Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout75A - SEXLING FARMHOUSE ORCHARDCC 3-4-2014 PRESENTATION.PPTXSexlinger Farmhouse & Orchard Residential Project 1584 E. Santa Clara Ave. City Council Public Hearing March 4, 2014 Project Site 1584 E. Santa Clara Ave. N Farmhouse and Orchard Farmhouse  Constructed In 1914 5-Acre Site  Approximately  250 Valencia Orange Trees Sexlinger Property Background Property served as the primary residence  and orange orchard for the Sexlinger family from 1914 until 2006. Property was annexed into the City in 1979  and zoned for residential development. Upon her passing, Martha Sexlinger, left the  property to Orange Lutheran High School and Concordia University as joint owners. The owners have pursued the sale and  development of the property in order to fund ongoing efforts at their schools. Entitlement Process Background City received first development  application in 2007, which was withdrawn. Current development proposal received  in 2010. Environmental and public review process  resulted in identification of the site as a historic resource. City Council placed property on SA  Register of Historic Places in June 2012. Entitlement Process Background Entitlement process placed on 240-day hold  to seek ways to preserve the property. Although there was great public interest in  preserving the property, the alternatives offered would have required funding for which no source was readily available. City continued to work with property  owners and preservation advocates. A “historic preservation alternative” was  added to and analyzed in the EIR. Historic Preservation Alternative Preserves farmhouse and garage in place on a 10,000 sq. ft. lot. • Preserves .23 acres for orange trees. • House and garage to be restored to Secretary of the Interior Standards. • Mitigates impacts to a level of less than significant. • Sold as part of the private development. • Entitlement Process Background In all the EIR was revised/recirculated three  times since July 2011 in order to respond to public comments and analyze additional alternatives. The applicant revised their plan to meet the  “historic preservation alternative.” The Planning Commission recommended  approval of the revised project, which preserves the farmhouse and trees on a 10,000 sq. ft. lot, on February 10, 2014. Proposed Project –23 Houses Cut-Through Traffic Analysis Cut-Through Traffic Analysis Cut-Through Traffic Analysis Offset Streets Bulb- outs Curvilinear Street Illustrative Elevations The property owners do not currently  have an agreement with a merchant builder to construct the houses. The elevations are for illustrative  purposes only. Project Conclusions Project is consistent with the General  Plan and Zoning designations allowing for low density, single-family residences. Project impacts have been mitigated to a  level that is less than significant. Project Conclusions If approved, the project would:  Allow for the construction of 22 new single- ◦ family houses. Preserve and rehabilitate the original ◦ farmhouse and .23-acre orchard. Allow for a reduction in setback to allow the ◦ farmhouse to remain in place. Allow for a reduction in frontage on one lot. ◦ Create a vesting tentative tract map to allow ◦ for the sale of the houses. Recommended City Council Actions Certify Environmental Impact Report No.  2011-01 Approve Variance No. 2012-04 (a, b)  Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.  2012-02