v N Ul N N R V T N N N z • 'O •tJ N •T+ (O O U O yNy N N w O C N Y ri O@ «� N p U m d N_ O O (O N C E C J N r_ L S O S d ^2 « Ll � OI NN f> d N G C C Vdl .0 C C_ Vl d 10 l0 10 C O. U N'A 6 C (O .♦) N y C m N di W c o m maws •>i m'c o > c E 2 E Ti o N «E odd vN!`m alo m2, C« N T O OI N O U O\ �± K N •G p 10 f? N N 6C C U CI T>-SU��'E O.°N'O VO C6C�C:C EbCCO o > •1 «° > o o .m m m CJ N> m° o °'1 Jw E 1O u mL !c \n o a o+ G o o `o. a y y JN �f c u d m of m s c o a s \ii J 1O 'ER ii 'o e o N N^ m m c7 a v a o-OO c m m m -E:!5 a Z Q IJn E a t o m jp d N N p N T� N m ` K =de y C O 09 E d�'vNv Jo w V d U m E J 0 d m d m e 0 1p m C U d Q ep O q m U d w 2 C y m J m> L Q Ip C J _O d d N U U E 3 a m o a U E= c v $ 8 of 18 m Z m c N N N C Y 0 d D; a c m a w v N 0 V N � d � C V a Oma C Q Q U d a v c C p\ m ¢ � c c p m J a m d O C T L U— N O y y y$ N U p! U N H.2 0 C O O Y f N U d a d E o m a N •C 'DID `� d N N O ° L d pT C d O N G' 01 EO a .p N •�` N 9 N UrylO�dy v a'� Yov y E n d d d a 2 rn� .2+ o d o a rn o go o p 6 O m � � o J � v E V � d d d E • Yn at d � O U E t n n� $ 9of16 9 � O d d o y d a c c m o C y d O U ° N N � d j N U 6 ' V C 2 • � Z'j d V g d y U n U a .2 iii C C a d rn rn� N S \ a b c o. d rn o • y� [L OU Q \ d .2.^ $ o c .Z• c o U 'w 2 E o c m a a $ u d E C U a n c c > a c `Ld, d N L a v E d N $ � M \ S— � a•DO d$ C • 1 •� O a "j • 12 y C c ° J 3 � • N y a =N =•C w a'v '^ �¢ d i c'rnt Z E C L C p\ C _ L a S r'o ca °yUZE�'� • O M E o a¢ d p N d c E 9$ y o-p U d N O Q d N a L N N N U L d U :e `2d' $ E � u iE E •U E O U O \p p J .0 O O a N c .O m_ O� � n dM u m ¢fin c4 a'z2ao o_z o a $ c m \ N c Q ULa• vJi E L a d w C d N w v N 0 V N � d � C V a Oma C Q Q U d a v c C p\ m ¢ � c c p m J a m d O C T L U— N O y y y$ N U p! U N H.2 0 C O O Y f N U d a d E o m a N •C 'DID `� d N N O ° L d pT C d O N G' 01 EO a .p N •�` N 9 N UrylO�dy v a'� Yov y E n d d d a 2 rn� .2+ o d o a rn o go o p 6 O m � � o J � v E V � d d d E • Yn at d � O U E t n n� $ 9of16 9 � O d d � d y d a � a m o C y d Y y N'_ ° N N � d j N U � J N V C T a � E d V g � y U a .N a .2 iii C C a ti N a X A N S o. d rn o d y� y E � C 0 N •r- �c C U a O s tO a 'Tp a c m L a v E d w 0 M 0 z d V F Q a c m V d C •e p .2 `o'c 'c o a U m u n n Q d n a rn V C C d Q O) OI C C c :o C 'am ii C O � N 3 N w c v c .c 0 .d• a N C v a v v N U � W O U � U N J U 'o g n p n O p !v a a a a OU p d d 0 N A a c •- v o y o a jp C O o u O N J v� `• n a G oc� V a'in O C N 'O q p j d N 2 6 ry 6 n 0 U C C C Er j � C O v aaa oc� m U m U 2 6 6 n Q 4 EJ 5 d O d O a a` U C a v C a y IO d Q O) O1 Q OI O1 - C •- C C a C a am am J. - LC d 10OauL IOOd N'_� tO? g L Fi p N v n N f N wv L .p :E E -. o 'I+ym1Ln���= o.ow=Eo E N C U .t. ma yE¢= Eo a O'1..dw EEo. -ffiw rn'3 N` E ioo E'- g wE ym c'c dE a Q `o Td `DC "o a c a c a u _ 12 1o°n t p E. u n W F V -, C ✓ p OIL N d Q C C 1p O 5 $ N Js N Y d O O lO dL j U C 1O N 6 N my �� J TN C'U d NdN nNg.p M -U 2 8'5 47, a�oE a a a m m 10 v LL m a E 3> c •�-j -j .` M. N `4 1 lU -6 a d ry m U E �'To N «tea cv QO� 'L F 6 N d o C C O O y� C y p 1yp N C C .°P a C o fi a 1Oc N C d p C C w A nu o w C Q N v c o N p L E pl rL.. w0 v QL C 1n 10= d O) u4E ,c d cc > °'Od aA.L.ata u Q d C U M a N C U v �o � •�1O1i °1 c v 1b ��oo T z w .o m e E v m a tg E S i B p O _ Q N '� N d '0 a 1O u c w m e C o a., 00 J'S c E °'�'c o. 1p �' nfE ' Q n n a` z Q rn v $ E o. u v ° E "gin v o ° tip °��' m a z u`« L a 0. 'M c 10 01. d N J 10 C L N O iY d O �..• d 'o E U�. O n d a L paU 6O OdN'V1d dC�C E lO O l0 O L T U O y' O C C C p d '0 d d nv NNE p1 l E 2 v v'in a V nno Va d'oo E o u o m 2 m -C' 10 of 18 C d c N m > x -7 O a d` c .0 i 0 « V 11 of 18 `m 3 0 u C N w N `o .c LL a 'c4 Q ¢ Q d a 3 U LL c ro m c O� rnW o J N U ro d C N j O � LL j U ro cc O C c a ° a dnz` d d t O ro u n n 0 t a E.0 .2 d � cg $ E d O > m c y c J 0 a c o '- � — o O o C? 2 C � g m a ��nnln 0 0 wd C C ro 3 q pJ C L_ d p E u d d Ol E a ve'v ro N (O y T r n+vi K C �No N Q U 5 CM J C N YJ O) m jNd e� e m3°'EV:3� O. 2? a U U E a W d U 2 U U U C p d O � c � 2 L c g ro ,m LL a am 1 ' ova a c =° a ro J d d O auci � U Ol d o-mLL o- ayymQo • O U W� w ro �� O d d 0 (V U N� O c'� �L� >_ayo oii y oy aci� o y a C U d 0 U 0. C O Q o y N y L N N N E N LL :5 d d6N O¢1C+L+ dpj N� O�O O d O d C? 6$ C C �. :p C L'O N T VUl n Q1CC O ro �' y . O S Q a d T C d j E °m m .E a° VJl O dal ° ij l° fi uLLi x 1-5 •1 Nc P >.$ E N 1? J Z VI °E E E i0 N '� a c d E L Z C u OR ro ro a. y R d V N Tn a > E b d m C o p E a N c 0— J N y J O d O U 2 U d d O J _N Z d d d ? m o a Ena N a .O. z ro ° E y ro ro—°. o LL Eo N v yu Ic v J m o co 3 v C 10 rnd 'c m i Q y° o- ro b. d d c ro d c c` p o gg d d o Yv c o c b c m t E c d m Q� A E iG E O vc °. °com •u O In �vm2`°y 3n��w�w g V O O E N m N A V d O O d'a C y ro O n E 'o n a O 3 Q M. 12 o d= o a—Ei o: E t N ¢a m a i m aui •o d p d m> 2 0 a z 1 O n d rJ d l U U °' N rdl C d N C L d C C a d d d C C d d O O_" d u L'O d d E -2 ° 80 E o ro ro u O y C � ydj C 10 11 of 18 `m 3 0 u C N w N `o .c LL a 'c4 Q ¢ Q d a 3 U LL c ro m c O� rnW o J N U ro d C N j O � LL j U ro cc O C c a ° a dnz` d d t O ro u n n 0 t a E.0 .2 d � cg $ E d O > m c y c J 0 a c o '- � — o O o C? 2 C � g m a ��nnln 0 0 wd C C ro 3 q pJ C L_ d p E u d d Ol E a ve'v ro N (O y T r n+vi K C �No N Q a c m 12 of 18 0 a V CI J V n U U 6 Q° d 0 a n a y °r Q c �r @'S a m N d c rn 000 E a @ y o s C C A O jg N � O U d d\ a of c � N o .2 a f L c d d U y rn c ° n � a ppJ _m 5 ° U N �O G T � v d U' Q T � O n� a W E Z 0 o d y � r d u C C � a c7 _8 O • a` a N`° D C U L Ny � O Fd= O WE • r v 2 r c m ai j t «o E a v v � .3 ui t aom o_3 ci2 mma£ ° « °mEL° @EE �£ rn 16 FE r � v m • '^ m 'S W d m '@ d E c .a `o = a v .9CF 0 Z.2 y J E Z d@ ,fo E a a @ N p m y 2t E @ c g' L rn o y y '6 y .6 M� • L E N2 m S N G y O O' L N C O N d 1O — ._ C w l] C N ° @ °<'>o 00 °m2.n= m m 001 W d L N C yr °a �'E3 «o E> a L O �^ @ d Yi d c i u d a d 2 2 2 y Q° c N y a d ti S a y E u uci L a v L d c° m �rn�mE ad 3 o,m u a @3vu QL3sLm= J UEyTy.y °ca yLE.Lo Ea y • d d a a d q d "£ c d£ ° c rn O d L d K C y'«d u @p FC N O Q d@ O d O � C C 2 v o c c vbi a s m E 12 of 18 0 a V CI J V n U U 6 Q° d 0 a n a y °r Q c �r @'S a m N d c rn 000 E a @ y o s C C A O jg N � O U d d\ a of c � N o .2 a f L c d d U y rn c ° n � a ppJ _m 5 ° U N �O G T � v d U' Q T � O n� a W E Z 0 0 6 d _ d O N d N d N d N d . g a m m c 6 v d C7 a C7 C C U lV0 n n m d • 'o 0 a` a U �O C 01 C d C O C d C O C v C b . g a m m a m y w"° rno 3 v m d Ec E E d3 d w d Fi'm Ec° c £ y E; n 0 5 = 5 `c 'm .9 E o •Ei o m'' `°' s g 3 y d w o o' oc c m m d m O N C N N N �I u�• .O E J d N N S'G �� � C CO u u u a 2 ai c y n c .o u a c d Ti u 'u a HC O.• d N d O ,G y y d C y C N L'. d N_ '�f S o c^ o N 0 o n .o m u d L � d 10 2 o S J U a e d c m em O ` 12 L° u o o d E e c E. .do p N m m_ v c d 'J 0 L C .J 10 vl 7 L n'O 6 d y A y Lp ` "O � '� C o d .O ;s . � N �' c m d '$- £ o� c m d� c J n w 'N V d '• u d a .° v U 'c@ OE d N E q u y lap O o c m° E v v °'Y_ 2 ayi c o E '°" c L' 01 °� d 2`vm,a° EO a.Ed v3 cJ �aaa� °�°n vo. 5Ay .d. = L uo� d 15 E y Y� 0 8-0 O�'' O (0 C d L n d L c J 'x�1 d• V L y� C ' m S�v yTi c 4'� rn E c o u 3 v 5 d o N y d 3 rnz 2 oD (= E Y° 2 d N m L O-Nu 'c ..; o c r 9 E c o v m y m o u c •° moo u w � c c E aiv m^'m 'a'c JdanmEy od m i u o 4 UJ o 0 1O Fes'- `n sv .o W .y ¢" `m U i £ U 2 c c C m � U N O d C O y � O � d a J L w U o w y m z° � m c y m CL L w U o 13 of 18 d a A 46 L) U L G 10 •c r 0 r e 'c° cm C 14 Of 18 N CN C d m o `0 00 R V u f R in U. N In d a O R U A a`U' d`aJ0 dmJ 0in U m cc c U U U U n n n n N 1 • � U � U OlQ Ua dQ IOQ C c C °I c C OI C OI a a ca c-O nm J EL N J am {C's am 1 Eo £ U o c u '° .o IO°p J N o C d d a3 L d 10 1.2 E iJ J A L SC_ (O ry (O d �' 10 L d in In yp p C L 'U • I N V J p d V a d 10 N� .O d j 10 d U N L T •� . 1 ! F L ifi b e d N U {� d 0_. p d C d d E F d t a ¢a u 42 £ p d S a d N Q N N U 6 ¢O G G _ 1 N N ,i d= w ja Coo N E d OIJ . 1 Q C O1 C U E s `• d° ._ O N� d N la J d W la d� OI y 2 la C s d °LS a d a5 m I� o d� a C m ry w41a dZ I„°o v N o .E .o rn w y O._ '� d m ncv dia m N 6 O 2 C �I__ae d 01 O JC la �8001jry 0! Ol la N d ecLa.0 m N C VJOm« C p N° N T c ¢° Ti a u N v u+ m C p O N y£ T O d J E R U C d R d C N :U E- 5 D_ Z O. a C d Vl O Q 2L N a N d w y d N O a mi; Z I d p d �✓ ya I O ry Ia C a ( n 5 y d N c t U d O O C U T d d X p O d N a d OI 2's V d b E a m d a"i 4 14 Of 18 N CN C d m b c m n m U o� a m a d IO C L O rl m € o c p rn n o 3 v'Ei @0_C N.E� s a w E uc8 m'o a F y d Er�AU'iN£ v cui c '9 9 E o_ E O o_ m m o E o. c c d Si a - 0 a o. 5 a° am Q3 ilT b N w b o a C C V V Z- gt wyo'An E 16 Eye a ymj'ba W ?N C Y C W TS N J fJ G N N t0 N W N t3 E a n d a Lu c E Z °1 E T y b o tO N S N n E O d a m E ] y. .- y ,� O O C .c b N y� O 7 aN+ d O a 2 ! Q. u E ia' u .CO s n m- d° nO io y c a E' L T o a a rn E N O CT C .'p- °� E" 1v�i !U C c a o o N N m s Yin 6 G L N °'It 1� d '.' N 'b L M(J C F-- 2 Z a C Gl L C E d OI 0 y b N y C 0 N y W L E L (� N t C N O •V_1 ° 2 O d N N Ip L_ 4=, dLL C d aL+ y U m E o M a m E- g m m i W O a N d Q E Ol E LO -FO Yl N> O V av N 'H u ao O ag •r° N W of Ea°i o 3mN aco N o N d O •1O _N � b � > N 4� IO C G u'va 4�. U C o N a.6 _Ot N> ry v E O m o c N U y Jagm a E= y o m m L ° E E c E N c c n c c d m m N N> 14 fjv uNdyo�uih >o Naa�E,c .2oN d��rn °rnJo 4 w 'oo m = O a ate° v a °° P Q as N `O �na�H3E£ EE`o N O d IO C L O rl a 01 a. N c p rn n o 3 v'Ei @0_C N.E� s a w E uc8 m'o a F y d Er�AU'iN£ Page 15 of 18 a a Page 16 of 18 w c 0 N T a) w w H 7 .-a _ �o IM of =_ °�� o N 2 E o a w E C N w C N ° c tom`- o w e c - E p n Q n m F. n- w � y5a� d N _> w o E o w O > w w w w U > a o 5 ° w ,2` y v E v ?>w E c nail N4�0 Sa ac�N �0 �N d� °T��L d NN2 R t2 ;F N p E ° 2 a'o �.. n mw 2 a� .E owpz OZa°t> n o o o n m o E nv! t y w c -a£ . w w O y OaCj :3 v O)KC w O`0 C aGSNNO E 1 Ty a Onm O O `^�' v a' w °' •2 a s a Ya ° A n j v a c c c 8 �' y Ewa 2^ n w o R s E v c �' m n U - o � w w •H LuL° � r G v E w - w mq ma's wt'N o.o2un.dnm aA y0 'm is �'" a` ° ni.E `I C w N N c a0i n c E d M w a 3 a) m b ° d `O O9 Y t n Q o E w .2 E o w w >. y b >o �a a`� a" w E -O E 9 « 3 c v E° a w o 0 o v 0 n np ..o m c :2,.R v n 9 = v a OlO C EF- L 9 H (O O L fi N ° j N b w� C U`F N> 2nN N° m 8 E m E= y u m L d E E S E E i a m a E •Q ff ,� ,'3_ .Q o o= o i0 we 2 °yy' rna °�°i °o E °' mL cnv oco E mn y, Ow .c° u° no... w LaE� «o. oO12DoQ °« r_ E 2Z E.Z. mU o� c w T� n .� o k o f t m ° .2 F` V o m a E a ._ m f0 n n ¢ o b o n -, w Page 16 of 18 w c 0 N T a) w w H 7 a c m C O E5 17 of 18 V/ U d� ° yC h M U y. d � U d ME C d- c 0 a 5 o d a w o D= f m t m n a • 'G d v d d a a a 3 U 3 U 3 d d _ O a a a 16 2` E y a •E h c �° v c `u ai 5= o io o a m '• c b ° °- 0 c obi d $ w� V`l d y L '$�d O N- Cj p 'E 42 E E 2 IO d•Vl T p c .� „{, mid Y° ocmd. om r ... °1 Q d v °' L° m y 1O MR o d '° m E o> c »° c° c w`° c 8 °' E E E c °p p°. > y " `° ° w '° E '� •1 $ iIl L° O 6L'J d am' r E E L° w m d Ol d U d U d o� C im tµ d 2 y L°HS+,La dyd3 o 5uo0 oEv mcop L .v •� °Ev a$p �� £S�' °� Y'-Q°� :?v, rn� �F" V �+-� oma� :yv d C i 'o E m-8 L, an d °n G— LD U E E y Vl y d • d 7 O C m> °n m Eya£ d" J �' d d cOo 0 ° ° N oc 5 v Emani HEv' u° o • a N d ` O Q d "'1'0 o d mrU m Om v c c a '1- 0 C fou w d a E.� • m t u m a d u H d E na a o 'v d w y y O> �d m° E o a o ,2 0 o a K E y r m .p >> p .c ? m c p U U d c y N J wy- d N N �.. i. r m 0 d N Id/1 C N n c• p ° o -p m J Q «� •f0 d O d N y N O.- d C p� yW� .P Q JU m % 3 d E d �/1 d L d C 2~ C m ✓O ' t O L OI w N ''F p d O� L° N° C d t �' y L" El CI C .� F d Vl 0 C m C p�(J O d O y p c d A °� m m E V 'o m m a -° N V t d E m o.._ .2 F Y .cd 'E n' C d .O L R C y y¢ m U U Q f- Q an d • d �°+ oz v v V1 ¢ i E N 1- O o. • . • . . N�o Q U C pEj °�i• m O O d U O) C O y C V 0 L' D 3 m d p Eto -6-611 m O m_ d a p y C E 6 N D 17 of 18 V/ U ) , / k ({ ƒ{ \} ) {2{ 2;27 . ( }Mu } ) ) \ {`k \J \�§{ � \$ \) )7 kE\{k(] } \m 7) / k 18 v 18 k § \} }} ) ) ) .! poem \ \ !2 .A!`km �ESw /E ■`2 mo L4 §2E I�0 { F Gf; . § \ \kk \ /§Iw !/ 4--; E 2§ �m -- -,a -; �[]§0, t- .- �} ^ �� - a Z5 /_ ©] /)) \ or?`. - Q �- Es 2kk�\k�\`\ /)R \\ \g \ /} \ } \W )\ 18 v 18 k §