HomeMy WebLinkAboutPOWERPOINT WS-A - MAPP STAFFING STUDY- RESULTS 11-18-14.PPTX [Read-Only]MAPP Overview
Staffing model developed by Dr. Eric Fritsch, University of
North Texas, to answer a fundamental question:
• How many patrol officers are needed to adequately police the
City of Santa Ana?
City Strategic Plan, Goal is Community Safety
"The City is committed to a high level of public safety and
working in partnership with the community to maintain a safe
and secure City."
Sec. 5, Subsec. A: "Monitor and report key performance goals
such as standards of cover, response time and location of
apparatus..."
MAPP Implementation
SAPD entered into agreement with UNT to conduct a
staffing study to project staffing needs in Patrol
Data from 2011 -2014 (YTD) used to compile data
SAPD Senior Management Team made policy
decisions to apply to the MAPP model before arriving
at a staffing number
Policy decisions were made based on best practices,
public safety and community policing goals
MAPP Policy Decisions
Self - initiated time in minutes per officer, per hour
•
15
Administrative time in minutes per officer, per hour
•
10
• Patrol visibility (hours) arterial roadways
•
4
• Patrol visibility (hours) residential roadways
•
36
• Response time goal for emergency (Priority 1, Minutes)
•
5
• Response time goal for Priority z (Minutes)
•
10
• Response time goal for Priority 3 (Minutes)
•
35
• Emergency calls with at least one officer available ( %)
•
95
• Calls for service that cannot be preempted ( %)
•
33
Administrate activities that cannot be preempted ( %)
•
15
Self - initiated activities that cannot be preempted ( %)
•
50
MAPP Policy Decisions (cont.)
Goal Weight: Each goal assigned a percentage -
goals must total i00%
• Weight for patrol visibility objective ( %) • ao
• Weight for response time goal to Priority i calls ( %) • 35
• Weight for patrol visibility objective Priority z calls ( %) • ao
Weight for patrol visibility objective Priority 3 calls ( %) • ao
Weight for officer availability for emergency ( %) • 5
Supervision / Deployment Goals
• Average number of officers supervised by a field supervisor • 7
• Time spent by supervisors as a primary responder ( %) • 5
• Time patrol units are staffed by two officers ( %) • 2
PInhcv Decis n
Call for Service and Service Tim
Base MAPP:
Current
Conditions
Variables Changed
for Strategic Staffing
Plan
Annual number of Priority 1 CFS
2,180
Annual number of Priority 2 CFS
17,698
Annual number of Priority 3 CFS
58,095
Average service time (hours) per Priority 1 CFS (includes primary and back -up)
2.79
Average service time (hours) per Priority 2 CFS (includes primary and back -up)
1.58
Average service time (hours) per Priority 3 CFS (includes primary and back -up)
0.84
Self -Ini Mated and Administrative Time Variables `
Performance objective - Self- initiated time in minutes per hour per officer
4.46
15.0
Performance objective - Administrative time in minutes per hour per officer
8.34
10.0
Response Time Variables
Performance objective — Response time goal for Priority 1 calls (minutes)
7.07
5.0
Performance objective— Response time goal for Priority 2 calls (minutes)
11.31
10.0
Performance objective — Response time goal for Priority 3 calls (minutes)
37.75
35.0
Area (square miles)
27.88
Average response speed (mph) for emergency activities
30.86
Average response speed (mph) for non - emergency activities
Immediate Availability Variable_
17.27
Performance objective - Percentage of time an officer will be available to
immediately respond to a Priority 1 call 95
Percentage of calls for service that cannot be preempted 33
Percentage of administrative activities that cannot be preempted 15
Percentage of self- initiated activities that cannot be preempted 50
'Ti
Visibility Variables
I
•
Performance objective - Visibility objective (hours), highway /arterial roadways
4
Performance objective - Visibility objective (hours), collector /residential
roadways
36
Number of miles, highway /arterial roadways
62.25
Number of miles, collector /residential roadways
434.16
Average patrol speed (mph)
16.2
Weights for Performance ObjectMWW' 11W
Response time goal for Priority 1 calls objective weight (percentage)
35
Patrol visibility objective weight (percentage)
20
Response time goal for Priority 2 calls objective weight (percentage)
20
Response time goal for Priority 3 calls objective weight (percentage)
20
Immediate availability objective weight (percentage)
5
Leave Percentage
Average Percentage of Time On Leave
Additional Variable
Percentage of time patrol units staffed with two officers
Number of Patrol Officers
23.59
Current: 142
Projected: 186
Differential: +44
Implementation
• Current funded sworn police positions - 328
• Actual sworn police staffing - 304
• MAPP Modeling indicates an additional 44 sworn officers needed
to adequately staff patrol
• The annual attrition rate for sworn personnel due to retirements is
approximately 17 per calendar year
• This rate is projected to decline due to new employees being hired
• To achieve the goals identified in the modeling and keep pace
with attrition to reach not only the currently funded sworn
number, but to increase total sworn positions by 44, the Police
Department would need to hire 153 officers over five years
• This would equate to approximately 3o new hires annually
• Newly awarded COPS funding will partially fund the hiring of 10
new officers