HomeMy WebLinkAbout25F - AGMT - DELHI DIVERSION PROJECTREQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
DECEMBER 16, 2014
TITLE:
AGREEMENT WITH URS CORPORATION FOR
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES
FOR SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
(STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 2)
CITY MANA 'R
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
APPROVED
❑ As Recommended
❑ As Amended
❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading
❑ Ordinance on 2 "d Reading
❑ Implementing Resolution
❑ Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with URS
Corporation, subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney,
to provide engineering services for the three -year period expiring December 2, 2017, with a
provision for two one -year extensions exercisable by the City Manager, in an amount not to exceed
$550,000.
DISCUSSION
The Santa Ana Delhi Diversion project is a multi- jurisdiction collaboration to establish a diversion
facility to mitigate current and future Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL's) into the Newport Bay.
Pollutants are regulated by the State Water Quality Control Board using TMDL's to measures
metals, bacteria, toxics, trash, and nutrients. The facility will be located in the downstream portion
of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel near the intersection of Mesa Drive and Irvine Avenue adjacent to
the Newport Beach Golf Course (Exhibit 1). The proposed project would remove all pollutant loads
transported by non- stormwater discharges in the Delhi and Santa Ana Gardens channels. The
diversion would remove solids and trash, and then divert the flow to the sanitary sewer system for
further treatment. As an alternative, the flow may be diverted to the adjacent golf course reservoir
for irrigation or redirected into the channel.
The design, construction, and maintenance costs for the diversion project are estimated at $7.4
million. The financial responsibility will be shared among the regional stakeholders as follows;
$2.57 million in OCTA grant funds; $1.73 million from the City of Santa Ana; $1.6 million from the
County of Orange; and $1.5 million from the City of Newport Beach.
25F -1
Agreement with URS Corporation for
Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project
December 16, 2014
Page 2
To meet the project grant funding deadlines, construction is required to start by July 2016;
therefore it is critical to complete the design, environmental work, permitting, and right -of -way
easements by early 2016. The contract provides for these services as well as construction
support. Upon Council approval, the contract will be effective December 16, 2014, through
December 15, 2017, with a provision for two one -year extensions exercisable by the City Manager.
Staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion project on the City's
website on October 16, 2014. Nine engineering firms attended the mandatory pre - proposal
meeting. Two proposals were received, with several engineering firms collaborating to submit one
joint proposal. Each proposal was evaluated and ranked by a review committee comprised of staff
from the Public Works Agency. The ranking criteria included the experience of the firms and the
subconsultants, understanding of the scope of work, the work plan, clarity and specificity,
permitting experience, and schedule. Both firms were interviewed with the following ranking
results:
Firm
Score
Proposed Fee
URS Corporation
94
$471,679
_CWE Corporation
91
Following the evaluation and ranking of proposals, the fee rate schedule for the top ranked firm
was opened and evaluated. Staff recommends awarding a contract to URS Corporation based on
its experience with similar work in flood channels, familiarity with the permitting requirements of all
relevant agencies, and unique approach to complete the work within the specified time. The
proposal contains a clear path toward achieving City goals and objectives as required by the RFP.
The total agreement compensation of $550,000 includes a project fee of $471,679 and a
contingency of $78,321.
STRATEGIC PLAN
Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #5 Community Health, Livability,
Engagement & Sustainability; Objective #2 (expand opportunities for conservation and
environmental sustainability).
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
25F -2
Agreement with URS Corporation for
Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project
December 16, 2014
Page 3
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are available in the Federal Clean Water Protection Enterprise account (05717640 - 62300).
Fred Mousavipour
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
FM /EWG/TC
Exhibits: 1. Location Map
2. Agreement
3. Preliminary Design Report
APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS:
Francisco Gutierrez e
Executive Director
Finance & Management. Services Agency
25F -3
25F -4
SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION FACILITY
PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION
(Newport Beach Golf Course)
Exhibit 1
25F -5
25F -6
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 16`x' day of December 2014 by and between
URS Corporations (hereinafter "Consultant ") and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal
corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter
"City ").
RECITALS
A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of civil,
hydraulics, geotechnical, structural, and electrical engineering, environmental, and surveying.
B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City.
C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in
its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in
compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm
in the field.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
11011MM
This Agreement shall commence on December 16, 2014 and terminate on December 16, 2016,
with a provision for two one -year extensions exercisable by the City Manager; unless terminated earlier in
accordance with Section 14, below.
i YKI SiI D1 tuU i
Consultant agrees to perform during the tern of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations
including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and
adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated by reference. Additional Agreement provisions, if any, are contained in
"Additional Provisions" attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit "D."
2. SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall complete the services identified in the Exhibit A, and shall perform and deliver
them to the City as described and detailed in the Schedule of Services - Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference. Such services shall be provided per written request of the Executive Director
of Public Works, or designee, after the City's issuance of a Notice to Proceed.
3. CONH'ENSATION
City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the
rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
Exhibit Z
25F -7
Professional Services Agreement with URS Corporation
December 16, 2014
Page 2 of 7
4. O WNERS141P OR MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non - exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify,
reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans,
specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any
tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or
otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant
under this Agreement (`Documents & Data "). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in
writing that City is granted a non - exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the
subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the
legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and
warranty in regard to Documents & Data which ware provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not
be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not
within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.
5. PAYMENTS & INVOICES
a. Consultant shall submit a monthly invoice by the fifteenth of the month to the City for the
services rendered in the prior month,
b. All invoices for work performed under this Agreement shall be submitted in a format
approved by the City. Invoices shall include the following information at a minimum:
i. Consultant's invoice number
it. Beginning and ending dates for services
iii. City project number and /or name (if applicable)
iv. Work site address /location (if applicable)
V. Tasks or deliverables completed, and percentage ( %) of total services completed.
City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved
charges thereon.
6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire tern of this Ag eement, be construed to be an independent
contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to
create an employer- employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise
discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are
the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be
provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services.
Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and
similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.
7. INSURANCE
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and
shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below:
25F -8
Professional Services Agreement with URS Corporation
December 16, 2014
Page 3 of 7
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance which shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising
from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property,
resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance
of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of
insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and
personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount
of $1,000,000 per occurrence, and in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City,
its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be
primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self- insurance programs maintained
by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insured's provisions.
b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of
not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned,
hired and non -owned automobiles.
c. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3300 of the
Labor Code, Contractor, if Contractor has any employees, is required to be insured against
liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance. Prior to commencing the
performance of the work under this Agreement, Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain any
employer's liability insurance with Limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident.
d. Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not
less than $1,000,000 per claim.
e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to
this section;
i. Contractor shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the
entire period covered by this Agreement.
ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this
Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Attorney.
iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled or reduced
in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the City.
I£ Contractor fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or
fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is
in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith
terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Contractor's right to be paid for
its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Contractor waives the
right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior
to approval of insurance by the City.
8. INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
City, its officers, agents and employees (collectively, the "indemnified parties ") from and against any and
all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property), demands,
25F -9
Professional Services Agreement with URS Corporation
December 16, 2014
Page 4 of 7
obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs
and expenses (including, without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind
and nature whatsoever (individually, a claim, collectively, "claims "), which may arise from or in any
manner related (directly or indirectly) to any work performed or services provided under this Agreement
(including, without limitation, defects in workmanship and /or materials) or Consultant's presence or
activities conducted perfonning the work (including the negligent and /or willful acts, errors and /or
omissions of Consultant, its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, contractors,
subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of Chem or for whose acts they may be
liable for any or all of them). Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require
Consultant to indemnify the indemnified parties from any claim arising from the sole negligence or
willful misconduct of the indemnified parties. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability
regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation
upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by the Consultant,
9. LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal
laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the services and
shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and
regulations in connection with services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to
such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely
responsible for all costs arising wherefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its
officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification
provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to
comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
10. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is
reasonably understood to be confidential and /or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or
disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and farther agrees to exercise the
same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than
reasonable care. "Confidential Information' shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential
information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually,
electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary
and /or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non -use and
nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources;
(b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful
possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by
operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information
disclosed by the City.
11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or
indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this
Agreement.
25F -10
Professional Services Agreement with URS Corporation
December 16, 2014
Page 5 of 7
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any
communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication
shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United
States trail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by
telefacsimile, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty -four (24) hours
after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed
as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City
holidays shall be excluded.
12. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and
Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event
of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this
Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by
the authorized representatives of the parties. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any
purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terns and conditions
hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City, Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that
no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any
party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.
13. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant,
Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written
consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior
written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit
the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City
personnel or by other consultants retained by City.
14. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of
termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant
compensation for all services perforled by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject
to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to
the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall
be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use
thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance
specified in the Recitals of this Agreement,
15. DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual
orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the
25F -11
Professional Services Agreement with URS Corporation
December 16, 2014
Page 6 of 7
recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities,
Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal,
state and local laws and regulations.
16. JURISDICTION -,VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity,
interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined
and governed by the laws of the State of California. The parties further agree that Orange County,
California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, m
connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
17. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits,
approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by
the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other
governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to
obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be
cause for termination of this Agreement.
18. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or
certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by tele£acsimile or other telegraphic communication in the matmer
provided in this Section, to the following persons:
To City: Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702 -1988
(714) 647 -6956 (fax)
With courtesy copy to: Executive Director of Public Works
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -36)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
(714) 647 -5635 (fax)
To Consultant: URS Corporation
2020 East First Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 835 -6886 (phone)
(714) 667 -7147 (fax)
25F -12
Professional Services Agreement with URS Corporation
December 16, 2014
Page 7 of 7
19, MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Additional provisions, if any, are identified as Additional Provisions — Exhibit D, attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority
and right to bind their respective patties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City
fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such
authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.
b, All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the
body of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above
written.
ATTEST:
MARIA D. HUIZAR
Cleric of the Council
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney ---
City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
FRED MOUSAVIPOUR
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
CITY OF SANTA ANA
DAVID CAVAZOS
City Manager
CONSULTANT
Tariq Husain
Vice President
URS Corporation
25F -13
25F -14
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF WORK
GENERAL
The City of Santa Ana (The City) is soliciting proposals from professional consulting Firms to provide
engineering services for the design and construction support of a diversion project for the Santa Ana
Delhi Channel. Engineering services may include civil engineering, electrical engineering, traffic
engineering, geotechnical, land /property surveying, structural, architecture, landscaping design, and
grant writing services.
The City anticipates the design process and award of the construction contract by June of 2016, with
construction support needed over two dry seasons in the channel, which establishes three year term
period for this agreement. The City may grant up to two one -year extensions, if needed.
The work, in general, consists of the design of a diversion structure for the Santa Ana Delhi channel
that will mitigate the associated TMDL's for that watershed including the pending TMDL for trash. The
design shall include diverting the low flow to the sanitary sewer, a retention basin, and back into the
channel. See Appendix Attachment F for the Preliminary Design Report Addendum No. 2 dated August
2014. The deliverables shall include the final conceptual design, which will be reviewed and approved
by the funding partners; the design; environmental process, all permits, CEQA approval, easement and
right -of -way agreements, final construction documents and construction support.
The Consultant shall be able to assist the City through this contract to provide the necessary services.
The Consultant shall utilize in -house staff and /or sub - Consultants to complete the assignments to meet
the City standards. For specialized work for which the prime Consultant shall require a sub -
Consultant, the prime Consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and
the sub - Consultant. The prime Consultant mark -up for sub - Consultants shall not exceed 10 %.
The proposal and work plan shall be limited to fifteen (15) pages, excluding the twenty (20) pages for
the Firms qualifications. A cover letter shall summarize key factors and guarantee that key personnel
shall be committed to manage and perform the required tasks throughout the duration of the contract.
A schedule of fees and charges described in the following section "Cost and Price" shall be included in
the proposal.
UZ@1901-11 -N VI&M
The Consultant shall perform the above noted engineering design services resulting in contract
documents (plans, specifications and cost estimates) and construction support services for the Santa
Ana Delhi Diversion Project. The Consultant shall provide a Work Plan which includes a detailed
schedule of the project prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed. Specific Task Orders with Notices to
Proceed (NTPs) will be provided for the project at the discretion of the City. Work required per Task
City of $q 3o 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
Order shall comply with the Scope of Services and additional provisions in each Task Order. The
Consultant shall also provide all field survey work, as required, and shall have the necessary
experience and required civil, traffic, electrical, structural, geotechnical, surveying, landscape architect
and architectural licenses for those in responsible- charge of the work being completed.
The Consultant's services for PS &E engineering project preparation shall include, but not be limited to,
the following:
1. Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed
improvements with existing field conditions.
2. Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level
survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a
California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in Microstation V8i
Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and
the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. All survey field notes shall be on forms provided by the City,
shall be neatly completed in pencil, and shall become property of the City upon completion of the
project. Informal field investigations including marking of removal areas may be required for some
of the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement replacement projects.
3. Complete the design including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. The
Consultant shall contact manufacturers and /or contractors to verify the engineer's estimate prior to
submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of
the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to
the Consultant.
4. If requested, all preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond or velum using the
Microstation V8i CADD program. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Santa Ana CADD
Standards. For interim submittals, the City may opt to receive only PDF versions of the plans for
reviewing purposes. If so, the Consultant team will provided plans and /or specifications
accordingly.
5. All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed
and stamped by the Consultant's licensed professional engineer in responsible- charge of the
project. These signed originals shall then become the property of the City.
6. As a part of the project scope, the Consultant shall provide support services during the bidding and
construction phases of the project on an as needed basis, including, but not limited to:
A. The Consultant shall respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including
preparation of any addenda. Following award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall
attend the pre- construction meeting.
B. The Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required
supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews
14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two
(2) working days of receipt.
C. The Consultant shall respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) to provide clarification or
resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three
(3) working days.
D. The Consultant shall provide periodic field reviews and bring to the attention of the City of Santa
Ana any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant
may observe. The Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City of
Santa Ana, or to deputize another to do so.
7. Upon completion of construction, the Consultant shall prepare as- builts and submit them to the City.
The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision
notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of as -built mylars shall be submitted to the
City with an electronic copy (in Microstation V8i CADD and pdf formats) of the final as -built
drawings via CD or e -mail.
8. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of
the work performed by in -house staff and /or sub - Consultants. Incomplete (not meeting targeted
completion) or poor quality work will not be accepted. The Consultant shall revise the documents
within a revised schedule set by the City, which may require overtime. No additional compensation
for regular or overtime hours necessary to complete this work to the satisfaction of the City shall be
approved by the City for the required revisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to produce
a professional -level quality of work product.
9. The Consultant shall attend meetings as required by the City.
10. The Consultant shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and any other issues with the
City, other Agencies, and all utility companies as required. At the direction of the City, the
Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies.
11. The Consultant shall be responsible for to reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to
plans and specifications.
12. Sample Project and Schedule: Proposal shall include a narrative for the project approach and
steps for the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project. Proposal shall also include a timeline to complete
the work tasks necessary for the project. Utilize Attachment C from this RFP to complete the
comparison forms for the Proposal and Fee Proposal. Note, no staff hourly rates or total design
costs shall be included in the Proposal for the project. However, hourly rates and total costs shall
be included in the Fee Proposal for the project.
A. Indicate any other assumptions made for the project which is described as follows:
14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
1) The project location will be in the Santa Ana Delhi Channel south of Bristol Street,
northwest of Irvine Avenue, on the Newport Beach Golf Course, property is owned by
the County of Orange.
2) The low flow shall be assumed at 0.4cfs.
3) The project shall include an in- channel diversion structure, an intake structure with
coarse and fine screening, sedimentation and discharge storage chamber, a disinfection
station, a pump station, and an outlet pipe back to the channel.
4) The pump station shall have the ability to pump to the sewer, at night, and to an adjacent
surface irrigation reservoir.
5) Assume the sewer line will connect to an existing 15 -inch diameter OCSD trunk main at
the intersection MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive. The pipe length is
approximately 7,600 feet in length.
B. For the Proposal, list the number of hours and staffing position levels anticipated to
complete the design PS &E and the construction support for this work, without the hourly
rates. Utilize Attachment C's format.
C. For the Fee Proposal, list the number of hours and staff position levels anticipated to
complete the design PS &E and the construction support for this work as well as the hourly
rates. Utilize Attachment C's format fully completed.
D. For the design phase, the schedule should include all activities required to provide a
Finalized PS &E package inclusive of two 3 — week stakeholder reviews.
E. For the Proposal, also include an engineering cost estimate, per bid item quantity estimated
for the project.
F. For the construction phase, the schedule should include all activities required to provide
adequate construction support, including weekly construction meetings.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All work shall be performed in conformance with the latest City of Santa Ana policies, procedures
and standards, and applicable, regulatory, state and federal requirements.
2. Consultant shall carry out the instructions received from the City of Santa Ana and shall cooperate
with the City of Santa Ana and other involved agencies.
3. The Consultant shall have complete responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of all
documents and plans prepared and shall check all such materials accordingly. The plans will be
reviewed by the City of Santa Ana and the County of Orange for conformity with the requirements of
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
the Agreement. Reviews by the City of Santa Ana and the County of Orange DO NOT include
detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted in the
documents and the plans. The responsibility for accuracy and completeness of such items remains
solely that of Consultant.
The documents and plans furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the
City of Santa Ana. The criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well
organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked, and dated and having the maker and
checker identified.
The Consultant shall have quality control procedures in effect during the entire time work is being
performed under the Agreement. The quality control procedures shall establish a process which
includes checking processes for PS &E preparation, an independent constructability review,
correcting and back checking procedures, and all job related correspondence and memoranda
dated and received by affected persons and then bound in appropriate job files. The City of Santa
Ana reserves the right to request proof of said documentation.
The Consultant's work and all records shall be subject to inspections by representatives of the City
of Santa Ana and funding agency requirements or audits if requested.
Consultant certifies that it shall comply with the following regulations, as required by the (funding
agency):
a. Audit Records - With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall
be made available for audit and inspection by the City, the grant agency and /or their duly
authorized representatives for a period of four (4) years from the termination of this
Agreement. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims
related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Consultant shall preserve
and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in
accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time
period, Consultant shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and
the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized
representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the
premises of Consultant, upon request during usual working hours.
b. Consultant shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for
inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required
to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or
agencies.
C. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) - All recipients of federal
funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act).
Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby
gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason
City of Mge 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject
to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that
receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Consultant agrees it will
ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be
binding on all of its consultants, sub - consultants, assignees or successors.
d. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - (ADA) Consultant must comply with all
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable.
e. Political Activity - None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or
indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to
further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of
the provisions of the "Hatch Act".
f. Civil Rights Compliance and Notification of Findings - Consultant, and all its sub -
consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with the nondiscrimination requirements of
the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789
(d), or Victims of Crime Act (as appropriate); Title VI of the Civil Rights At of 1964, as
amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II
of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; Department of Justice Non -
Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department
of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a
Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Consultant makes
a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Consultant will
forward a copy of the findings to the City which will, in turn, submit the findings to the
Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
g. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal
Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967,
and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as
applicable.
h. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Copeland "Anti- Kickback" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in
Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable.
i. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a -7) as supplemented by
Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable.
City of.%au�pQn "P 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14.069
Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work and Safety Standards Act
(40 U.S.C. 327 -330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR
Part 5), as applicable.
k. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all applicable
standards, orders or requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order
11738, and the Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15), as
applicable.
Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94 -163, 89 Stat. 871),
(53 FR 8078, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 19639, 19645, Apr. 19, 1995),
as applicable.
M. Consultant agrees that the funding agency shall have the authority to seek patent rights
for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding
through this Agreement.
n. Consultant may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials
developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding
agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty -free, non-
exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to
authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and /or City purpose:
i. the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and
ii. any rights of copyright to which the sub - consultant purchases ownership with
support through this grant. The Federal government's, SAA's and City's rights
identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the
publisher's release form must ensure the preservation of these rights.
IV. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will provide the following:
• All plan check coordination within the City
• Sample boiler plate specification to be used for specifications
• Sample plans & City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards
• Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders
fi 8410101
25F -22
: PRr OPOSAL TO PROVIDE
r ,r
Design and CoiiMructi,
25F -23
0 • AZI
TABLEOF CONTENTS .............................................................. ..............................1
1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................... ............................... 3
A.
Cover Letter ................................................................ ...............................
3
B.
Contract Agreement Statement .................................. ...............................
5
C.
Firm and Team Experience ......................................... ...............................
5
C.1 URS — Prime Consultant ............................................. ...............................
5
C.2 Subconsultants ............................................................ ..............................6
C.3 Organizational Chart .................................................... ..............................6
CASubconsultants ............................................................ ..............................7
C.5 Relevant Experience .................................................... ..............................7
D.
Understanding of Need Statement. ............................................................
8
D.1 Project Understanding ................................................. ..............................8
D.2 Development of a Regional Trash Removal System ... ..............................9
D.3 Proposed Project Description ...................................... ..............................9
DA Sanitary Sewer Diversion Capacities .......................... .............................17
D.5 Required Permitting and Environmental Documentation .........................17
D.6 Required Environmental Documentation .................... .............................17
E.
Schedule ..................................................................... .............................17
2. PROPOSAL ........................................................................ ............................... 21
Work Plan - Scope of Services ............................................ ............................... 21
3. FEE PROPOSAL ................................................................ ............................... 37
4. CERTIFICATIONS .............................................................. ............................... 38
APPENDIX- RESUMES
25F -24
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
um 25F -25
1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
I_� +i•�f�3:
November 13, 2014
Mr, Tyrone Chesanek
City of Santa Ana
Public Works Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza, 3rd Floor, Ross Annex
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Subject: Request for Proposal (RFP) for Design and Construction Support of the Santa Ana Delhi
Diversion Project — RFP No. 14 -069
Dear Mr. Chesancle
With a proven track record of delivering creative, comprehensive and quality engineering designs on schedule and within
budget to numerous clients throughout the Country, URS Corporation (URS) is pleased to respond to the City of Santa
Ana's (City) Request for Proposal for Design and Construction Support for the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project.
It is our understanding that this proposal and its contents in its entirety will become an attachment to our agreement
with the City. As such, the person signing this letter, T'ariq Hussein, is legally authorized to bind the company, URS
Corporation, with the Proposal, Work Plan, and Fee Proposal, which together comprise URS' total submittal package
for the design and construction support of the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project.
We believe the URS Team is the best qualified for your project. We have:
Team Members with Direct Relevant Experience —The project team selected for this project has extensive
experience in the design of diversion facilities, pipelines, preparing environmental documentation, coordinating and
obtaining permits, structural engineering and electrical and instrumentation design. URS guarantees that personnel
presented in the proposal are committed to manage and perform the identified tasks throughout contract duration.
Knowledge of Your Project — The URS Team (URS) prepared the preliminary design report (PDR) for the Delhi
Diversion project and thoroughly understands the needs, goals and challenges. During the preparation of the attached
proposal, our team developed another alternative to the radial gate structure discussed in the PDR and identified a new
pipeline alignment that may potentially save the City valuable finds. Having in -depth knowledge about the project will
allow our team of engineers to immediately start the design and ultimately minimize the expense and time to get up to
speed on the project's history and obtaining background information.
Highest and Best Value to City — URS respects the City as a partner with common goals for a successful project. We
are confident that our design team, project approach and work plan will provide the City with the highest and best value
in the design of this project.
Please contact me with any questions at (714) 648 -2857 or via email joseph.long @urs.com. We appreciate the
opportunity to continue to work with the City to deliver an outstanding project.
Sincerely,
URS Corporation Americas
r
Joseph Long, PE
Project Manager
URS Corporation
2020 East First Street, Suite 400
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Tel 714.835.6886
Fax: 714.667.7147
w w.urs.00m
25F -26
Taxiq Husain
Vice President
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
um 25F' --27
B. CONTRACT AGREEMENT STATEMENT
URS has reviewed the sample agreement and finds the terms and conditions to be generally acceptable.
URS has successfully entered into several contracts with the City. URS is confident we can successfully
execute an agreement with the City to perform the services proposed herein. We are able to begin work
immediately upon award of contract and are able to maintain the required level of effort to meet the
proposed schedule.
C. FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE
C.t UPS - Prime Consultant
Since its oldest predecessor company's founding in 1904, URS Corporation (URS), dba URS Corporation
Americas, has grown to a global, fully - integrated engineering technical services organization with a fill
complement of capabilities to support every stage of the project life cycle —from inception through start-
up and operation, to decommissioning and closure. Our services include project management, planning,
design, construction support, and construction management, operations and maintenance, and closure
services.
We have over 50,000 employees in a network of more than 300 offices. Our Southern California region
includes ten offices that employ over 2,000 professionals covering all aspects of engineering, planning,
and environmental disciplines. This broad base of capabilities allows URS to respond immediately to any
challenge and to quickly provide specialists in virtually any area of expertise at any phase of project
delivery.
The City will be served by our Santa Ana office and select staff from other Southern California offices,
whom have been chosen for their strong capabilities in civil engineering design, roadway design,
transportation planning, traffic engineering, stormwater management, landscape architecture, irrigation
design, environmental and urban planning, geotechnical engineering, grant writing, and cost analysis. In
addition, URS has a strong workingrelationship with the City of Santa Ana spanning many
projects, including the Grand Avenue Grade Separation, the Bristol Street Widening, and the
Santa Ana -Delhi Chatmel Diversion.
URS has provided engineering services for a number of as- needed /indefinite quantity (IQ) contracts for
government agencies and public utilities. These contracts demonstrate government and private sector
recognition of URS' depth of staff and proven experience to successfully perform on delivery of task
orders. URS has provided as- needed contracts to City of Irvine, City of Pomona, LA County, IA Metro,
Riverside County Transportation Department, City of San Diego, Caltrans, California Department of
Water Resources, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, just to name a few.
We have consistently ranked highly in the Engineering News - Record (ENR) annual rankings of top
firms. Our rankings in 2014 were no exception, including #1 in Bridges; #2 in Green Design,
Transportation, and Highways; #3 in Design; #4 in Mass Transit and Rail; and #5 in Sanitary and Storm
Sewers.
UM 5
25F -28
Financial Capacity
In 2013, URS generated $11 billion in
revenues and more than $600 million in cash
flow from operations. As a representation of
our financial capacity, we have included
financial highlights for the last two years
below. Also provided is a listing of the current
major projects being handled by URS' Santa
Ana office.
C.2 SiSk0n%ltant`3
Yee ende4 veer mdul
I ..W 3, a...", 28.
(1n mII1Pona, c.al par %he0 deal) 2014 2012
Income Statement eats:
Revenues
Gast of lowness
GerMral and adminlsuat(ve e>jansea
Aequiskiommimed expenses
Equity in income of unennsotidate4jdm+erwas
Operating Income
f A mst captives
oths, Income (expenses)
Income {afore income tax
Net income (loss) atmbutable to URS
Dilated eamings (100x) per sham
Cash dividends declared par share
The URS Team will be augmented by the
Balance Shoat onto
services of our highly qualified sub - consultant,
(es oP the and of 06405!:
cash and cast, awnalama
Coast Surveying, Inc., which also enables us to
Total assets
promote business opportunities for small and
Total longterm debt
Taal URS stockhoTh s equity
disadvantaged business enterprises
C.3 Organizational Chart
Teriq Hussain, REA
Joseph Long, PE
Tame Snow, PE
Hydraulics Engineering
Jimmy Medellin, PE
Geotechnical Engineering
Mike Smith, PE, GE
Civil Engineering
Nathan Chase, PE, LEEDAP ND,
ENV SP, QSD
Joseph Zhao, PhD, PE
Environmental
JenniferZJv
UM 25F�29
Surveying
Ruel delCastillo, PLS
(Coast Surveying, Inc.)
Structural Engineering
Timothy Gutkowski, PE
Electrical Engineering
Richard Joe, PE
$ 10,090.7
s 10.872.9
(10,418.0)
(10,204.9)
(77.8)
(53.0)
83.6
107.6
.....890.8
... 665.9. .
(70.7)
(Z7)
0.5
S 497.0
$ 815.1
S 247.2
$ 310.8
$ 3,31
$ 4.17
S 0.84
$ 080
S 283.7 S 314.5
S 8.718.0 $ 8,281.0
$ 1,885.8 S 1892.9
S 4,081.2 S 4,044.0
Jun Wang, PE
C.4 Subconsultartt;s
Coast Surveying, Inc.
Coast Surveying, Inc., (Coast) a California Corporation, was founded in 1981. Coast specializes in
surveying, mapping, aerial photogratmnetry and Right-of-Way mapping services.
Coast has worked for such governmental agencies as: Caltrans - Districts 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12; MWD;
WBMWD; LADWP; OCTA; NAVFAC; USACE; TCA; RCTC; Metro; SCRRA; SBCAG; CPTC;
CBMWD; IRWD; PWD; So. Calif. Water Company; Counties of Orange and Los Angeles; and
numerous cities throughout the area, as well as numerous private engineering companies. Coast is highly
qualified in construction management survey support and public water projects. Coast currently has on-
call surveying contracts for the Yorba Linda Water District, Moulton Niguel Water District and the Cities
of Garden Grove, Newport Beach, Santa Ana, and Tustin. Coast also has a current contract with
WBMWD. Approximately 98% of Coast Surveying's work is for public agencies.
Coast has one office located in Tustin and will performing all work out of Tustin. Coast has 12
employees. Coast is a DBE /SBE /MBE firm certified with Metro.
C.5 Relevant Experience
The URS team has extensive experience working with the City of Santa Ana and other public agencies
throughout Southern California, as demonstrated by the list of key municipal projects below and the
associated key staff members. Further experience is reflected by the personnel resutnes included in
Appendix I and the general qualifications included on the SF330 Part II forms for each firm,
subconsultant, and branch included on the URS Team in Appendix 2.
Project Name, Location Project Description
Grand Avenue Grade URS prepared a Project Study Report Equivalent (PSRE) and a • Douglas
Separation Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) for OCTA for Smith
Santa Ana, CA the Grand Avenue Grade Separation. To evaluate both an ' Bryan Paine
overpass and underpass option, the scope included various • Noel Casil
surveys (e.g., traffic, right-of-way, utilities, and topography), - Virginia Viado
geotechnical investigations, a conceptual hydrology and hydraulics
study, environmental review; preparation of conceptual drawings,
and a final report.
Bristol Street Widening/ URS prepared planning and environmental documents for the ' Noel Casil
Bristol Street Corridor widening of a 0.55 -mile section of Bristol Street from four lanes to ® Virginia Viado
Specific Plan six lanes. URS provided planning and environmental services for
Amendment, General the Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan Amendment, which
Plan Amendment, and included preparation of amendments to the original Specific Plan
EIR Addendum document and City General Plan to allow the re- designation of land
Santa Ana, CA currently zoned for park and open space uses to a commercial
designation more consistent with the City's goals for this important
arterial corridor. The project included preparation of technical
studies and an EIR Addendum for compliance with CEQA.
25F -�O
Project
Project
Santa Ana -Delhi Channel
URS prepared preliminary design documents for an urban runoff
' Joseph Long
Diversion
diversion facility to be located in the downstream portion of the
• Tama Snow
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Ana Delhi Channel system near the intersection of Mesa
Drive and Irvine Avenue. The proposed project is intended to
collect non-stormwater discharges from the Delhi Channel and
divert the flow to the sanitary sewer system for further treatment, or
to the adjacent Newport Beach Golf Course reservoir to be used for
irrigation purposes. The proposed project addresses the potential
urban surface water quality issues associated with discharges to
the Upper Newport Bay.
Edinger Avenue
URS was responsible for designing the reconstruction of
' Stephanie
Reconstruction/
approximately one mile of a major city arterial, including providing
Hillebrand
Resurfacing
field reviews and preparing construction plans and cost estimates.
Santa Ana, CA
The project involved cold milling and resurfacing of the existing
asphalt and affected side streets.
Orange County Great
URS prepared a modification to the Great Park Master Plan for the
` Joseph Long
Park, Master Plan
1,200 acre Orange County Great Park URS is also providing
• Patricia
Modification /On -Call
ongoing support to the City of Irvine /Orange County Great Park
Trauth
Environmental Services/
Corporation on environmental investigation /remediation, regulatory
' Nathan
Water Management Plan
permitting and compliance, and other technical support services.
Chase
Irvine, CA
Furthermore, URS developed a Water Management Plan for the
long -term build -out of the Orange County Great Park to capture
storm water from 5,550 acres of contributing watersheds that will be
stored in onsite water features, and treated and reused for irrigation
of Great Park landscaping.
D.] Project Understanding
'The City of Santa Ana, in collaboration with the Cities of Newport Beach, Costa Mesa and the Orange
County Flood Control District are in development of an Urban Discharge Recovery Project located in
the Santa Ana Delhi Channel adjacent to the existing Newport Beach Golf Club. The over - arching intent
of the project is to provide a regional treatment facility that addresses trash removal from the tributary
watershed, low -flow urban discharge pollutant removal, and diverts pollutant laden discharges to the
sanitary sewer system for further treatment and recycling of water for indirect water supply augmentation.
Initially, the proposed project was developed to provide Stakeholders within the tributary watershed the
ability to address current and future TMDL's associated with heavy metals, selenium concentrations,
trash removal and bacteria removal for discharges into the Newport Back Bay. Initially the project was
developed to provide treatment and diversions for only the urban low flow discharges from the tributary
watershed with an anticipated flow rate of 0.40 cfs. Revisions to the initial project concept were also
incorporated to increase the urban discharge flow rate from 0.40 cfs to approximately 100 cfs with the
primary pollutant of concern being trash and debris removal. Based on a review of the Draft Staff Report
for Proposed Trash Amendments prepared by the Division of Water Quality, State Water Resources
Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency Uune 2014), it appears that there are
significant planned changes in addressing trash and debris within the urban and natural water ways that is
generated by human activities.
UM 25F831 -
iD.2 Development at a Regional Trash Rerrloval System
The Draft Staff Report for Proposed Trash Amendments to the MS4 permit requirements will requite a
significant increase in non -point source trash and debris mitigation requirements. The proposed trash
amendments identify several potential trash capture solutions inclusive of storm -water catch -basin
modifications (filter inserts) and enhanced routine street sweeping maintenance. The proposed
amendments also recognize that modifications to an existing MS4 closed conduit drainage system will
have potential capacity impacts and, therefore, may not be feasible. As such, the proposed trash
amendments also provide the ability to develop a regional treatment facility as described in "Section 5-
Reasonably Foreseeable Methods of Compliance ", as published in the above reference, providing for a
full capture system and has the ability to remove gross solids larger than 5mm in diameter. Although, the
draft proposed trash amendments don't specifically identify a stormwater flow rate associated with the
proposed treatment process, URS is making the basic assumption that the current storm water quality
flow rate event (approximately the 85th percentile) will be the target flow rate to be passed through the
trash removal system during normal operations.
The project stakeholders, Cities of Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach, are essentially located in
fully developed watersheds with little or no planned future land use changes. All three stakeholders have
implemented stotmwatef quality mitigation measures that address gross solids removal at catch basins
and other storm drainage inlets. Although, the implemented mitigation measures did provide some
success in the reduction of trash and debris entering into the MS4 systems, the mitigations also proved to
reduce storm drain capacities and posed potential public safety issues during storm events due to local
street flooding. Based on the potential public safety issues and labor intensive maintenance associated
with catch basin inlet treatment systems, the project stakeholders are interested and willing to implement
a regional treatment system that not only addresses the potential trash amendments, but also has the
ability to remove other pollutants of concern and therefore provide for a multi - beneficial project.
tD.3 Proposer Project Description
The proposed Santa Ana Delhi Diversion project is to be located between Irvine Avenue and Santa Ana
Avenue adjacent to the Santa Ana Delhi Channel within the Newport Beach Golf Course. The Santa Ana
Delhi Diversion project is intended to capture and divert dry - weather urban water runoff to the sanitary
sewer system addressing urban surface water quality, capture trash and debris being transported within
the channel drainage system and provide measurable water quality improvements in the downstream
receiving waters, primarily in Newport Back Bay. The use of an in- channel trash removal system will
enhance the overall treatment process which will be compliant with the proposed MS4 Amendments and
address other future TMDL including waste load allocations for MS4 Dischargers into the Upper
Newport Bay through the Santa Ana Delhi Channel and its sub - tributaries. The proposed treatment
system will remove target pollutants of concern that that either currently include or will include bacteria,
metals, nutrients in addition to the trash and debris from the Santa Ana Delhi tributary watershed.
URS, through the collaborative efforts of the project stakeholders, have prepared and evaluated a number
of design alternatives since the inception of the project, developing several preliminary design reports
(PDR) documenting the various alternatives have been prepared. The various iterations and features of
each alternative are summarized as follows:
25F -932
Conceptual Design Iteration(s)
Design Iteration 1— URS Preliminary Design Report(PDR). Submitted as part of
OCTA Environmental Cleanup Tier 2 Grant Application. Process included grate inlet
catch basin located along the bottom of the Santa Ana Delhi channel followed by a
storm water treatment device, CDS Unit, with the capacity to capture sediment,
trash, and debris prior to discharging the flows into an underground storage tank,
and then eventually be pumped into the Orange County Sanitation District for further
treatment and final discharge,
Features
• CDS units sized for Dry-
weather Flow only
' System installation may not
require extensive
construction
' System maintenance
requirements are low
Design iteration2— URS PDR Addendum No. 1 This iteration included a revised
• Increased treatment
process that included in- channel radial gates to divert majority of dry- weather flow
capacities
and up to 100 cfs of first flush wet - weather flow to an off -line treatment facility
® Incorporated direct irrigation
consisting of bar screens, sediment trap and fine screening chamber, and followed
reuse options.
by a discharge storage chamber prior to pumping to the Newport Beach Golf Club for
• Minimized off -site pumping
irrigation purposes or discharging to near -by Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD)
requirements.
sewer facilities and then conveying flows to the Orange County Sanitation District for
' Minimized off -site
final treatment and discharge.
infrastructure improvements.
Design Iteration 3 —URS PDR Addendum No 2. Refined the channel diversion
• Radial gates capable of
options to include radial gates, and inflatable rubber dams. Improved the intake and
diverting dry- weather and
treatment process to meet 100 cfs operational capacities and refined life cycle costs
wet- weather flows
for the development of an operational agreement between the project Stakeholders
' Discharge captured flows to
and the County of Orange. On -site irrigation options eliminated due to potential risk
OCSD trunk sewer line or
seen by the OC John Wayne Airport. Process includes an in- channel diversion
used for irrigation
structure, intake structure, pretreatment and trash removal unit, a bypass structure to
return up to 100 cfs of the first flush storm flow to Delhi Channel, pretreated water
storage tanks and a dry- weather pump station discharging treated flows to an OCSD
sanitary sewer main via an 8 -inch force main or used at the adjacent Newport Beach
golf course for irrigation.
The final design for the proposed project will be based on a refinement of Design Iteration No. 3 that
will include the development of an in- channel trash screening structure. The proposed design refinement
will have the ability to screen trash and debris from channel storm flows up to approximately 1200 cfs or
equivalent to the stormwater quality flow event. 'The intent of the refinement will be to qualify the
proposed improvements as a regional BMP and, therefore, satisfy the proposed amendments to the MS4
permit addressing trash removals. URS will prepare up to two additional design refinements to serve as
the basis for the final design as follows:
In- channel Screening — Perforated Radial Gates
URS has researched and developed an alternative design to the radial gates diversion structure that
incorporates in- channel screening by perforating the front face of the gate and, therefore, screening out
debris and trash from the channel. In general, the perforated gates will be approximately 8 feet tall and 25
feet wide, similar to the radial gates that were presented in the 2�d and Yd design iterations. Operationally,
the surface of the radial gates will be customized with perforated plates with 3/16" diameter punched
orifices for the entire surface area of the gate. During dry - weather conditions, the low flow will be
screened through the 3/16" orifices and diverted to storage /pump station facility for discharge to the
sanitary sewer system. Theoretically, the perforated radial gates will be capable of screening the storm
flows up to 1,200 cfs and have a total capacity of 3,683 cfs channel capacity in the closed position
combining both the proposed screen flow and the flows over the screens in a bypass configuration. The
combination of orifices in the gates and flow over the gates, below the overall channel lieeboard, will
have a total capacity to pass a 2 -year storm event. During the non -storm season, dry- weather flows will
be collected downstream of the radial screens through two depressed grated inlets and a pipeline to a
25P 33
CDS unit with a capacity of 1 cfs. The vortex (CDS) will further remove sediments and floatables and
then flows to the storage chamber prior to being discharged to the OCSD sanitary sewer system.
The following features will be incorporated into the final design:
• Retractable m- channel screening with a maximum 5mm openings and therefore qualifying as a full
removal system.
• Incorporate in- channel inlets to divert low -flow urban discharges into a series of Vortex (CDS) gross
solids removal chambers prior to discharging into underground storage facilities.
• Approximately 21,000 gallons of underground storage vaults to temporarily hold diverted flows prior
to discharging into the regional sanitary sewer system.
• Two 150 gpm sump pumps discharging into a new force main sanitary sewer pipeline.
• Approximately 7,5001f feet of 8" sanitary sewer force main from the channel diversion facilities to
the regional sanitary sewer system located at the intersection of Campus Drive and MacArthur
Boulevard.
The following figures provides for graphical representation of the proposed project layout.
25F1134
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
um 25P!35
25F-36
§
®
\.
( rm (
�
z�\
)
p
lb
1
,
25F-36
Y
C
t0
CO
N
J
T
m
c
0
G
N
G
N
(0
IL
N
L
25F -37
25F -38
Y
C
c6
0]
d
J
T
t6
C
O
C
N
C
N
t6
a
25F -39
DA Sanitary Sewer Diversion Capacities
The Orange County Sanitation District has successfully implemented a dry weather urban runoff
diversion program. In 2000, OCSD established the requirements for municipal dischargers requesting
discharge of urban water runoff into OCSD facilities. The resolution set aside up to 10 MGD of surplus
dry weather capacity for this purpose. Current OCSD policy provides for treatment at no charge for
municipal discharges of dry weather urban mnof£ within the OCSD service area up to a cumulative
volume of 4 million gallons per day for all dischargers within the service area. For this project, we expect
OCSD will waive fees for the urban low flow runoff from the Della Channel.
D.3 Required Permitting and Environmental Documentation
The following regulatory permits have been identified as required for the proposed project:
• Orange County Flood Control District — Encroachment Permit.
• California Department of Fish and Game — 1602 Agreement.
• City of Newport Beach /City of Costa Mesa — Encroachment Permits.
• USt10E — 404 Nationwide Permit.
• Regional Water Quality Control Board — Section 401.
• Implementation of the proposed diversion projects will require several permissions and permits
including Section 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreements.
• CEQA Document Adoption & Filing of a Notice of Determination: City of Santa Ana, as the lead
agency for the diversion project will be required to adopt the project EIR and to file a NOD with the
State of California Office of Planning and Research.
• Coastal Development Permit (CDP): This project is outside of the jurisdictional boundaries of the
California Coastal Commission, so no Coastal Development Permit is required.
• Caltrans for potential crossings at the SR -73.
U,& Required Environmental Documentation
The City's proposed Santa Ana -Delhi Channel low flow diversion project will require California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) clearance. Environmental impacts of the project would primarily be
short -term, related to construction activities. Long term, the project will provide improvements to water
quality in the channel and Upper Newport Bay. In addition to CEQA compliance, work in the channel
w ll require regulatory permits from resources agencies with jurisdiction over the channel including the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDBX� and
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). It anticipated that the only a Negative
Declaration will be required for the construction of the proposed force main within the existing public
right of way.
The following Scope of Services will provide specific details as to the individual tasks and effort to ensure
a successful completion of the project.
E. SCHEDULE
Our proposed schedule is presented on the following pages. The critical items will be approval of the
CEQA documents and obtaining approval from the jurisdictional agencies including Army Corp of
Engineers, Orange County Flood Control and Caltrans.
UM 25F1740
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
um 25P!41
d A a
m 5 9
25F -42
Y
C
t0
0]
O
J
T
(0
C
O
C
N
C
N
m
CL
N
C
r
25F -43
�
WORK PLAN - SCOPE OF SERVICES
The work plan presented below shows the progression of design and coordination activities that URS
proposes for the design of the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project. The scope of services and details are
presented herein.
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination
URS will conduct effective project management that adheres to the scope, schedule, and budget; provide
efficient and frequent communication with the City and other project stakeholders; and implement the
URS Quality Management System in order to provide effective quality assurance /quality control. The
scope of services for Project Management includes the following items:
1.1 Preparation of Project Status Reports — URS will prepare monthly project status reports for the City
of Santa Ana's Project Management Team. The monthly status reports will consist of a brief (one to
two paragraph) e -mail summarizing work activities completed the previous month along with
activities planned for the upcoming month. Monthly status reports will include an updated project
schedule prepared in Microsoft Project Gantt Chart and a summary of budget expenditures to date
per task and budget remaining. In addition, URS' management team will maintain strong lines of
communication with the City via e -mail and telephone. URS will copy City Staff on all e -mails to and
from jurisdictional agencies and other project stakeholders.
1.2 Meetings and Workshops — URS will schedule and lead meeting with the City and stakeholders teams
to ensure that all design issues are being addressed. URS will provide agendas of upcoming project
coordination meetings five working days in advance of the meeting and prepare meeting tr nutes and
action items within five working days subsequent to the meetings. These efforts are intended to
ensure that all technical issues are being addressed and that the project remains on schedule. For the
purposes of budgeting, the following meetings are anticipated for the project:
1.3 Ouality Assurance /Quality Control — URS will implement out Quality Management System (QMS)
throughout the project to ensure consistent quality control for all project phases. The QMS system is
based on the ISO 9001 standard and is required on all of our projects. Per this system, each project
deliverable will undergo an independent technical review and a detail checking review, and
construction documents will undergo a cons tructability review. The independent technical review will
be provided by a technical expert in the related field, who has not been involved in preparation of the
deliverable. The detail checking review focuses on a review of grammar, spelling, notes, construction
call-outs, construction coordinates, plans and specification coordination, and discipline coordination.
25F2144
Description
General project management and design development meetings
Eight (8) two -hour meetings,
Coordination activities with project stakeholders, (City of Newport Beach, City
Twelve (12) two -hour meetings
of Costa Mesa and City of Santa Ana), jurisdictional agencies (OCFCD,
ACOE, Santa Ana RWQCB), County of Orange, Newport Beach Golf Club and
John Wayne Airport Authority.
Review Project Alternatives Developed
One (1) two -hour workshop
Present the 75% design and discuss the City's and stakeholders comments
One (1) three -hour workshop
and outstanding item resolution
Present the 100% design and discuss the City's and stakeholders comments
One (1) two -hour workshop
1.3 Ouality Assurance /Quality Control — URS will implement out Quality Management System (QMS)
throughout the project to ensure consistent quality control for all project phases. The QMS system is
based on the ISO 9001 standard and is required on all of our projects. Per this system, each project
deliverable will undergo an independent technical review and a detail checking review, and
construction documents will undergo a cons tructability review. The independent technical review will
be provided by a technical expert in the related field, who has not been involved in preparation of the
deliverable. The detail checking review focuses on a review of grammar, spelling, notes, construction
call-outs, construction coordinates, plans and specification coordination, and discipline coordination.
25F2144
URS will provide the City with review comment disposition forms, redlines, redline back - checks, and
QMS forms upon request.
1.4 Stakeholder Liaison — URS will obtain the services of a Stakeholder Liaison to be selected by the City
of Santa to provide project review and project recommendations during the course of project
development and implementation.
Dedverables:
• Project Meeting Agendas, supporting meeting information, and appropriate presentation materials
including easement exhibits describing the required properties for the implementation of the project.
All initial deliverables shall be forwarded to the City for review and approval prior to distribution to
the meeting invitees. Upon approval, the City of Santa Ana will prepare all required legal descriptions
and plats required to describe and negotiate the procurement of required easements.
• At the request of the City, URS will provide the City with review check information based on our
internal "Detailed Reviews" including redline review, issue resolution documentation, and external
review documentation.
Task 2 -- Final Basis of Design
URS has identified and presented a number of alternatives as part of our previous efforts in the
development of this project. In addition to those presented in previous documents and as discussed in
the Proposed Project Description Section, URS will further refine Design Iteration No. 3 that will include
the development of an in- channel trash screening structure. URS has also anticipating up to two
additional design refinements dependent on comments from the County of Orange and other
stakeholders. It is further anticipated that a direct in- channel solution will need to be refined to satisfy
County Flood Control regarding flow conveyance restrictions that may incorporate a rubber dam
solution and off channel trash screening system. All design refinements will be used to identify the
preferred alternative and ultimately form the basis for the final design. URS will prepare a Basis of Design
Memorandum (BOD) with a decision matrix that outlines the pros, cons and estimated construction
costs for each refined alternative for the City's and Stakeholders review and final alternative selection.
The specific tasks and items to be included and addressed in the BOD are as follows:
2.1 Existing Data Collection, Utility Research & Review — URS will perform an existing utility search for
underground utilities witivn the project area, specifically along the proposed force main pipeline. The
utility search will be completed using Underground Services Alert (USA) and as -built searches
through the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach; Caltrans and the County of Orange. All
affected utilities including water, sewer, gas, electric and telephone will be field marked and reviewed
by the design team. Utility notifications will be prepared and sent to utility providers within the
project area to obtain as- builts, atlas mapping and existing easement documentation.
2.2 Coordination with Caltrans District 12 — URS will obtain as -built plans for the Irvine
Avenue /Campus Drive existing bridge over the SR -73 for the development of the proposed 8" force
main crossing. Coordination efforts with Caltrans will include the development of the proposed
crossing plans, and obtain required permits to allow for construction.
2.3 Permits and Easements — URS will identify and prepare a review of all permits and easements that
will be necessary for construction. Permits from the following agencies are anticipated:
• Orange County Flood Control District — Encroachment Permit;
• City of Newport Beach /City of Costa Mesa — Encroachment Permit;
• California Department of Fish and Game —1602 Agreement;
• USACE — 404 Nationwide Perm t;
25P245
• Regional Water Quality Control Board — Section 401;
• Streambed Alternation Agreements - Section 1600;
• CEQA;
• Caltrans; and
• Department of Airports — URS will develop required easement exhibits identifying the
requited land easements within the Newport Beach Golf Club (Airport) property.
2.4 Design Criteria Development — In general, all design criteria will be based on The City of Newport
Beach Engineering Design Criteria & Standard Plans for Street and Sewer Projects, and Orange
County Public Works Standards for channel and flood control related facilities. In areas where special
considerations are required, such as crossing the Caltrans Bridge at the Corona del Mar Freeway and
Irvine Avenue and areas where Caltrans or the City of Newport Beach may require additional criteria,
URS will evaluate the most stringent and /or applicable design criteria for future use. Design criteria
findings will be documented and incorporated into the Basis of Design Memorandum for record
keeping requirements and future reference.
2.5 Santa Ana Delhi Channel Hydraulics — URS currently has developed preliminary channel hydraulics
for the portions of the Santa Ana Delhi hydraulically impacted by the proposed diversion structure.
In addition, URS also prepared additional hydraulics reviewing the potential impacts of using an in-
channel trash screening system. All previous and future HEC -RAS analyses will be based on the
Santa Ana Delhi Channel hydraulic analyses prepared by the Orange County Flood Control District.
URS will prepare final HEC -RAS hydraulics analyses for the preferred project alternative HEC -RAS
hydraulics for the Santa Ana Delhi Channel from the Mesa Drive Crossing to Santa Ana Avenue
inclusive of the 2, 5, 10 and 100 -year storm events that will include both the pre - project condition
and the post - project condition. Based on the Santa Ana Delhi Hydraulics analysis, URS will develop
general operational parameters of the proposed in- channel screening system including water surface
elevations and anticipated Flow rates.
2.6 Low -Flow Pump AnalXsis — URS has already prepared the preliminary hydraulic analysis for the
preferred pipeline route 5. URS will finalize the hydraulic analysis of the proposed low pumping
system. The hydraulic analysis will include the development of head -loss calculations from the pumps
to the proposed outfall along the alternative force main route.
2.7 Initial Geotechnical Considerations — URS will obtain available geotechnical reports associated with
the original construction of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel and any geotechnical reports associated
with construction within the proposed pipeline rights -of -ways. Based on URS' review of the available
documents, a final recommendation as to the final engineering geotechnical study will be provided.
URS has included a full geotechnical investigation as required by the City in the Final Engineering
Phase of work. If necessary, URS will provide refinements to the original scope of geotechnical
services to either exclude un- warranted geotechnical explorations or refine the locations of
geotechnical borings.
2.8 Initial Structural Considerations — URS will develop structural requirements for the proposed
improvements inclusive of required flood control channel sections, underground vaults and support
structures for the proposed screening system. Structural recommendations will be prepared and
included into the Basis of Design Memorandum for review by the project stakeholders. All structural
recommendations will be based on the Orange County Flood Control loading criteria.
2.9 Initial Electrical Considerations — URS will develop electrical and power requirements based on the
proposed pumping and gating control systems. Electrical loads will be developed and provided to
Southern California Edison for power service planning purposes. It is anticipated that SCE will
prepare a power service plans to be included as part of the final design documents.
UM 25F2346
2.10Identification of Proposed Pothole Locations —Upon the completion and approval of the proposed
pipeline alignments, URS will prepare a utility investigation pothole location exhibit. For the
purposes of this proposal, URS has included a minimum of 10 potholes for budgetary purposes.
Adjustments to the actual required number of potholes will be refined as part of the Basis of Design
Memorandum phase of the project.
2.11 Survey Requirements for Final Design — URS and our teaming partner, Coast Surveying, will review
the final limits of the project construction and provide a refined limit of surveying services.
Currently, URS /Coast Surveying have provided for a full design survey inclusive of existing rights of
way along the proposed pipeline alignment, surface features, dipping of existing manholes and depth
measurements to "top of nut" for existing water valves of existing utilities. Upon approval of the
final alignments of the proposed pipelines, URS /Coast Surveying may revise the limits of survey to
only facilities deemed required for final design.
2.12Constructability, Construction Phasing, Critical Physical Crossings, Infrastructure Impediments and
Traffic Control Constraints — Through our Quality Assurance programming and Technical Advisors,
URS will complete a thorough constructability review of the project specifically through areas where
there are potential infrastructure conflicts. Upon the completion of the cons tructability review, URS
will document potential conflicts and general construction phasing requirements of the project to be
included in the Basis of Design Memorandum.
2.13Allowable Shutdown Periods and Shutdown Sequencing Requirements — URS will work with the
Orange County Sanitation District to obtain information regarding allowable shutdown periods and
procedures for construction of the OCSD trunk mains and making a connection to OCSD's existing
15 inch sanitary sewer force main. Shutdown and sequencing requirements will be documented
including points of contacts, when shutdowns are available and required construction coordination
efforts.
2.14 List of Drawings and Outlined Specifications — URS will prepare a complete listing of drawings and
special provisions required for final design and preparation of tie construction documents.
2.15O12imon of Probable Construction Costs — URS will prepare a preliminary Opinion of Probable
Construction Costs for all elements of the project.
Deliverables:
• Prepare and submit a Basis of Design memorandum developing up to two additional alternatives.
Prepare a decision matrix to include the pros, cons, and construction costs for the two additional
alternatives for the City's and Stakeholders reviews.
Task 3 - CEQA Documentation and Regulatory Permits
Upon the City and Stakeholder's selection of the final preferred alternative, URS will prepare the
necessary environmental documentation. The tasks will include:
3.1 CEQA Documentation:
a. Prepare CEQA Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration — URS will prepare a draft
CEQA Initial Study (IS) in accordance with the current CEQA Guidelines and Appendices.
We will begin with preparation of the project description, in consultation with the City, and
incorporating the following maps and other existing background data to the extent possible:
• A regional map and project site map(s) illustrating the boundaries of the project area, site
layout and pipeline routes.
- 25P447 __
• A statement of the project objectives, prepared in coordination with the project
stakeholders.
A statement briefly describing the intended uses of the IS /Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND) including a list of agencies that are expected to use the IS /MND in decision
making /permitting and a list of the discretionary approvals for which the IS /MND will be
used.
• A discussion of the environmental setting; and regional setting with special emphasis on
rare or unique environmental resources.
The IS will include a summary of the existing environmental conditions using information
readily available, such as the EIR for the County of Orange's Santa Ana -Delhi Channel
Widening project. URS will then evaluate potential impacts of the project using the CEQA IS
checklist form. Impact discussions will cover potential short -term construction impacts and
potential long -term impacts of the low flow diversion project, including pipelines. For each
environmental topic listed in the checklist, URS will conduct an appropriate level of analysis to
support the findings of impact required. As needed, a list of mitigation measures will be
included to reduce any potential impacts to less than significant. For this effort, URS will
utilize our in -house technical specialists in biology, cultural resources, noise, traffic, air quality,
water quality and hydrology to adequately assess the environmental topics. Based on our
experience with environmental issues in the local area including Upper Newport Bay, it is likely
that impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels with incorporation of tmitigation
measures, and therefore, the IS will most likely lead to a MND.
URS will submit the Draft IS /MND to the City in electronic format for up to two rounds of
review and comment. If needed, URS will meet with the City to discuss comments for
incorporation into the final IS /MND. On the basis of this second review, URS will provide five
hard copies to the City, one hard copy for the local library and 15 CDs for the State Clearinghouse
for distribution to responsible agencies.
b. Assist with required Notifications and Responses to Comments on MND — In accordance
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, URS will prepare a draft Notice of Intent (NOI) to
adopt a MND. The NOI must be sent to the Orange County Clerk- Recorder's office,
interested public citizens, responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse, as well as to the
local newspaper for publication. The NOI will also be posted at the project site. URS will
conduct these tasks for City, and will utilize a mailing list provided by the City. URS will
submit the draft NOI to City for review and comment prior to distribution.
During the 30 -day MND review period, the City may receive written comments from federal,
state and local agencies as well as interested public citizens and local groups. URS will assist
the City in preparing written responses to comments. The responses can be provided to the
City Council for review and consideration prior the City Council adoption of the MND.
During this time, URS will prepare the required Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. The MMRP will be
prepared in a table format and will include the list of mitigation measures, timeframe for
compliance for each measure; party responsible for mitigation implementation; and reporting
agency. URS will also update the Draft IS /MND based on the comments that were received
and prepare the Final IS /HIND. URS will submit an electronic version of the document for
City review and comment. On the basis of this review, URS will finalize the MND for
adoption by the City Council.
25F2548
Within five days of the City Council's adoption of the MND, URS will prepare a Notice of
Determination (NOD) as required by CEQA and file it with the Orange County Clerk -
Recorder's Office and the State Clearinghouse. URS will submit a draft NOD for the City's
review and comment prior to any filings. When filing the NOD with the County Clerk,
payment of the CDFW filing fee is required.
Assumptions for CEQA Documentation:
• All required engineering, conceptual grading plans, utility, hydrology /hydraulics, water quality,
and geotechnical studies, project site plans and maps are available and suitable for use in
preparing the IS /MND.
• No separate technical studies will be prepared for traffic, noise, visual, water quality, and air
quality.
• No more than 10 public /agency comments are received on the MND and no additional
technical studies or environmental analysis will be required.
• All filing fees required by the County of Orange and CDFW, as well as newspaper publication
fees will be provided by the City.
3.2 Cultural Resources Record Search and Letter Report:
To evaluate cultural resources for the IS /MND and for the agency permit applications, a cultural
resources record search must be conducted. A URS archaeologist will request a cultural resources
records search through the designated California Historical Resources Information System
(CHRIS) for Orange County, California. The records search will review relevant previously
recorded cultural resources and previous investigations completed for the Project Area within a'A
mile search radius. Information to be reviewed will include location maps for all previously
recorded trinomial and primary prehistoric and historic archaeological sites and isolates, site record
forms and updates for all cultural resources previously identified, previous investigation boundaries
and National Archaeological Database citations for associated reports, technical reports, historic
maps, and historic addresses. The search will also review properties listed on /as the California
Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge
Inventory, California Historical Resources Inventory, local city and county registries of historic
properties, the California Register of Historic Resources, and the National Register of Historic
Places. URS will also conduct a search of the Sacred Lands file from the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC).
Upon completion of the cultural resources record search, results will be provided to URS by the
CHRIS information center and NAHC. URS will review and compile the record search results and
will prepare a summary letter report discussing those results. This summary letter report will be
created for use in the CEQA IS and will be used for compliance purposes for the USACE permit
application process.
Assumptions for Cultural Resources:
• Assumes the project study area covers 'A mile radius of the diversion area of the channel,
retention basin area, and pipeline. If the study area boundary changes, additional costs will be
required to revise the records search to cover the new areas.
• Records search will be conducted as a standard request.
25F49
• In the event the records search results indicate the presence of known cultural resources,
further cultural resources investigations may be recommended. This cost estimate does not
include such additional cultural resources work.
• Assumes that no paleontological search or Native American Consultation is required.
• The deliverable for this scope is limited to one letter request to the information center with
one project map figure and one record search results summary letter report.
• The cost estimate does not include any additional GIS time associated with the digitization of
information resulting from the record search request or for the creation of result figures for
inclusion with the letter report.
3.3 Biological Field Survey and Technical Report
A biological field survey and technical report are needed to evaluate potential impacts on biological
resources for the IS /MND. The survey and report are also needed as supporting documentation
for resource agency permits applications (described later in Task 5).
URS will review biological resource databases, local resource management plans, aerial photos, and
any other readily available commercial data to determine the locations and types of biological
resources that have the potential to occur at the Project site and general vicinity. The literature
review will support the development of a brief Biological Technical Report.
Following the literature review, URS will conduct a pedestrian -based biological survey of the
project site (channel diversion area, retention basin area, and pipeline route) to observe, document,
and evaluate the onsite conditions and determine the potential for occurrence of common and
special- status biological resources and aquatic resources. The field analysis and data collection will
identify the acreages of land use and vegetation present, a list of plants and wildlife present will be
compiled, and special - status species with potential to occur within the study area will be
determined. The field results will be synthesized within a Biological Letter Report, which will be
used in the analysis for the CEQA IS /MND as well as included as a requisite attachment to the
resource agencies' permit packages.
34 jurisdictional Determination:
For projects that may impact areas under the jurisdiction of the USACE, a jurisdictional
delineation is required utilizing USACE standard delineation methods. URS evaluated the
possibility of using previously- prepared Jurisdictional Delineations associated with the Santa Ana -
Delhi Channel Widening project, since the channel widening areas may overlap with the current
project. However, based on our experience, we believe the USACE and other perm tting agencies
would not accept this Jurisdictional Delineation for the proposed project, and would request a
project- specific delineation instead. Reasons would likely include the differing magnitude of
impacts, as well as new delineation mapping standards (issued on August 6, 2012) that must be
utilized in all new USACE jurisdictional delineations. Furthermore, if utilizing a previously -
prepared Jurisdictional Delineation, it would be difficult to address any potential agency data
requests, given that the report was prepared by another consulting firm wonting for a different
municipality. Therefore, URS has determined it would be most appropriate to prepare a project -
specific delineation for the proposed project, as discussed in the following paragraphs.
URS will delineate aquatic resources within the study area. The study area includes aquatic resource
areas that will be impacted by the project, which likely will be limited to the diversion area of the
Santa Ana Dellni Channel. For the delineation, URS will utilize procedures and practices in the
25F2'50
following publications and agency guidance documents: USACE Wetland Delineation Manualu;
USACE Interim regional supplement to the Wetland Delineation Manual, Arid West Region,
Version 2.02; and USACE and Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Clean Water Act
Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell
v. United States guidance document3.
A pedestrian -based field survey of the study area will be conducted using sub -meter GPS accuracy
to precisely delineate the boundaries of potential aquatic resources. The field survey results will be
synthesized into a Jurisdictional Delineation Report, which will be submitted as a requisite
attachment to the USACE, CDFW, and the RWQCB aquatic resource permit applications. The
report will identify the limits of wetlands, non - wetland waters of the U.S., waters of the State, and
jurisdictional riparian areas within the study area boundaries. It will also include Project- specific
details associated with vegetation communities, soils, and hydrology of aquatic resources within the
study area and will include a photolog of aquatic resources. A Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination, rather than an Approved Jurisdictional Determination, will be requested from the
USACE in order to expedite the permitting process. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination is
a formal letter from the USACE stating that Waters of the U.S. "may be" present on site and
assumes federal jurisdiction. Because the Delhi Channel is jurisdictional, no Approved
Jurisdictional Determination is required.
3.5 Aquatic Resource Permitting:
The study area includes aquatic resources that will be impacted by the proposed diversion facility in
the Santa Ana -DeN Channel. Completion of Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 and Section
404, and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) 1602 (et seq.) permit applications are most likely
required to execute the Project. Within this scope of work, URS will prepare and submit a USACE
CWA Section 404 Nation Wide Permit (NWP) Preconstruction Notification (PCN) package. The
NWP Program provides applicants with a streamlined USACE evaluation and approval process for
certain types of activities that have minimal impacts to jurisdictional aquatic environments. If this is
feasible based on the total disturbance footprint, then it will significantly reduce the federal permit
processing time and expense. The Project appears to qualify for NWP 43, Stormwatet
Management Facilities, so long as impacts to Waters of the U.S. are under 0.5 acre, 300 linear feet,
and no construction will occur within perennial streams. It is assumed that the Santa Ana -Delhi
Channel is seasonal, rather than perennial. If NWP 43 is not acceptable due to perennial flows
within the channel, then NWP 18, Minor Discharges, may be potentially used.
The RWQCB has determined that an individual 401 water quality certification may be required for
most nationwide permits. URS will subunit a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC)
application to the RWQCB. The WQC is required for those applicants seeking a federal permit
(e.g., CWA Section 404 permit) to discharge fill material into Waters of the State and /or Waters of
the U.S. The USACE will not grant authorization until the WQC has been obtained or has been
waived.
Environmental Laboratory (EL). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y -87 -1, U.S. Army Engineer
Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
i Interim regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers Welland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0). J. S. Wakeley, R.W.
Lichvar, and C. V. Noble (Eds.). ERDCIEL TR- 08 -28. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
s U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USACE). 2008a. Memorandum Re: CWA Jurisdiction Following
U.S. Supreme Court discussion in Rapanos v United States.
25851
The CDFW regulates all activities that modify the bed, bank, or channel of streams, lakes, and their
associated riparian habitats under Section 1600 (el seq.) of the CFGC. A CDFW Lake and
Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) will be required for all activities resulting in impacts to
streambeds and associated riparian habitats. URS will prepare and submit a LSAA package to
CDFW to obtain CFGC 1602 (et seq.) compliance.
URS will also informally correspond with applicable state and federal regulatory and resource
agencies (e.g., CDFW, USACE, and RWQCB) as needed during the permitting phase to identify
potential data requirements, minimization, and /or avoidance measures, and mitigation, if needed,
to implement the Project.
Assumptions for Biological Resources, Jurisdictional Delineation and Agency Perinining
• The preferred alternative will be finalized prior to permit application submission.
• The City will provide necessary Project- specific documentation and components for
application packages, which may include, but us not limited to, an hydrology /drainage report,
water diversion plan (if work will be completed in wet portions of the channel), Best
Management Plans, cubic yards of cut and fill, construction period and duration, and any other
relevant documents and data required for permit applications other than the requisite items
produced in this scope.
• This scope assumes that the project can be permitted through a Nationwide Permit and does
not include the production of a USACE Individual Permit and associated 404(b)(1) analysis.
• This scope does not include Federal or California Endangered Species Act (ESA) protocol
surveys, consultation, or ESA permitting, if necessary for Project implementation.
• This scope does not include the production of a compensatory mitigation plan for Project
impacts to aquatic resource areas, should mitigation be required.
• This scope does not include agency permit filing fees, potential CEQA filing fees,
compensatory mitigation fees, or an environmental filing fee (Fish and Game Code Section
711.4).
Task 4 -Final Design
Final design will be completed in accordance with The City of Santa Ana's Engineering Design Standards
and Standard Plans for Street and Sewer Projects, Orange County Public Works Standards and Standards
Design Process Manual. URS will address the following items during final design:
4.1 Construction Specifications — URS will prepare the Construction Specifications in Microsoft Word in
standard 8 1/2 x 11 format for the Delhi Diversion Project utilizing the latest Edition of the
Greenbook: Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. The City of Santa Ana will
provide the specification boiler plate for the front -end documents related to bidding, agreements,
general provisions, and special provisions. The special provisions will be tailored by URS for the
project. URS will submit the construction specifications for the City and stakeholders reviews at the
75 %, 100% and Final Design Submittals.
4.2 Construction Plans — URS will prepare detailed construction drawings in Microstation V8i using the
City of Santa Ana CADD Standards. Construction plans will be prepared on standard 24 -inch x 36-
inch sheet with City of Santa Ana title block. Pipeline plan and profile sheets will be prepared (e.g.
profile over plan view) at a scale of 1 " =40' horizontal and 1 " =4' vertical. This will include general
plans, civil plans, mechanical plans, and associated details. The horizontal and vertical control will be
UM 25F2952
established with NAD83 and NAVD88 survey standards, respectively. The following table presents
our preliminary list of the potential construction drawings.
UM 25F!° --53
Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project
Construction Drawing List
325F154
Na, Sheet
1
a
G -1
Sheet Title
Title Sheet
2
G -2
Location Map, Vicinity Map, and Drawing Index
3
G -3
General Notes, Symbols, Agency Index & Abbreviations
4
G -4
Construction Staging Plan and Survey Data
5
C -1
Construction Phasing Plan
6
C -2
Sheet Index Maps
7
0-3
Delhi Diversion Channel Grading and Demolition Plan
8
C -4
Delhi Diversion Channel Site Improvement, Final Grading, Utility and Horizontal
Control Plan
9
C -5
Delhi Diversion Channel Details
10
C -6
Delhi Diversion Channel Ramp Details
11
C -7
In- Channel Screening System Layout Plan and Elevations
12
C -8
In- Channel Screening System Details
13
0-9
Off-Channel Conveyance Plan and Profile
14
C -10
Vortex Separator Layout Plan and Details
15
0.11
Underground Water Storage Vault Plan
16
C -12
Utility and Piping Plan Layout
17
C -13
Miscellaneous Civil Details
18
C -14
Miscellaneous Civil Details
19
C -15
Miscellaneous Civil Details
20
C -16
Submersible Pump Layout and Mechanical
21
C-17
Submersible Pump Sections and Level Controls
22
C -18
Submersible Pump Yard Piping and Valving
23
C -19
Mechanical Details
24
C -20
Mechanical Details
25
C -21
Mechanical Details
26
C -22
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile -1
27
C -23
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile- 2
28
C -23
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 3
29
C -24
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 4
30
C -25
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 5
31
C -26
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 6
32
C -27
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 7
33
C -28
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 8
34
C -29
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile - 9
35
C -30
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Plan & Profile -10
36
D -1
Caltrans Pipeline Control Plan and Details
37
D -2
Caltrans Crossing Details
38
D -3
Pipeline Details -1
39
D -4
Pipeline Details - 2
40
D -5
Miscellaneous Details -1
41
S -1
Delhi Diversion Channel - General Structural Notes
325F154
LXMMIK1
42
e
S -2
Delhi Diversion Channel - Structural Sections and Reinforcement Details
43
S -3
DelhiRamp /Wall Structural Details
44
S -4
Pre -Cast Vault Placement and Construction Details
45
S-5
Pump Wet Well Structural Sections and Reinforcement Details
46
S -6
Structural Miscellaneous Details
47
S -7
Structural Miscellaneous Details
48
S -8
Structural Miscellaneous Details
49
E -1
Standard Symbols and Abbreviations
50
E -2
Site Plan for Santa Ana Delhi Channel
51
E -3
Process and Control Diagrams
52
E -4
Conduit Schedule and Routing Plan
53 -H
TC -1 thru 16
Traffic Control Plans
70
TC -17
Traffic Control Details
URS will submit the construction drawings for the City and stakeholders reviews at the 75 %, 100%
and Final Design Submittals.
4.3 Traffic Control Plans — URS will prepare detailed traffic control plans for all proposed pipelines and
facilities. The traffic control plans will be prepared in accordance with, and approved by, the
appropriate agency (e.g. Cities of Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, County of Orange, and /or others).
The traffic control plans will be included in the set of construction plans and will take construction
phasing into consideration. The traffic control plans will be prepared at 1"=40' scale with two plan
view panels per sheet. URS will work closely with all project stakeholders when preparing the traffic
control plans in order to develop plans that meets their access needs.
4.4 Utility Disposition —During the final design phase, URS will collect utility as -built drawings from
Cities of Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, the County of Orange, SC Edison, the Gas Company, telecom
companies, and other agencies and private parties in order to create a utility base map for final
design. We will also perform a web search of USA Digalert's online database to locate all of the
utilities in the project vicinity and then contact each utility owner to request a copy of their available
as -built drawings, We have included budget in our fee estimate for purchasing utility as -built plans.
The as -bats will be used to create an Auto CAD utility map for the project. We will field walk the
proposed pipeline alignments after the base map has been created in order to field verify utility
locations and surficial appurtenances (i.e. O/H utilities, valve cans, manholes).
4.5 Aerial Survey and Topographic Mapping — Current aerial topography and existing planimetrics data
will be obtained for the Sanitary Sewer Pipeline alignments. The photography will be flown for use at
a scale of 1" = 40', with contours compiled at 1 -foot intervals. Spot elevations and existing site
features identifiable from photography will also be compiled. In an effort to provide sufficient
coverage for design, the aerial limits will extend to extend approximately 50 -feet beyond the public
right -of -way. This line item includes the field work to set horizontal and vertical control required for
the aerial effort, which will be based on Orange County NAD83 horizontal control, and NAVD88
vertical control present in the area. Deliverables will include a digital CAD file containing the
resulting data along with a color digital ortho -photo prepared from the photography. The ortho-
photo will be a rectified image so as to match the compiled topography as closely as possible,
providing the capability to prepare accurate, color exhibits of the property on subsequent efforts.
® Supnlemer ntal Touo aphy —As a supplement to the aerial effort, conventional ground survey
will be used to locate significant features not reflected by aerial photography, and obtain
additional detail in key areas. Visible indications of surface utilities will be located, as will rim
UM __ 25P 55
elevations for drainage structures present. The supplemental data will be used in conjunction
with the aerial mapping to create a single topographic map that will be used as the basis for
design.
Sewer Manhole Details, and Water Valve Locations — Invert elevations will be obtained for
sewer manholes present in the alignment. In addition, the top of valves nuts will be observed
for water valves present in the alignment, if accessible. Based on preliminary investigation, this
effort may include up to 40 sewer manholes, and 50 water valves. It is anticipated that the
manholes and valve covers will be accessible and that the measurements can be safely obtained
with minimal traffic control. Coast Surveying will work with the Cities of Santa Ana and
Newport Beach to ensure that traffic control requirements are met prior to initiating this
effort.
Existing Right_ -Cf -Way Base Mao — Research, analysis, and mapping will be performed to
retrace the centerline and rights -of ways within the project area. The result will be a Right -of-
Way Base Map illustrating existing centerline and right of way conditions. Existing centerline
monuments combined with available agency research and assessor parcel mapping will be used
to prepare the Base Map. This will not be a full and complete boundary survey of the right -of-
way and adjacent land parcels. Monuments located will be limited to those along the street
centerline.
4.6 Geotechnical Investigation —
4.6.1 Geotechnical Recommendations Analysis - URS will conduct a geotechnical review of
existing geotechnical information prepared for the original construction of the Santa Ana
Delhi Channel and the construction of the existing public right of way for the proposed
pipeline alignment (currently assumed to be as described by South Bristol to Campus, and
along Campus to MacArthur) to provide an existing records review as to adequacy of
existing information to prepare updated geotechnical design recommendations. Based on the
adequacy of the existing information, URS will prepare a letter report providing
requirements for additional geotechnical investigations and /or design recommendations to
be utilized as part of the final design. In the event that existing information is not available
or deem inadequate, URS will provide recommendations as to the extent of additional field
investigation required to provide the needed geotechnical information as described in Tasks
4.6.2 and 4.6.3 for the final development of a Geotechnical Report.
4.6.2 Optional Geotechnical Field Investigations — Santa Ana Delhi Channel — URS will conduct
geotechnical field investigations for the Santa Ana Delhi Channel that include the following
field operations:
a) Drill and sample 2 borings (hollow stem auger and rotary wash) maximum depth
will be 30 feet below ground surface or refusal. These borings will be adjacent to
the existing concrete lined channel within the proposed improvement area. All
boring locations will be located subject to permit guidelines.
b) Collect samples every 5 feet alternate SPT and California samples.
c) Groundwater will be located based on the surface control of the boring site.
d) Perform hand auger upper 5 feet.
e) Collect the soil/mud in drums since rotary wash method will be used.
J) The borings will be backfilled with bentonite slurry to abandon the borehole after
measuring the groundwater in the borehole (if encountered).
g) URS will obtain boring permits and call USA digalert before drilling.
h) URS will arrange traffic control and drum disposal.
25F3356
Conduct laboratory tests of selected samples to evaluate moisture content, density,
gradation, Atterberg limits, consolidation, shear resistance, expansion, R- value, soil
corrosivity, and /or other criteria as recommended by the geotechnical engineer.
Prepare a geotechnical report presenting findings, conclusions, and
recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed facilities. The
report will include, at a minimum:
1. Groundwater presence and levels;
2. Construction dewatering requirements;
3. Pipe bedding requirements;
4. Trench shoring requirements;
5. Settlement potential;
6. Excavatability of soils;
7. Backfill suitability, and
8. Backfill compaction.
The geotechnical report will emphasize specific concerns regarding construction
methods and the integrity of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel and structures. The
report will provide recommendations regarding the design of facilities. At a
minimum, recommendations will include:
1. Active, at -rest, passive and dynamic earth pressures;
2. Foundation type;
3. Allowable bearing pressure;
4. Coefficient of friction between the foundation and sods /subgrade;
5. Foundation design data;
6. Settlement potential;
7. Pipe bedding;
8. Maximum cut slope requirements;
9. Structural needs;
10. Groundwater dewatering well(s) design criteria, and /or
11. Other standard design criteria.
URS will provide five (5) copies of the draft Geotechnical Investigation Report (GIR) for
the City and stakeholders review. Upon resolution and incorporation of review comments,
five (5) copies of final GIR and one (1) electronic copy in PDF (single file) on CD will be
submitted.
4.6.3 Optional Geotechnical Field Investigations — Force -main Pipeline Alignment - URS will
conduct geotechnical field investigations for the Force -main Pipeline Alignment that include
the following field operations:
a) Drill and sample 8 borings (hollow stem auger and rotary wash) maximum depth
will be 15 feet below ground surface or refusal. These borings will be adjacent to
the proposed pipeline alignment within the shoulder area of the public right of way.
All boring locations will be located subject to permit guidelines.
b) Collect samples every 5 feet alternate SPT and California samples.
c) Groundwater will be located based on the surface control of the boring site.
d) Perform hand auger upper 5 feet.
e) Collect the soli /mud in drums since rotary wash method will be used.
f) The borings will be backfilled with bentonite slurry to abandon the borehole after
measuring the groundwater in the borehole (if encountered).
g) URS will obtain boring permits and call USA digalert before drilling.
h) URS will arrange traffic control and drum disposal.
tM 25P457
Conduct laboratory tests of selected samples to evaluate moisture content, density,
gradation, Atterberg limits, consolidation, shear resistance, expansion, R- value, soil
corrosivity, and /or other criteria as recommended by the geotechnical engineer.
Prepare a geotechnical report presenting findings, conclusions, and
recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed facilities. The
report will include, at a minimum:
1. Groundwater presence and levels;
2. Construction dewatering requirements;
3. Pipe bedding requirements;
4. Trench shoring requirements;
5. Settlement potential;
6. Excavatability of soils;
7. Backfill suitability; and
8. Backfill compaction.
The geotechnical report will emphasize specific concerns regarding construction
methods and the integrity of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel and strictures. The
report will provide recommendations regarding the design of facilities. At a
minimum, recommendations will include:
1. Active, at -rest, passive and dynamic earth pressures;
2. Foundation type;
3. Allowable bearing pressure;
4. Coefficient of friction between the foundation and soils /subgrade;
5. Foundation design data;
6. Settlement potential;
7. Pipe bedding;
8. Maximum cut slope requirements;
9. Structural needs;
10. Groundwater dewateting well(s) design criteria, and /or
11. Other standard design criteria.
URS will provide five (5) copies of the draft Geotechnical Investigation Report (GIR) for
the City and stakeholders review. Upon resolution and incorporation of review comments,
five (5) copies of final GIR and one (1) electronic copy in PDF (single file) on CD will be
submitted.
4.7 Easements — URS will prepare property easement requirements exhibits for the proposed project
improvements adjacent to the Santa Ana Delhi Channel and within the Newport Beach Golf Club
area. No easements are anticipated for improvements located within the public right of way. The City
will coordination with the County of Orange to obtain all required easements inclusive of all legal
descriptions, plates and other supporting documentation.
4.8 Design Coordination — Coordination efforts may include, but will not be limited to, pipeline points
of connection, construction phasing, staging areas, and site access. URS will also coordinate our
design efforts with other project stakeholders, including the County of Orange, Orange County
4.9 Permits — At the request of the City, URS will prepare applications and coordinate all perm is with
the County of Orange, City of Newport Beach and Caltrans District 12 inclusive of environmental
permitting. URS will prepare and process the permit applications, including exhibits requited by the
issuing agency, and shall furnish the required number of copies of all plans and exhibits. City staff
will sign all applications as required by the owner. The City will pay all pettnit, filing and other fees
directly.
5
25F358
4.10Project Schedule — URS will submit monthly project schedule updates and with each final design
submittal. The project schedule will reflect coordination items, submittal milestones, critical path
items, City and stakeholders review times, shop drawing approvals, manufacturing, delivery, and
seasonal weather impacts. URS will prepare the schedule in Microsoft Project (Gantt) format.
4.11O12inion of Probable Construction Cost — URS will prepare an engineer's estimate of probable
construction costs for the 75 %, 100% and final submittals. URS will incorporate and address
comments from the City, related to the cost estimate. Construction costs will be determined from a
variety of resources, including: vendor quotes, RS Means Costworks software, Caltrans Cost Data
Books, recent construction bids from other similar local projects that URS has recently designed.
Final Design Deliverables — URS will provide the following final design deliverables:
• Hard copies of construction plans will be reproduced in either full-size (24 "x36 ") bond format
or tabloid (11 "x17") bond format, per City's preference. The Construction Specifications will
be reproduced in double -sided letter -size format per City standards. The submittals that will be
provided are as follows:
— URS will submit five (5) hard copies and one (1) electronic file in PDF format of the first
(60 %) submittal. Plans for the first submittal will include a draft set of drawings for the
entire project. Pipeline alignments, preliminary profiles, existing utilities, street /pipe
sections, and details will be provided in detail for of each components of the design such
as civil, mechanical, structural, and traffic control components. The first submittal will
include all sections of the Construction Specifications with technical specifications and an
engineer's estimate of probable construction cost.
— URS will submit five (5) hard copies, one (CD) with Auto CAD files for the entire plan set,
and one (1) CD with a single full-scale PDF file of the construction plans for the third
(100 %) submittal. This subtr ttal will include the complete plan set and specifications and
a notebook with the design calculations (including mechanical, civil, structural, pipe
thickness and restraint). URS will incorporate City comments on the 60% submittal, as
well as comments received at the plan review meeting. URS will update the Specifications
and engineer's estimate of probable construction cost for this submittal.
— URS will submit wet - sealed and signed reproducible plans (mylars) of the final
construction plans and original signed Construction Specifications for the City's
signatures. URS will attend a meeting for signatures to explain the project and answer
questions. A final engineer's estimate of probable construction cost will be submitted with
the final plans and Specifications.
4.1213id Support, Addenda Preparation and Pre -Bid Meeting — During the bidding period, URS will
provide bidding support and assistance as it pertains to the contract documents and construction
drawings. For budgetary purposes, we have assumed a number of hours in out fee estimate to answer
questions from prospective bidding contractors, and assist the City in providing information and
clarification of the bid documents. URS will consult with the City to address concerns or answer
questions in support of administering the bid process. URS has budgeted for up to three (3) addenda
to the construction plans and /or Construction Specifications for prospective bidders, if requested by
the City. Addenda preparation will include:
• Plan Revisions — URS has budgeted eight (8) hours of staff time for plans revisions.
• Specification Revisions — URS has budgeted eight (8) hours of staff time for revisions to the
Construction Specifications,
Im 25P659
r
• Bidder Questions — URS has budgeted eight (8) hours of staff time to address and respond to
bidder questions.
Pre -Bid Meeting — URS will prepare for and conduct one (1) two -hour pre -bid meeting along
with a site visit with potential bidders, if required. URS will prepare the meeting agenda,
exhibits, sign -in sheet, arnd minutes for the pre -bid meeting.
Task 5 - Construction Phase Services
URS will provide the City with as- needed construction phase services for the project URS is currently
providing construction support services for other municipalities and we understand that being
responsive, organized, and detail- oriented during the construction phase will help the City keep the
project on schedule and avoid contract change orders from the Contractor. URS' anticipated level of
service during the construction phase is detailed below:
5.1 Project Meetings — Upon the request of the City, URS will attend /conduct progress meetings of two
hours each during the course of project construction and provide agendas and meeting minutes
within five (5) working days of the meeting. For this task, we have budgeted twelve (t2) project
construction meetings.
52 Contractor's Request for Information (RFI) — URS will respond to Contractor's Requests for
Information to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. URS will
maintain a log of RFIs using a standard submittal log. URS will return responses to the City within
five (5) working days or earlier. URS has budgeted for up to twenty -five (25) RFI's.
5.3 Site Visits — URS will make periodic field reviews and notify the City of any defects or deficiencies in
the Contractors work. URS understands that they have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of
the City or to deputize another to do so. URS has budgeted for twelve (12) site visits of two hours
each during construction.
5.4 Shop Drawing Reviews — URS has budgeted for the review of twenty (20) shop drawing submittals
and /or resubmittals. Submittals will be reviewed for completeness and conformity with the contract
documents. URS will provide comments to the City electronically using Adobe PDF Professional.
URS will maintain a log of submittals. URS will return comments to the City within fourteen calendar
days.
5.5 Change Order Requests Reviews — At the request of the City, URS will review Contract Change
Order requests from the Contractor. Reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of
receipt.
5.6 Construction Coordination - URS shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and other issues
with the City, other Agencies, and utility companies as required. At the direction of the City, URS
shall be the liaison with the affected agencies.
5.7 As -Built Drawings — Upon completion of construction, URS will incorporate all changes to the plans
electronically using the Contractor's and City Inspector's red lines. URS will utilize the standard
industry revision notations. One (1) signed set of as -built mylars will be submitted to the City with
electronic copies in Microstation V8i CADD and pdf formats. URS shall deliver the signed electronic
files on CD and one color PDF file of the entire construction plan set on CD to the City.
The Fee Proposal is submitted in a separately sealed envelope, as required in the RFP.
25F3760
4. CERTIFICATIONS
The following forms are signed and included on the following pages:
• Attachment D -1: Non - Collusion Affidavit;
• Attachment D -2: Non - Lobbying Certification;
• Attachment D -3: Department of Housing & Urban Development Section 3 Contract Clause; and
• Attachment D -4: Certification of Non - Discrimination by Consultants.
um I 25P -61
9()
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -1: NON- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
CERTIFICATIONS
NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
(Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and
Public Contract Code Section 7106)
To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares
that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company,
association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has
not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or
indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that
anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by
agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix
any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage
against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements
contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid
price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid,
and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to
any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.
Note: The above Non - collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature
portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non - collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioned that
making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
Signed -
r-
Richard Hart, Vice President, URS Corporation Americas
State of California
County of
S }}��bsQribed MA sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this �� ` day of )) 20� by
((j (� f y( j y (f �( proved to me on the ba ' KEL Y P. O'CONNOR the person(s) who
appeared before me. COMM. #2085476 z
X Notary Public - California
Z QMV Orange County
t C omm. EX ireS Oct. 10, 2018
Nota Pub(lia/S{igna� mature Notary Public Seal
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDE'.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE
20299
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -2: NON - LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATIONS
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee
of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal
contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into
of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to Influence any officer or employee of any federal
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or
cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities ".
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S.. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and
that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Firm Name URS Corporation, dba URS Corporation Americas
Signature and Printed
Vice President
November 11, 2014
Richard Hart
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE,
City of Santa Ana RFP 14 -069
ZSP -63
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -3: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 3 CONTRACT CLAUSE
CERTIFICATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT UM
SECTION 3 CONTRACT CLAUSE
A. The work to be performed under this contract is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Section 3). The
purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated
by HUD assistance or HUD - assisted projects covered by Section 3, shall, to the greatest extent
feasible, be directed to low- and very low- income persons, particularly persons who are
recipients of HUD assistance for housing.
B. The parties to this contract agree to comply with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR Part 135, which
implement Section 3. As evidenced by their execution of this contract, the parties to this
contract certify that they are under no contractual or other impediment that would prevent them
from complying with the part 135 regulations.
C. The Consultant agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with
which the Consultant has a collective bargaining agreement or other understanding, if any, a
notice advising the labor organization or workers' representative of the Consultant's
commitments under this Section 3 clause, and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous
places at the work site where both employees and applicants for training and employment
positions can see the notice. The notice shall describe the Section 3 preference, shall set forth
minimum number and job titles subject to hire, availability of apprenticeship and training
positions, the qualifications for each; and the name and location of the person(s) taking
applications for each of the positions; and the anticipated date the work shall begin.
D. The Consultant agrees to include the Section 3 clause in every subcontract subject to
compliance with regulations in 24 CFR Part 135, and agrees to take appropriate action, as
provided in an applicable provision of the subcontract or in this Section 3 clause, upon a finding
that the sub - consultant is in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR Part 135. The Consultant will
not subcontract with any sub - consultant where the Consultant has notice or knowledge of that
the sub - consultant has been found in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR Part 135.
E. The Consultant will certify that any vacant employment positions, including training positions,
that are filled (1) after the Consultant is selected, but before the contract is executed, and (2)
with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR Part 135 require employment
opportunities to be directed, were not filled to circumvent the Consultant's obligations under 24
CFR Part 135.
City of Santa Ana RFP 14 -069
2P X64
�w
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
F. Noncompliance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 35 may result in sanctions, termination of
this contract for default, and debarment or suspension from future HUD assisted contracts.
G. With respect to work performed in connection with Section 3 covered Indian housing assistance,
Section (7) b of the Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450e)
also applies to the work to be performed under this contract. Section 7(b) requires that to the
greatest extent feasible (1) preference and opportunities for training and employment
subcontracts shall be given to Indians, and (ii) preference in the award of contracts and
subcontracts shall be given to Indian organizations and Indian -owned Economic Enterprises.
Parties to this contract that are subject to the provisions of Section 3 and Section 7 (b) agree to
comply with Section 3 to the maximum extent feasible, but not in derogation of compliance with
Section 7(b).
For the purpose of training and employment the rip mare Section 3 covered project area is the
area in closest proximity to the actual construction work site within the U.S. Census Tract in
which the project is located. It is understood that priority for employment opportunity is to be
given to residents residing within the primary Section 3 area as defined.
A Section 3 area resident is any lower income individual residing within the Section 3 area,
whose total family income does not exceed 80% of the median income of the metropolitan
statistical area in which the project is located (Orange County). A public housing resident is
defined by regulations as Section 3 resident, regardless of income.
The Consultant and each sub- consultant certifies that they will provide, to the greatest extent
feasible, opportunities for employment to lower income residents (local residents) and job
opportunities in connection with projects in their neighborhoods. For fiscal year 1996 -97,
minimum goal for each project is 30 %.
The Consultant /Sub- consultant/Service Provider by the signature affixed hereto declares under
penalty of perjury: Consultant /Sub - consultant /Service Provider has read Section 3 requirements
and accepts all its requirements contained therein for all of his /her operations within the City of
Sant a
Richard Hart, Vice President, URS Corporation
Signature Print Name and Title
Signature
Signature
Print Name and Title
Print Name and Title
November 11, 2014 _
Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
City of Santa Ana RFP 14 -069
2SP -65
C
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -4: CERTIFICATION OF NON - DISCRIMINATION BY
CONSULTANTS
CERTIFICATIONS
As suppliers of goods or services to the City of Santa Ana, the Firm listed below certifies that it
does not discriminate in its employment with regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin; that it is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders
regarding non - discrimination in employment and including, but not limited to, what is listed in
the Non - Discrimination Clause in Exhibit 10 -V per:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/lam/forms/chapterl 0/1 Ov-20.13-05-14 docx
and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity
in employment. The same shall apply and be included in all sub - consultant agreements.
WE AGREE SPECIFICALLY:
1. To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees with the company.
2. To establish or observe employment policies within affirmative promotion opportunities
for minority persons at all job levels.
3. To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees,
outside recruiting services, especially those servicing minority communities, and to the
minority communities at large.
FIRM NAME URSCorporation ,dbaURS Corporation Americas
TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING
SIGNATURE AND PRINTED NAME
DATE November 11, 2014
Richard
Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment
programs now in effect within your company.
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
City of Santa Ana RFP 14 -069
AV266
N\
Joseph Long, P.E.
Project Engineer, Infrastructure Design, Irvine Spectrum Phase IV,
The Irvine Company, CA: Responsible for development of the wet
infrastructure for the Irvine Spectrum Phase IV commercial development.
The project included water demand analyses, sewer demand analyses,
hydrology /hydraulics analysis and the design of water, sewer and storm
drain facilities.
Principal -in- Charge /Project Design Manager, Archibald Avenue,
Ontario, CA: Responsible for overall design and widening of Archibald
Avenue from Bellgrave to Riverside Drive. The project involved
reconstruction and widening of Archibald Avenue from its original two -
lane rural roadway to a secondary six-lane arterial highway. The project
included design of the roadway section to include 50 feet setback areas to
be utilized for low -flow stormwater management and water quality
25F -68
Project Manager
Overview
Mr. Long has more than 24 years of experience in engineering consulting,
with an emphasis in multi- discipline project solutions for public
infrastructure. I-Ie provides technical direction and project oversight for
the development of public infrastructure that includes potable /reclaimed
pipelines, pressure regulating stations, pump stations, storage facilities,
flood control facilities, regional and sub - regional storm drain facilities,
storm water quality mitigation treasures, and natural storm water
Areas of Expertise
treatment systems. His technical expertise ranges from master planning
Recharge /Water Banking Projects
and program management to final design and construction
Potable Water /Reclaimed Water
implementation.
Pumping Facilities Facilities
Ptunp
Project Specific Experience
Regional Flood Control Facilities
Project Manager /Project Engineer, Santa Ana Delhi Urban Water
Transportation Infrastructure
Recovery Unit, Newport Beach, CA, City of Santa Ana: Responsible
Stormwater Master Planning
for the initial planning and final design of a new urban water recovery
Water Conveyance /Flood Control
system. The project includes the design of an inflatable dam diversion
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
structure, primary and secondary grit and debris removal clarifiers, return
Years of Experience
flow pumping facilities and 240,000 gallon subsurface storage reservoir.
With URS: 3 Years
The effluent from the facility is utilized for irrigation purposes within an
With Other Firms: 21 Years
existing golf course or diverted to the sanitary sewer system dependent
upon water quality.
Education
Senior Engineer, Orange County Great Park Water Management
BS /Civil Engineering /1991 /California
Plan (WMP), Irvine, CA, City of Irvine: URS developed a WMP for
Polytechnic University, Pomona
the long -term build -out of the Orange County Great Park to capture
Registration /Certification
storm water from 5,550 acres of contributing watersheds that would be
1994 /Professional Civil Engineer /CA/
stored in onsite water features, and treated and reused for irrigation of
#54329
Great Park landscaping. The heart of the WMP planning process is a
hydrologic water model that uses 23 years of precipitation data and
incorporates native vegetation palettes, contributing watershed
characteristics, and a range of phased collection, storage and treatment
facilities.
Project Engineer, Infrastructure Design, Irvine Spectrum Phase IV,
The Irvine Company, CA: Responsible for development of the wet
infrastructure for the Irvine Spectrum Phase IV commercial development.
The project included water demand analyses, sewer demand analyses,
hydrology /hydraulics analysis and the design of water, sewer and storm
drain facilities.
Principal -in- Charge /Project Design Manager, Archibald Avenue,
Ontario, CA: Responsible for overall design and widening of Archibald
Avenue from Bellgrave to Riverside Drive. The project involved
reconstruction and widening of Archibald Avenue from its original two -
lane rural roadway to a secondary six-lane arterial highway. The project
included design of the roadway section to include 50 feet setback areas to
be utilized for low -flow stormwater management and water quality
25F -68
Joseph Long, P.E.
utilizing LID techniques, the design of a regional stortnwater collection
system (24" to 96" diameters), the reconstruction of two regional flood
control box - culverts, power and telecommunication utilities,
potable /reclaimed water transmission mains and six complete signalized
intersections.
Project Manager, County of Riverside Transportation /Land
Management Agency, On -Call Engineering Services: Responsible for
providing On -call engineering services to the TMLA. The scope of
services included the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for
local roadway improvement projects (generally projects less than 9$500,000
in construction values). The services included the development of
roadway rehabilitation plans, corrective measures addressing original
design deficiencies, reconstruction of damaged facilities and the
development of small improvement projects.
Principal -in- Charge /Project Design Manager, Various Roadway
Projects, City of Ontario, Ontario, CA, 2006 -2009: Responsible fox the
overall design and widening of several roadways associated with the
redevelopment of the New Model Colonies within the City of Ontario
inclusive of Milliken /Hamner from Bellgrave to Riverside Drive,
Riverside Drive from Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue and Edison
Avenue from Vineyard to Milliken.
25F -69
Tama S. Snow, P.E.
Deputy Project Manager
Senior Project Engineer, Design of Chloramine Booster Stations at
Three Existing Domestic Water Reservoirs, Irvine, CA: Preparing
preliminary design report (PDR) for the design of three chloramine
booster stations at three existing domestic water reservoirs. PDR includes
conducting a site analysis to locate new booster stations, identifying all
land acquisitions required, identifying permits necessary and CEQA
documents.
Senior Project Engineer, Baxter Bioscience, Los Angeles, CA:
Conducted Failure Mode and Effect Analysis at existing wastewater
treatment plant; conducting workshops, preparing report and making
recommendations on prioritizing modifications to undersized wastewater
treatment plant.
25F -70
Overview
Ms. Snow has over 22 years of experience in civil engineering planning,
design and construction of water, wastewater and recycled water projects.
She has worked on a multitude of projects from the conceptual phase
through the construction and operation phases that included such tasks as
obtaining grants and loans, hydraulic modeling, preparing master plans,
preparing design plans and specifications, and served as the lead technical
spokesperson for the Orange County Water District's (OCWD)
Areas of Expertise
Groundwater Replenishment System's Public Relations Campaign while
Civil Engineering Planning, Design and
working as a Senior Engineer at OCWD.
Construction of Water, Wastewater
Project Management Experience
and Recycled Water
Years of Experience
Ms. Snow has managed both small projects and large multi - million dollar
projects involving multiple municipalities and subconsultants. She delivers
With URS: >2 Years
projects on schedule and within budget.
With Other Firms: 19 Years
Education
Planning and Design Experience
MS /Engineering /2001 /Cal Poly
She has extensive planning and design experience on a multitude of
Pomona
projects including planning and feasibility studies, pipelines, pump
BS /Civil Engineering /1991 /University
stations, water reservo rs, and water and wastewater treatment facilities.
of California, Irvine
She also has experience in promoting recycled water for landscape and
BA /Mathematics /1988 /University of
industrial applications, preparing industrial engineers reports and drawings
California, Riverside
to obtain health department approval to convert facilities to recycled
water and dual plumbed facilities.
Registration /Certification
1997 /Professional Civil Engineering/
Project Specific Experience
CA/ #056934
Project Manager, Stockdale West Wellhead Equipping and
Conveyance Facilities, Bakersfield, CA, Irvine Ranch Water
District, 2014 -2015: Project includes the design of wellhead equipment
for three deep aquifer wells and pipelines to convey up to 9000 gpm of
untreated water to a turn -in into the Central Valley Canal. Prepared
preliminary design report, construction drawings and specifications.
Design Completion Date December 2014; Construction completion
December 2015.
Senior Project Engineer, Design of Chloramine Booster Stations at
Three Existing Domestic Water Reservoirs, Irvine, CA: Preparing
preliminary design report (PDR) for the design of three chloramine
booster stations at three existing domestic water reservoirs. PDR includes
conducting a site analysis to locate new booster stations, identifying all
land acquisitions required, identifying permits necessary and CEQA
documents.
Senior Project Engineer, Baxter Bioscience, Los Angeles, CA:
Conducted Failure Mode and Effect Analysis at existing wastewater
treatment plant; conducting workshops, preparing report and making
recommendations on prioritizing modifications to undersized wastewater
treatment plant.
25F -70
Tama S. Snow, P.E.
01 ovl�l
Senior Project Engineer, Orange Park Acres Pump Station, Orange,
CA, Irvine Ranch Water District: Prepared technical specifications for
the construction of well head equipment, pump station, wet well, sodium
hypochlorite, ammonia injection systems and pipelines for the Irvine
Ranch Water District.
Senior Project Engineer /Assistant Project Manager, Groundwater
Replenishment System, (Orange County), CA, Orange County
Water District (OCWD) /Orange County Sanitation District, 1997-
1999: Prepared planning and feasibility analysis for the GWR System.
Analyses included determining secondary effluent requirements for the
advanced water treatment plant from project inception through build -out,
financial analysis, developing preliminary pipeline alignments based on
utility conflicts, encroachment penirits and costs, preparing technical
memoranda and overseeing consultant's preparation of environmental
documents and planing and feasibility studies.
Lead Project Engineer, Recycled Water System Expansion, Long
Beach, CA, Long Beach Water Department (LBWD): During
preliminary design phase, developed pipeline alignments, completed
hydraulic model to size pipelines, pump stations and reservoirs and
prepared Preliminary Design Report. During final design phase, prepared
construction drawings and specifications for recycled water pipelines,
pump stations, chlorine contact tanks, and conversion of two potable
water reservoirs to recycled water.
Lead Project Engineer, Recycled Water Program, (Various Cities),
CA, West Basin Municipal Water District (WBMWD): Developed
pipeline alignments, prepared cost estimates, managed multiple contracts
with subconsultants and contractors, reviewed design of pipelines, pump
stations and water reclamation facilities prepared by other consulting
firms. Coordinated activities with consultants, subconsultants, State and
County Department of Health Services and prepared hydraulic model.
Also oversaw cross connection testing with State and County DHS.
Project Manager, Reclaimed Water Feasibility Study, Compton, CA,
Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD): Identified
potential reclaimed water users, developed pipeline alignments and
prepared feasibility report.
Lead Project Engineer, Recycled Water Program, Martinez, CA,
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD): Developed standard
pipeline drawings and specifications for recycled water facilities.
Design Engineer, Construction Plans and Specifications, Laguna
Niguel, CA, Moulton Niguel Water District (MNWD): Responsible
for preparation of construction plans and specifications for various
pipeline projects for MNWD. Design included 15,000 linear feet of 8 to
30 -inch potable water pipelines, 32,000 linear feet of 8 to 16 -inch
reclaimed water pipelines and 5,500 linear feet of 8 -inch gravity sewer
pipelines.
25F -71
Areas of Expertise
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
Spill Prevention and Countermeasures
Plans
OPA -90 Plans
Spill Training
TableTop Spill Exercises
Feasibility Studies and Remedial Action
Plans
Engineering Evaluation /Cost Analysis
(EE /CA) and Expedited
Removal /Remedial Actions
Installation and Operation of
Remediation Systems for Soil and
Groundwater
Site Assessments
Groundwater Studies and Solute
Transport Modeling
Wastewater Treatment Plants
RNiPP, PSM, and Waste Minimization
Plans
Project Management
Years of Experience
With URS: 15 Years
With Other Firms: 8 Years
Education
MS /Chemical Engineering /1987/
University of Kansas, Lawrence
MS /Petroleum Refining and
Petrochemical Engineering /1981 /
Institute of Petroleum and Gas
Registration /Certification
1994 /Registered Environmental
Assessor /CA
Tariq Hussain, R.E.A.
Principal -in- Charge
Overview
Mr. Hussain is a Vice President and Manager of the Water /Wastewater
Engineering Division for the URS Southern California operations. He has
been a consultant in the field of environmental and water /wastewater
engineering for over 26 years. Ile specializes in managing large multi-
disciplinary programs for private and public sector clients. His experience
in the field of water resources is expansive and diverse, such as developing
groundwater management models for aquifers that were under strain
because of excessive use based on water rights, or the economics of using
desalination as a water supply tool.
Project specific Experience
Project Manager, Turnkey Removal Action, Santa Ana, CA: The site
was involved in litigation; therefore, National Contingency Plan (NCP)
requirements were followed to prepare for and execute the Removal
Action. This included the preparation and regulatory approval of an
EE /CA prior to implementation. The Removal Action involved the
excavation, removal, and disposal of heavily contaminated soil from the
site. The Removal Action became necessary because the concentrations of
halogenated solvents in a portion of the site were posing an imminent
threat to groundwater.
Project Manager, Expedited Remedial Action Plan, Vernon, CA:
Managed the first Expedited Remedial Action Plan prepared under the
California SB -923 program. The site is the first to be selected under this
program.
Project Manager, Union Station Gateway Project, Los Angeles, CA,
Union Station: Participated in the preparation and implementation of an
EE /CA for a Removal Action for the Union Station Gateway Project.
The action became necessary when a former town gas site was
encountered during construction activities. The encountered soil was
heavily contaminants with PAHs, VOCs, and other contaminants
associated with town gas sites. Through the timely implementation of the
removal action plan, construction activities went ahead on schedule.
Project Manager, Feasibility Study for Federal Superfimd Site,
Various Cities in Southern California, CA: Extensive treatability
studies for waste, soil, groundwater, and NAPL. The feasibility of
excavating soil impacted with high concentrations of VOCs was also
evaluated for the site.
Project Manager, Large Remediation Project, Ontario, CA,
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC): Successfully
piloted the project through the regulatory process and obtained approval
of the Feasibility Study (FS), Remedial Action Plan (RAP), and Remedial
Design. The RAP, as approved by the DTSC, recommended soil vapor
extraction as the remedy for impacted soil. After a detailed pilot test to
obtain physical and operating parameters for the site, a full-scale soil
25F -72
Tariq Hussain, R.E.A.
vapor extraction system was installed at the site. The installed system has
been successfully operated for over one year and is meeting or exceeding
all project objectives.
Project Manages, Comprehensive Long -term Environmental Action Navy
(CLEAN) Program, Various Cities in Southern California, CA, Naval and
Marine Corps: This program, which is one of the largest DOD hazardous
waste management contracts to date, covers most of the Naval and
Marine Corps bases between Los Angeles and San Diego to the south and
the New Mexico border to the east. Projects include contamination
assessment, UST removal and site closure, site investigation, removal
action, solid waste assessment, design of soil and groundwater
remediation processes, and identification and evaluation of appropriate
technologies for soil and ground -water remediation.
Project Manager, Superfund Sites Study, Various Cities, U.S., Chevron:
Conducted a study of 30 Superfund sites nationwide and evaluated each
site in terms of Potentially Responsible Party participation, community
concerns, treatment technology selection process, implementation of the
remediation plan, agency reactions, and cost - analysis per ton of treated
waste. The purpose of the study that was conducted for Chevron was to
show trends in the Superfund process leading to site remediation. The
influence of each criterion on the remedy selection process was evaluated.
Project Manager, Industrial Site Feasibility Study, San Diego County, CA:
Responsible for the industrial site, which had groundwater contaminated
with halogenated solvents. Conducted a feasibility study and designed a
remediation system using a pump and treat system. The design included
the use of computer models to locate the optimum location of extraction
and injection wells. Evaluated different technologies, including carbon
absorption, air stripping, and peroxidation for treating contaminated
water. This remediation plan was approved by the San Diego Regional
Water Quality Control Board and implemented.
Project Manager, Hazardous Waste Minimization Study and Audit, San
Diego, CA, San Diego Gas &Electric: Completed a hazardous waste
minimization study, and audit for SDG &E facilities. Installation included
power plants, gas pipeline booster stations, service centers, and vehicle
maintenance shops. Also evaluated SDG &E's compliance with
California's SB -14 regulation. The project led to a comprehensive
understanding of the SDG &E operations.
Project Manager, RMPP Project /Fault Tree Analysis, San Bernardino
County, CA, San Bernardino County Health Department: Responsible for
an RMPP project involving handling and storing ammonia, chlorine,
sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and TDI. A Hazop study was conducted for the
equipment forming part of each chemical operation. In addition, a Fault
Tree Analysis was conducted using a maximum of two successive faults
that could lead to a release from the facility. The scenarios selected for
off -site consequence analysis were derived from the Fault Tree Analysis.
25F -73
Jun Wang, P.E.
25F -74
QA /QC
Overview
Mr. Wang has over 25 years of extensive water resources engineering and
management experience in the fields of hydrology, hydraulics, floodplain
management, drainage and flood control, storm drain system planning
and design, water conservation, sediment transport analysis, erosion and
sedimentation, stream restoration, water quality studies, bridge scour
evaluation, and floodplain mapping studies. He also has broad computer
modeling skills in hydrology, hydraulics, floodplain, sedimentation,
Areas of Expertise
dam /embankment failure, and flood detention.
Surface Water Hydrology /Hydraulics
project Specific Experience
Flood Control and Drainage Planning
and Engineering
Deputy Contract Manager /Task Manager, Civil Engineering for
Erosion and Sedimentation
Civil Works Projects IDIQ, Los Angeles, CA, U.S. Army Corps of
Bridge Hydraulics and Scour
Engineers: Responsible for the award and performance of 16 task orders
Evaluations
involving levee design, hydrology/ hydraulics modeling, habitat
Years of Experience
restoration design, waste water facilities, sea water desalination, and value
engineering. Example task orders include: Santa Maria Wash Levee Final
With URS: 5 Years
PS&B, Rio Salado Ecosystems Restoration, Los Angeles River Watershed II /h'
With Other Firms: 21 Years
Modeling, Santa Paula Creek Flood Coteml/Fish Passage Engineering and
Education
Permitting, Nogales Wash Flood Control Value Engineering, and Cambria Sea
MBA /Business Administration /1994/
Water Desalinalion.
California State University
Study Manager /Hydraulic Engineer, Santa Clara River Hydraulic
BS /Civil Engineering /1985 /Colorado
Modeling and Overflow Analyses, (Los Angeles /Ventura Counties),
State University
CA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Responsible for preparing
Registration /Certification
hydraulic models and floodplain maps of over 55 natural streams and
1997 /Professional Engineer /CA/
urban channels totaling over 300 stream miles. This study involved
C58362
extensive field inspections of the study reaches including more than 200
bridges and culverts. Overflow evaluations of these facilities using
HecGcoRAS captured a wide range of flood characteristics from 2- to
500 -year events.
Project Manager, Bus Canyon Channel Improvement Study, Simi
Valley, CA, County of Ventura Watershed Protection District:
Responsible for the alternative study and preliminary design of channel
improvements for the Bus Canyon and Bus Canyon Tributary in the City
of Simi Valley. The project involves developing multiple drainage
improvement alternatives including an upstream detention and channel
and bridge modifications to meet the 100 -year flood capacity.
Senior Advisor/ QA Manager, Drainage Planning and Engineering
for the Westside Subway Extension, Los Angeles, CA, LA
Metropolitan Transportation Authority: Provide technical guidance
and QA /QC for the development of drainage design plans for the
Advanced Conceptual Engineering and Preliminary Design phases of the
subway extension project in downtown Los Angeles.
Project Manager, Barrel Springs Wash Watershed Hydrologic Study
and Drainage Plan, Palmdale, CA, City of Palmdale: Responsible for
25F -74
Jun Wang, P.E.
conducting a watershed stream -basin network modeling of Barrel Springs
Wash in the City of Palmdale following the Los Angeles County
hydrology procedure to determine the peak flow rates as well as the flood
hydrographs of the design event.
Project Manager, Amargosa Creels Hydraulics/ Sediment Transport
Study and Channel Improvement Design, Palmdale, CA, City of
Palmdale: Responsible for directing and performing channel hydraulics
and sediment transport analyses to develop the basis of the channel
improvement design for an over one mile long soil cement channel in the
City of Palmdale. The study involved detailed hydraulic analysis of the
river system using Hec -Ras and sediment transport modeling using Hec -6
under a range of storm events to determine the extent of scour/
deposition in the channel to facilitate the preparation of channel
improvement plans.
Project Manager, Prince Barranca Channel Improvement Design,
Ventura, CA, County of Ventura: Responsible for the on -going
preliminary design of a flood detention basin facility in the City of
Ventura. The project involved developing multiple drainage improvement
alternatives including an upstream detention for the existing Prince
Barranca Channel which is currently unable to carry the 100 -year flood.
The project involved hydrology, hydraulics, sediment yield analysis, and a
30% completion design of the basin facility. Flood damage analysis and
benefit /cost ratios were also developed to justify the flood detention
project.
Project Manager, FEMA Letter of Map Revision Study of Amatgosa
Creek, Palmdale, CA, City of Pahndale Public Works: Responsible
for developing the 100 -year floodplain map of Amargosa Creek and
coordinating with FEMA to obtain the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
The work was done for the Public Works Department of City of
Palmdale. The floodplain map was prepared based upon a Hec -Ras
analysis of the river's study reach and digitally using GIS -based
topographic information. Both FEMA standard base map and annotated
revised Flood Insurance Rate Map were created. The LOMR was issued
by FEMA within one and half months from the date of submittal.
Project Engineer, Drainage Study, Viejas Indian Reservation, CA,
Viejas Indian Tribe: In charge of conducting a drainage evaluation of
Viejas Indian Tribe including a floodplain analysis of Viejas Creek
through development of a rainfall runoff model using GeoHMS to
determine the 100 -year flood peaks and a HECRAS model to simulate the
vertical and horizontal profiles of the 100 -year flood event. The study also
evaluated the design adequacy of number of major drainage structures and
developed alternative solutions to improve the flood conveyance
conditions of these facilities.
25F -75
Areas of Expertise
Hydrologic Analyses
Hydraulic Analyses
Conceptual Design
Drainage Design
Alluvial Fan Analyses
Floodplain Delineation
Scour Analyses
Dam Breach Analyses
Years of Experience
With URS: >9 Years
With Other Firms: >3 Years
Education
BS /Environmental Engineering /2001 /
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Registration /Certification
Professional Civil Engineer /CA/
Jimmy J.M. Medellin, P.E.
Hydraulics Engineering
Overview
Mr. Medellin is a Senior Water Resources Engineer in the URS Water/
Wastewater practice. He has over 13 years of experience in the fields of
hydrology and hydraulics, and has completed flood hazard analysis of
numerous project areas requiring this analysis as a prerequisite to
development of subdivisions. His role in flood hazard analysis includes
stochastic analysis of alluvial fans, 2- dimensional modeling using FLO-
2D, scour analysis, and hydraulic analysis of flood control channels. His
additional project experience involves drainage design and surface
modeling. A partial listing of his prior project experience includes
awareness floodplain mapping for the California Department of Water
Resources, and stormwater drainage system design and stormwater best
management practices (BMP) design for the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans). He has experience working with HEC -RAS,
HEC -1, HEC -HMS, WSPGW, HEC- GeoRAS, HEC- GcoHMS,
Autodesk Civil 3D /AutoCAD, AES, Microstation, ArcView 3.3, ArcGIS
93, PondPack, and StormCAD.
Project Specific Experience
Senior Engineer, LAX Runway 61,2411 Safety Area and
Rehabilitation, Los Angeles, CA, Los Angeles World Airports, 2014:
Responsible for analyzing the pre- and post - development hydrologic and
hydraulic characteristics and evaluate the possible impacts to the existing
airport drainage system within the project area, including increased runoff
potential for project conditions. Performed one - dimensional hydraulic
analysis for box culvert extension within Argo Channel and designed
outlet protection.
77250
Senior Engineer /Engineer -of- Records, Chatsworth Park South,
Chatsworth, CA, City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and
Parks, 2013 - Present: Responsible for surface drainage component of
park redevelopment. The primary objective of this project was to develop
and implement a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and improve surface
drainage of the site. Implemented several best management practices
including drainage improvements such as perimeter bio- swales to
minimize the potential for migration of sub - surface contaminates through
surface water, a network of detention basins to trap sediment and
modulate offsite surface water discharge, as well of design of several cross
culverts.
Senior Engineer, Vail Dam Seismic and Hydrologic Deficiency
Evaluation, Riverside County, CA, Rancho California Water
District, 2013 -2014: Completed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for
existing arch dam of Vail Lake. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses
included calculating the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF), routing the
flood through the reservoir via the existing spillways, overseeing the dam
break analysis, and providing remedial measures for the dam.
25F -76
Jimmy J.M. Medellin, P.E.
Senior Engineer, Stonybrook Lane Storm Drain, Orange County,
CA, Orange County Public Works, 2012: Completed a hydrology and
hydraulic analyses to determine the hydraulic impacts the addition of a
proposed Stonybrook Lane system storm drain would have on the
existing Ball Road storm drain system. The project included updates to
the hydrology and hydraulic models developed for the Master Plan of
Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area (Sept., 2010).
Deliverable to the client included a letter report, and updated hydrology
and hydraulic models.
Senior Engineer, I -710 EIR /EIS, Los Angeles County, CA, Los
Angeles County Metro, 2010 - Present: Developed one- dvnensional
hydraulic models of the Los Angeles River to analyze the potential
hydraulic impacts of possible improvement alternatives for I -710. The
results of the hydraulic study were compared to water surface elevations
of the effective HEC -RAS model for the Los Angeles River developed by
the US Army Corps of Engineers. Alternatives focused on relocation of
DWP transmission facilities and encroachment onto the Los Angeles
River.
Senior Engineer, Pier G Berths G230 -G236 Terminal
Redevelopment, Long Beach, CA, Port of Long Beach, 2010 -
Present: Responsible for storm drain and sewer lines. Project scope
included the construction of new wharfs and redevelopment of bacldands
areas within Pier G. Design of new utilities was based on a master plan
approach for the ultimate condition of Pier G.
Senior Engineer, P -063 Design Build Marine Reserve Training
Center, Seal Beach, CA, RMA Land Construction, 2010 -2011:
Prepared storm drain design and Low Impact Development (LID) design
for new Marine Reserve Training Center. Site features concrete parking
lot expansion, POV parking lot, roadway extensions, sidewalks, and
landscaping. Stormwatex best management practices (131N1P) design
included bioretention basins to treat water quality volume and attenuate
peak flood flows. Other BMPs to be used at the site include bioretention
strips and bioswales. BMP design was deemed a project priority due to
emphasis of design -build process to minimize environmental impacts.
Senior Engineer, Durfee Avenue Grade Separation, Pico Rivera, CA,
Alameda Corridor — East Construction Authority (ACE), 2012 -
Present: Responsible for drainage design in support of grade separation
at Durfee Avenue. The purpose of the grade separation project is to
alleviate the current and potential traffic impacts and hazards posed by the
existing at -grade rail crossing. Task involved hydrology and hydraulic
analysis of existing and proposed storm drain system. Proposed storm
drain improvements included re- alignment of existing storm drain and a
new pump station.
25F -77
Project Engineer, Investigation and Characterization of Alluvial
Borrow for the Diamond Valley Lake, (Riverside County), CA,
County of Riverside: Responsible for the investigation of over 50
million cubic yards of alluvial borrow material for three earthcore rockfill
dams. Oversaw the field drilling and sampling program, as well as the
laboratory testing program.
Staff Engineer, Design and Construction of Day Dam, San
Bernardino County, CA: Participated in the geotechnical investigation
for the design of the embankment dam. Also participated in test fills and
material testing during construction.
25F -78
Michael G. Smith, P.E., G.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
Overview
Mr. Smith has over 29 years of experience in geotechnical, foundation,
dams, and earthquake engineering. His experience includes a wide range
of projects including reservoirs, dams, power plants, pipelines, airports,
Caltrans projects, commercial developments, and municipal buildings.
Project Specific Experience
Lead Geotechnical Engineer, SR -91 Design - Build, Corona, CA,
Areas of Expertise
Riverside County Transportation Commission, 2012 -2014, $627M:
Geotechnical, Foundation Engineering
The project includes 12 miles of freeway widening to convert one HOV
Dams, and Earthquake Engineering
Lanes in each direction into two Toll Express Lanes and includes 32
Years of Experience
bridges, traffic design, geotechnical investigations, soundwall design,
utility relocations, and drainage and water quality design. Mr. Smith is the
With URS: 29 Years
geotechnical design lead.
With Other Firms: 1 Year
Education
Lead Geotechnical Engineer, I -15/I -215 Interchange (Devote)
Design - Build, San Bernardino County CA, Caltrans, 2012 -2013,
MS /Geotechnical Engineering /1986/
$208M: A complete reconfiguration of the interchange to provide route
University of California, Berkeley
continuity and truck bypass lanes for I45 traffic.
BS /Civil Engineering /1984 /University
of California, Berkeley
Geotechnical Task Manager, I -710 Corridor, (Los Angeles County),
CA, County of Los Angeles: Preparing geotechnical information
Registration /Certification
reports, materials reports and preliminary geotechnical reports for over 80
1987 /Professional Civil Engineer /CA/
bridges along the study corridor.
C42978
1993 /Professional Geotechnical
Geotechnical Task Order Manager, SR -215 Soundwalis and
Engineer /CA/2229
Retaining Walls, Grand Terrace, CA, Caltrans District 8: Responsible
for performing a geotechnical investigation and preparing a foundation
report for Caltrans District 8 for 710 meters of soundwalls and 150
meters of soundwalls on retaining walls along SR -215.
Project Manager, Geotechnical Investigation for Two Grade
Separation Projects, Pomona, CA, City of Pomona: The projects
involved lowering East End Avenue and Reservoir Street to pass beneath
two heavily used railroad tracks and city streets. Dual -span bridges will
support the railroad tracks, and a separate single -span bridge will support
the street.
Project Engineer, Investigation and Characterization of Alluvial
Borrow for the Diamond Valley Lake, (Riverside County), CA,
County of Riverside: Responsible for the investigation of over 50
million cubic yards of alluvial borrow material for three earthcore rockfill
dams. Oversaw the field drilling and sampling program, as well as the
laboratory testing program.
Staff Engineer, Design and Construction of Day Dam, San
Bernardino County, CA: Participated in the geotechnical investigation
for the design of the embankment dam. Also participated in test fills and
material testing during construction.
25F -78
Michael G. Smith, P.E., G.E.
Project Engineer, Cajalco Creek Dam and Detention Basin,
Riverside County, CA: Prepared alternative designs for mitigating
dewatering problems during the construction of the 46 -foot high earthfill
embankment. Prepared draft specifications and drawings for stone
column foundation improvement and soil- bentonite and cement -
bentonite cutoff wall alternatives.
Project Engineer, San Joaquin Dam Monitoring and Inspection,
Irvine, CA, Irvine Ranch Water District: Performed safety inspections
of the San Joaquin Dam and Reservoir in the company of the DSOD
inspector. The dam is a 224 -foot high, zoned earth- rockfill embankment
with a crest length of 873 feet.
Project Geotechnical Engineer, Flow Control Facility and Zone 3 to
4 Booster Pump Station, Irvine, CA, IRWD: Performed a geotechnical
investigation for the flow control facility and booster pump station. The
investigation consisted of soil borings, geotechnical laboratory testing,
foundation recommendations and geotechnical report.
25F -79
Areas of Expertise
Civil Engineering
Climate Change Adaptation
Drainage Design
Environmental Engineering
Green Infrastructure /LID
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis
_ _ _ Stormwater_Quality Management
Stormwater Permitting
Sustainability Rating Systems
Total Water Management Planning
Water /Wastewater Treatment
Years of Experience
With URS: 1.5 Years
With Other Firms: 6 Years
Education
MS /Civil and Environmental
Engineering /2009 /Stanford University
BS /Civil Engineering /2007/
Northeastern University
BS /Env ronrnental Geology /2007/
Northeastern University
Registration /Certifi cat! on
2011 /Professional Engineer in Civil
Engineering /CA/ C77953
2012 /LEED ®Accredited Professional
with a Neighborhood Development
specialty/ 10492874 -AP -ND
2013 /National Council of Examiners
for Engineering and Surveying Record,
Model Law Engineer/ 52195
2013 /Envision"m Sustainability
Professional
2014 /Qualified Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan Developer/
Practitioner/CA/24821
Nathan Chase, P.E., LEED° A.P. N.D., ENV.
S.P., Q.S.D.
Civil Engineer
Overview
Mt. Chase is a registered Civil Engineer with over seven years of
experience in civil and environmental engineering, design, and planning
for water, wastewater, and stormwater projects. He has performed
technical design and planning on a wide range of projects including
reservoirs, detention basins, pump stations, drinking water wells,
blackwater and graywater treatment, rainwater harvesting, stormwater
management, bridge /highway /rail /site drainage, site development,
hydraulic & hydrologic modeling, LEEDO ccrtification, and climate
change adaptation. He is experienced in specialized software applications,
including Autodesk (AutoCAD, Civil 3D, Storm and Sanitary Analysis,
Hydraflow Storm Sewers), Bentley (MicroStation, F1owMaster, InRoads,
PondPack), Esri (ArcGIS and AreHydro), US Army Corps of Engineers
(HEC -RAS, GeoRAS, HEC -HMS, GeoIIMS), and Microsoft (Office
Suite and Project).
Project- Specific Experience
Project Engineer, Shadow Rock Detention Basin Urban Water
Recovery, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, Trabuco Canyon Water
District, 2013 -2014, $402K: Responsible for performing hydrologic and
hydraulic analyses for the tributary watersheds to Shadow Rock Detention
Basin for the 2 -year and 100 -year return period design storms using the
Advanced Engineering Software package (AES). The analyses included
watershed delineation, rational method modeling, hydrograph
development, and basin routing of the selected design storms. Also
responsible for pump selection calculations and design for a low flow 80
gpm pump and a high flow 215 gpm pump to convey water from the
detention basin to a reservoir in the District's reclaimed water supply
system.
Project Engineer, Orange Park Acres Well No. 1 Wellhead
Facilities, Orange, CA, Irvine Ranch Water District, 2013 -2014,
$5.2M: Responsible for site civil engineering, pump selection and design
for a 2,000 gpm groundwater well, booster pump, and chloramine
disinfection facility that will supply treated groundwater to the Orange
Park Acres service area to meet domestic water demands. The pump
building and calculations were designed to accommodate a future
doubling of the production capacity to 4,000 gpm upon addition of a
second supply well. Developed engineers estimate of probable costs.
Prepared permitting documents and coordinated to obtain approvals from
Orange City Fife Department and City of Orange Water Department.
Project Engineer, Ttampas Lake Reservoir and Dam, Orange
County, CA, Rancho Mission Viejo, 2013 -2014, $51M: Responsible for
preparing plans, reports, design calculations, and construction cost
estimates for converting an existing tailings storage dam to a recycled
S:A] UtKr.fNGAQ, of Sunm Anx Ddhi Di.eulaaAResume \FaiennttedA07 Chnsq Mflun CityofSanmdnaDelhiU'mevsion.d-
25F-80 1
Nathan Chase, P.E., LEED® A.P. N.D., ENV. S.P., Q.S.D.
water reservoir for Rancho Mission Viejo that would connect to Santa
Margarita Water District's infrastructure, including the Chiquita Water
Reclamation Plant. Coordinated field investigations and interdisciplinary
design groups to develop conceptual design alternatives for 3,000 acre -
feet and 5,000 acre -feet reservoir options, including associated
improvements to the existing dam and site.
Project Engineer, Durfee Avenue Grade Separation, Pico Rivera,
CA, Alameda Corridor -East Construction Authority, 2013 -2014,
$73.6M: Responsible for preparing the Standard Urban Stormwater
Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for the grade separation project at the junction
of Durfee Avenue and the Union Pacific Railroad in the City of Pico
Rivera, Los Angeles County. Designed stormwater best management
practices (BMPs), including a dry detention basin using Autodesk
AutoCAD Civil 3D.
Project Engineer, Transfer Station Cover Structure and Site
Improvements, Inglewood, CA, City of Inglewood Public Works,
2014: Responsible for site civil design and stormwater permitting to
obtain a no exposure certification from the State Water Quality Board via
retrofits at an open -air waste transfer station in the City of Inglewood.
Coordinated a multidisciplinary design team, including architecture,
structural engineering, electrical engineering, solar energy design,
sustainability / LEED® design, and cost estimating. Led coordination
efforts with City departments, including Buildings, Planning, and Public
Works.
Project Engineer, BNSF /UPRR Mojave Subdivision Tehachapi
Rail Improvement, Fern County, CA, Union Pacific Railroad, 2014:
Responsible for preparing the Project Registration Documents and
construction general permit SWPPP for two rail segments, including a
0.37 -mile siding extension and a 1.01 -mile addition of a second track.
Project Engineer, Orange County Great Park, Irvine, CA, City of
Irvine, 2014: Responsible for updating the master construction general
permit SWPPP for the Orange County Great Park and overseeing its
implementation, including conducting quarterly stormwater inspections.
Project Engineer, Northam Station Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan, La Mirada, CA, Chevron Environmental
Management Company, 2013 -2014: Responsible for preparing and
implementing the Project Registration Documents and construction
general permit SWPPP for structure demolition, underground pipeline
and utility removals, soil remedial actions, excavations, and backfill,
compaction, and grading phases of work at a 23 -acre former crude oil and
hydrocarbon fuel storage and pumping station. Conducted weekly site
inspections and storm event inspections, communicating required follow -
up actions to the contractor and owner.
25F -81
Lead Project Engineer, Hydraulic and Hydrology Analysis for C -44
Reservoir /STA, Martin County, FL, County of Martin: Responsible
for C -44 Reservoir and Storm Water Treatment Area project system
hydraulic analysis. C -44 Reservoir and Storm Water Treatment Area
project located on approximately 12,000 acres of land located in southern
Martin County. The project supports the goals and objectives of
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. The overall plan calls for
the implementation of more than sixty projects over a period of thirty
years and will cost an estimated 10.9 billion dollars. The project will
capture excess surface water runoff that flows to the Atlantic Ocean and
Gulf of Mexico and re- directing it to a series of impoundments for
storage and treatment. Duties included leading the system hydraulic and
hydrology analysis during the 30 %, 60% and 90% design. Served as
process engineer and designed all hydraulic components including
spillway, pump station, intake and other hydraulic structures.
Hydrauhc /hydrology model was completed using EPA SWMM 5.0.
25F -82
Joseph Zhao, PhD, P.E.
Civil Engineering
Overview
Dr. Zhao has extensive experience in hydraulic and hydrology modeling in
particular in areas of watershed hydraulic and hydrology study, drinking
water and sewer master plan, water distribution system and wastewater
collection system modeling and transient analysis and system hydraulic
evaluation and optimization for water and wastewater treatment plant. He
is currently a member in AW WA Water Distribution System Standard
committee. Joseph is proficient in following modeling programs including
Areas of Expertise
EPA SWMM, FLO -21), HEC -RAS, Bentley, MWH, DHI, KYPipe and
Advanced Water Treatment
EPANET.
Technology
H &H Modeling
Project Specific Experience
Years of Experience
Project Engineer, Westminster Watershed Feasibility Study and
Integrated EA /EIR, Orange County, CA, USACE Los Angeles
With URS: >5 Years
District- Planning Division: Provided hydraulic and flood routing
With Other Firms: 13 Years
analyses for the expanded project study area of approximately 23.6 square
Education
miles including Haster Basin, the tributary areas upstream of Haster Basin;
PhD /2004 /Environmental
the lower reaches of the CO2 Channel System downstream of the
Engineering /University of Central
confluence point of CO2/C04 and the Outer Bolsa Bay from Warner
Florida
Avenue to the Tidal Gates located at the Terminus of C05. Performed
MS /1997 /Environmental
floodplain analyses using HEC -RAS and FLO -21) for varying storm -
Engineering /Tongji University
events as prescribed by the USAGE. Hydraulic and hydrology evaluation
BS /1994 /Environmental Engineering/
focused on various storm -water events from 5 to 500 -year return period,
Tongji University
and their impacts along the channel right of ways, and potential
downstream effects to Bolsa Bay, resulting from increased volumes and
Registration /Certification
velocity of storm water. FLO -2D model was developed using the GDS to
Professional Engineer /FL/63109
process the DEM, a 300- by 300 -ft and a 100- by I00 -ft grid element
Professional Engineer /CA/79329
systems were developed for the study area. The model included elements
including storm water retention ponds, pump stations, channel, bridges,
box culverts, overflow weir and tidal gates.
Lead Project Engineer, Hydraulic and Hydrology Analysis for C -44
Reservoir /STA, Martin County, FL, County of Martin: Responsible
for C -44 Reservoir and Storm Water Treatment Area project system
hydraulic analysis. C -44 Reservoir and Storm Water Treatment Area
project located on approximately 12,000 acres of land located in southern
Martin County. The project supports the goals and objectives of
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. The overall plan calls for
the implementation of more than sixty projects over a period of thirty
years and will cost an estimated 10.9 billion dollars. The project will
capture excess surface water runoff that flows to the Atlantic Ocean and
Gulf of Mexico and re- directing it to a series of impoundments for
storage and treatment. Duties included leading the system hydraulic and
hydrology analysis during the 30 %, 60% and 90% design. Served as
process engineer and designed all hydraulic components including
spillway, pump station, intake and other hydraulic structures.
Hydrauhc /hydrology model was completed using EPA SWMM 5.0.
25F -82
Joseph Zhao, PhD, P.E.
Long Beach Generation Station Wastewater Treatment Plant, Long
Beach, CA, 2012 -2013, $1M: Responsible for the 1.2 mgd wastewater
treatment plant improvement projects at LBGS, including new VFD
forwarding pump station, addition of 40,OOO1b granular activated carbon
and 3,000 gallon ion exchange system. Following completion of hydraulics
and process evaluation and preliminary design report, completed 30 %,
90 %, 100% design, permitting and then bid. Project is currently under
construction.
Project Engineer, Design Engineering Services for the Treatment
Plant Optimization of the Horace P. HincIdey Water Treatment
Plant, Redlands, CA, 2012,$12M: Prepared 90% and 100% plan,
specification and bid package. The project is to expand the existing
treatment processes at Hinckley from 10 mgd capacity to 14.5 mgd.
Lead Project Engineer, Water Master Plan Update and Water
Distribution System Modeling, Redlands, CA, City of Redlands:
Responsible for development of water distribution system hydraulic
modeling for City of Redlands's complex water system, including
extensive model dynamic calibration and simulation of water quality and
blending for different and sources and pressure zones.
Lead Project Engineer, Water Distribution System Modeling and
IDSE Study, Tiffin, OH, City of Tiffin: Responsible for performing
IDSE study for City of Tiffin water distribution system. Calibrated the
hydraulic model and performed EPS water quality simulation. Successfully
submitted EPA IDSE filing.
Project Engineer, Hydraulic Model Update of Pier G, Long Beach,
CA, Port of Long Beach (POLB): Responsible for the Port of Long
Beach Pier G Development hydraulic modeling. Modeling efforts
included demand analysis and allocation for the average day demand,
maximum day demand, peak hour demand and fire flow analysis.
Lead Project Engineer, Hydraulic Modeling and System Evaluation
for City of Norfolk, VA: Responsible for performing hydraulic modeling
and pumping schedule optimization at the two treatment plants and the
two ground storage tanks with associated pump stations and two elevated
water storage tanks. Hydraulic modeling analysis included WTP, tank
operation and master meter SCADA data analysis, Extended Period
Simulation and multiple scenario comparison.
Lead Project Engineer, Alternative Water Supply Study, Hydraulic
Modeling, Bay County, FL, Bay County: Responsible for performing
surge and hydraulic analysis using Bentley's Hammer and WaterGEMS
program.
25F -83
25F -84
Jennifer Ziv
Environmental
Overview
Ms. Ziv is a Senior Environmental Planner with over 24 years of
experience in environmental consulting, specializing in planning,
environmental impact analysis and California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) documentation for public and private sector clients in Southern
California, with an specialty in water resource - related projects. She also
has experience in Clean Water Act Section 404 and 401 compliance and
NPDES stormwater permit compliance.
Areas of Expertise
CEQA /NEPA Documentation
Project Specific Experience
Clean Water Act Compliance
Project Manager, Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Rose and
NPDES Storm Water Permitting
Lang Wells Water Treatment Facilities Upgrade, Trabuco Canyon
Watershed Planning
Water District, Orange County, CA: Managed preparation of the
Years of Experience
CEQA MND for water treatment facility upgrades for two District -
owned groundwater wells. Additional treatment was required by Calif.
With URS: 16 Years
Dept. of Public Health (DPH) to meet requirements of EPA's Surface
With Other Firms: 8 Years
Water Treatment Rule. Environmental analysis focused on biological
Education
resources of adjacent'rrabuco Creek, visual effects to surrounding land
MS /Water Resource Management/
uses, and construction traffic and noise impacts. The MND met all DPH
1992 /University of Wisconsin,
requirements, including NEPA -like analysis for federal issues, which
Madison
helped the District secure loans to construct the project.
BA /Environmental Science /1986/
Project Manager, Orange County Great Park, (OCGP), On -Call
University of California, Berkeley
Environmental Services - Irvine, CA: Providing environmental and
planning support services to the OCGP /City of Irvine staff on regulatory
permitting, environmental remediation reviews, and compliance issues
including third party CEQA reviews; EIR mitigation monitoring and
regulatory permit compliance tracking, and technical support related to
OCGP's Clean Water Act Section 404 perniits, 401 water quality
certifications, and California Fish and Game Code Section 1600
strearnbed alteration agreements and Habitat Mitigation Monitoring Plan
for the Agin, Chinon Creels Corridor.
Project Manager, Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard Residential
Development. City of Santa Ana Planning Department. Santa Ana,
CA: URS prepared a focused FIR for a proposed single - family residential
subdivision located on a property with historically significant cultural
resources in Santa Ana. URS worked with the City to analyze a range of
project alternatives to help address community concerns over
preservation of the historic resources. For the Final EIR, Ms. Ziv and the
URS team worked with the City to prepare and respond with concise and
accurate responses to public comments utilizing URS' in -house experts on
Cultural Resources. A historical preservation alternative that reduced
significant impacts was adopted by the City Council, and the Final EIR
was certified in March 2014.
Project Manager, Third Party Review for EIR Irvine GPA /ZC for
PA17 and 33, City of Irvine Community Planning Department
25F -84
Jennifer Ziv
Irvine, CA: Provided thud parry review of the FIR for the Irvine
Company's proposed 1,660,000 square foot office campus development
project requiring a density transfer from PA 33 to PA 17 in the City of
Irvine. Major issues include traffic and access, air quality, views /aesthetics.
Project Manager, San Diego Creek Watershed Special Area
Management Plan (SAMP) Programmatic EIS /EIR, (Orange
County), CA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Los Angeles District
Regulatory Division: Under the direction of the Corps of Engineers and
Calif. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife for preparation of the Programmatic
EIR /EIS for the San Diego Creek Watershed SAMP and Water
Streambed Alteration Agreement (WSAA) Process. The SAMP /WSAA is
watershed- specific permit program for regulated discharges into Waters of
the US and State under Clean Water Act Section 404 and California
Department of Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq. The SAMP also
includes a Strategic Mitigation Plan and Mitigation Coordination Program
that will comprehensively help restore and improve ecosystem integrity in
the watershed overall. Participating applicants included The Irvine
Company, County of Orange, City of Irvine, Irvine Ranch Water District.
Project Manager, MND for Drainage Area Management Plan
(DAMP), (Orange County), CA, County of Orange Planning
Development Services: Responsible for County of Orange, Planning
Development Services Department to prepare a Negative Declaration on
the County's 2003 DAMP in accordance with CEQA.
Assistant Project Manager, Wetlands Water Supply Project EIR,
(Orange County), CA, Irvine Ranch Water District: Managed
preparation of Wetlands Water Supply Project EIR. Project involved the
use of a wetland pond system for the advanced treatment of 5 million
gallons per day of reclaimed water from IRWD's Michelson Water
Reclamation Plant Under an NPDES permit, the treated wastewater
would be discharged to San Diego Creek after final nitrogen removal in
the ponds. Major environmental issues included water quality and
biological resource protection of San Diego Creek and Newport Bay.
Assistant Project Manager, MND for Alamitos Barrier Reclaimed
Water Project, (Los Angeles County), CA, Water Replenishment
District of Southern California: Managed the preparation of the MND.
Project involved the substitution of tertiary- treated reclaimed water for
potable water for injection into the Alamitos Barrier project to prevent
seawater intrusion of the groundwater basin. Study focused on effects of
brine discharge to water quality and biological resources of the San
Gabriel River and water quality effects of the reclaimed water on the local
groundwater basins.
Technical /Regulatory Support - Water Management Plan (WMP),
OCGP, Irvine, CA: Provided regulatory support on storm water permit
compliance issues and water quality analysis support to URS' lead
engineer to prepare a WMP for build -out of the Great Park. The WMP
addresses storm water storage and reuse of Park storm water runoff to
comply with the municipal storm water permit requirements for low
impact development (LID) and help reduce Park costs for irrigation.
25F -85
Mr. del Castillo has over 47 years of experience in managing both field and office operations for all phases of
surveying and mapping services. He has managed 30 "On -Call' contracts directly for the support of many
federal, state, and local agencies. These contracts include the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange, the U.S.
Forest Service, various U,S. Army Corps of Engineer Districts, the U.S. Navy - Southwest Division, and the
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Water District (MWD).
He has a "hands -on" working knowledge of various land surveying services, including Right -of -Way and
boundary surveys and analysis, GPS surveys, topographic surveys, utility location surveys, large -scale aerial,
and geodetic control and monitoring quantities. While working directly for the County of Orange, Mr. del
Castillo was responsible for all boundary surveys, first order / second order vertical and horizontal control
surveys, photogrammetric mapping, control surveys and centerline surveys.
1QX q1;;1 IH?
Central Basin Municipal Water District - 2002 to 2007, as
Survey Manager. Work consisted of Construction surveys,
topographic surveys, aerial mapping, boundary surveys, legal
descriptions and plats. Projects sites were: Central Basin Water
Quality Priority Plan, Central Basin Waterline, Raw Water
Collector Pipeline, Vernon Booster Pump Station, Hollydale
Pump Station and Cal State University Dominguez Hills. Projects
were completed on -time and within budget. Reference: Veronica
Govea, CBMWD, 62652 Telegraph Rd, Commerce, CA 90040,
(323) 201 -5500, veronica awcbwater.org. $45K in Project Fees.
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Echo Park
Lake Rehabilitation Project - 2008, as Survey Manager. Work
consisted of control point survey, aerial photogrammetric
mapping, topographic survey of the entire park area, bathymetric
survey of the lake bottom, Right -of -Way mapping, locate plume
monitoring wells, review Preliminary Title Reports and plot
easements, Work performed under Black & Veatch for the City of
Los Angeles. $141 K in fees. Reference: Michelle Ma, PE, Black
& Veatch Corp, (213) 312 -3348, fax (213) 312 -3399,
mamm@bv.com.
City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Penmar
Water Quality Improvement Project - 2008, as Survey Manger.
Work consisted of a topographic, boundary survey, GPS, digital
levels, and ALTA survey. $72K in fees. Reference: Scott
Dellinger, PE, Brown & Caldwell, (213) 271 -2300, fax (213) 271-
2320, sdellingerna,brwncald.com.
COAST SURVEYING, INC. Ruel del Castillo
25F -86
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California - 2004 to
2008, as Survey Manager. On -Call Surveying and Mapping
Services Contract. Work consisted of: boundary surveys,
topographic surveys, Record of Surveys, monument preservation,
control surveys, and review of title reports. Project was completed
on -time and within budget. 29 separate Tasks Orders were
performed for Pushawalla #1 and 2, Eagle Mtn, Copper Basin,
Iron Mtn, Gene Camp, Vidal Jct, West of Needles, Needles -
Parker #1, 2, 3, and 4, Needles Boulder #1 and 2, Nevada
Boulder #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Big Morongo Aggregate, Orange
Park Acres, South Gate, Soto St, Merrimac Dr, Chamber Wells
Rd, Twin Lode Aggregate, Review Title Policies, and Road
Encroachment. Reference: Michael Duffy, PLS, Team Manager of
Survey Mapping, MWD, 700 Moreno Ave, La Verne, CA 91750,
(909) 392 -2539, mduffy�@mwdh2O.com. $975K in Project Fees,
Yorba Linda Water District - 2008 to 2009, as Survey Manager.
On -Call Surveying and Mapping Services Contract. Work
consisted of: Construction surveys, topographic surveys,
boundary surveys, legal descriptions and plats. 4 separate Tasks
Orders were performed at: Highland Reservoir, Highland Booster
Pump Station, Hidden Hills Reservoir and Savi Ranch
Annexation. Project was completed on -time and within budget.
Reference: Steve Conklin, YLWD, 913 S. Richfield Rd, Placentia,
CA 92870, (714) 701 -3106, sconklin(@.ylwd.com. $21K in Project
Fees.
Moulton Niguel Water District: 2008 to 2010, as Survey
Manger. On -Call Surveying and Mapping Services Contract. Work
consisted of: Aerial mapping, boundary surveys, legal
descriptions and plats. 3 separate Task Orders were performed
at: Rancho Reservoir, Mission Viejo Country Club and La Paz
Reservoir. Tasks were completed on -time and within budget.
Reference: Matt Collings, Moulton Niguel Water District, 26161
Gordon Road, Laguna Hills, CA 92653, (949) 425 -3552,
mcollings(u7mnwd.com. $14K in Project Fees.
City of Lake Forest - Alton Parkway Commercentre to Town
Center Project through AECOM - 2011, as Survey Manager.
Work consists of As- Needed Construction Management Survey
Support Services. This includes surveying, computing all final
construction quantities for mass grading, check line and grade
staking of critical items. Reference: Regina Talamantez, AECOM,
(714) 567 -2414, fax (714) 689 -7349,
Reg in a.Talamantez @aecom.com.
COAST SURVEYING, INC. Ruel del Castillo 2
25F -87
Areas of Expertise
Steel
Concrete
Wood
Masonry
Buildings
Industrial Structures
Tanks and Tank Foundations
Support Systems for Vessels and
Equipment
Building Design Analysis (Occupancy
and Access)
Hazardous Occupancy Design
Permitting
Years of Experience
With URS: <1 Year
With Other Firms: 20 Years
Education
BS /Architectural Engineering/ 1988/
University of Colorado
Registration /Certification
Professional Civil Engineer /CA/50171
Professional Civil Engineer /TX/
101622
Professional Civil Engineer /NV/
12411
Professional Civil Engineer /MO/
30411
Timothy Gutkowski, P.E.
Structural Engineering
Overview
Mr. Gutkowski has more than 20 years of civil /structural design
experience that includes industrial, commercial, environmental and civil
site development projects. Tim has spent the last fifteen years in the roles
of lead engineer and civil /structural department manager.
Past projects have included work on waste water separation systems for
industrial facilities and commercial site developments. Certain projects
have included design and permitting of storm water connections to major
storm water conduits in the Los Angeles basin. Tim also has extensive
experience related to the design of building structures: steel flame,
concrete, and other building types.
His past experience includes work on projects requiring compliance with
regulatory agencies. Previous permitting experience includes work with
Los Angeles and Orange County Flood Control Districts, Cities of
Newport Beach, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana and the Regional Water
Control Board.
Project Specific Experience
Civil Lead, Storm Water /Process Water Segregation System, Los
Angeles, CA, ConocoPhillips Lube Oil Production Facility, 1996:
Responsible for the design of the storm water management system at the
Conoco /Phillips Lube Oil Processing facility. The Unocal site is provided
with drain systems designed to handle both process wastes and storm
water. Over time the process and storm water drain systems had been
interconnected. Only one separator was provided for both waste streams
which discharged to the County of LA storm collection facilities. The
objective of the project was to determine where the systems were
interconnected and segregate the waste streams into two independent
systems. The existiig separator was repurposed for process water
separation and the discharge connected to the LACSD facilities. Storm
water from the site was segregated and processed through a new storm
water separator.
Civil Lead, Equipment Storage Area: SCE ROW Adjacent to Peters
Canyon Creek, Irvine, CA, Waste Management, 1998: Responsible
design of paved parking area in the SCE ROW along on the west side of
Peters Canyon Creek. Engineering design included storm drain discharge
to the flood control channel requiring review and approval from Orange
County Flood Control District. Project plans included a hydrology study
and design for storm drain connections to Peters Canyon Creek.
Civil/ Structural Lead, Bus Maintenance Yard, Los Angeles, CA,
UCLA, 2003: Providing civil /structural engineering design for site
development plans. Scope of work included a 30' high 600 sf metal
canopy over the truck maintenance area and site improvement plans for a
wash down pad and parking /drive areas. As part of the scope a
r••
Timothy Gutkowski, P.E.
storm /process water management plan for the facility was provided along
with the design for an oil water collection and separation system.
Civil Lead, Maintenance Facility OSBL Utilities, Los Angeles, CA,
Valero Refinery, 2009: Responsible for the design of utilities outside the
battery limits of a new 6000 s£ maintenance facility. The new utilities
included a sewer line extension and a storm water collection system.
Design of the storm water system required calculation of storm runoff
quantities and sizing of a proposed lift station. The sewer design required
confirmation that the existing sewer capacity was adequate for existing
and proposed sewer flows. Scope of work also included permitting
activities for the site improvement plans through the City of Los Angeles.
Civil /Structural Lead, QA Laboratory OSBL Utilities, Torrance,
CA, Exxon Mobil Refinery, 2010: Responsible for the OSBL grading
and utilities for a new 8000sf QA Laboratory facility at the Exxon Mobil
Refinery. Engineering activities included grading of the areas around the
building and coordination of all utilities to the building. Interior drains for
the lab were segregated into two systems, one for sanitary wastes and the
other for process wastes from lab sinks. The design included a below
grade concrete vault housing two small tanks for the collection of process
waste. These wastes are pumped from the tanks through above grade
piping to an existing waste line about 500' away. All process waste from
the refinery discharge to LACSC facilities and a study of the refinery drain
systems was completed as part of the permit effort required by LACSD.
The study provided details of all process waste piping within the refinery
that discharge to the LACSD outfall.
25F -89
25F -90
Richard Joe
Electrical Engineering
Overview
Mr. Joe is an electrical engineer more than 35 years of experience in
electrical planning, design, specifications, testing, troubleshooting, and
resolving electrical system faults. Twenty five of those years were focused
on the interface of materials handling equipment with suitable electric
power and the interaction of the machines with facility infrastructure.
Materials handling equipment included ship to shore (quayside) container
cranes, lmdside stacking cranes, conveyors used to move containerize
Areas of Expertise
cargo, break bulk, loose bulk, and machines that is used to move cargo.
Specialized Container Handling Cranes
His involvement also included vertical -lift bridges and elevators.
Electric Power, Control Systems, and
He has worked with the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) for 27 years on
Electronic Sensors
various container cranes and material handling machines and their
Crane Power Systems for Maximum
interface with wharves and electric utilities. He began his career with
Utility Electric Power Source
POLA working directly with crane drives with POLA electricians and
Power Quality Analysis
machinists performing design, troubleshooting faults, and implementing
Railroad Signalization
modifications. Eventually, crane ownership evolved away from the Port
Years of Experience
of Los Angeles to the shipping companies. I-Ie continued to provide
With URS: <1 Year
service to POLA and the slipping companies engaging in review of crane
With Other Firms: 37 Years
design and performance and quality specifications.
Education
He also has experience in co- generation, electric plan review, electric
BS /Electronics Engineering /1976/
component testing, and as a marine electrician in the U.S. Navy. As a lead
California State Polytechnic University
electrician he was involved with electric power generation and
Graduate Courses /Electrical
distribution.
Engineering and Economics /1977/
Project Specific Experience
California State University, Los
Angeles
Project Manager, Modification of Quayside Container Cranes, San
Pedro, CA, Port of Los Angeles (POLA): Coordinating the installation
of quayside container cranes for proper and safe interface of cranes with
the wharf structure and balancing crane power needs with available utility
electric power without over providing electrical capacity.
Port Electrical Engineer, Technical and Advisory Services, San
Pedro, CA, Port of Los Angeles (POLA): Provided advisory and
technical services to POLA terminal operators for the alteration of diesel
engine powered stacking cranes to alternative electric utility power under
testing conditions monitoring $L2M to $2M planning, design, developing
specifications, and implementation of additional $2M infrastructure
planning, design and the construction phase. Further tasks include the
coordination of the machines to prevent machine collisions and ability for
the machines to avoid overlap.
Port Electrical Engineer, Design and Specifications to Replace and
Upgrade outdated DC Variable Speed Drives, San Pedro, CA, Port
of Los Angeles (POLA): Provided design and specifications to replace
and upgrade outdated DC variable speed drives on quayside container
cranes to AC variable speed drives, upgrade controls and communication
interface.
25F -90
Richard Joe
Consultant, Container- Handling Cranes Support and Training, San
Pedro, CA, Port of Los Angeles (POLA): Provide specialized support
and training to Port of Los Angeles Engineering staff related to container
handling cranes and other materials- handling machines, including rubber
tire gantry cranes, rail- mounted gantry cranes, automatic stacking cranes,
passenger gangways, conveyor systems, lift bridges, et al. Responsibilities
included: Design and review electric power, control systems, and
electronic sensors; Review suitable interface between mechanical
equipment and power systems; Find and resolve crane system faults;
Modify container cranes for break bulk operations; Review lift bridge
adjustable variable speed drive system and integrate electronic sensors for
bridge positioning; Design and review crane power system for adequate
and most efficient utility electric power source. Provide mentoring,
training, coordinate structural, mechanical, and electrical engineer reviews
of systems on ship to shore cranes and other material handling machines,
RR bridge, and electromechanical machines and equipment used to move
bulk, break bulk, and container cargo; and Integrate crane structure to
marine wharf structure for capacity and seismic loads, electric utilities,
data and voice communications, and machine and power diagnostic
systems. (While working for another firm.)
Building Electrical Engineer Associate IV, Project Management/
Economic Costs and Value Engineering, San Pedro, CA, Port of
Los Angeles (POLA): Provide project management and evaluate
economic costs and value engineering. AmoCad design, review,
troubleshoot, and construct the following controls and systems:
Coordinate and direct review of container shipping company design,
specification, performance, and capacity for dockside gantry crane
structural design, mechanical system, electric power system,
instrumentation and control system, diagnostics, and communications
systems, and to recognize various crane manufacturer design methods;
Design 600 VAC to 15 IN electric power system distribution, with
electrical protection, and coordination of protection components; Design
communication and control systems; Design fire alarm, life safety systems;
Design distributive control systems; Design traffic signal systems; Electric
metering; Design sewage lift station pump and controls; Identify and
design for appropriate needs for an electrical system in a potentially
hazardous explosive environment; Railroad signalization; Power quality
analysis; and Interior and exterior area lighting design, and monitoring.
(While working for another firm.)
25F -91
2020 East. First Street, Suite 400, Santa Ana, California 92705
www.urs.com
25F -92
ee g�g55
t
fi
0
25F -93
a
i
25F -93
25F -94
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE
SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
(FLOOD CHANNEL LOW FLOW AND TRASH DIVERSION)
RFP NO: 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Santa Ana Public Works Department
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Tyrone Chesanek
Principal Civil Engineer
Email: tchesanek(d )Santa- ana.org
Phone: (714) 647 -5045
Approved for Release:
Fred Mousavipour
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
City of 4 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS
Proposals in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) will be accepted until 2:00 pm on Thursday,
November 13, 2014. Proposals received after this date and time will not be considered.
All notifications, updates and addenda will be posted on the City's RFP Bid page at santa- ana.org /bids -rips.
The proposing Firm shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation.
Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive proposal. Questions
regarding this RFP shall be made in writing via e-mail to the Principal Civil Engineer as identified on the cover.
A Mandatory Pre - Proposal Meeting is scheduled for 2:00 pm on Thursday, October 30, 2014 at the
address where the proposals are due. Failure to attend may result in a determination of a nonresponsive
proposal.
A Kick -Off Meeting will be held after the award of this contract by the City Council. The Consultant selected
and its team shall attend a mandatory meeting with City's staff to discuss project and schedule. A Notice to
Proceed (NTP) will be issued at this meeting.
The proposal package shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope and marked clearly with following information
and formatted as follows:
"SEALED PROPOSAL FOR
RFP NO. 14 -069; DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE
SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL."
City of Santa Ana
Attn.: Tyrone Chesanek
Public Works Agency; 20 Civic Center Plaza; 3rd Floor, Ross Annex, Santa Ana, CA 92701
The proposal package may only be MAILED, HAND DELIVERED, OR COURIERED. ALL OTHER FORMS OF
DELIVERY WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.
The FEE PROPOSAL shall be sealed in a separately envelope and shall be included within the proposal
package.
The City may require that DBE goals be applied for various tasks within this agreement and the Consultant
selected shall be prepared to comply with such goals per the latest federal /state requirements. Also see:
• hftp://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocaIPrograms/lam/forms/chapterl 011 Oi-2013-05-14.docx
• http: / /www.dot.ca qov /hq /LocalPrograms /lam/ forms /chapterl0 /10i- 2013- 05- 14.docx
The City will enter into an agreement to design and provide construction support for the Santa Ana Delhi
Diversion Project, as a result of this RFP process, for a three year term with two one -year extensions.
City
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION
4
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 4
A. GENERAL
1. NUMBER OF COPIES AND SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS
2.DEADLINE
B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS
1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
2. PROPOSAL
3. FEE PROPOSAL
4. CERTIFICATIONS
III. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION)
A. EVALUATION AND RATING
B. SELECTION
IV. SCHEDULE & CONTRACT AWARD
A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
V. IMPLEMENTATION
A. KICK -OFF MEETING
B. NOTICE TO PROCEED
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
B. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES
C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION
D. ADDENDA
E. LICENSES & PERMITS
F. INSURANCE
G. PAYMENT INFORMATION PACKET
H. PRE - PROPOSAL MEETING
I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT
J. PUBLIC RECORDS
Al. APPENDICES
10
ATTACHMENT
A:
SCOPE OF WORK
17
ATTACHMENT
B:
SAMPLE AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT
C:
NOT USED
27
ATTACHMENTS D -1, D -2, D -3, & D -4: CERTIFICATIONS
28
ATTACHMENT
E:
SAMPLE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE AND ADDITIONAL INSUREDS
33
ATTACHMENT
F:
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ADDENDUM NO. 2
34
City of zspa � 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
I. INTRODUCTION /PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Santa Ana is seeking engineering services for the design and construction support of the
Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project, as described in the Scope of Work included in Attachment A of the
Appendix. The Scope of Work and the Work Plan shall become part of the Professional Services
Agreement. A sample Agreement is shown in Attachment B of the Appendix.
II. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. GENERAL
Number of Copies and Signature Requirements: five (5) hard copies and one (1) digital file
PDF formatted file on a USB Flash Drive, shall be provided in all proposal submittals which
shall also be specifically listed as and signed by a company official with the power to
bind the company per the "Notice Inviting Proposals" and submit it to the City of
Santa Ana. One (1) copy of your Fee Proposal shall be submitted, as outlined herein this
RFP.
2. Deadline: Proposals are due to the City of Santa Ana, at the date, time, and location set
forth above in the Notice Inviting Proposals.
B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS
A responsive proposal shall contain the following documentation:
1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
The Firm's qualifications, proposal, and work plan shall be limited to a MAXIMUM of thirty -
five (35) DOUBLE -SIDED PAGES (excluding front and back covers, section dividers and
attachments) and unless otherwise noted elsewhere. The page limitation includes all
appendices, attachments, and supplemental information except as indicated in 3 below.
a. Cover Letter — The proposals shall include a letter signed by a principal or authorized
representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. A
statement that "the person signing this letter is legally authorized to bind the company
with the Proposal, Work Plan, and Fee Proposal, together comprise each Firm's total
submittal package for the on -call engineering services project" shall also be included.
b. Contract Agreement Statement: The Proposal shall include a statement outlining the
Firm's concurrence or concerns with any and all provisions as contained in the sample
Professional Services Agreement.
c. Firm and Team Experience: The Firm's qualifications shall include the profile of the
Firm's experience. This information and key resumes shall be resubmitted for the Firm,
sub - Consultants, and branches of all anticipated team members previously listed within
the Firm's qualifications.
City ofAKWP 14 -069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
d. Understanding of Need Statement: Proposals shall include a statement outlining the
Firm's understanding of the Scope of Work, anticipated approach, suggestions or special
concerns that the City should be made aware of, and any tasks considered necessary
for successful completion. Any assumptions and /or exclusions used in preparation of
the scope of work and associated fee estimate assumptions should be directly stated
within the proposal.
e. Schedule: Proposal shall include a timeline to complete the work for Firm's Work Plan
listed in the Scope of Work.
2. PROPOSAL:
The Team's Proposal and Work Plan shall be submitted concurrently (within the larger
overall sealed package) clearly labeled as "Proposal." The Proposal shall respond to all
items required in the Scope of Work.
3. FEE PROPOSAL
Firm's fee proposal shall be submitted concurrently with the technical proposal, but in a
separately sealed envelope (within the larger overall sealed package) clearly labeled as
"Fee Proposal ".
The Fee Proposal shall include a proposed fee per task for the Scope of Work per the Work
Plan with associated personnel and hours anticipated to complete the work. The hourly
rates shall also be included.
The Fee Proposal will not be opened until the proposals have been evaluated by the
proposal selection committee. The City shall select the Consultant based on qualifications;
then review and negotiate the rates.
4. CERTIFICATIONS:
The following forms shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package:
Attachment D -1: Non - Collusion Affidavit
Attachment D -2: Non - Lobbying Certification
Attachment D -3: Department of Housing & Urban Development Section 3 Contract Clause
Attachment D -4: Certification of Non - Discrimination by Consultants
Ili. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION)
A. EVALUATION AND RATING
The following criteria will be use to evaluate and rate the proposals:
City
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
The City shall established a proposal review committee to evaluate each Firm's proposal based
on the responsiveness to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format,
and the City evaluation criteria set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each
submitted proposal and used to rank the Firms.
B. SELECTION
The City will recommend award of the contract to the Firm who will provide the best value to the
City. The City reserves the right to begin negotiations and enter into a contract without
interviews or further discussions.
IV. SCHEDULE & CONTRACT AWARD
At present, the City of Santa Ana anticipates the following RFP schedule and contract award as follows:
Friday, October 17, 2014 Released RFP
• Tuesday, December 16, 2014 Contract Kick -Off
Estimated dates are subject to change and /or cancellation at the City's discretion.
A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Following evaluation and rating by the proposal review committee, the Project Manager will
recommend award of a contract to the Firm providing the best value to the City.
B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
A sample Agreement is attached herein. "Firm" will hereinafter be referred to as "Consultant."
The terms of the contract will begin after the contract agreement is fully executed, and all
required bonds, insurance documents and contents of the Information Packet have been
received and approved.
-- _ -.. City Aj �a 6V 14-069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
V. IMPLEMENTATION
A. KICK -OFF MEETING
A kick -off meeting will be held within one week after the award of contract. The Consultant and
its team shall meet with City of Santa Ana staff to conduct introductions, discuss scope of
services, work plan, schedule, critical path, and establish milestones.
B. NOTICE TO PROCEED
At the kick -off meeting, a formal Notice to Proceed (NTP) will be issued to start the first phase of
the work plan.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will provide information in its possession relevant to preparation of required information
in RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred
to in the Scope of Work.
B. FIRM RESPONSIBILITIES
Point of Contact: The selected Firm will assume responsibilities for all services in its proposal.
The selected Firm shall identify a sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge in regard to
the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of any and all
charges resulting from the Agreement.
Evidence of Financial Capacity: Firm may be requested to submit its most recent audited
financial statement, evidencing Firm's financial capacity to fully perform the required services,
including provision of equipment and personnel expenses over a ninety (90) day period. If said
financial statement does not reflect full ninety (90) day operational capacity, Firm may include a
letter of credit as evidence of supplemental capacity.
Compliance With Requirements of Funding Agency: This contract will be funded through a
variety of funding sources. Firm shall be prepared to comply and in fact comply with all
requirements of these various funding sources.
Consultant Audit and Review Process: Prior to awarding the contract, the selected Consultant
Team shall be subject to an audit or review by Caltrans' Audits and Investigations (A &I), other
state audit organizations, or the federal government. The selected Consultant shall complete
Exhibit 10 -K — Consultant Certification of Costs and Financial Management System per
http:// www .dot.ca.ciov /ha//LocalProarams /lam /forms /chapterl o /10k- 2014- 05- 16.docx .
C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION
All questions or requested clarifications shall be made in writing via e-mail to the Project
Manager (contact information as noted on the cover paae to this RFP) no fewer than five (5)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
calendar days prior to the date and time set for opening of proposals. No verbal requests or
responses will be accepted. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via
addenda to this RFP.
D. ADDENDA
Any changes in RFP from the date of release to date of submittal will result in an addendum or
amendment. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on City's website,
santa- ana.org /bids -rips as set forth in the Notice Inviting Proposals. Addenda shall become part
of the agreement documents. Firms are responsible to verify they comply with any addenda.
E. LICENSES & PERMITS
The selected Firm shall be required to obtain a City of Santa Ana Business license within ten
(10) business days of selection and must provide a copy to the City projects manager or
designee prior to commencing any work in Santa Ana.
Additionally, Firm will be responsible for obtaining any licenses /permits required by the Scope of
Work or elsewhere in this RFP.
F. INSURANCE
The Selected Firm shall provide the required evidence of insurance coverage as set forth in this
RFP and the Scope of Work within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice that the contract
has been awarded. Failure to provide the required insurance certificates shall be cause for the
annulment of the award and the forfeiture of the proposal guaranty.
G. PAYMENT INFORMATION PACKET
The selected Firm shall return a completed payment information packet within ten (10) business
days after the successful Firm has received notice that the contract has been awarded. The
packet is available on the City's website: santa- ana.orq /bids -rfps.
H. PRE - PROPOSAL MEETING
The City does not plan on holding a Pre - Proposal meeting for this RFP.
I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT
The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is
made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise.
The City reserves the right to accept or reject the combined or separate components of this
proposal in part or in its entirety or to waive any minor inconsistency, informality or technical
defect in the proposal.
The City reserves the right to reject, replace and approve any and all sub - consultants. All sub -
consultant(s) shall be identified in the response to the RFP. Sub - consultants shall be the
City
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
responsibility of the successful Firm and the City shall assume no liability of such sub -
consultants.
J. PUBLIC RECORDS
All data, documents and other products used, developed, or produced during response
preparation of the RFP will become property of the City. All responses to the RFP shall become
property of the City. Firm information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained
confidential to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act.
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF WORK
GENERAL
The City of Santa Ana (The City) is soliciting proposals from professional consulting Firms to provide
engineering services for the design and construction support of a diversion project for the Santa Ana
Delhi Channel. Engineering services may include civil engineering, electrical engineering, traffic
engineering, geotechnical, land /property surveying, structural, architecture, landscaping design, and
grant writing services.
The City anticipates the design process and award of the construction contract by June of 2016, with
construction support needed over two dry seasons in the channel, which establishes three year term
period for this agreement. The City may grant up to two one -year extensions, if needed.
The work, in general, consists of the design of a diversion structure for the Santa Ana Delhi channel
that will mitigate the associated TMDL's for that watershed including the pending TMDL for trash. The
design shall include diverting the low flow to the sanitary sewer, a retention basin, and back into the
channel. See Appendix Attachment F for the Preliminary Design Report Addendum No. 2 dated August
2014. The deliverables shall include the final conceptual design, which will be reviewed and approved
by the funding partners; the design; environmental process, all permits, CEQA approval, easement and
right -of -way agreements, final construction documents and construction support.
The Consultant shall be able to assist the City through this contract to provide the necessary services.
The Consultant shall utilize in -house staff and /or sub - Consultants to complete the assignments to meet
the City standards. For specialized work for which the prime Consultant shall require a sub -
Consultant, the prime Consultant shall serve as an administrative liaison between the City and
the sub - Consultant. The prime Consultant mark -up for sub - Consultants shall not exceed 10 %.
The proposal and work plan shall be limited to fifteen (15) pages, excluding the twenty (20) pages for
the Firms qualifications. A cover letter shall summarize key factors and guarantee that key personnel
shall be committed to manage and perform the required tasks throughout the duration of the contract.
A schedule of fees and charges described in the following section "Cost and Price" shall be included in
the proposal.
II. PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Consultant shall perform the above noted engineering design services resulting in contract
documents (plans, specifications and cost estimates) and construction support services for the Santa
Ana Delhi Diversion Project. The Consultant shall provide a Work Plan which includes a detailed
schedule of the project prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed. Specific Task Orders with Notices to
Proceed (NTPs) will be provided for the project at the discretion of the City. Work required per Task
City
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
Order shall comply with the Scope of Services and additional provisions in each Task Order. The
Consultant shall also provide all field survey work, as required, and shall have the necessary
experience and required civil, traffic, electrical, structural, geotechnical, surveying, landscape architect
and architectural licenses for those in responsible- charge of the work being completed.
The Consultant's services for PS &E engineering project preparation shall include, but not be limited to,
the following:
Research existing records of utility companies and agencies and coordinate the proposed
improvements with existing field conditions.
2. Provide all field survey and topographic work necessary to complete the design effort. Design level
survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a
California licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with the City guidelines and in Microstation V8i
Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and
the vertical datum shall be NAVD 88. All survey field notes shall be on forms provided by the City,
shall be neatly completed in pencil, and shall become property of the City upon completion of the
project. Informal field investigations including marking of removal areas may be required for some
of the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement replacement projects.
3. Complete the design including plans, specifications, and engineer's construction cost estimate. The
Consultant shall contact manufacturers and /or contractors to verify the engineer's estimate prior to
submitting to the City. Specifications shall be prepared in Microsoft Word and an electronic copy of
the final version shall be furnished to the City. The City will provide the specification boiler plate to
the Consultant.
4. If requested, all preliminary and bid sets of plans shall be plotted on bond or velum using the
Microstation V8i CADD program. All drawings shall be completed per the City of Santa Ana CADD
Standards. For interim submittals, the City may opt to receive only PDF versions of the plans for
reviewing purposes. If so, the Consultant team will provided plans and /or specifications
accordingly.
5. All original plan sheets, the title sheet of the specifications, calculations, and reports shall be signed
and stamped by the Consultant's licensed professional engineer in responsible- charge of the
project. These signed originals shall then become the property of the City.
6. As a part of the project scope, the Consultant shall provide support services during the bidding and
construction phases of the project on an as needed basis, including, but not limited to:
A. The Consultant shall respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including
preparation of any addenda. Following award of the construction contract, the Consultant shall
attend the pre- construction meeting.
B. The Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required
supporting the construction contract. The Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews
City
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two
(2) working days of receipt.
C. The Consultant shall respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) to provide clarification or
resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Responses shall be completed within three
(3) working days.
D. The Consultant shall provide periodic field reviews and bring to the attention of the City of Santa
Ana any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant
may observe. The Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City of
Santa Ana, or to deputize another to do so.
7. Upon completion of construction, the Consultant shall prepare as- builts and submit them to the City.
The Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision
notations. Once plans have been updated, a signed set of as -built mylars shall be submitted to the
City with an electronic copy (in Microstation V8i CADD and pdf formats) of the final as -built
drawings via CD or e-mail.
8. The Consultant shall monitor the project progress, maintain project files, and control the quality of
the work performed by in -house staff and /or sub - Consultants. Incomplete (not meeting targeted
completion) or poor quality work will not be accepted. The Consultant shall revise the documents
within a revised schedule set by the City, which may require overtime. No additional compensation
for regular or overtime hours necessary to complete this work to the satisfaction of the City shall be
approved by the City for the required revisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to produce
a professional -level quality of work product.
9. The Consultant shall attend meetings as required by the City.
10. The Consultant shall coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and any other issues with the
City, other Agencies, and all utility companies as required. At the direction of the City, the
Consultant shall be the liaison with affected agencies.
11. The Consultant shall be responsible for to reviewing and approving addenda and clarifications to
plans and specifications.
12. Sample Project and Schedule: Proposal shall include a narrative for the project approach and
steps for the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion Project. Proposal shall also include a timeline to complete
the work tasks necessary for the project. Utilize Attachment C from this RFP to complete the
comparison forms for the Proposal and Fee Proposal. Note, no staff hourly rates or total design
costs shall be included in the Proposal for the project. However, hourly rates and total costs shall
be included in the Fee Proposal for the project.
A. Indicate any other assumptions made for the project which is described as follows:
City gf,�� A p I W 14 -069
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
1) The project location will be in the Santa Ana Delhi Channel south of Bristol Street,
northwest of Irvine Avenue, on the Newport Beach Golf Course, property is owned by
the County of Orange.
2) The low flow shall be assumed at 0.4cfs.
3) The project shall include an in- channel diversion structure, an intake structure with
coarse and fine screening, sedimentation and discharge storage chamber, a disinfection
station, a pump station, and an outlet pipe back to the channel.
4) The pump station shall have the ability to pump to the sewer, at night, and to an adjacent
surface irrigation reservoir.
5) Assume the sewer line will connect to an
the intersection MacArthur Boulevard
approximately 7,600 feet in length.
existing 15 -inch diameter OCSD trunk main at
and Campus Drive. The pipe length is
B. For the Proposal, list the number of hours and staffing position levels anticipated to
complete the design PS &E and the construction support for this work, without the hourly
rates. Utilize Attachment C's format.
C. For the Fee Proposal, list the number of hours and staff position levels anticipated to
complete the design PS &E and the construction support for this work as well as the hourly
rates. Utilize Attachment C's format fully completed.
D. For the design phase, the schedule should include all activities required to provide a
Finalized PS &E package inclusive of two 3 — week stakeholder reviews.
E. For the Proposal, also include an engineering cost estimate, per bid item quantity estimated
for the project.
F. For the construction phase, the schedule should include all activities required to provide
adequate construction support, including weekly construction meetings.
III. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
All work shall be performed in conformance with the latest City of Santa Ana policies, procedures
and standards, and applicable, regulatory, state and federal requirements.
2. Consultant shall carry out the instructions received from the City of Santa Ana and shall cooperate
with the City of Santa Ana and other involved agencies.
3. The Consultant shall have complete responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of all
documents and plans prepared and shall check all such materials accordingly. The plans will be
reviewed by the City of Santa Ana and the County of Orange for conformity with the requirements of
15114I:1
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
the Agreement. Reviews by the City of Santa Ana and the County of Orange DO NOT include
detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted in the
documents and the plans. The responsibility for accuracy and completeness of such items remains
solely that of Consultant.
4. The documents and plans furnished under the Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to the
City of Santa Ana. The criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well
organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked, and dated and having the maker and
checker identified.
5. The Consultant shall have quality control procedures in effect during the entire time work is being
performed under the Agreement. The quality control procedures shall establish a process which
includes checking processes for PS &E preparation, an independent constructability review,
correcting and back checking procedures, and all job related correspondence and memoranda
dated and received by affected persons and then bound in appropriate job files. The City of Santa
Ana reserves the right to request proof of said documentation.
6. The Consultant's work and all records shall be subject to inspections by representatives of the City
of Santa Ana and funding agency requirements or audits if requested.
Consultant certifies that it shall comply with the following regulations, as required by the (funding
agency):
a. Audit Records - With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall
be made available for audit and inspection by the City, the grant agency and /or their duly
authorized representatives for a period of four (4) years from the termination of this
Agreement. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims
related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Consultant shall preserve
and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in
accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time
period, Consultant shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and
the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized
representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the
premises of Consultant, upon request during usual working hours.
b. Consultant shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for
inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required
to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or
agencies.
C. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) - All recipients of federal
funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act).
Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby
gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason
City q��r,�a
0
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject
to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that
receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Consultant agrees it will
ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be
binding on all of its consultants, sub - consultants, assignees or successors.
d. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - (ADA) Consultant must comply with all
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable.
e. Political Activity - None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or
indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to
further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of
the provisions of the "Hatch Act".
Civil Rights Compliance and Notification of Findings - Consultant, and all its sub -
consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with the nondiscrimination requirements of
the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789
(d), or Victims of Crime Act (as appropriate); Title VI of the Civil Rights At of 1964, as
amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II
of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; Department of Justice Non -
Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department
of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a
Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Consultant makes
a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Consultant will
forward a copy of the findings to the City which will, in turn, submit the findings to the
Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
g. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal
Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967,
and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as
applicable.
h. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Copeland "Anti- Kickback" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in
Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable.
Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a -7) as supplemented by
Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable.
City of,&;a Wgm j�P§14 -069
LL 9e ��JJ;`�'�
(a)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
j. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work and Safety Standards Act
(40 U.S.C. 327 -330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR
Part 5), as applicable.
k. Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all applicable
standards, orders or requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order
11738, and the Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15), as
applicable.
Consultant, and all its sub - consultants (or sub - recipients) will comply, with all
requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94 -163, 89 Stat. 871),
(53 FR 8078, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 19639, 19645, Apr. 19, 1995),
as applicable.
M. Consultant agrees that the funding agency shall have the authority to seek patent rights
for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding
through this Agreement.
n. Consultant may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials
developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding
agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty -free, non-
exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to
authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and /or City purpose:
i. the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and
any rights of copyright to which the sub - consultant purchases ownership with
support through this grant. The Federal government's, SAA's and City's rights
identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the
publisher's release form must ensure the preservation of these rights.
IV. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will provide the following:
• All plan check coordination within the City
• Sample boiler plate specification to be used for specifications
• Sample plans & City of Santa Ana's CADD Standards
• Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders
0
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT B
SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this XX day of Month 2014
by and between:
Firm
(hereinafter "Consultant') and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation
organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City ").
RECITALS
A. The City desires to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of:
Engineering Services as indicated in the scope of work
B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City.
C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable
in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed
in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting
Firm in the field.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
TERMS
This Agreement shall commence on START DATE / the date first written above and terminate on
END DATE, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 14, below.
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant agrees to perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations
including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and
adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached
City of
(a)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
hereto and incorporated by reference. Additional Agreement provisions, if any, may be contained in
"Additional Provisions" attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit "D."
2. SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall complete the services identified in the Exhibit A, and shall perform and deliver
them to the City as described and detailed in the Schedule of Services - Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated by reference. Such services shall be provided per written request of the Executive
Director of Public Works, or designee, after the City's issuance of a Notice to Proceed.
3. COMPENSATION
City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the
rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference.
4. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non - exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify,
reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans,
specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any
tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or
otherwise recorded on computer disks (CD)s, USB jump drives or equivalent, which are prepared or
caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ( "Documents & Data "). Consultant shall
require all sub - consultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non - exclusive and perpetual license
for any Documents & Data the sub - consultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents
and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant
makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to
Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any
time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's
sole risk.
5. PAYMENTS & INVOICES
a. Consultant shall submit a monthly invoice by the fifteenth of the month to the City for the
services rendered in the prior month.
b. All invoices for work performed under this Agreement shall be submitted in a format
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
approved by the City. Invoices shall include the following information at a minimum:
i. Consultant's invoice number and City's agreement number
ii. Beginning and ending dates for services
iii. City project number and /or name (if applicable)
iv. Work site address /location (if applicable)
V. Tasks or deliverables completed, and percentage ( %) of total services completed.
vi. Remaining Task budget available
City will, within 45 days of receiving such statement in a manner that meets the City's
requirements, review the statement and subsequently pay the approved charges thereon.
6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent
contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed
to create an employer - employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to
exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services
which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant
shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such
services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment
insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding
taxes.
7. INSURANCE
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and
shall require its sub - consultants, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below:
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance which shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising
from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to
property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the
performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The
amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to
bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in
the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, and in the aggregate. Such insurance shall
(a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as
(a)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
additional insured(s); (b) be primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self -
insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insured's
provisions.
b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of
not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned,
hired and non -owned automobiles.
c. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3300 of
the Labor Code, Contractor, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured
against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance. Prior to
commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to
obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000
per accident.
d. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer,
Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not
less than $1,000,000 per claim shall be maintained.
e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant
to this section:
I. Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the
entire period covered by this Agreement.
ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this
Agreement and shall be approved in form by the City Attorney.
iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled or reduced
in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the City.
f. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section
or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured
and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith
terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid
for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives
the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed
prior to approval of insurance by the City.
City o .LS.ar" Ay RFP 14 -069
C
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
8. INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
City, its officers, agents and employees (collectively, the "indemnified parties ") from and against any
and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or damage to property),
demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court
costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a claim; collectively, "claims "), which may
arise from or in any manner related (directly or indirectly) to any work performed or services provided
under this Agreement (including, without limitation, defects in workmanship and /or materials) or
Consultant's presence or activities conducted performing the work (including the negligent and /or
willful acts, errors and /or omissions of Consultant, its principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors,
suppliers, consultants, sub - consultants, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for
whose acts they may be liable for any or all of them). Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein
shall be construed to require Consultant to indemnify the indemnified parties from any claim arising
from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnified parties. This indemnity shall apply to
all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do
not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by the Consultant.
9. LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal
laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the services and
shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and
regulations in connection with services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary
to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be
solely responsible for all costs arising wherefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its
officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification
provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to
comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
10. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is
reasonably understood to be confidential and /or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or
disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise
the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less
(a)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential
information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually,
electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary
and /or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non -use
and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available
sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in
rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be
disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference
to information disclosed by the City.
11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or
indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this
Agreement.
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any
communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail,
communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been
deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed
as set forth above. If sent by telefacsimile, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been
given twenty -four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the
transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time
frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.
12. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and
Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the
event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this
Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by
the authorized representatives of the parties. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any
purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and
conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement
acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise,
have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.
City
utj
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
13. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant,
Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior
written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the
City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be
construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement
performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City.
14. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of
termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant
compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination,
subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to
the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product
shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the
City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance
specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.
15. DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable
law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment
related activities. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all
applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
16. JURISDICTION - VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity,
interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be
determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. The parties further agree that Orange
County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of,
(a)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
17. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses,
permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and
required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana
and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its
inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability
shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.
18. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or
certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by telefacsimile or other telegraphic communication in the
manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:
To City: Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702 -1988
facsimile (714) 647 -6956
With courtesy copy to: Executive Director of Public Works
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M -36)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
facsimile (714) 647 -5635
To Consultant: Name
Address
City, State, Zip Code
(714) 000 -0000 (phone)
(714) 000 -2601 (fax)
C
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Additional provisions, if any, are identified as Additional Provisions — Exhibit D, attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power,
authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall
indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in
the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.
b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in
the body of this Agreement.
iCSiI:I!]
L
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above
written.
ATTEST:
CITY OF SANTA ANA
MARIA D. HUIZAR DAVID CAVAZOS
Clerk of the Council City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
Jose Sandoval
Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: FIRM
FRED MOUSAVIPOUR (NAME)
Executive Director (Title)
Public Works Agency
(a)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
Not Used
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT C
FIRM RATE COMPARISON FORM
City of
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OF THE SANTA ANA DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -1: NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
CERTIFICATIONS
NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
(Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and
Public Contract Code Section 7106)
To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares
that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company,
association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has
not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or
indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that
anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by
agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix
any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage
against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements
contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid
price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid,
and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to
any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.
Note: The above Non - collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature
portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non - collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioned that
making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
Signed
State of California
County of
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of , 20_, by
, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who
appeared before me.
Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
City
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -2: NON - LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATIONS
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee
of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal
contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into
of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or
cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities ".
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lowertier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and
that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Firm Name
Signature and Printed Name:
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -3: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 3 CONTRACT CLAUSE
CERTIFICATIONS
A. The work to be performed under this contract is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Section 3). The
purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated
by HUD assistance or HUD - assisted projects covered by Section 3, shall, to the greatest extent
feasible, be directed to low- and very low- income persons, particularly persons who are
recipients of HUD assistance for housing.
B. The parties to this contract agree to comply with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR Part 135, which
implement Section 3. As evidenced by their execution of this contract, the parties to this
contract certify that they are under no contractual or other impediment that would prevent them
from complying with the part 135 regulations.
C. The Consultant agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with
which the Consultant has a collective bargaining agreement or other understanding, if any, a
notice advising the labor organization or workers' representative of the Consultant's
commitments under this Section 3 clause, and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous
places at the work site where both employees and applicants for training and employment
positions can see the notice. The notice shall describe the Section 3 preference, shall set forth
minimum number and job titles subject to hire, availability of apprenticeship and training
positions, the qualifications for each; and the name and location of the person(s) taking
applications for each of the positions; and the anticipated date the work shall begin.
D. The Consultant agrees to include the Section 3 clause in every subcontract subject to
compliance with regulations in 24 CFR Part 135, and agrees to take appropriate action, as
provided in an applicable provision of the subcontract or in this Section 3 clause, upon a finding
that the sub - consultant is in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR Part 135. The Consultant will
not subcontract with any sub - consultant where the Consultant has notice or knowledge of that
the sub - consultant has been found in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR Part 135.
E. The Consultant will certify that any vacant employment positions, including training positions,
that are filled (1) after the Consultant is selected, but before the contract is executed, and (2)
with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR Part 135 require employment
opportunities to be directed, were not filled to circumvent the Consultant's obligations under 24
CFR Part 135.
City of S lw 2 4-069
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
F. Noncompliance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 35 may result in sanctions, termination of
this contract for default, and debarment or suspension from future HUD assisted contracts.
G. With respect to work performed in connection with Section 3 covered Indian housing assistance,
Section (7) b of the Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450e)
also applies to the work to be performed under this contract. Section 7(b) requires that to the
greatest extent feasible (1) preference and opportunities for training and employment
subcontracts shall be given to Indians, and (ii) preference in the award of contracts and
subcontracts shall be given to Indian organizations and Indian -owned Economic Enterprises.
Parties to this contract that are subject to the provisions of Section 3 and Section 7 (b) agree to
comply with Section 3 to the maximum extent feasible, but not in derogation of compliance with
Section 7(b).
For the purpose of training and employment the rip mary Section 3 covered project area is the
area in closest proximity to the actual construction work site within the U.S. Census Tract in
which the project is located. It is understood that priority for employment opportunity is to be
given to residents residing within the primary Section 3 area as defined.
A Section 3 area resident is any lower income individual residing within the Section 3 area,
whose total family income does not exceed 80% of the median income of the metropolitan
statistical area in which the project is located (Orange County). A public housing resident is
defined by regulations as Section 3 resident, regardless of income.
The Consultant and each sub - consultant certifies that they will provide, to the greatest extent
feasible, opportunities for employment to lower income residents (local residents) and job
opportunities in connection with projects in their neighborhoods. For fiscal year 1996 -97,
minimum goal for each project is 30 %.
The Consultant/Sub- consultant /Service Provider by the signature affixed hereto declares under
penalty of perjury: Consultant /Sub- consultant/Service Provider has read Section 3 requirements
and accepts all its requirements contained therein for all of his /her operations within the City of
Santa Ana.
Signature Print Name and Title
Signature Print Name and Title
Signature Print Name and Title
Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
0
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT D -4: CERTIFICATION OF NON- DISCRIMINATION BY
CONSULTANTS
CERTIFICATIONS
As suppliers of goods or services to the City of Santa Ana, the Firm listed below certifies that it
does not discriminate in its employment with regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin; that it is in compliance with all federal, state and local directives and executive orders
regarding non - discrimination in employment and including, but not limited to, what is listed in
the Non - Discrimination Clause in Exhibit 10 -V per:
http://www.dot.ca.aov/ho/LocalProcirams/lam/forms/chapterl 0/1 Ov-201 3-05-14.docx
and that it agrees to demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity
in employment. The same shall apply and be included in all sub - consultant agreements.
WE AGREE SPECIFICALLY:
To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees with the company.
2. To establish or observe employment policies within affirmative promotion opportunities
for minority persons at all job levels.
To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees,
outside recruiting services, especially those servicing minority communities, and to the
minority communities at large.
FIRM NAME
TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING
SIGNATURE AND PRINTED NAME
DATE
Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment
programs now in effect within your company.
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
M
G
a ��
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14.069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT E
SAMPLE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE AND ADDITIONAL INSUREDS
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
°oiai
am'
rBGppELr1 "� -"
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
WeuXm _•_ --
IN61AiENnv�_v ��-
IxauHRN:
IN6U %Efl C: �e�..
re%E.
COVERAGES
THE P01.088 OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BE EN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAM ED MOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD I N DICATED. NOi WITHSTAN DING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OP ANY FACT OR OTHER DGCUMENT WITH gE6PECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE IS6UE0 D0.
MAY FERRARI THE INSURANCE AFFORLO DSYWE POLICIES OESCRMEDIIEREIN I5 SUBJECT NEWT TO WHIS. THIS CE NFICAZ MAY BE
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED RY PAID CLAIMS.
�-
iimE
IYP.°PINCURAN°E
T- '"'"'°�"
-� �PoQCYNBMBEB
P011CY EFFECTOR
011012001
pp °MpI0Al1UX
0110112002
' -�v
IJ_Mlie
tlaERnLLLVennY
x1nI1II1i
EncxG�c a %nervGE
s 1.RaR,RW
x COFWCACVLGfiNFV1.01, LV.tlilRY
@OAM.NIE A-
MFD F%r IMVUturFrrinl
S BDOOR
b D.WR
p AAA LL_eAWINI°PY
s 1AriRARO
OEN_Q-- OINOANI
L___1000,000
4EN440GREDGELMRAPPLIESNO1
_ CL1w. P,to. Lam..
P
PHO..1tl
S 2,,9C0
__ ....OW
..�..—
OYtIXAO01LELU°I(ItY
X pNYAUfG
X222222222 011011`2RD1 Gil0101W2
MAt61N5°SINOLf. U41R
IBnna,
9 1,O00.0 OR
u.LOV.wmurtae
6EFIINNII.F,OAVECB
Nvw�mn. —_
IFMParw 1
_ - - -__
6
HI%6NAIIiOJ
xnx.munEpnvruv
GBCILY MUM, �-
IPnraarrN
6
I�e�un:IlAMnaE
b
` —.�
SEE ATTACHED ADDITIONAL
INSURED ENDORSEMENT
COVERAGES DEPEND ON TYPE
�nxYAU^G
A1Q.-EL.LIeNN
6
AIA'09HI.Y.
�-
E%CEpOtIPe11M
E'AEY {OCUINIxkxCE
4
GO TBLE
OF AGREEMENT /CONTRACT
; --
WipE.ECPLNIL.IN 1NNALU OYEIRSLIW
,
1N20I Ri(tl12002
E1. ancxuc lEx,�,a
—�
Y,(1000010
fiL. CI6EA6EEM1EYPLOYIi'
b �,CWI W,IiW
EA .°.i L.PoLIEY111111
I I,WRADO
,TIRO
MAdMAM1
WO12WIi OIfUV2R02
ENCXOmSralap 1.090.000
PrpfaasIW. LLaMliry
pEeENTpNOF ORE° Af10X8M1° CATMNeryENIC46& H% CLU6ICNBABNBBBYEXCCN9EGE lrtI6tECULPIWN01p119 .s.�_�
G0N(ICAIO HOMEr16 Af1t1ION9MUr0tI P0r II1f11CfIR11.
PGI.t Nu. _
CERTIFICA'rEHOLDEft ADDrtmxnuxvve6D; IUapflER LEnER: CANCELLATION �-
WIOULDMYWI) IEABQVSDt BRIDEOYUUClFOCCANCELLEDNSPCPE TIIERPIRn ON
City of Santa Ana
30 CAYe NAMF.X
20 Civic Center Plaza - Ross Annex (M- )
N6YIEETOYIIE DEPl1E1EAle IIa.D6rtNAMEDmnre LEEO
Santa Flna, CA °J2701
110111 10111IVE
(YISD OACORO CORPORATION 1988
(9)
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFP NO. 14 -069
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT F
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT ADDENDUM NO. 2 AUGUST 2014
of S t� Ran
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT
b
'+aoxmr?.� <IFOB�
SANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL DIVERSION PROJECT
ADDENDUM N0.2
Collaborative effort:
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana. California 92701
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd
Newport Beach, California 92663
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Revised August, 2014
Prepared by:
2020 East First Street, Suite 400
Santa Ana, California 92705
Exhibit 3
25F -129
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. ...............................
I
1.1 Background ....................................................................................... ...............................
1
1.2 Facility Description ............................................................................ ..............................1
2.0 DIVERSION FACILITY PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA ................. ..............................3
2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... ...............................
3
2.2 Basis of Design Flows and Operations ............................................. ...............................
3
2.2.1 Normal Dry- weather Flow ......................................................... ...............................
3
2.2.2 Maximum Design Flow ............................................................. ...............................
5
2.2.3 Dry - Weather Flow Diversion Operations .................................. ...............................
5
2.2.4 Wet - Weather Diversion Operations ........................................... ...............................
5
3.0 RECOMMENDED PRELIMINARY TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE .... ..............................6
3.1 In- channel Diversion Structure ......................................................... ...............................
6
3.1.1 Radial Steel Gates ...................................................................... ...............................
6
3.1.2 Air - inflated Rubber Dam ........................................................... ...............................
6
3.1.3 Hydraulics ................................................................................... ..............................6
3.1.4 Operation and maintenance ........................................................ ...............................
7
3.2 Intake Structure ................................................................................. ...............................
9
3.3 Coarse Screening ............................................................................... ...............................
9
3.4 Fine Screening Chamber ................................................................... ...............................
9
3.5 Sedimentation and Discharge Storage Chamber ............................. ...............................
10
3.6 Pump Station ................................................................................... ...............................
10
3.7 Hydraulics ....................................................................................... ...............................
11
3.7.1 Channel Hydraulics .................................................................. ...............................
11
3.7.2 Diversion Facility Hydraulics .................................................. ...............................
13
3.8 Reliabil ity .......................................................................................... .............................14
4.0 ALTERNAITVE PIPELINE ROUTE ANALYSIS ............................... .............................15
4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... ...............................
15
4.1.1 Background ................................................................................ .............................15
4.1.2 Objective and Study Approach ................................................ ...............................
15
4.2 Basic Data ....................................................................................... ...............................
16
1[W
i
25F -130
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
4.2.1 Introduction .............................................................................. ...............................
16
4.2.2 Route Study Area ..................................................................... ...............................
16
4.2.3 Aerial Photographs ................................................................... ...............................
16
4.2.4 Existing Utility Data ................................................................ ...............................
16
4.2.5 Rights -of -Way and Easements ................................................. ...............................
17
4.2.6 Regulatory Requirements ......................................................... ...............................
17
4.2.7 Pipeline Design Criteria ........................................................... ...............................
17
4.2.8 Pipe Installation Methods ........................................................ ...............................
17
4.3 Alternative Pipeline Routes ............................................................. ...............................
19
4.3.1 General ....................................................................................... .............................19
4.3.2 Description of Alternative Routes ........................................... ...............................
19
4.4 Evaluation and Comparison of Alternative Pipeline Routes ........... ...............................
25
4.4.1 Cost Estimate Software ............................................................ ...............................
25
4.4.2 Pipeline Construction Cost ...................................................... ...............................
25
4.4.3 Pump Energy Cost ................................................................... ...............................
26
4.4.4 Non - Cost - Identifiable Evaluation ............................................ ...............................
26
4.5 Route Recommendation .................................................................. ...............................
28
4.5.1 Preferred Alternative Routes .................................................... ...............................
28
4.5.2 Estimated Route Cost ............................................................... ...............................
28
4.5.3 Recommended Route ............................................................... ...............................
28
5.0 COST EVALUATION ............................................................................ .............................29
5.1 Capital Costs ................................................................................... ...............................
29
5.2 Operations and Maintenance Costs ................................................. ...............................
31
List of Tables
Table 2- 1 Dry- weather Flows and Diversion Alternatives Summary ............................ ..............................4
Table 3- 1 Comparative Summary of Diversion Structure Costs
7
Table 3- 2 Sedimentation and Discharge Storage Chamber Design
10
Table 3- 3 Design Discharge for the Santa Ana Delhi Channel (cfs)
11
Table 3- 4 Design discharge for incremental return periods for the Santa Ana Delhi Channel
12
Table 4- 1 Preliminary Construction Cost of Force Main Installation ........................... .............................25
Table 4- 2 Preliminary Estimate of Power Consumption ............................................ ...............................
26
Table 4- 3 Non - Cost - Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria ......................................... .............................27
Table 4- 4 Route Evaluation Weighted Overall Scores ................................................. .............................27
UM ii
25F -131
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Table 4- 5 Cost Estimates for Four Alternative Options ................................................ .............................29
Table 4- 6 O &M Cost Estimates for Four Alternative Options ..................................... .............................31
List of Figures
Figure3- 1 Typical Radial Gate ..................................................................................... ............................... 8
Figure3- 2 Typical Rubber Dam ................................................................................... ............................... 8
Figure 3- 3 Discharge Rate versus Return Period Relationship ..................................... .............................12
List of Appendices
Appendix A- I Preliminary Design Drawings
PD -1: Diversion Facility Plans and Sections
PD -2: Hydraulic Profile
PD -3: Routing Analysis Project Location
PD -4-7: Routing Analysis Force Main Sewer Plan and Profile Optionl
PD -9 -11: Routing Analysis Force Main Sewer Plan and Profile Option2
PD- 1213: Routing Analysis Force Main Sewer Plan and Profile Option3
PD- 1416: Routing Analysis Force Main Sewer Plan and Profile Option4
PD- 1719: Routing Analysis Force Main Sewer Plan and Profile Option5
Appendix A- 2 Delhi Channel Hydraulic Calculation
Appendix A- 3 Diversion Facility Hydraulic Calculation
Appendix A- 4 Routing Analysis Force Main Construction Cost Estimation
Appendix A- 5 Routing Analysis Hydraulic Calculation
UR.S iii
25F -132
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Ana, in association with the Cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa, is currently
developing a conceptual engineering plan for a proposed urban runoff diversion facility. The proposed
Delhi Channel Diversion Facility is located in the downstream portion of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel
system near the intersection of Mesa Drive and Irvine Avenue adjacent to the Newport Beach Golf
Course. The proposed project is intended to collect non - stormwater discharges from the Delhi Channel
and divert the flow to the sanitary sewer system for further treatment, or to the on -site golf course
reservoir to be used for irrigation purposes.
The proposed project addresses the potential urban surface water quality issues associated with discharges
to the Upper Newport Bay. The proposed diversion facility will comprise an in- channel flow diversion
structure, an intake and bypass outlet structures, a primary treatment facility including coarse screen, fine
screen, gravity sedimentation, sub - surface storage facilities, and a lift station and force main (FM) to
convey the harvested flow from the discharge storage chamber to the existing drainage sewer for further
treatment in the regional wastewater treatment plant. The goal of the proposed project is to divert non-
stormwater during dry weather condition to eliminate the potential threat of selenium exceeding the
current Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) (Santa Ana Delhi Channel Diversion Project Preliminary
Design Report, Sept. 2012, Addendum No. 1 August, 2013).
Key drivers for the project are:
• Removing environmental impacts: the project will provide a treatment system that will remove
pollutants from dry- weather /stormwater discharges from the regional drainage system complying
with current and future TMDL concerns from local watersheds;
• Removing local cities for wastewater treatment: The costs are too high for local cities to invest
capital to operate and maintain a wastewater treatment facility to address TMDL challenges;
• Harvested water is a valuable resource: dry - weather discharges and stormwater is becoming a
valuable resource and will be in demand for local golf course irrigation needs.
Engineering and environmental evaluation of alternative force main routes has been completed, along
with the design of the diversion facility.
1.2 FACILITY DESCRIPTION
Preliminary Design Report (PDR) Addendum No. 1 (August 2013) revised the conceptual design PDR
(July 2012) to include a three -stage clarifier system with bar screen, sediment removal and fine screen to
capture floatables. The flow capacity of the system will treat the front end portion of the first flush storm
water quality event to a maximum flow capacity of 100 cfs and all of the dry- weather discharges within
the Santa Ana Delhi Watershed. The proposed channel diversion would be accomplished through the use
of an in- channel flow diversion structure and discharge into a side inlet incorporated into the original
flood control channel. The existing channel would be removed and replaced approximately thirty feet
upstream and fifty feet downstream from the in- channel structure for structural purposes. The existing
channel will be modified with inlet and bypass outlet structures as part of the proposed diversion facility.
URS >I
25F -133
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Inlet and outlet structures will consist of large diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with slide gates
mounted on the vertical channel wall.
The proposed in- channel structure, intake and by -pass discharge structures will be located along the Santa
Ana Delhi Channel within existing County of Orange Flood Control District (OCFCD) Right of Way.
The three -stage clarifier system followed by additional storage tank and submersible pump station will be
located underground within the golf course. It is anticipated that the new facility will not impede the
existing golf course operations with the exception of during construction. After construction, the majority
of the facilities will be located underground except for the man -way accesses, control panels and vent
risers.
URS 2
25F -134
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
2.0 DIVERSION FACILITY PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This section presents design requirements for the proposed diversion facility. The proposed diversion
facility will operate as a preliminary treatment facility for the removal of trash and debris. The diversion
facility will be operated based on both dry and wet weather conditions.
2.2 BASIS OF DESIGN FLOWS AND OPERATIONS
2.2.1 Normal Dry- weather Flow
Based on the original PDR (July 2012), it is estimated that the dry- weather flow in the Delhi Channel is
0.4 cfs, therefore, an estimated dry- weather flow of 260,000 gallon per day will be collected and treated
by the proposed facility. Disposal scenarios of the diverted and treated flows have been developed that
analyze the feasibility of using a portion of the diverted flows for irrigation purposes and/or providing for
a direct connection to the existing Orange County Sanitation District trunk sewer facilities for further
treatment at the regional water reclamation plant. The following discussion provides for an overview of
the two alternative scenarios. Two sanitary sewer pumping scenarios have been developed for this
analysis that include using the capacity within the existing Costa Mesa Sanitary District Newport Avenue
Pump Station, using the proposed pumping facilities associated with the diversion treatment facilities, and
making new connections to the Orange County Sanitation District Mainline located along Fairview Road
and MarcArther Blvd in the City of Costa Mesa.
Dry- weather Flow Diversion Alternative 1 - Alternative 1 is based on providing irrigation supplies to
the Newport Beach Golf Club. The Newport Beach golf course has an estimated demand of
approximately 200,000 gallon per day in winter months and 292,000 gallon per day in summer months
for irrigation; therefore in theory, 77% to 100% of non- stormwater flow collected at the Diversion
Facility can be used by the golf course for irrigation purposes. During winter months, excess flow needs
to be discharged to the sewer collection system. Operationally, the system would divert flow away from
the Santa Ana Delhi Channel and provide for an initial treatment through the gross- solids clarifier
chambers and ultimately discharged into the underground storage cisterns. When irrigation demands of
the golf course warrant supplemental supply, water stored in the cisterns would be pumped into the
existing irrigation system on a daily basis. The remainder of the stored water within the cisterns would
then be pumped into the sanitary sewer system for further treatment and disposal by the Sanitation
District. Using the existing stormwater flows for irrigation purposes affords an opportunity to use portions
of the existing sanitary sewer system owned and operated by the City of Costa Mesa based on specific
operational parameters (discussed below).
There is an existing Costa Mesa Sanitary District sanitary sewer lift station (Irvine Station) at the
intersection of Irvine Boulevard and Mesa Drive which discharges to the Orange County Sewer Trunk
Main located at the intersection of Fair Drive and Mesa Drive. The current pumping capacity of the Irvine
Station is approximately 300 gallons per minute which discharges into the suction side of the Elden lift
station located near the intersection of Santa Ana Avenue and Mesa Drive. The combined system has a
total pumping capacity of 300 gallons per minute (gpm), providing for a total of discharge volume of
432,000 gallons in a 24 hour period. Discussions with the Costa Mesa Sanitation District indicated that
URS 3
25F -135
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
the existing hvine Station has available capacity during the off peak hours from midnight to 5:00 am. As
such, the available pumping capacity that is available to service the Santa Ana Delhi Channel Diversion is
approximately 90,000 gallons. Below is a generalized flow balance summary based on providing
irrigation water to the Newport Golf Club during the winter months:
Urban Discharge from SAD Channel .................. 260,000 gallons
Golf Course Irrigation Demand (winter) ............. <200,000> gallons
Irvine Station Pump Capacity Volume ................ <90,000> gallons
Excess Capacity .................... ............................... <30,000> gallons
Dry- weather Flow Diversion Alternative 2 - Alternative 2 is based on developing a direct connection to
the OCSD trunk main as discussed above and not providing any irrigation supplies to the Newport Beach
Golf Club. This alternative would consist of developing the overall diversion and treatment facilities as
discussed above and constructing a new force main trunk from the treatment facilities to the OCSD trunk
main. Advantages associated with Alternative 1 include no dependence on Costa Mesa Sanitation District
facilities, specifically the Irvine Station, and the limited pumping scenario from midnight to 5:00 am. It
also provides for the opportunity to use continuous pumping throughout the day. The only disadvantage is
that this scenario will require the construction of approximately 2 miles of 8 inch diameter force main
from the diversion facilities to the OCSD trunk connection. Below is a generalized flow balance summary
based on direct pumping to the OCSD trunk main:
Urban Discharge from SAD Channel .................. 260,000 gallons
Pumping Rate to OCSD Trunk (300 gpm) .......... <270,000> gallons at 15 hrs /day
Excess Capacity .................... ............................... <10,000> gallons
More details on the above two alternatives can be found in Section 3.
Table 2- 1 Dry- weather Flows and Diversion Alternatives Summary
Flow
Design Flow ( m)
Design Flow d)
Dry- weather Flow
180
260,000
Alternative 1
Pump Station to CMSD (5hrs)
300
90,000
Pump Station to Golf Course 19 hrs)
300
342,000
Golf Course Irrigation Demand
200,000 (winter)
292,000 (summer)
Alternative 2
Pump Station to OCSD (24 hrs)
300
432,000
URS 4
25F -136
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
2.2.2 Maximum Design Flow
Based on the PDR Addendum No. 1 (August 2013), the proposed diversion facility will have a target
maximum flow capacity of 100 cfs to treat the front end portion of the "first flush" flow to provide
adequate capacity for the entire dry- weather urban discharges and a portion of the "first- flush" stormwater
quality event. The "first- flush" stormwater quality event is defined as the 85" percentile discharge of
stormwater runoff events.
2.2.3 Dry- Weather Flow Diversion Operations
During dry- weather operations, the proposed Diversion Facility will provide primary treatment to remove
floating debris and sediments from Delhi Channel. The treated water will then be pumped into either the
golf course reservoir or the sewer system for further reuse or treatment and disposal. As such, the in-
channel diversion structure will remain in the closed position; the water level in the Delhi Channel
upstream of the diversion facility will raise and the water level will be controlled by the tailwater
condition in the proposed diversion facility. System hydraulics and detailed calculations are discussed in
Section 3.
The diversion facility by -pass channel will remain open during normal dry- weather operation. The water
level in the storage tank will be kept lower than the invert of the outlet pipe and therefore no flow will be
redirected back to the channel system downstream. However, if the storage tank level is raised above the
outlet pipe invert, water will overflow to the channel system downstream.
2.2.4 Wet - Weather Diversion Operations
During the wet - weather operations for storm water flow less than 100 cfs, the treatment process will
provide gross solids removal from entering into the channel system and the storm water will be re-
introduced into the channel system downstream. As such, the in- channel flow diversion structure will
remain in the closed position. A maximum of 100 cfs will be diverted to the facility. Trash and debris will
be removed by the coarse and fine screening portions of the facility. Upon exceeding the maximum
design capacity, the in- channel diversion will open, allowing the storm flow to pass.
The pump station will be shut down during the wet - weather operations due to concerns of deteriorated
water quality for reuse purpose, when only a minimal percentage (0.4 %) of flow could be reused.
URS 5
25F -137
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
3.0 RECOMMENDED PRELIMINARY TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE
This section provides discussion of the preliminary treatment system. The preliminary treatment system
will consist of an in- channel flow diversion structure, intake structure, coarse screening, fine screening,
sedimentation chamber, storage chamber, a conveyance pump station, access manhole /cleaning structure,
outletibypass structure. Detailed discussion of the force main will be discussed separately in Section 4.
3.1 IN- CHANNEL DIVERSION STRUCTURE
The in- channel diversion structure will capture up to 100 cfs of water to a maximum depth of 8 feet in the
Delhi Channel. The in- channel flow diversion structure will be in the closed position during all dry-
season periods and pre /past- winter storm events. During the winter season, the diversion will remain in
the closed position to promote near continuous trash and debris screening of all urban discharge events.
During the rainy season, from October 15th to April 15s the in- channel flow diversion structure will
remain closed during the first flush event of any impending storm event (approximately 15 minutes after
the start of the storm) before moving into the open position. Upon the passing of a storm event, the
diversion can be placed back into service once the stream flow events have subsided and returned back to
typical urban flows. Two types of diversion structures have been considered: radial steel gates and an air -
inflated rubber dam.
3.1.1 Radial Steel Gates
Radial gates are designed for a wide, clear waterway opening. Radial gates are usually applied for
diversion of water where wide, clear waterway openings are necessary and where economical control of
water is important. The main advantage of radial gates is that friction is concentrated at the pin and is
usually much less than that for other channel flow control structures, such as sliding gates. Radial gates
are lightweight, economical gates that can be opened and closed with minimum effort and with a
comparatively small number of turns of the hand wheel on the hoist.
3.1.2 Air - inflated Rubber Dam
Air - inflated rubber dams are made of synthetic materials such as rubber, and are inflated with air and/or
water. They usually have an inner shell and outer casing, and can be used to close very long spans with
heads up to 18 feet. The main advantages of an air - inflated rubber dam are low cost, low weight, absence
of a heavy lifting mechanism, little need for maintenance, and ease of installation. The disadvantage is
that the fabric /rubber material can be damaged and may have a limited life. Rubber dam service life can
be improved by including a stainless steel wire mesh. It is recommended that a rubber dam be considered
that includes the stainless steel wire mesh. Based on operational familiarity and experience of the existing
OCFCD staff member, the rubber dam is the favored diversion configuration.
3.1.3 Hydraulics
Both types of structures are capable of efficient performance under dry- weather flow conditions and 15-
minute first flush wet - weather flow conditions. Two radial gates in parallel have been proposed in the
original PDR and PDR addendum No. 1. As for the rubber dam, one single piece would have to be
installed on a single clamp plate. Radial gates would provide a superior clean water way, compared to the
inflatable rubber dam, which would partially block the water way after deflation. Operationally, the radial
URS 6
25F -138
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
gate provides superior hydraulics and requires less long -term maintenance activities. It should be noted
that the anticipated life span of a radial gate exceeds fifty years in comparison of the rubber dam, which
may need a complete replacement after fifteen years of operation.
3.1.4 Operation and maintenance
Both structures can be installed in open channels. Radial gates require maintenance which includes
periodic lubrication of the side racks and bearings. Comparatively, the rubber dam has a more intensive
operation and maintenance schedule. The replacement costs for the rubber dam is relatively high, as it
cannot be replaced in parts, but rather the whole unit would have to be replaced.
Table 3- 1 Comparative Summary of Diversion Structures
Radial Gate (Hydro Gate)
Inflatable Dam (D rhoff Ltd.
• Dimension: 8 ft high x 26.5 ft wide x 2
• Dimensions: 8 ft high x 55 ft wide x l span
• hoist/operator included
• Material of rubber body:
• Hot - Rolled Steel (Plates, Structurals, Flat
• EPDM rubber outer layer
Bars) ASTM A36 or A306, Grade 60
• 2 layers of nylon fabric;
• Cold- Rolled Steel (Shafting and Pins)
• 1 layer of stainless steel wire mesh
• ASTM A108, Grade 1045
• nominal thickness 3/8 inch
• Stainless Steel (Fasteners)
• Clamp plates: ductile iron
• ASTM F593 or F594 Group 1
• Anchor bolts: carbon steel
• Cast Iron ASTM A126, Class B
• Special pipe connection flanges: stainless
• Rubber: ASTM D2000, Grade 1AA625
steel 304
• Stainless Steel: ASTM Al 67 or A240, Type
304L
$970,000
$380,000
Table 3- 2 Comparative Summary of Diversion Structures Costs
In summary, both structures are suitable for the project. While radial gates offer benefits of superior
hydraulics and clear water way, faster operation and lower maintenance requirements, its initial
installation capital cost is higher than that of the rubber dam. Comparatively, the rubber dam is
economically a more feasible option for this particular case.
UiLS 7
25F -139
Radial Gate
Inflatable Dam
Initial Capital Costs
$970,000
$360,000
Lifes an
60
15
Discount Rate
3.00%
3.00%
Annual maintanance
$6,000
$12,000
27.68
11.94
-Repayment
Equivalent Annual Costs
41,049
42,156
In summary, both structures are suitable for the project. While radial gates offer benefits of superior
hydraulics and clear water way, faster operation and lower maintenance requirements, its initial
installation capital cost is higher than that of the rubber dam. Comparatively, the rubber dam is
economically a more feasible option for this particular case.
UiLS 7
25F -139
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Figure 3- 1 Typical Radial Gate
Photo Source: www.armtec.com
Figure 3- 2 Typical Rubber Data
Photo Source: Wikipedia
Un 8
25F -140
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
3.2 INTAKE STRUCTURE
A conceptual intake design has been developed for the proposed facility that will supply sufficient flows
for dry- weather and wet- weather conditions. This system consists of a dedicated intake slide gate, and a
dedicated 48" diameter RCP that will be located directly upstream of in- channel diversion structure. No
screens are provided at the inlet, as headless at the inlet would be excessive for the 100 cfs flow
condition, due to the limited opening area available within the 48" RCP.
3.3 COARSE SCREENING
The Bar Screening Chamber will be outfitted with a coarse screen bar rack to remove large floatables and
debris from the channel discharge.
The coarse screen will consist of one (1) manual bar screen, 6.0 feet deep and 20.0 feet wide. The bar
screen will have clear openings of 3.0 inches and be constructed of 0.5 inch wide by 3.0 inch deep bars.
The bar screen will be inclined at 15 degrees from vertical. The coarse screen is vital to the successful
operation of the diversion facility. Due to potential corrosive environment, galvanized steel materials are
considered for this design.
All screenings will be collected in the first chamber and excavated through the man -way openings in the
roof portions of the facility. Approximately 30 tons of trash is expected to be collected and because all
preliminary treatment will be underground and expecting low maintenance activities, a mechanical bar
screen will not be considered for this facility.
Flow after the coarse screen will be directed through a baffle wall consisting of ten (10) orifices, each 2
feet high by 1 foot wide, located at the bottom of the baffle wall. The baffle wall and orifices will ensure
flow be distributed evenly prior to the fine screen.
3.4 FINE SCREENING CHAMBER
The sediment trap will be located downstream of the coarse screen bar rack. To effectively remove
sediment from the discharges, a hydraulic depth in excess of 4 feet will need to be maintained.
The fine screen will consist of one (1) manual bar screen, 5.0 feet deep by 20.0 feet wide. The bar screen
will have clear openings of 0.5 inches and be constructed of 3/8 inch wide by 2.0 inch deep bars. The bar
screen will be inclined 15 degrees from vertical. Stainless steel 316 materials are considered for this
design.
All screenings will be collected in the second chamber and excavated through the man -way openings in
the roof portions of the facility.
URS 9
25F -141
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
3.5 SEDIMENTATION AND DISCHARGE STORAGE CHAMBER
The discharge storage chamber will provide approximately 140,000 gallons of storage for further
sediment particles and storage volume to be pumped either to the surface reservoir located within the golf
course or pumped directly into the sanitary sewer system for final treatment and disposal.
The discharge storage chamber will consist of a 60,000 gallon concrete chamber followed by four precast
reinforced concrete underground storage chambers, each with a dimension of 7' -8" by 14' by 50'. The
RCB storage tank will provide an additional storage capacity of 80,000 gallons for dry- weather
conditions. During the wet - weather condition, the water level in the storage chamber will be
approximately 2 feet higher than the dry- weather condition, and will provide an effective storage volume
of 75,000 gallon (for HRT calculation) and a total storage of 175,000 gallons. The calculated hydraulic
retention time for the dry- weather conditions is 13 hours, which is conservative compared to a typical 28
hour sedimentation chamber design. The short HRT during maximum design flow conditions (100 cfs)
indicates that sedimentation will not likely be effective during the high flow event. This suggests that the
cleaning of sedimentation from dry- weather conditions should take place prior to the rainy season, to
avoid flushing the sediments in the storage chamber.
Table 3- 3 Sedimentation and Discharge Storage Chamber Design
3.6 PUMP STATION
URS understands that the underlying land owner of the golf course has expressed concerns regarding
water quality and its suitability for irrigation. If the golf course accepts the water quality for irrigation, a
single pump station with proper control and a single motorized three -way control valve on the pump
discharge pipeline will be able to deliver the harvested water to the golf course reservoir during the hours
of 5:00 am to 12:00 pm. The pump on -off control will be based on levels in the receiving reservoir and
the pump station wet well. The pump station will pump the harvested water to the sewer system during
the hours of 12:00 pm to 5:00 am through the adjacent CMSD sewer connection. If the captured dry -
weather flow can not be reused for golf course irrigation, alternatively it can be pumped continuously to
the OCSD trunk main connections.
The pump station will be a typical duplex station, each with a 300 gpm capacity submersible pump. The
pump head varies for different pipe routing options and discharge points between 20 feet to 80 feet
dynamic head. More details are provided in Section 4.
LW 10
25F -142
Total Stora a
Effective Volume
HRT
Dry- weather Condition
1 140,000 gallon
140,000 gallon
13 hours
Maximum Flow Condition
1 175,000 gallon
75,000 gallon
1.7 minutes
3.6 PUMP STATION
URS understands that the underlying land owner of the golf course has expressed concerns regarding
water quality and its suitability for irrigation. If the golf course accepts the water quality for irrigation, a
single pump station with proper control and a single motorized three -way control valve on the pump
discharge pipeline will be able to deliver the harvested water to the golf course reservoir during the hours
of 5:00 am to 12:00 pm. The pump on -off control will be based on levels in the receiving reservoir and
the pump station wet well. The pump station will pump the harvested water to the sewer system during
the hours of 12:00 pm to 5:00 am through the adjacent CMSD sewer connection. If the captured dry -
weather flow can not be reused for golf course irrigation, alternatively it can be pumped continuously to
the OCSD trunk main connections.
The pump station will be a typical duplex station, each with a 300 gpm capacity submersible pump. The
pump head varies for different pipe routing options and discharge points between 20 feet to 80 feet
dynamic head. More details are provided in Section 4.
LW 10
25F -142
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
3.7 HYDRAULICS
3.7.1 Channel Hydraulics
This section summarizes the results of a hydraulic analysis to evaluate the impact of the in- channel flow
diversion structure on the upstream water surface profile. Detailed channel hydraulic analyses results can
be found in Appendix A- 2. A hydraulic model was created for (1) the existing condition and (2) the
proposed condition, which includes the proposed 8 foot high in- channel flow diversion structure
(representing either the radial steel gate or air- inflated rubber dam).
The section of the Delhi Channel between Bristol Street and hvine Avenue is a concrete -lined rectangular
channel, with a width of 55 feet and a height of 16 feet. In the center of the channel is a 1 foot high
trapezoidal low -flow channel, with a base width of 6 feet and a top width of 14 feet. The dimensions of
the channel are based on the original model provided by the City of Santa Ana, and updated based on the
as -built drawings.
Figure A -2 -1 shows the model layout and cross - section stationing. The numbering for the stationing is
based on the as -built drawings.
Channel Discharge
Table 3- 3 shows the design discharge for the Delhi Channel. These values were provided in the model
from the City. Station 9400 represents the upstream station of the model at Bristol Street. At station 6541
there is additional inflow from the Airport Channel.
Table 3- 4 Design Discharge for the Santa Ana Delhi Channel (eft)
Station
As -built flow
2 -year
5 -year
10 -year
25 -year
50 -year
100 -year
9400
8,550
3,033
4,790
5,990
7,420
8,200
9,200
6541
8,770
3,183
1 4,940
6,140
7,570
8,350
9,350
A relationship between discharge rate and return period was developed, in order to estimate discharge for
smaller return period increments (see Figure 3- 3 and Table 3- 4).
URS 11
25F -143
10.
G 7,
m
M
u
n 6,
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
uuv
000
—r
1.1-year
y= 1556.51n(x) +2199.6
000
...
R2 = 0.9927
1.5- ear
9400
2,200
2,348
000
--
000
---
6541
2,350
000
—
2,758
2,873
000
n00
.
20 40 60 g0 100 120
Return Period (years)
Figure 3- 3 Discharge Rate versus Return Period Relationship.
Table 3- 5 Design discharge for incremental return periods for the Santa Ana Delhi Channel (cfs)
Station
1 -year
1.1-year
1.2-year
1.3- ear
1.4-year
1.5- ear
9400
2,200
2,348
2,483
2,608
2,723
2,831
6541
2,350
2,498
2,633
2,758
2,873
2,981
Channel Hydraulic Analysis
A hydraulic model was developed using the USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis
System (HEC -RAS) version 4.1 to determine the hydraulic impacts of the proposed in- channel flow
diversion structure. HEC -RAS was used to perform a one - dimensional, steady -state hydraulic analysis of
the Santa Ana Delhi Channel. The model was computed using the mixed flow regime to produce the full
range of water surface results. Normal depth was used as the boundary conditions. The upstream and
downstream normal depth slopes are 0.000738 and 0.000772, respectively; the slope changes
downstream of the confluence with the Airport Channel. A Manning's roughness coefficient of 0.013 was
used for the concrete -lined channel.
The Delhi Channel flows underneath Santa Ana Avenue, approximately 1,340 feet downstream of the
Bristol Street crossing. The channel flows through three parallel rectangular culverts, which were
included in the HEC-RAS model.
For the proposed conditions, the in- channel flow diversion structure was included in the model as an 8
foot high and 4 foot wide broad - crested weir, with a weir coefficient of 2.6. It was located approximately
3,500 feet downstream of the Bristol Avenue crossing.
EW 12
25F -144
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Channel Hydraulic Analysis Results
Tables A -2 -1 and A -2 -2 show the HEC -RAS results for every cross section for the existing and proposed
conditions, respectively. Figure A -2 -2 shows the existing and proposed conditions profile plots. Figure A-
2-3 shows the existing and proposed conditions cross - section flow depths.
For the proposed conditions, the largest flow that can pass through the channel in which the depth
everywhere in the channel is below 15 feet (which includes 1 foot freeboard) is the 1.2 -year storm. This is
equivalent to a flow of 2,483 cfs in the upstream part of the channel and 2,633 cfs in the downstream part
of the channel, at the in- channel flow diversion structure.
3.7.2 Diversion Facility Hydraulics
This section summarizes the results of the hydraulic analysis for the diversion facility, which includes the
intake, coarse - screen, fine- screen, sedimentation chamber, storage tank and outlet discharge structure,
pump station and associated conveyance force mains. For conveyance pipeline by gravity and pressurized
force mains, the C factor (Hazen - Williams coefficient) of 120 was used for all pipe sizes in this hydraulic
study, which corresponds to a moderate pipe operational condition. The specified inside diameter
dimensions, pipe length and associated valves, bends and other appurtenances were based on preliminary
levels, and verification will be needed in further design stages.
The proposed facility's hydraulic profiles for 0.4 cfs dry- weather and 100 cfs maximum design flow
conditions are depicted in Appendix A -1 sheet PD -2.
Detailed diversion facility hydraulic analyses results can be found in Appendix A- 3
Intake Pipe to Pre Coarse - screen Chamber
Of particular importance is the need to provide redundancy for each component within the intake
structure for the diversion facility. Various events could potentially reduce or eliminate the water supply
normally available via a single intake (e.g., periodic maintenance on the intake structure). To adequately
ensure a robust intake system, two 48" diameter RCP and channel side inlets are proposed for the
preliminary design of the intake structure.
The proposed intake pipe from the proposed intake to the proposed treatment facility is shown in
Appendix A -1 PD -1. The intake consists of two parallel slide gate structures at the intake within the Delhi
Channel, followed by two parallel 48 -inch diameter RCPs, approximately 50 feet long each. The
estimated flow velocity for maximum flow of 100 cfs is estimated to be 8 feet per second (fps), and head
loss is estimated to be 1.7 feet. The estimated velocity and headloss for dry- weather flow of 0.4 cfs are
negligible.
Coarse - screen and Baffle Wall
The maximum velocity through the screen open area is 3.3 fps, assuming a clogging factor of 50 %. The
headloss by coarse screen for maximum flow 100 cfs is estimated to be 0.27 ft. Flow velocity through the
orifices after the coarse screen baffle wall is estimated to be 5 fps and headloss through orifices is 1.0 ft.
The estimated velocity and headloss for dry- weather flow of 0.4 cfs are negligible.
URS 13
25F -145
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Fine - screen and Broad- crested Weir
The maximum velocity through fine screen open area is 5.6 fps assuming a clogging factor of 50 %. The
headloss through the fine screen for maximum flow of 100 cfs is estimated to be 0.75 ft. Headloss over
the broad - crested weir downstream of the fine screen is estimated to be 0.62 ft. The estimated headloss
for dry- weather flow is estimated to be 0.03 ft for the screen and 0.02 ft for the broad - crested weir.
Bypass Pipeline from Post fine- screen Chamber to Outlet
The proposed bypass discharge pipeline from the proposed post fine - screen chamber to the outlet
structure is shown in Appendix A -1 sheet PD -1. It consists of one 48 -inch diameter RCP approximately
50 feet long following and a slide gate structure at the intake within the Delhi Channel. The estimated
flow velocity for maximum flow of 100 cfs is estimated to be 8 fps, and head loss is estimated to be 1.7
feet. The estimated velocity and headloss for dry- weather flow of 0.4 cfs are negligible.
$.8 RELIABILITY
While all municipal wastewater treatment facility Classes I, R and III will require the facility to have
redundancy /reliability to maintain the design capacity with one large unit out of service (Design criteria
for mechanical, electric, and fluid system and component reliability for wastewater treatment facilities,
Bulletin 430 -99 -74 -001), such redundancy is not required for stormwater storage /sedimentation facilities
(Storage /Sedimentation Facilities for Control of Storm and Combined Sewer Overflows Design Manual,
Bulletin EPA/600 /R- 98/006, Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet Flow Diversion, Bulletin 832 -F -99-
014). A maintenance program should be established to ensure that the system functions properly. The
diversion facility should be inspected to remove debris prior to the rainy season and shortly after a
significant rainfall event.
This project will have two intake structures, with only one in service at a time. This will aid in
redundancy /reliability.
The proposed Diversion Facility plan layout and sections are shown in Appendix A -1 sheet PDA
URS 14
25F -146
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
4.0 ALTERNAITVE PIPELINE ROUTE ANALYSIS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.1.1 Background
This section and subsections that follow present the process validation and selection approach, summarize
the five pipeline routing options that have been identified, and present the two recommended pipeline
routings for the Delhi Diversion Facility.
Per earlier investigation, the on -site sewer pipeline does not have the capacity for the additional flow from
the Delhi Channel. The harvested dry- weather flow from the Delhi Channel has to be sent to sewer
collection systems further downstream. Thus, URS investigated potential routes to connect the discharge
FM to potential locations, including the following: 1) connection to the local sewer collection system,
owned and operated by Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD), which will also discharge to the OCSD
trunk main; and 2) direct connection to the OCSD trunk main further downstream. For both pipe routes,
the conveyed flow will ultimately be treated by regional wastewater treatment facilities.
4.1.2 Objective and Study Approach
The objective of this section is to summarize the investigations, in order to establish, evaluate, and
compare alternative routes for the proposed Diversion Facility sanitary sewer discharge force main (the
force main) and identify the most cost - effective pipeline route. The preferred alternatives will be based on
constructability and maintainability. A detailed approach has been implemented to identify the best
constructible route for the force main. This approach consists of the following major components:
• Identify potential pipeline route alternatives;
• Prepare preliminary cost for purposes of comparing the alternative routes;
• Perform a hydraulic analysis on the preferred route;
• Identify the preferred routes, considering the criteria ranking and costs.
This analysis reviews all project related information, such as digital aerial maps, Orange County Public
Works Records, easement descriptions, right -of -way (ROW) records, available utility system data, and
other pertinent information for an effective execution of the proposed project.
The objective of this analysis is to assist in identifying the most favorable route for the force main. It will
also serve as the document of record for technical support in later engineering decisions as the Project is
designed and constructed.
URS 15
25F -147
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
4.2 BASIC DATA
4.2.1 Introduction
In order to compare and evaluate suitable alternative pipeline routes, it is necessary to acquire a variety of
information or basic data on existing and proposed conditions. Comparative evaluations of the alternative
routes include the development of probable construction costs, land acquisition costs, and where
applicable, additional design costs. Other pertinent criteria, which are not readily cost identifiable, have
been assessed by means of an evaluation matrix. This matrix will be discussed later in the study.
4.2.2 Route Study Area
A route study area is the area within which alternative routes from Point A to Point B are developed. In
this alternative study, Point A is at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility's Pump Station and
Point B includes the connection points to existing sewer conveyance systems at various potential
locations, as described in Section 4.3.
4.2.3 Aerial Photographs
Aerial photography is necessary in pipeline route selection to identify highways, railroads,
environmentally sensitive lands, density of development, waterways, and other natural and man -made
features visible from air. For this alternative study, the aerial photos covering the route study area were
obtained from Google Earth Pro.
4.2.4 Existing Utility Data
Information on existing public utilities, particularly underground utilities, is required to identify pipeline
routes that will result in minimizing potential utility conflicts during construction. Existing large diameter
sanitary and storm sewers, sanitary force mains and water mains are usually the greatest concern. Other
utilities, including buried communications lines, gas mains, and power lines are also important, but are
typically much smaller in diameter than sewers and water mains. Consequently, they do not have a
significant impact on route selection, as it is comparatively easy to avoid these utilities or at least provide
adequate clearance for their protection during construction. The locations of above - ground power and
communications lines can affect route selection.
The following utility agencies maintain existing utilities with the alternative route corridors:
• Water
— City of Newport Beach
• Water
— City of Costa Mesa
• Sewer
— Orange County Sanitation District
• Sewer
— Costa Mesa Sanitation District
• Electricity — Southern California Edison
• GAS —
SC GAS
• Telephone — AT &T Distribution
• Cable
— Time Warner Cable
I= 16
25F -148
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
4.2.5 Rights -of -Way and Easements
Generally, it is desirable to install municipal pipelines in existing public ROW. Occasionally, it is
necessary to acquire permanent and temporary construction easements from private landowners to
accommodate a new utility. Acquiring easements may present costly and time - consuming challenges,
which can significantly delay a project. Easements and right -of -ways will be discussed later in the
description of each route.
Land records information including parcel/track boundary, easement, and ROW were obtained from the
Orange County Department of Public Works website.
4.2.6 Regulatory Requirements
The following regulatory agencies will have jurisdiction over the issuance of permits for design and
construction of the force main:
• Orange County Flood Control District — Encroachment Permit
• City of Newport Beach/City of Costa Mesa — Encroachment Permit
• Caltrans — Encroachment Permit
• Sewer — Orange County Sanitation District
• Sewer — Costa Mesa Sanitation District
• Electricity — Southern California Edison
• GAS — SC GAS
• Telephone — AT &T Distribution
• Cable —Time Warner Cable
• California Fish and Game Commission
4.2.7 Pipeline Design Criteria
The design flow for the Pump Station to discharge to the CMSD sewer collection system is 300 gpm in a
four -hour time window (PDR, Sept., 2012). It may be possible to design flow to be higher than 300 gpm
if it is to discharge directly to OCSD trunk main; this will be further addressed during later design phases.
Typical maximum and minimum velocity of the sewer pipe are 2 fps and 10 fps, respectively. The design
flow velocity for 300 gpm in the 8 -inch diameter pipe is 1.9 fps, which slightly lower than the minimum
velocity of 2 fps. A 6 -inch diameter pipe will be more suitable for the 300 gpm design flow with a
velocity of 3.4 fps. For routing evaluation purposes, a uniform 8 -inch diameter force main is used in this
study. Pipe material will be assumed to be high - density polyethylene (HDPE) for non - conventional
installation methods and ductile iron for conventional installation. Pipe installation methods are discussed
further below.
4.2.8 Pipe Installation Methods
The installation of the proposed reclaimed water main along each alternative can be achieved by different
construction methods. The following paragraphs will discuss the different methods available that can be
applied to this project and a recommendation will be presented based on the analysis performed.
URS 17
25F -149
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Open -Cut Excavation
Open -cut excavation is a commonly used method for the construction of wastewater sewer and water
mains. A new main is constructed by digging along the length of the pipeline to be replaced. The
traditional dig- and - replace (open -cut) method requires more restoration and causes more disturbance than
other construction methods. Open -cut replacement is typically the most costly method for constructing
pipelines due to intensive traffic control, pipe excavation, bedding and backfilling, and surface restoration
requirements. However, it provides the best option for repairing all defects and eliminating poor trench
conditions that are typically the cause of many pipeline defects. Open -cut excavation may be performed if
adequate space is available for construction of the new pipeline without significantly impacting service,
traffic, and access to private roadways and the community.
Trenchless Construction Technologies
Due to the environmental sensitivity of the project area and regulatory restrictions that would be imposed,
trenchless construction methods have been evaluated for this Project as an alternative to open trench
construction, where applicable. Technologies currently in use for small size pipe construction include
jack and bore and horizontal directional drilling (HDD).
Jack and bore is a multi -stage process for installing pipelines, which consists of constructing a temporary
horizontal jacking platform and a starting alignment track in an entrance pit located at the desired
elevation. The casing is jacked by manual control along the starting alignment track with simultaneous
excavation of the soil being accomplished by a rotating cutting head in the leading edge of the pipe's
annular space. The new main is inserted into the steel casing. The removed soil is transported back to the
entrance pit by rotating helical auger flights. Jack and bore typically provides limiting tracking and
steering as well as limited support to the excavation face. Removal and disposition of excess material is
usually required.
HDD offers much less impact on the environment and surrounding structures compared to other utility
construction methods. The HDD pipe installation method requires limited construction on either side of
the road, causing minimal impact on traffic and other buried utilities and structures. Typical HDD
construction is for pipe diameters greater than 2" and pipe lengths greater than 600 feet. The HDD
construction method is a two -stage process. The first stage consists of drilling a small diameter pilot hole
along the desired centerline of a proposed pipeline. The second stage consists of enlarging the pilot hole
to the desired diameter to accommodate the utility line and pulling the utility line through the enlarged
hole. The method's unique ability to track the location of the drill bit and steer it during the drilling
process results in a greater capability in placing the utilities in difficult underground conditions.
The limited traffic and surface disruption benefits of this method are comparable to the jack and bore
method. A smaller excavation area is required for the entry and exiting points; less equipment and less
soil disruption are also added benefits to the HDD method. It is anticipated that the HDD method is the
preferred method of construction when crossing the Delhi Channel and within the golf course area. This is
primarily due to the low amount of surface -level environmental impact associated with this technology
and the sensitivity of the project area. Also, the HDD technology is applicable in the saturated soil and
underwater conditions that will be encountered crossing the Delhi Channel.
Per Caltrans encroachment permit guidelines and specifications for trenchless technology projects
regarding jack and bore and HDD technologies, all transverse crossing pipes that are 6" or greater in
URS 18
25F -150
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
diameter shall be encased. The recommended minimum depth of cover for 8" to 14" diameter pipeline
using HDD technology is 6 feet. In this study, a 20" diameter case for 8" FM has been assumed.
4.3 ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTES
4.3.1 General
Five alternative sewer discharge FM pipeline routes from the diversion facility to the possible
City /County existing sewer collection connection points were identified and evaluated to determine the
best overall route. The location map for the five alternative routes is depicted in Exhibit A. Routes were
identified based on field observations, analysis of existing sewer collection system network data, and
traffic conditions. Both cost and non -cost (feasibility of construction and minimization of public
disruption) were considered in the selection of the routes. The five alternative routes are called:
• Route 1
• Route 2
• Route 3
• Route 4
• Route 5
These route corridors, plan (1:2400 scale), and profiles are on PD-4 to PD -19 in Appendix A -1
4.3.2 Description of Alternative Routes
Route 1
The limits of Route 1 begin at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility Pump Station and end at the
existing OCSD's 27" diameter trunk main located on the east side of Fairview Road near Fair Drive
intersection. The proposed FM connection is through an existing manhole. This route begins at the
proposed diversion facility location and proceeds west to cross under Delhi Channel and continues
southwest along Delhi Channel within the Newport Beach Golf Course. The route continues within an
existing Orange County sanitary sewer easement into the Irvine Avenue ROW. The route continues south
within the Irvine Avenue ROW to Mesa Drive, then continues west within the Mesa Drive ROW,
crossing Santa Ana Avenue to Newport Boulevard ROW, and then crossing Newport Boulevard through
the bridge's existing utility crossing structures, and continues west to Fair Drive ROW and then ends at
an existing manhole located on the east side of Fairview Road.
Pipeline Length
Route 1 is approximately 10,442 feet in length.
Public Inconvenience & Safety
Medium level of public inconveniences will occur within Route 1 when constructing along the roadway
due to equipment placement, work vehicles, etc. The beginning of route 1 will require that an easement be
obtained from the owner of the Newport Beach Golf Course and an existing sanitary sewer easement will
be used. The majority of the route is within ROW and will require maintenance of traffic (MOT). When
URS 19
25F -151
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
possible, a trenchless method of construction will be used to cross major intersections to minimize lane
closures along the route.
Right of Way Availability
Route 1 utilizes existing rights -of -way along the majority of the route. The following properties will need
permanent construction easements acquired from private landowners:
• Newport Beach Golf Course, 20 feet wide by 250 feet long
• 20321 -20371 Irvine Avenue, 20 feet wide by 400 feet long (this study consider existing sanitary
easement per OC parcel map no. 89 -128)
• 2765 Newport Blvd, 20 feet wide by 50 feet long
Operation and Maintenance
This section will be addressed at the completion of the hydraulic calculations of the preferred alternative
routes.
Special Construction
Trenchless construction techniques will be used for all pipeline crossings of major highways to avoid
disruption in vehicular traffic. Route 1 contains three crossings, which will require special coordination
and involvement with the applicable agencies.
• Delhi Channel (HDD), 300 feet, 30 feet deep
• Newport Beach Golf Course, continue through 2031 Irvin Avenue. (HDD), 600 feet, 10 feet deep
• Santa Ana Avenue (jack and bore), 150 feet, 10 feet deep
• Newport Blvd (HDD), 500 feet, 40 feet deep
Directional Drilling, and Jack and bore construction will be used to accomplish these major highway
crossings. Additional information regarding the estimated cost of special construction is located in
Exhibit B.
Route 2
The limits of Route 2 are similar to Route 1, beginning at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility
Pump Station and ending with the pipeline connection to the existing OCSD's 27" diameter trunk main
through an existing manhole at the east side of Fairview Road near Fair Drive intersection. This route
begins at the proposed diversion facility location and proceeds west to cross under the Delhi Channel and
continues southwest along the Delhi Channel within the Newport Beach Golf Course. The route continues
to northeast to Orchard Drive ROW then crossing to Santa Ana Avenue ROW. The route continues south
within the Santa Ana Avenue ROW to Mesa Drive, then continues west within the Mesa Drive ROW,
crossing Santa Ana Avenue to Newport Boulevard ROW, and then crossing Newport Boulevard through
the bridge's existing utility crossing structures, and continues west to Fair Drive ROW and ends at an
existing manhole east of Fairview Road.
URS 20
25F -152
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Pipeline Length
Route 2 is approximately 10,773 feet in length.
Public Inconvenience & Safety
Minor public inconveniences will occur within Route 2 when constructing along the roadway due to
equipment placement, work vehicles, etc. The beginning of Route 2 will require that an easement be
obtained from the Newport Beach Golf Course. The majority of the route is within ROW and will require
maintenance of traffic (MOT). When possible, a trenchless method of construction will be used to cross
major intersections to minimize lane closures along the route.
Right of Way Availability
Route 2 utilizes existing rights -of -way along the majority of the route. The following properties will need
permanent construction easements acquired from private landowners:
• Newport Beach Golf Course, 20 feet wide by 550 feet long
• 2765 Newport Blvd, 20 feet wide by 50 feet long
Operation and Maintenance
This section will be addressed upon the completion of the hydraulic calculations of the preferred
alternative routes.
Special Construction
Trenchless construction techniques will be used for all pipeline crossings of major highways to avoid
disruption in vehicular traffic. Route 2 contains three crossings which will require special coordination
and involvement with the applicable agencies.
• Delhi Channel (HDD), 300 feet, 30 feet deep
• Newport Beach Golf Course (HDD) to 1731 Orchard Drive, 600 feet, 10 feet deep
• Santa Ana Avenue (jack and bore), 150 feet, 10 feet deep
• Newport Blvd (HDD), 500 feet, 40 feet deep
HDD and jack and bore construction will be used to accomplish these major highway crossings.
Additional information regarding the estimated cost of special construction is located in Exhibit B.
Route 3
The limits of Route 3 begin at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility Pump Station and end with
the pipeline connection to the manhole upstream of the existing Irvine Boulevard Pump Station, which is
an existing system owned and operated by CMSD. Wastewater collected at the Irvine Boulevard Pump
URS 21
25F -153
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Station can be further pumped to the Elden Pump station through a 14" FM and then ultimately discharge
to the OCSD trunk main, which is the manhole upstream of the end connection points of Routes 1 and 2.
This route begins at the proposed diversion facility location and proceeds west to cross under the Delhi
Channel and continues southwest along the Delhi Channel within the Newport Beach Golf Course. The
route continues within an existing Orange County sanitary sewer easement to the Irvine Avenue ROW
and ends at an existing manhole located east of Irvine Avenue and north of Mesa Drive.
Pipeline Length
Route 3 is approximately 1,962 feet in length.
Public Inconvenience & Safety
Minor public inconveniences will occur within Route 3 when constructing along the roadway due to
equipment placement, work vehicles, etc. The beginning of route 3 will also require that an easement be
obtained from the Newport Beach Golf Course. The majority of the route is within ROW and will require
minimal maintenance of traffic (MOT). There is also minimal impact due to reduced pipeline route length
and the number of crossings of major intersections.
Per earlier discussion with CMSD, which is the local sewer collection owner for Route 3, the existing
CMSD system can take a maximum of 90,000 gallon per day discharge from the Delhi Channel with 300
gpm pumping capacity over the low peak time window from 12:00 pm to 5:00 am.
Right of Way Availability
Route 3 uses existing rights -of -way along the majority of the route. The following properties will need
permanent construction easements acquired from private landowners:
Newport Beach Golf Course, 20 feet wide by 250 feet long
20321 -20371 Irvine Avenue, 20 feet by 400 feet long (this study will consider existing the
sanitary easement per OC parcel map no. 89 -128)
Operation and Maintenance
The existing Irvine Pump Station and Elden Pump Station will be impacted by additional flow from the
Project. Although there is no change expected for the existing pump stations, these pumps will be running
longer and start/stop more frequently, and thus could potentially increase the future operation and
maintenance costs. There is extra operational cost associated with energy cost for pumping water three
times before entering the OCSD trunk main along with the potential increased O &M cost for the existing
CMSD sewer collection system. The energy cost will be addressed upon the completion of the hydraulic
calculations of the preferred alternative routes.
URS 22
25F -154
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Special Construction
Trenchless construction techniques will be used for all pipeline crossings of major highways to avoid
disruption in vehicular traffic. Route 3 contains one crossing, which will require special coordination and
involvement with the applicable agencies.
• Delhi Channel (HDD), 300 feet, 30 feet deep
• Newport Beach Golf Course continue through 2031 Irvine Avenue (HDD), 600 feet, 10 feet deep
HDD and jack and bore construction will be used to accomplish these major highway crossings.
Additional information regarding the estimated cost of special construction is located in Exhibit B.
Downstream Existing Pump Station Improvements
Route 3 will divert flow into MCSD's existing sewer system, before it can enter the OCSD's sewer trunk
main. The pump stations that will be impacted are the Irvine Sewer Lift Station and Elden Sewer Lift
Station. The Irvine Pump Station was rehabilitated and upgraded in 2007. The most recent improvement
for the Elden Pump Station was in 1990. The Irvine Pump Station is a duplex pump station equipped with
two Flygt NP3202 Type MT, 8 "X8" submersible pumps with 60 HP motors. The Irvine Pump Station
consists of two emergency storage vaults in addition to storage capacity in wet wells and sewer manholes
at the pump station. The Elden Pump Station is also a duplex pump station equipped with Flygt CP -3300
pumps each with 60 HP motors. In this preliminary phase, we do not have detail design flow and head
information of these two pump stations, and for rough cost estimation we assumed that both existing
pump station wet wells and structures can be reused. Pumps will be replaced with slightly larger pumps
from the same manufacturer ( Flygt), and the controls will remain in place. The installation cost of two
new pumps to the existing Irvine and Ellden Pump Stations is estimated to be approximately $100,000 for
each pump station. By including contingency of 100 %, the downstream existing pump station
improvements are estimated to be approximately $400,000.
Route 4
The limits of Route 4 begin at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility Pump Station and end with
the pipeline connection to the existing OCSD's 27" diameter trunk main at the intersection of MacArthur
Boulevard and Birch Street. This route begins at the proposed diversion facility location and proceeds
north, crossing the Newport Beach Golf course, southeast to Bristol Street ROW, crossing Corona Del
Mar Freeway, through the bridge's existing utility crossing structures, and continues southeast to Birch
Street within the ROW. The route continues northeast within the Birch Street ROW to MacArthur
Boulevard, ending at an existing manhole on the northwest corner of the MacArthur Boulevard and Birch
Street intersection.
Pipeline Length
Route 4 is approximately 7,132 feet in length.
Public Inconvenience & Safety
The public inconveniences for Route 4 when constructing along the roadway include the major crossing
at Corona Del Mar Freeway (including Bristol Street S. and Bristol Street. N) and two street crossings on
URS 23
25F -155
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Birch Street at Quail Street and Dove Street, all of which are close to John Wayne Airport. The beginning
of Route 4 will require an easement to be obtained from Newport Beach Golf Course. The majority of the
route is within ROW and will require maintenance of traffic (MOT). When possible, a trenchless method
of construction will be used to cross major intersections to minimize lane closures along the route.
Right of Way Availability
The OC Public Works land use records indicate that a portion of Birch Street parallel to Campus Drive is
within a private tract (from Bristol Street N. to Dove Street, OC Tract No. 3201), and therefore Route 4
goes along Campus Drive for the majority of the route. The following properties will need permanent
construction easements acquired from private landowners:
• Newport Beach Golf Course, 20 feet wide by 1,000 feet long
Operation and Maintenance
This section will be addressed upon the completion of the hydraulic calculations of the preferred
alternative routes.
Special Construction
Trenchless construction techniques will be used for all pipeline crossings of major highways to avoid
disruption in vehicular traffic. Route 1 contains three crossings which will require special coordination
and involvement with the applicable agencies.
• Newport Beach Golf Course (HDD), 1,000 feet, 10 feet deep
• Campus Drive. (jack and bore), 150 feet, 10 feet deep
• Birch St. (jack and bore), 60 feet, 10 feet deep
HDD and jack and bore construction will be used to accomplish these major highway crossings.
Additional information regarding the estimated cost of special construction is located in Exhibit B
Route 5
The limits of Route 5 begin at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility Pump Station and end with
the pipeline connection to the existing OCSD's 15" diameter trunk main at the intersection of MacArthur
Boulevard and Campus Drive. This route begins at the proposed diversion facility location and proceeds
north across Newport Beach Golf course to Bristol Street SE ROW, crossing Corona Del Mar Freeway
using an existing utility crossing structure, and continues northeast on Campus Drive within the ROW.
The route continues northeast within the Campus Drive ROW to MacArthur Blvd, ending at an existing
manhole on the northwest corner of the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive.
Pipeline Length
Route 5 is approximately 7,566 feet in length.
Public Inconvenience & Safety
The public inconveniences within Route 5 when constructing along the roadway include the major
crossings of the Corona Del Mar Freeway (including Bristol Street S. and Bristol Street N). Campus
Drive is on the premises of John Wayne Airport. The beginning of route 5 will require an easement to be
UR.S 24
25F -156
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
obtained from the Newport Beach Golf Course. The majority of the route is within ROW and will require
maintenance of traffic (MOT). When possible, a trenchless method of construction will be used to cross
major intersections to minimize lane closures along the route.
Right of Way Availability
Route 5 will use the easement on the Newport Beach Golf course to cross the Corona Del Mar Freeway,
and therefore an easement must be obtained from owner of the golf course. The following properties will
need permanent construction easements acquired from private landowners:
• Newport Beach Golf Course, 20 feet wide by 1,000 feet long
Operation and Maintenance
This section will be addressed upon the completion of the hydraulic calculations of the preferred
alternative routes.
Special Construction
Trenchless construction techniques will be used for all pipeline crossings of major highways to avoid
disruption in vehicular traffic. Route 5 contains three crossings which will require special coordination
and involvement with the applicable agencies.
• Newport Beach Golf Course (HDD), 1,000 feet, 10 feet deep
HDD and jack and bore construction will be used to accomplish these major highway crossings.
Additional information regarding the estimated cost of special construction is located in Exhibit B.
4.4 EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTES
4.4.1 Cost Estimate Software
The conveyance pipeline cost estimate was developed using the Tabula 3.1 software.
4.4.2 Pipeline Construction Cost
Preliminary construction costs for the routes have been estimated for route comparison purposes. Table 4-
1 lists the preliminary construction cost for each route based on pipe material, installation, crossings,
special construction, and surface restoration. Detailed construction cost analysis for the five different
routes can be found in Appendix A- 4.
Table 4- 1 Preliminary Construction Cost of Force Main Installation
Route
Approximate
Length (ft)
Cost of
Installation
Cost/LF
1
10,442
2,900,000
278
2
10,773
2,080,000
193
3
1,900
961,000
506
4
6,886
2,390,000
347
5
7,150
2,060,000
288
URS 25
25F -157
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
For cost estimation purposes, the pipe material is considered to be ductile iron with HDPE pipe when
HDD is proposed. Road crossings, which also include canal crossings, were evaluated to determine the
construction method needed (i.e. open cut, HDD, or jack and bore) and cost associated with each method
was included in this cost estimate. The preliminary cost estimate was developed using the Tabula 3.1
Conveyance System Estimate Software. Tabula is a computer program that has been developed by King
County to provide conveyance cost estimates at the planning level. Costs related to surface restoration
includes the restoration of any disrupted surface whether it is roadway, sidewalk, or undisturbed
landscape. A detailed breakdown of the cost estimate is located in Exhibit B.
According to these criteria the most favorable routes based on construction cost of installation in each
section, shown in italics, are Routes 3 and 5respectively.
4.4.3 Pump Energy Cost
Preliminary hydraulic analysis and estimated pump horse power based on elevations and hydraulic
friction loss of the FM are summarized below for each route. The energy consumption is relatively small
as compared to the large difference of capital cost for the pipeline construction. Detailed hydraulic
analysis for the five different Routes can be found in Appendix A- 5.
Preliminary power consumption costs for different routes have been estimated for route comparison
purposes.
Table 4- 2 Preliminary Estimate of Power Consumption
Route
Pump Head
(ft)
Pump Horse Power
(HP)
Annual Energy
Cost
1
84
2.6
369
2
85
2.7
373
3
21
0.7
93
4
62
2.0
274
5
63
2.0
278
Note: 0.10 dollar/Kwh, 5 hours per day continuous pumping
4.4.4 Non - Cost - Identifiable Evaluation
Development /Ranking of Criteria
The alternative pipeline routes in each section have been evaluated and compared on the basis of an array
of non -cost identifiable criteria. For purposes of evaluation, these criteria are assumed to have little or no
cost value. The non -cost identifiable criteria are possible characteristics or special requirements
associated with each route. Although they are not evaluated with a cost value, these criteria are of critical
importance in determining the appropriate route. The non -cost identifiable criteria developed for this
evaluation are shown in Table 4 -3.
URS 26
25F -158
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Table 4- 3 Non -Cost Identifiable Route Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Impacts
Pipeline Length - Duration of construction; date of initial operation
- Number of pipe joints and potential latent defects
- Number of appurtenances requiring O &M
- Duration of public inconvenience
Public Inconvenience
- Number and duration of roadway /lane closures
1
- Traffic volume along route
Special Crossings
- Duration of construction
5
- Permitting
40
- Future maintenance accessibility
ROW /Easement Availability
- Administrative, surveying and engineering costs
18
- Design and bidding schedules
Operation and Maintenance
- O &M convenience
2
- Maintenance accessibility
An evaluation matrix is a convenient tool for identifying priority criteria for each alternative route. The
matrix is a method of rating each route against each of the 10 weighted non -cost identifiable route
selection criteria previously discussed. The weight for cost used is 40 in addition to the six non -cost
factors with a total of 100. The alternative routes in each section have been evaluated on the basis of non-
cost identifiable criteria using the "Route Evaluation Matrix." Each alternative route was compared and
rated against the cost and non -cost identifiable criteria on a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent). A weight
factor was applied to each criteria rating for each route.
The overall weighted scores for each route are summarized in Table 44.
Table 4- 4 Route Evaluation Weighted Overall Scores
Route
Weight
1
2
3*
4
5
Cost
40
13
18
40
18
19
Pipeline Length
10
2
2
10
3
3
Public Inconvenience
10
5
5
10
5
5
Special Crossings
10
3
5
5
5
10
ROW/EasementAvailability
10
3
5
5
t0
10
Operation and Maintenance
10
10
10
0
10
10
Weighted Overall Scores
100
36
45
70
50
56
* Most Preferred Route
Italicized values in Table 411 indicate the most preferred route in that particular section based on the
selected non -cost identifiers in Table 4 -3. The most favorable routes are Route 3 and 5.
URS 27
25F -159
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
4.5 ROUTE RECOMMENDATION
For each alternative, basic data, including but not limited to, aerial photography, utility data, property
maps, wetlands, and long -range planning were evaluated and supplemented with field reconnaissance.
Two preferred alternative routes were identified and further evaluated below. The two preferred route
corridors were selected to be the least - disruptive, safest, and most cost - effective alignment for each route
of the alternative alignments.
4.5.1 Preferred Alternative Routes
Preferred Route —Route No. 3
Below is a list of the estimated total quantities for preferred Route 3:
• 1,900 LF
• One easement to be acquired
• Two special crossings
• Irvine and Elden Pump Stations upgrade (cost not included)
Preferred Route — Route No. 5
Below is a list of the estimated total quantities for Preferred Route 5:
• 7,566 LF
• One easement to be acquired
• Three special crossings
4.5.2 Estimated Route Cost
The overall estimated construction cost for the two preferred alternative routes are as follows:
Preferred Route 3 $861,000
Preferred Route 5 $2,060,000
Preferred Route 3 has the lowest construction cost.
4.5.3 Recommended Route
Based on the comprehensive evaluation presented herein, Preferred Route 3 and 5 arethe recommended
routes.
URS 28
25F -160
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
5.0 COST EVALUATION
In this section, the alternatives developed for the Delhi Diversion Facility have been evaluated for cost -
effectiveness. The conceptual costs include capital, and operation and maintenance costs. Capital costs
were considered for the Diversion Facilities, conveyance piping and pump stations.
5.1 CAPITAL COSTS
The original estimated costs of the Urban Discharge Water Diversion System that was presented in the
Santa Ana Delhi Channel Diversion Project, Preliminary Design Report Dated July 31, 2012, which
incorporated a new pump station and force main, were approximately $3,430,500. The PDR addendum
No. 1 dated August 2014 had an estimated cost of $3.7 M.
The estimated construction costs for the Santa Ana Delhi Diversion and Treatment System are presented
below:
Option A — In- channel structure Rubber Dam, Force Main Route 3
Option B - In- channel structure Rubber Dam, Force Main Route 5
Option C — In- channel structure Radial Gates, Force Main Route 3
Option B - In- channel structure Radial Gates, Force Main Route 5
The estimated cost has been revised based on several updates. The original cost estimate for radial gates
was $250,000 and has revised to $970,000. Cost for four water storage tanks of $184,000 which were
added to the updated version. It is also critical that if the golf course will not be able to accept the
harvested flow for irrigation, then all the harvested dry- weather flow will have to be pumped to OCSD
trunk main. Subsequently, an increased cost of $961,000 for the 8" FM routing to the nearby CMSD
sewer connection location increases the cost of the FM routing to the OCSD trunk main to $2,060,000.
This is a significant increase compared to $1,125,000 for the Addendum No. 1 cost estimate for the 4"
FM.
Table 4- 5 Cost Estimates for Four Alternative Options
Item #
Item Description
Estimated Cost
1.0
Mobilization (not to exceed 5% of the total contract)
$169,000
2.0
Preparation of Construction Management Plan
$10,000
3.0
SWPPP maintenance (0.5% of construction cost)
$17,000
4.0
Surveying and construction staking (not to exceed
2% of the total contract)
$67,000
5.0
Permits OCFC, ACOE, Fish & Game, OCSD)
$15,000
6.0
Traffic control (5% of construction cost)
$169,000
7.0
Clearing and grubbing (5% of Construction Costs)
$169,000
8.0
Temporary shoring including removal of top five
feet
$360,000
9.0
Site unclassified excavation including stockpiling
and export
$167,000
ults 29
25F -161
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Item #
Item Description
Estimated Cost
10.0
-Site backfill including imported material and
compaction
$75,000
11.0 A
Radial Gate
$970,000
11.0 B
Rubber Dam
$380,000
4-2-.0
Rt sB
$9
13.0
Three Chamber Clarifier
$495,000
14.0
Water Storage Tank
$140,000
15.0
RCP
$36,000
15.0
Diversion Pump Station / Disinfection
$515,000
16.0 A
8" Force Main (Route 3)
$961,000
16.0 B
8" Force Main (Route 5)
$2,060,000
17.0
Demolition
$67,500
18.0
1 Electrical
$150,000
Option A - Rubber Dam, FM Route 3
Subtotal
$3,957,000
10% Contingency
$396,000
Design Costs (Engineering, Survey, Environmental,
Const. Support)
$338,100
Construction Management Costs
$514,575
Base Bid
$5,206,000
Option B - Rubber Dam, FM Route 5
Subtotal
$5,056,000
10% Contingency
$506,000
Design Costs (Engineering, Survey, Environmental,
Const. Support)
$338,100
Construction Management Costs
$514,575
Base Bid
$6,415,000
Option C - Radial Gates, FM Route 3
Subtotal
$4,547,000
10% Contingency
$455,000
Design Costs (Engineering, Survey, Environmental,
Const. Support)
$338,100
Construction Management Costs
$514,575
Base Bid
$5,855,000
Option D - Radial Gates, FM Route 5
Subtotal
$5,646,000
10% Contingency
$565,000
Design Costs (Engineering, Survey, Environmental,
Const. Support)
$338,100
Construction Management Costs
$514,575
Base Bid
$7,064,000
UR.S 30
25F -162
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
5.2 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
As part of the cost evaluation, annual operation and maintenance costs including labor, power
consumption, and miscellaneous costs have been developed for each alternative, as explained below:
• Power costs were based on total estimated power consumption to run each facility.
• Labor costs at each facility include maintenance personnel for seasonal cleaning, O &M at the
Diversion Facility; annual inspection; and maintenance at the pump station facility.
Miscellaneous costs include Rehabilitation and Repair (R &R) cost, parts, utilities, and general
operating supplies.
Table 4 -6 presents a summary of the Fiscal Year 2014 Operation and Maintenance Costs for each
alternative. The table shows the distribution of operation and maintenance costs spread with percentages
of costs for the power, labor and the miscellaneous costs, and their respective percentage of total capital
cost for each option. Table 4 -6 shows the O&M costs only account for 0.2 to 0.4 percent of the capital
cost. Therefore the cost estimate of the project options are mainly decided by the capital costs, and are not
impacted much by the O &M costs.
Table 4- 6 O &M Cost Estimates for Four Alternative Options
Description
Unit
Option A
Rubber
Dam
FM Route 3
Option B
Rubber
Dam
FM Route 5
Option C
Radial
Gates
FM Route 3
Option D
Radial
Gates
FM Route 5
Power Required for Pump
kwh/yr
930
2,780
930
2,780
Power Required for Blower
kwh/yr
2,500
2,500
Total Yearly Power Cost
$ /yr
343
278
343
278
Labor
Total Yearly Labor Cost 2
$ /yr
3,048
3,048
3,048
3,048
Miscellaneous
Debris Cleaning (30 tons
annually) 3
$ /yr
5,500
5,500
5,500
5500
Miscellaneous R &R Costs 4
$ /yr
12,000
12,000
6,000
6,000
Total Annual O &M Cost
$ /yr
20,891
20,826
14,891
14,826
Annual O &M Percentage of
Capital Cost
%
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
Notes:
1. 50Kw blower, 10 times, each time runs for 5 hours
2.40 Hours for O &M labor, Labor Hour + OT and tools is estimated to be $76.20/hr
3. 50% of LA County average debris cleaning cost
Source: http:// dpw. lacounty. gov/ epd /aboutthebag/pdf%5CDWAB_BC.pdf
4. None of the budget totals include R &R costs greater than $5,000
URS 31
25F -163
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Appendix A- 1
Preliminary Design Drawings
25F -164
\\
|$}
: !E!
J L ;
--
.�
. \
& »
! \ -
i
| , ;
� \ �
! , :
,(
� ..
25F.165
Y
a
�ll
1'
Aq
C:
Z
W
W
J
LLI
R
U
J
7
-
n
7.
e
0
\s�
s�
rF
P�
� 4 �
° 5
rS 04'
J� 4J
G
25F -167
3 °-
0
0
N
O
p 11
O
W
U
N
0
z o 0
w
z 3�;'Dj 335
L77b +hL VIS R111 HO1VV�
a.
w q
11
0
� o � a
i a
y
i I p
w z e
o
xZmo
wa�u
°OSa
ao=
Z�2¢
II
II1
0: 2 a
O
I
s°
ii
I
$
O
N uJ
7 t "
<
6
it
L,
E
j
P
a
�
AVM UBYMWA,_ -
.ate:
T
II
I
8
� v
jNld3A
j
a
hO
MSI i?£9)
t 151X31935
55 NIa39
'ZO
_ _
— S
o
—s- —
!
Hm
oly HW
+bOI. Y15
s
avow M31rnm
` �L_
E 3HnOIH 33S -
Lb'Zb +" ViS SNIT HD1tlW R
LL
w °
o b 8 z a
w II II Z T Z 8LL
Q_ $
— ma a 5z
m
vUi II ° �a KO
N W W-
wO Qz W p o
>2 QJZ ¢io
$
O Z � ¢
U
z v
a
I a s
o V
3nN3AV N30l3
IT
IT
0
1 aS
y lid
p
I
o
s 8
Ow
p N �
V I a O GdVAl 10B 1NOdM3N a T
_l Ir o
8
4VM3383 SS -tl -
\yl %I /N
s
x
I 8 w a
I 8 m
I 3
IS
9
I : m
8 � j
_ Z
25F -169
4 J?n91d 33S
/0Z9 +2L VJS '3NIl HXVW
I N
� a
I
v
ry
a
II I ^
III
f I I j
III LL v
I 1
1 ji l
,I I
I
'I
I
I _$
4
III 3
s
I e
--- 25F -170
s
r.
a
w
U
b N
O
O
p.
_i
i
_ I
t
25F -171
25F -171
Z 3HH9d 335
887[ —iL N1S JNI HXVVW
i
vt I _I
I i cc
L_ -J
I
O.i
I � -
i
P
P
8
,
LHA�L6'I'l5i. ) 3lT 9Oux4 woae I tl15
�x
illy
I
i
— z —:
� a
°o
n
1 ° w
� U
O N
° 40
4 } AYM a8 nD VA
�?a
z
u
�I
�o
R
ovoa xaUane
-172
I '
�_
3an�l 33s
_
86ZL
+Lb tl15 9Nn
HXtlW
'.
:3f1N30V 30NVNO'
R
0
w a
a
ti
<yz
os
v�
w <�o
II II
!
S
R
C?0
z
LY
o
If
zFm�
�
z��
O
nW.
g x
II
e a
I
I
n
3nN v N M3
Mjjs
0
I.
_I
z
wa
L o
�
O
.-
J
U
N
Il
'/
$
awV n03 INOdB N
�
V
o
dtlM33U1 SS —`A
I
�
m
I
i
F
?
C
III
"�25F
�e�..:_..�
-173
J �
LL 0
w ¢ a
z a
rn �
0-5s
ozaw o
3rL
0
¢�zs
�¢¢ "w
4 ainou 33S a w 6
99 '00 +ZZ V1S 3NII HO1VW U gp
O
LL
U
N _ d
9`
Ie
o o
o
I P s
$
$ O
°n N j
2SE-1 74
8 0 �
e
Y
I
0
F
8
I
t
i
• t
S �
$ a
I � E
8
I a
3
a
W
R
d
w � n
z a
zv�ro
$?g a3
N
N W f
O
LL yp
O
L
Y
I1 N
I
w i OO
J
U
I o w+
o � 1
n o 0
g
I I
8 � 5
y � _
s ° a
a
_ a
/ F
z
r I '
d
25F -175
W ^ f
R
LL Q
w
z m a
a
Z N
Z N Z a LL
�z
UW
Z LL �
o�w0
�
Qi. z2
QOQ rm
Z x €
W
WV7 P FI, c
rr
6
i
I II
O w
N W
O N
O
ti O
— 1
E
r
LL Z
'W a
Y
g
1vGx 3MYO 5
d
S
5
9f
25F-1 76
3
W
LL
J O
w rc
z O g
zN
Q y j
�Jma�
Waaz
o<wo
¢3w0
zQ ] N
z W n Nw
w w =
O
LL
_ S C
A _
fAW S YZL9 )�.��
S N19 9,
00'00 S N 9-0
a
+I �
I =�
b
ddd_ N W
L I U
G N
� O
I
I
l
3
I
I
I
R
S
3 2
� d
g
s
(�Nt Rl)
nl I_A � a
l$ l 83,3L95
LI 01 1J (Ij
R
6
i
25F -177
Z MnOl3 33S
00'00 +0£ ViS :3NIl HOIVIN a
0 Q
W d
z a
z y
ijg e�
UJ o h
a
�05a
z
QJz
Q0Q Sw
N Wrc
U
K
U �o
s B
Z�
0
°o
r
ui
U
°o h
0
�4p
J /
\ J7
N3j` `i4j
f
�c
40 Y
y
8
s
I i
L WIT
25F478/--\
i J
r
I
C
I '
i
.
IV
Y1 $
I
I
ry
i�
11
i
�
1
L
1 1
1 \1
�
m
8
Ii
I
I
w �l
�
\
m
O r
8
/f
/ i
8
a
8
I I
r
SS Ni932
0000 +00 b1
£ 3W)013 13S
0000 +09
N13 :3NIl
HO1VW
w
z a
a
a
¢¢ N m
S
U J g e
pzaz
ry
wQKO
OUP
o
a
�Zw0
Q 7 N
r
U
z
FL
ao
<
O y
O
I
w II
<
N ww
0
$ Zro
R
O
LL
O
Y
N
K ll
>O
I
2
I
1
I
1
0
I
1
y�
Ow
1
G
1
Z�
w
o
w
z a
a
a
¢¢ N m
S
U J g e
pzaz
ry
wQKO
OUP
o
�Zw0
Q 7 N
r
U
z
FL
ao
<
O y
O
<
N ww
0
$ Zro
R
O
LL
O
Y
DOVE Si� ,.jv
4
J R
R w O
Z,,
INZ
<5
o zaz
o -
¢ao
zo
� c9�F
Z?w0
O ¢ J N
ry ¢OZ irc
z aw
w
¢
N O
0
O
It-
odb
� .
I
i
ul
Im a
a
I
1 WPV a
4
g
1
8
a
8
a°
3
s
S
6
i
`a
i
a
s
E
— 1
(I�NI
55 313
G9lf +:L b15 .. O o
I L coo,,%
w ,ll II
¢
N
> S
_I
I
1
\
I
1
I
I
r
w
_
0
w ¢
Z a
a
zNz
S
a3
1-
o
z 0 w
p
F
QDz
m I II
Q O G
z
=
m
O
R o
8
i
8
I
a
8
^
I
8
1 )
8
1
q
�\
8
�
8
I
i
/
o
tiW
V
11
�O
I
I
I
I
�
I
I
SS NMQ
00'Oot00
V15
r
°a
°o
it
o f
w
� U
O N
O
J
w
-
R
0
w ¢
Z a
a
zNz
S
a3
N
,QUO
iw
z 0 w
p
F
QDz
.a
Q O G
z
=
m
O
R o
°a
°o
it
o f
w
� U
O N
O
J
w
R �
F 321f101j
335
0
a
_
00'00 +09
tl153NIl HO1tlW
w
z a
2(n�
U J Q
_
$ 4
N
z
zam o
w¢�u
'
z w
z
-
mII II
I
o
Qjz
�o
¢a
!!
o
o
Boa
I
s° s
I
i
I
I
°a
I
1
'.:
n
`�I
DOVE STREET
o
w
U
�
I
I
1
( I
I
1
t I
O
Orc
1
I
E
�
V
I
QUAIL STREET
1
1
I
1
fl
25F -183
o�
s
N
I
O f
N W
N
0
( NQ
S
1 Om
h SYby
1 I !
(ANI Opp
55'pN3
CC S9 tSL tl15
- O
J II p
4
w O
I
I
°w
1
1
1
¢p
O
N
xl \ \ \1
I
25F -183
o�
s
N
I
O f
N W
N
0
( NQ
S
1 Om
h SYby
1 I !
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Appendix A- 2
Delhi Channel Hydraulic Calculation
25F -184
N
O
Z
E
7
a
c
a�
a
a
CL
m
c
rn
N
N
T
L
r_
C
E
L
CL
25F -185
N
0
zC
C
C
d
Q
0
Q
N
i
07
y
0
O
T
R
C
a`
C
O
7
0
Ci
C
:s]
a
C
2
N
a
25F -186
N
Ln
N
7
-It
-It
M
N
L
V
V
m
m
m
Ln
R
.4
m
m
m
m
V
0)
N
N
N
Ift
Lq
N
N
to
Lq
to
l!1
Lll
Lq
Lq
Vt
Lq
Ill
Vl
Lq
m
Vt
Lq
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7 L
o u
LL
N
7
7
m
l0
m
'-I
e-I
V
M
n
00
N
m
00
rl
LI1
'Q
m
N
N
I�
V
y
M
7
N
N
l0
N
tD
lD
H
N
N
L
Q
W
LIl
O
Vl
V
l0
01
rl
00
m
00
00
m
l0
H
m
w
N
3 ,�
LD
m
O
Ln
m
Ln
W
to
M
n
m
n
N
n
m m
O
vl
m
m
00
�
m
�
n
m
m
N
m m
O O'
LL
m
00
LI1
M
L D
LD
LD
n
N
m
n
N
ci
H
rl
M
m
N
lD
LD
l0
V
C
N
t
'--I
W
H
Ill
N
li
It
O
n
rI
Lq
N
o6
m
0
I'
O
V
r1
O
L
V
00
m
O
O
ri
rI
rI
CO
m
O
O
H
rl
H
m
O
O
H
H
rl
00
N
�
H
N
rl
rl
rl
rl
N
N
rl
H
r1
rl
N
H
N
w
M
m
H
l0
t!1
V
m
m
m
N
m
00
00
N
l0
m
't
r1
rl
N
LD
N
CL
V
ti
H
0
0
o
m
m
0
0
m
m
m
m
H
m
m
m
m
m
m
O
O
Ln
Ln
M
Ln
0
M
v
o
Ln
In
v
v
a
v
Ln
0
v
0
a
0
a
0
v
0
v
0
c
0
Ln
0
Ln
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
m
n
m
to
N
.�
n
N
vl
.-I
Ln
.-I
Ln
In
N
Ln
Il
Lq
m
N
N
N
N
<D
V
N
.-i
c-I
t
b
Lq
m
6
0
0
m
Lll
ui
W
Vl
00
O
N
M
'd'
m
m
W
O
N
m
It
m
m
w
N
N
m
T
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
ti
N
N
N
N
N
rl
rl
N
N
N
N
Q
W�
N
LIl
Ll)
Ln
N
N
n
Lq
-i
rl
N
00
LA
O
3
rV
d
LA
l0
l0
i�
ri
v
<D
M
m
N
N
C
N
.--I
'-I
tll
00
00
N
m
N
n
N
N
LA
t0
m
N
N
n
N
O
Ol
O
m
m
00
rq
0
01
t
M
00
V
a-i
O
.-I
V
d'
CL ^
l0
00
O
N
N
V
Ni
lD
O0
O
N
N
H
M
w
00
0
N
m
V
M
LD
>
m
n
ri
v
v
to
m
00
0o
N
"I
Ln
N
r
m
m
v
N
N
oo
.�
a
y
LO
rI
N
V
M
V
N
.I
v
m
Lq
N
11
l0
W
N
W
O
r
N
r4
Il
0
O
l0
w
O
H
H
H
3�
N
N
co
O W
00
00
W
W
00
W
W
00
00
W
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
w
w
m
m
N
m3_
rl
N
N
rl
N
N
l0
l0
l0
lD
lD
lD
LL
e-I
N
N
r-I
rl
rl
e-I
Iq
mrl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O0
CO
W
W
CO
00
00
r
n
n
n
Lq
L
u
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
l0
tO
l0
l0
l0
l0
lD
to
lO
l0
lD
lD
1p
l0
LO
C_
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
r
m
m
m
N
0
0
m
m
m
m
N
0
0
N
LIl
0
m
O
m
N
m
m
N
V
0
N
0
N
LIl
0
M
O
0-
O
M
n
d'
m
0
v
N
00
N
m
LIl
00
O
m
n
a
m
Lll
n
N
W
m
C0
m
a
LA
n
W
m
W
m
h 16
C
O
O
2
N
Y
L
L
L
N
Y
L
L
N
w=
Y
OJ
N
N
N
N
W
T
J
N
N
N
01
N
>
J
N
N
N
0)
Ol
T
J
t0
0
Q
N
01
T>
?
O
N
N
?
>>
O-9
Ol
O.
N
LIl
O
ei
m
N
O
Ln
O
r-I
h
Q
N
?
LI)
O
N
L 1
N
6
N
O
rl
Q
N
LP
N
N
LIl
N
Q
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
000
0
o
O
o
0
NT
T
co
001
001
001
25F -186
N
cs
z
C
W
Q
0
O
C
C)
C
cm
.N
d
T
L.
C
.0
d
25F -187
V
m
m
M
m
N
m
m
m
m
N
N
N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
w
LA
to
N
N
LA
N
m
VI
Ln
N
N
N
Lq
V1
m
LQ
Lq
Ln
Lrt
Ln
Lq
W
N
Lll
u
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
o u
tL �
m
w
m
m
H
m
N
H
N
m
V
LD
N
m
L!L
r`
LA
Lq
M
N
H
LO
m
N
m
w
41
O
O
Lll
N
rf
w
W
LD
n
H
trl
O
N
M
V
Nj
w
N
w
O
N
M
M
L
Q
V
H
O
N
a
0
m
O
w
m
m
w
m
m
V
N
n
O
H
M
w
w
N
H
LD
O
w
T'It
W
n
w
lD
r
w
m
H
m
O
LD
m
w
d'
n
O
w
n
n
w
m
N
m
O
LO
n
M
n
H
00
n
n
w
m
N
0
H
LD
O
n
0 c
LL �
m
w
r`
H
N
H
n
N
N
LD
w
w
0)
n
w
w
H
H
H
N
H
w
m
L
m
m
LD
O
V
H
at
N
Ol
LD
LT
M
O
00
H
00
Ln
O
m
O
0C
6
01
O
w
0)
r`
w
Ln
w
LD
w
n
w
H
w
H
01
co
w
r`
w
o,
.�
"
n
n
r,
H
N
v
n
m
LD
H
m
CL
0
V
V
0
d
n
7
n
w
It
N
7
n
V
V
O
d'
O
n
It
n
d
r`
V
LO
d
LD
V
V
O
LD
V
LD
V
vi
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W .,..
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
D
O
O
L11
O
N
l0
N
Ln
M
m
Ol
N
l0
N
N
O1
V
w
Ll>
w
H
N
H
m
n
m
N
N
Ol
m
N
V
H
w
w
H
M
H
O
m
n
n
O
N
Ol
Oi
W
L—y
00
H
N
tr
M
H
00
H
H
N
d'
m
m
w
H
H
N
V
m
H
N
H
H
H
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
H
H
N
N
N
N
H
N
Q
W ....
VI
3
u` x
Ol
7
N
w
O1
V
N
w
H
w
N
Ll>
w
H
m
m
N
w
N
m
w
V
N
rY
Lq
V
al
Ln
N
N
LO
Lq
O
LD
M
N
M
W
LD
H
LO
N
.-.
w
O
H
H
y
m
lO
w
O
N
M
�Y
M
to
O1
O
N
m
V
M
w
Ol
O
H
01
V1
V
w
N
w
O
m
N
m
H
N
r,
H
m
H
H
m
m
V
m
H
H
m
w
N
w
H
m
w
LO
W
M
w
m
m
cr
N
r�
.
N .
O
.
al
.
O
.
M
H
.
LD
.
N
.
m
.
VI ..
H
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
3x
w
w
w
w
w
w
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
m
m
m
m
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
N
w
w
w
00
00,
w
w
LO
w
W
w
W
to
LD
Ln
Lt)
Ln
Ltl
C W
r
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
N
n
n
t\
n
co
N
N
n
n
n
N
N
N
N
N
L
m
Lq
LA
Li
Ln
Li
V
cr
V
V
y
V
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
u
Lo
LD
LD
w
LO
LD
w
lD
Lo
LD
LD
LD
LO
w
W
w
w
W
l0
LD
LD
LO
LD
W
O
o
O
O
o
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
O
O
y
m
N
m
m
N
V
O
N
O
N
m
N
m
O
m
rl
m
N
O
O
m
m
m
T
N
14T
O
O
m
m
01
m
N
v
Ln
�
w
rn
w
m
y
m-t
Ln
n
N
w
N
m
m
w
O
m
N
y
m
Ln
�
N
w
N
rn
W
w
O
m
N
y
m
Ln
V
�
F N
w
C�
0
0
0
LO
Y
L
L
L
(6
Y
L
L
L
fO
Y
N
w
w
w
T
7
N
N
w
w
w
T
7
N
L9
w
w
w
T
J
f0
t9
w
w
O'
O
N
O
O
T
O
L%1
d
tll
N
Ll1
Q
N
Lll
N
L!1
Q
N
Ln
Q
N
W
H
N
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f6
w
w
w
w
w
w
tD
W
tD
W
l0
lD
to
V
C
V
d'
!F
a
s
N
N
N
N
N
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
Mimi
w
w
w
w
25F -187
N
Q
z
E
J
C
°
L
O
O.
d
C
rn
.N
d
D
T
C
d
25F -188
N
e-1
M
IA
lD
tD
1n
n
n
LD
m
7
r-I
ri
a-1
H
N
V
V
C
V
d
�
in
ui
Lq
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
0
v
v
v
v
tD
tD
lD
lD
to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
o u
lY ik
W
o0
to
to
n
m
00
m
W
l0
Ln
m
H
N
V1
N
lD
L
W
O
M
N
Il
V1
lD
N
e-I
m
m
N
LA
(n
Il
o0
W
It
4
to
0
in
m
m
to
r�
m
n
v
m
v
m
v
m
m
lD
m
V
w
m
m
N
m.
O
3 K
N
c-I
00
W
N
to
N
n
N
w
r
m
O
0
00
0
m
0
u
k
00
m
m
0
O
m
m
v
m
D
w
o v
LL �
lf1
t0
Ln
m
N
M
V
V
m
V
C
00
N
m
7
t0
N
W
rl
o6
N
r
O
r`
d'
Il
ti
o0
C
V
M
1
t(1
m
U\
O
O
m
tD
r
n
W
00
vl
N
n
00
00
m
00
00
O
y
m
c0
rl
m
H
ci
00
N
V
N
V
c0
r
t0
M
tll
V
V
-t
N
lD
CL
ID
t0
t0
00
O
N
H
N
N
N
ti
C
m
N
N
00
N
0)
O
H
H
V
7
V
rl
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
tD
O
n
n
n
in
x
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
°0000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
x000
00
000
000
00000
0
to
N
v
tD
m
m
m
oo
ao
00
0o
to
m
a
vi
v
ao
n
v
W
m
N
m
Il
V
m
m
l0
00
V
O
t0
V
M
1(t
W
V
m�
m
N
ti
N
N
N
t0
00
O
H
L
W ...r
m
N
N
m
m
N
N
yj
O
ul
V
m
0.j
u1
.-i
rl
ci
rl
N
c-I
N
L W
U
M
N
lD
06
N
m
W
M
V1
tD
I�
N
t0
n
N
7
a
DO
m
m
N
ti
C
m
V
I,
06
N
Ln
m
d'
Il
m
m
1l
(i
4
N
lD
^
l0
V
.-.
0)
m
O
x'
ti
N
c-I
c-I
rl
ei
rl
ri
N
N
N
rl
N
0
>
m
Lf1
m
lD
lD
m
V
W
.--I
N
tD
H
m
LD
m
m
m
m
m
W
V
00
OJ
W
m
N
V
O
lD
t
M
V1
o0
m
m
I�
m
.-1
N
lD
-i
N
LQ
0
06
W
O
H
m
tD
n
m
O
ti
0
m
V1 „
3x
m
m
m
LD
lD
tD
tD
tD.
lD
LD
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
to
m
Lq
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
C(
m
m
m
m
m
m
0 W
I�
n
n
tD
1p
W
1p
lD
lD
tD
�(1
�I1
V1
Ln
V1
N
I�
n
n
n
W
N
N
N
lD
lD
lD
tD
lD
tD
lD
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
o0
W
W
W
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
t
U
tD
tD
lD
l0
tD
tD
tD
W
tD
lD
ui
Vl
U�
m
m
Ln
to
t/1
ul
Ln
to
Vt
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
0
0
0
0
O
O
m
O
N
m
m
m
N
o
o
M
m
m
N
O
Y
N
N
V1
N
m
d
N
N
V
O
I�
m
V
N
N
O
oo
m
00
m
I
m
oo
m
oo
m
a
in
m
m
w
m
y
m
n
o0
H w
C�
0
0
0
w
d
N
(O
N
w
Y
L
L
L
10
L
f0
L
f0
IO
0)
Y
tf
L
L
L
(O
L
(O
L
N
10
GJ
Y
L
L
fO
L
(O
L
(O
N
?
J
N
t0
OJ
?
0)
?
O1
?
T
J
O)
f0
f0
N
OJ
OJ
>
J
t0
@
O)
O)
O)
6
T
O'
O1
>'
N
?
0
d
VI
H
Q
N
V1
N
N
VI
ti
Q
U
N
Vt
N
N
t!1
�--�
Q
N
Ln
N
N
to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
.ti
~
N
N
N
N
~
0
0
0
0
0
W
W
°W
W
W
00
d' N
00
W
o0
00
00
00
00
00
co
00
co
00
00
0°0
00
00
00
25F -188
N
z
C
7
C
O
O
tiZ
d
C
N
41
0
T
LL
R
C
.E
a`
25F -189
V
7
N
V
V
V
V
V
V
N
m
O
ct
ct
<t
m
N
M
V
V
V
t
M
J t
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O U
LL tt
IO
lO
m
l0
00
I�
VI
�
D1
N
M
Ol
N
I�
V
m
H
V1
V
N
m
N
N�
N
m
M
M
C
M
N
W
l0
O
uj
N
m
0
N
0
1�
Ol
V
Ol
IA
O
n
n
Q
M
o
N
n
V
v
m
O m
O
H w
o M
lD
n
O
o
O
H
N
ui
o 0
t0
m
O
lD
O
O
H�
N
m
.�
m
m
m
lD
�
v
m
o
N
n
O P
LL �
C
W
l0
H
N
M
l0
00
1
m
W
H
M
N
n
n
m
N
V
W
N
00
n
M
r
O
tD
00
T
N
H
N
O
l0
n
V
N
H
m
O
l0
N
0
N
H
Vl
O
lD
U
N
00
0
H
N
N
N
00
0
N
N
N
N
00
H
N
N
N
to
a �
cm-I
emi
�m-I
H
em-I
H
N
H
O
Op
l0
H
Cl
N
O
H
H
H
N
Ot
m
H
t0
n
W
O
0
0
O
H
H
QI
H
m
C1
l0
H
M
N
n
C
CL
O
l0
l0
�--�
0
O
t0
t0
O
l0
m
m
t0
t0
w
a
O
O
O
O
t0
N
O
0
O
O
a
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
0
O
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
0
O
Wr
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
N
I,
V
N
m
H
tll
00
M
n
W
tll
to
H
M
Ql
t0
H
N
lD
Ol
d
N
fl
N
00
V
H
H
N
�
H
N
O
dl
nl
d:
C1
N
H
Ol
O0
dl
N
W
N
H
cT
tO
00
O
H
N
H
dT
H
00
O
O
N
H
m
t0
00
0)
O
H
H
N
H
H
H
N
N
N
N
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
N
N
N
U
Wr
N
3
«_
ut
V
N
N
N
l0
H
w
m
V
m
H
lD
N
tD
t0
to
m
H
l0
N
l0
n
r
m
W
00
0)
Ol
t0
V
m
00
00
41
N
lO
d'
m
M
00
M
N
l0
14:
m
00
0
n
m
O
H
N
H
N
n
01
O
H
N
H
>
V
m
lD
lD
V
Cl
lD
C1
m
N
m
N
H
tll
Ill
co
00
ID
H
n
H
N
0)
1�
N
O
H
d'
n
l0
Ol
O
Cl
O
LD
n
Ill
V
�
N
00
H
l0
m
m
W
W
m
m
m
tll
l0
H
00
H
Cl
N
N
H
n
00
0)
00
H
V
lD
n
co
m
W
V1 ^
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
3�
mm
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
to
o
m
a
v
0
0
0
Ql
Ql
m
Ol
Ql
O1
m
O W
n
n
n
N
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
r
n
n
n
l0
l0
t0
t0
lO
t0
tD
mar
W
00
00
m
M
m
m
m
m
m
00
co
00
00
00
co
00
V
V
V
t
ct
zt
't
L
Cl
Cl
W
W
W
OR
co
W
W
t0
t0
tq
t0
tD
l0
tD
In
In
m
m
to
m
U1
U
V)
Vl
tll
m
N
N
N
N
m
N
m
m
to
to
m
to
to
N
Ill
N
to
m
IA
C_
0
o
m
o
0
0
0
0
o
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
tt>
m
01
m
N
O
O
0
m
m
m
N
O
O
m
m
m
m
N
O
O
tll
y
N
Vl
O
N
m
Nt
N
N
m
O
N
m
V
"
N
m
O
n
m
ct
N
N
Vl
Cl
00
m
V
Vl
n
W
m
Oo
m
7
m
n
w
m
00
m
It
N
n
00
m
W
N
w
a!!I
0
0
0
0
>
J
m
m
0)
O1
01
T
J
@
m
OJ
O!
O1
T
J
m
m
O)
01
O!
>
J
O
O
O
O
Vl
0
O
LL
H
Q
N
?
N
H
IA
N
V
H
Q
T
N
T
m
O
H
N
0
M
H
H
Q
�-
N
T
M
O
H
N
N
O
V1
H
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
010
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
> m
0
O
0
O
O
00
o
m
0
W
0
00
0
W
0
W
O
0o
o
tD
0
lO
0
tO
0
lD
o
tD
0
tD
0
ID
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z l
w
co
n
n
N
r,
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
N
n
n
r
n
n
25F -189
N
0
z
C
O
C
N
a
0
0
Q
Ccm
caO
N
N
i
O
.0
25F -190
.�
m
v
c
v
v
m
M
v
v
It
It
m
lD
en
v
v
v
v
m
to
m
m
w
�
LP
kq
kq
1p�
�
1p
�
Lq
0'4
t
0
1p
1p
�
1p
to
�
0
tp
kq
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o u
LL �
lD
V
H
Ol
00
H
1p
m
m
00
I�
H
d'
V1
1l
00
Vl
N
V1
m
V
00
V
tp
y
H
N
Ill
Il
H
00
m
00
V
m
'4
O
N
C
Vl
V
M
N
V
V
N
M
to
H
L
Q
00
N
N
H
M
V
00
V
N
N
H
M
V
00
O
m
M
H
M
O
Ol
N
V
V
3
v
m
to
v
m
n
H
o
vl
to
o
n
n
lD
m
o
v
m
n
m
to
o
n
m
to
�
m
w
v
m
n
to
n
lD
In
m
v
m
n
o c
LL v
H
tD
tll
M
I11
to
LD
Ol
l0
Ill
m
tD
lD
to
V1
M
M
N
A
to
0)
H
H
H
C
Il
M
N
H
ll>
O
N
IO
M
N
H
Vl
O
N
lD
M
N
H
Ill
OLr?
lD
M
N
m
l.7 H
00
O
H
N
N
M
H
W
O
H
N
N
m
H
00
O
H
N
N
M
N
00
O
H
y
lD
W
V
lD
H
I,
N
N
n
V
to
H
00
N
m
N
W
h
CL
R
n
m
O
H
H
m
O
H
H
m
m
n
m
O
n
H
00
N
lD
00
O
l0
w
w
n
r
n
lD
W
W
tD
n
11
n
tD
l0
O
l0
n
O
r
w
l0
LID
w
Vf
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
0
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
o
O
LLj L
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
lD
N
W
lD
I�
H
V1
m
0)
lD
N
m
1�
H
lD
Ifl
N
I�
01
N
n
n
H
W
d
W
V
H
I-
lD
W
H
Il
N
00
lD
Ill
lD
O
ni
H
n
V
M
In
00
V
O
Ill
W
M
LD
Ol
O
H
H
m
l0
1l
0)
O
H
H
H
lD
Ol
O
H
O
m
tD
1,
H
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
L
W�
3
m
n
v
m
a
00
rn
m
n
v
m
m
n
m
v
m
to
m
v
00
W
Ol
N
lD
V
M
W
M
N
lD
V
M
rl
IT
41
N
LD
7
M
0l
0l
O
N
.-.
✓1
1�
T
O
H
N
H
1�
m
O
H
N
H
Vl
I�
m
O
H
N
H
V
00
0)
Q
>
W
lD
M
M
n
m
m
N
m
m
w
N
to
V
01
w
0)
7
00
H
N
lD
N
w
lD
1�
O
V
N
H
lD
Ill
lD
00
m
O
O
Ill
a
V
n
H
Ol
W
V
m
tt1
lD
W
N
a
lD
h
CO
m
W
N
M
h
W
O1
W
N
d'
Vl
I�
N
00
W
N
V
I1/
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
N
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
VI „
3�
O1
l
m
Ol
Ol
m
Ol
1
l
l
l
l
l
l
IA
Ill
Ill
Ill
I!1
I!1
rn
n
n
lI!D
tIlo
lVD
IVD
tVo
ltq
tIlo
6
6
l4l6
6
to
0
to
m
m
m
0 W
lD
lD
lD
lD
lD
l0
tD
l0
ID
ID
1p
lD
lD
lD
ID
tD
lD
°
x
m3_
co
w
Oo
ao
Oo
Oo
o
m
m
v
v
v
v
a
v
a
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
a
v
v
m
m
M
m
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ol
Ql
T
L
U
Vl
to
to
Vl
Vl
N
Vl
In
to
to
Vl
tll
Vl
Vl
Ill
IA
IA
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
d'
V
V
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
m
o
0
0
0
0
o
m
O
o
0
0
0
0
m
O
o
M
Ol
m
N
O
O
Ill
m
Ol
m
N
O
O
Vl
M
m
T
N
O
O
m
m
T
0)
Y
O
I�
Ol
d'
N
N
Ill
O
I�
m�
N
N
Vl
O
I�
m
V
N
N
1<7
O
r
0)
O ....
m
V
m
n
00
m
W
m
V
Vl
I�
00
al
00
m
1*
I(1
1�
00
T
00
m
V
t»
H w
Cr
O
O
O
4--
L
�
W
O)
L
L
(0
f6
(0
16
N
Y
L
L
L
f0
L
f0
L f6
O) w
Y
L
L
L
L
L
N
Ol
Y
L
L
L
10
10
Ol
N
O1
T
�
IC
IC
N
U1
N
T
7
f0
f0
w
0)
N
w
OJ
w
T
�
t0
f0
w
Ol
�
T
T
O
Vl
0
0
�
T�
O
IA
O
O
�
T�
O
Ill
O
O
✓I
�'
�'
O
a
N
tll
H
N
I11
H
Q
N
Vl
H
N
m
H
Q
N
to
H
N
Vl
H
Q
N
tll
H
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
v
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
N
^
^^
25F -190
N
O
z
7
a
c
a
a
Q,
O
O_
d
c
07
•N
d
T
w
c
a`
25F -191
v
v
v
m
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
In
n
n
n
w
to
to
tD
tD
to
tD
tD
tD
tl�
kj�
tD
1p
�q
tD
kR
tD
tD
tD
kq
tD
tD
kq
0
tD
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1i ik
m
m
m
w
tD
n
v
v
m
a
w
cf
H
n
H
H
w
m
w
a
m
m
m
N
`
nfyi
N
0
O
O
NI�t
m
n
w
H
H
N
ul
O
a
m
CF
to
w
M
H
Q
N
H
Vl
t0
m
O
O
w
m
M
N
N
N
H
O
N
d'
m
V
tD
m
N
N
H
M
m
V
w
m
N
N
c-1
M
V1
t0
M
m
V
m
tD
V
tD
LO
w
m
m
N
d'
N
O
w
V
w
t0
lG
m
M
0
V
N
trl
O
tD
V
lO
m
O
o c
LL v
C
N
O
M
n
m
V
N
M
n
V
Lq
li
cM1
Omi
tmvl
Oml
rll�
Lq
Om1
7
li
Cl
Lq
C�
U
V
N
N
M
N
m
O
H
N
N
m
m
m
O
H
N
N
m
m
m
O
H
N
N
m
w �
w
N
m
Ill
n
N
N
rM
N
N
N
N
H
N
M
N
N
N
N
m
n
H
H
H
H
p,
0
0
H
w
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
tD
n
n
n
n
n
c
n
O
n
O
n
O
0 O
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
o
n
n
n
n
�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
O
O
O
W r
O
O
O
a
O
1010,01010
O
O
O
O
a
a
a
a
a
O
O
O
0101
m
V
co
m
CY
d'
.-+
n
w
N
tD
M
V
V
l0
n
H
m
V
w
In
m
H
N
W
M
N
m
n
M
m
W
N
H
M
W
w
ri
H
O
N
IA
H
LD
N
H
m
0
W
m
O
O
H
m
n
m
O
H
O
H
L11
H
m
O
H
O
m
n
m
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
N
W v
N
3
Y Z
W
n
Vl
w
m
m
w
w
Ill
to
m
111
M
co
lD
Vl
V)
m
IA
m
m
w
Ill
lD
N
0
:
in
m
n
n
O
a
N
H
lD
n
n
O
a
N
H
tD
n
I�
O
a
N
N
CL
w_
>
m
w
m
w
a
m
m
w
m
w
to
n
m
m
In
n
m
.-+
v
m
a
w
O^
n
N
O
O
M
OR
Ill
w
m
m
m
N
L6
d'
M
w
n
w
ui
Vl
^
N
W
n
H
w
w
N
V
Ill
w
n
H
n
H
m
Vl
H
n
w
n
H
M
H
lD
H
w
VI �
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
3$
N
Vl
N
Vl
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
.0
m
m
m
m
m
m
M
M
m
M
m
�������
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C W
lD
w
tD
tD
tD
l0
w
l0
tD
IO
t0
tD
LD
lD
lD
tO
t0
E0
co
m
V
V
V
V
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
L
d
d
v
v
v
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
�
to
to
IO
tD
0
0
0
0
0
m
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
0
0
0
0
0
N
V
o
N
o
N
In
to
aD
H
v
m
a
H
n
0
In
ul
n
n
w
H
a
v
H
n
V
m
In
n
w
H
v
v
H
n
m
m
♦�.r
0
n
w
m
w
m
V
w
n
m
w
m
m
w
m
m
V
w
n
m
w
m
m
n
w
m-zr
m
N
0
n
m
w
m
m
N
V-.
a=
0
0
0
w
w
w
w
m
ro
m
w
w
m
m
w
m
ra
w
ra
w
w
T
�yy
w
w
>
>
T
�
w
w
>
>
?
-9
w
w
>
>
>
O
N
O
O
loll
Q
N
L!1
N
N
Q
N
ul
t
O
O
O
O
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
w
O
o
0
0
v
v
v
v
a
a
v
o
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
7 1c
LD
lD
lO
W
Ifl
Itl
Vl
Itl
N
In
to
V
V
V
7
7
V
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
LO
Lo
tD
to
t0
w
tD
tD
w
to
w
lO
w
N
w
t0
w
UD
tD
25F -191
N
0
zC
C
7
c
Q
O
CL
0
d
c
rn
N
41
T
L
C
C
z
d
25F -192
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
kD
kD
0
io
�o
o u
m
m
m
Ot
y
N
N
N
M
l0
.-I
Ot
O
V
m
V1
n
M
a
N
V1
Vl
l0
01
d'
N
m
l0
`'
Q
VI
W
H
r
O
N
m
d'
W�
.
O
N
m
V
W.
ti
N
O
O
N
d'
V
m
d'
to
o0
m
3 F
l0
LO
M
In
N
O
V
Ol
l0
w
m
m
m
v
N
m
O
�o
V
a
w
w
w
M
m
m
v
m
a
ko
w
w
m
0 of
lL v
0�0
N
V1
W
t0
M
n
c-1
C
n
t0
m
n
N
d'
n
l0
M
n
N
V
C
V
Ol
n
N
N
V
N
t
C 1
n
N
N
V
M
m
n
N
.-I
V
M
Ol
m
u N
m
O
H
c-I
al
O
.--1
N
O
v �
Ln
w
�n
W
vi
v
v
m
CL
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
Vf
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
01
M
T
to
l0
Ol
V
N
w
m
Co
m
m
n
rl
to
N
n
W
N
n
al
O
Ol
L1
O
W
n
N
Ot
V
O
n
l0
CO
ti
m
zt
O
n
w
CO
H
N
W
N
N
m
n
00
Ot
N
O
N
In
n
W
m
O
O
N
Vt
n
c0
Ot
O
O
r-I
N
N
N
H
N
N
e'I
e-I
N
e-I
ri
N
N
ti
N�
c-I
N
N
N
W ...
N
3
Y
•L
W
V
-D
a-I
i0
V
w
t
00
m
a--I
n
V
0o
V
00
V
N
n
to
a
V
00
V
N
0
V
N
r1
l0
n
n
CL
r-I
Vl
n
Oi
O
ey
N
N
Vl
n
Ot
O
H
N
N
In
n
01
O
�--�
N
f-I
VI
x
>
.o
v
co
a
co
m
v
Lo
n
a
Lq
m
Lq
m
m
.o
o
00
�o
m
m
io
to
m
m
.ti
o
Lq
LQ
m
m
o
o
n
m
y
w
n
co
n
w
vi
3x
Ot
01
01
Ot
Ot
al
Ol
m
m
m
m
m
m
M
p
m
m
m
m
W
CO
W
W
00
W
W
W
W
c0
CO
W
00
00
W
� W
1p
Vt
�n
�I1
Vl
ul
Lft
Vt
V1
m
to
t!1
�Il
Vl
�Il
tll
co
W
m
m
m
0
m
m
m
Ol
v,
v
u
v
c
c
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
o
m
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
0
0
0
0
0
O
m
n
co
v
v
n
�n
m
n
co
v
a
n
.n
m
n
n
oo
a
m
v
H
n
0
-
m
.n
m
n
n
00
.�
.
m.
m
m
m
n
.
m.
u
m
m
.
M
y
�o
n
w
m
oo
m
N w
C
0
0
0
0
Y
L
L
L
fO
w
Y
L
L
L
(O
Y
L
L
1O
w
Y
W
�
N
L
f6
N
N
N
l
L
@
(0
10
N
L
IO
@
f0
d
l
'
'
O
0)
O
o
O
O
o
to
O
O
IL
Q
N
In
Q
N
o
0
0
0
0
0
v
v
v
c
a
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
a
v
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
N
POCD
0
0
0
0
o
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
i
w
w
o
25F -192
N
z
J
C
a>
a
Q
O
CL
w
N
C
.N
O
T
L
C
C
25F -193
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
a
a
0
a
a
0
a
0
0.
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
o u
LL �
V
w
V
tD
Ill
m
a
N
V
m
m
n
N
n
N
N
m
m
w
m
N
N
.--I
y
1p
n
O
Ill
M
V
V
V
Ill
w
M
'i
N
n
�4
w
�4
tp
V
Ill
O
m
tt
Q
N
H
H
N
qt
d'
w
H
H
O
N
d'
�
w
In
.--I
O
N
V
V
m
N
H
Z.0
N
O
V
m
w
m
0
N
O
V
m
to
m�
N
1p
d'
m
O
m
N
O
3
-zr
In
tp
tp
tp
tp
m
v
w
w
w
tD
m
Ill
1p
1p
1p
m
m
tD
p Cr
C
V
n
m
m
n
N
H
v
n
lD
Co
n
N
v,
v
n
m
m
w
N
m
M
tD
m
L
m
n
Ill
m
v
m
7
m
n
N
N
V
m
m
m
n
I11
m
V
en
M
m
n
Vl
H
O
c-1
m
0
H
N
cm-I
c-I
N
N
N
V
tll
V
m
tp
N
tp
V
V
m
M
M
N
N
m
N
CL
C
n
n
n
n
r,
n
rl
n
n
n
n
n
N
N
n
n
N
n
n
N
n
N
n
n
N
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
p
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
_
N
o
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
W �.
O
0
0
0
a
O
O
a
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
0
w
w
a
w
m
n
V
m
w
V
m
n
�--�
w
m
0
w
m
N
l!1
N
w
d
V
O
n
tp
w
N
w
M
m
tp
m
n
O
tp
N
.
ul
.
L.
m
111
O
tp
m
W
to
n
w
m
O
O
N
Vl
w
w
N
O
O
N
m
1p
w
m
O
m
N
tll
w
w
U; W �
tp
tp
tp
a
V1
tD
N
N
M
3
m
i
N
M
V �
N
n
o
m
o
m
V
m
w
V
m
n
n
0
V
N
ti
t
n
n
0
O
CWL ^
n
T
a
.4
N
.4
Il
n
6
O
.4
N
c4
ui
n
m
O
r4
N
Ill
n
6
H
>
w
1p
M
Vl
w
Vl
to
r-1
w
N
w
N
w
m
Vl
M
m
m
r,
N
I!1
N
n
N
W
Ill
W
6
O
H
a
a
IIl
n
N
m
m
M
'-I
m
ID
O
q
00
n
N
H
M
V
m
W
M
V
.-i
1l
n
ri
N
M
V
tp
w
n
n
.-I
m
'7
w
w
N
r-I
ri
a.
rl
N
�--.
H
3�
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
""NN
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
In
ul
Ill
In
m
m
vi
v
v
v
v
OW
0
0
0
0
0
Ill
Ill
111
Ill
0
0
0
0
IA
111
V
m
to
0
m
m
M
to
0
Co
w
v
c
v
V
v
v
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
d:
I
a
y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
.-i
.ti
N
ti
.�
.�
.�
o
0
0
0
L
C
O
o
0
0
0
o
m
O
o
0
0
0
o
m
o
0
0
0
0
o
m
o
0
0
v
e
n
m
m
N
w
v
v
n
n
n
n
w
v
a
n
n
n
n
w
v
v
n
m
.-i
I
m
m
n
H
m
H
v
m
m
n
.-�
m
.�
In
m
m
n
.
m
H
0
t
w
n
w
m
w
m
v
W
n
w
m
w
m
v
w
n
w
m
w
m
a
0
n
F N
w
0
0
0
d
L
(0
f0
f6
(O
N
Y
f0
f0
(0
I6
N
Y
L
f0
L
l6
L
f0
IO
O!
Y
f0
f0
4
O1
aJ
?
T
0
0
o
o
0'
c
LL
Vl
�
N
IOII
Q
N
Ill
N
Ill
L
v
v
v
v
a
v
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
m
m
m
m
m
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
> m
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
tp
tp
tp
tp
tp
tp
tp
v
v
v
v
z N
In
In
In
In
m
In
In
In
m
m
m
In
vl
In
In
vl
In
vl
In
In
Irl
In
m
In
25F -193
N
O
z
C
a
c
0
a
a
Q
i.N
O
Q
nd/
L.L
C
Q�
N
d
Q
T
i
a`
d
o u
o
0
0
L
LL �
L
C
a
m
to
Lo
O c
LL �
C
00)
V
L
U H
N
N
M
N
M
N
x
C
^
n
rl
0
O
^
O
^
O
n
O
O
O
O
�+
W ....
O
O
O
N
V
n
W
O1
O
O
W�
IA
N
Ol
N
�
Q1
c-I
ti
v
N
It
N
V �
C
n
N
m
M
D
O. •--,
W w
� r
N
N
N
N
rl
a-1
y
lD
to
O
W
tD
I�
n
VI
3�
y
N
V
N
V
N
V
O W
ill
V1
V1
am �-
W
O
O
O
s
u
v
a
v
o
O
O
r
O
M
00
m
0)
w
F u
c
3
0
d
t0
M
N
w
Y
0
0
0
25F -194
N
0
z
C
O
a
c
m
a
a
Q
L
O
d
d
cm
c
.M
0)
T
C
E
a`
e
c
0
u
v
0
a
V
C
w.7
�i
N
I
V
n
t
r
sc
oo
m
oo
rn
ti
m
a
n
00
o0
00
m
.
.
'6
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7
O L
LL u
m
I,
M
N
N
m
O1
N
1�
N
l0
to
Q1
W
lO
I�
N
I�
00
N
00
Ol
e-I
m
W
m
M
lD
Ol
Cl
N
V
N
V
Vl
Ol
Ill
4
r-I
o0
N
Vl
Il
n
N
N
Ol
N
m
lO
Q
N
lD
r-I
00
IA
N
Ql
I�
O
o0
CO
M
tD
W
O
O
Vl
W
Ql
lD
M
o0
lO
w 1p
O
I�
V
V
W
m Ol
O�
.--I
e-1
r-I
M
Ol
CO
lD
O
n
r-I
n
N
n
n
n
l0
n
V
00
N
Ol
N
O
o a
LL �
C
m
W
L!1
N
N
N
00
m
N
N
n
V
m
co
N
d'
N
00
00
lO
I�
n
=
N
m
M
l0
n
CO
Ql
1p
N
Ql
lD
.
^
1-
M
m
V
Vl
tO
Il
O)
.--I
o0
u N
M
M
M
M
M
M
V
V
V
tD
Il
r
M
m
m
m
m
m
mm
v
m
an
Ol
e-I
e{
lD
W
N
00
Q1
N
d'
N
n
rl
V
n
V1
N
N
N
lO
00
N
CL
V
V
l
0
M
lD
I-,
O
O
C
O
m
l0
I,
w
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
e
.
O
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
h
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
+
W v
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
CD
00
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
rl
lD
Ol
.-I
.-I
I�
N
Ql
N
Ol
Ol
N
Ol
Ill
00
t11
00
tll
Ol
tll
lO
00
Ol
N
Vl
W
O
N
tll
I�
O
LD
O
Ol
W
o0
.-I
M
6
6
O
N
N
t0
O
m
0
L6
jy
O
O
H
N
H
M
0
to
W
m
H
O
N
N
H
r-I
N
H
N
N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
m
N
N
N
N
N
Q
W_
V
00
m
00
O
N
N
m
N
Vl
m
m
m
li
N
li
m
N
e-i
W
m
V
tll
O
3
ti
H
rV
N
N
N
N
N
M
IA
O
O
n
n
U �
M
M.
rl
N
to
N
1p
o0
W
to
O
V
l0
00
V1
N
ID
O1
o0
I,
N
M
o0
N
o0
O
0
M
m
Vl
H
W
N
O
N
V
N
0
H
m
N
rY
O
a--I
ryi
m
06
[f
w
Il
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
.-I
M
lD
c-I
O .
>
Itl
m
I,
Ol
m
00
N
00
I�
00
N
N
to
Ol
Ill
N
tD
00
Ol
rl
N
Il
tD
n
w
M
tD
00
O
ti
V
a0
N
b
M
N
N
uY
M
lD
W
O
N
Zt
00
N
l0
M
m
V
lO
N
m
0
m
O
O
O
V1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3�
V
V
V
V
V
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
N
r
N
W
00
00
00
co
00
00
00
t
00
00
00
00
co
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
CC
c �
LO
w
l0
w
lO
lD
lD
lD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
0o
W
W
W
W
00
00
W
L
u
n
N
n
r
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
l0
l0
lO
l0
w
l0
ID
lD
tD
W
C
O
m
m
m
m
ti
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
m
m
w
m.
m
0
0
0
m
O
V
00
O
N
m
m
.--I
m
m
N
O
O
Vl
O
V
00
O
N
M
m
N
m
Ol
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M�
Ill
1�
00
Ol
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
F�
V
II1
c v
3
N
m
m
m
m
m
m
to
m
m
N
N
-
N
'0
>
m
N
m
N
to
m
to
0J
m
m
N
t0
f0
f0
0)
3
m
m
m
m
Oy
N
M
V
Vl
>
>
>
O
m
O
O
�n
>
r-I
N
M
ul
C1
H
H
H
H
N
�--I
N
M
V1
N
N
V1
N
Q
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
> m
a vl
m
m
m
m
m
rn
rn
m
rn
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
rn
rn
25F -195
N
O
zC
C
C
O)
Q
O_
O
C
.N
0
O
T
ca
C
iC
lO
I�
W
I�
LD
n
n
n
W
00
W
W
1p
r
r
f`
W
'O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3
O i
LL V
W
W
I-
M
0)
V
V
N
V1
01
h
lD
l0
N
N
W
In
N
« 1
V
Ill
N
N
lD
V
y
N
V
r6
ti
H
ID
1p
Ol
O
I,
n
N
V
W
O
N
O
Ill
I�
al
CA
N
M
W^
a
I�
01
V
Co
to
lD
It
.--I
V
n
c-I
V
m
00
H
M
V1
V1
N
h
H
N
N
0
N
Ol
lD
r,
N
I�
m
n
V
n
m
n
n
00
m
Ol
m
O
M
00
3
ci
O Q
IY v
W
V
lD
m
M
V
M
Q1
l0
M
M
W
lD
.-I
rl
m
I�
T
H
e-I
I,
r
L
l0
V
c1
.--I
n'1
V
V1
l0
I-
vi
Vl
ci
W
Vi
Ol
V
ri
.-1
N
m
Ill
l0
m
W
U N
W
n
n
m
m
m
m
m
V
Ill
Ill
l0
l0
Il-
m
m
m
M
m
M
N g
y
N
00
Ill
O1
N
V1
00
.-I
M
L!1
01
V
lO
Ol
Ill
N
N
.--I
V
N
01
H
m
n
CL
c-I
H
N
N
V
V
V
Ul
In
In
M
n
W
Ol
0
H
N
H
V
V
V
V
Ill
Ili
In
o
N��
ti
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
H
H
.�
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
inn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Co
C
�,
w �.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
to
lO
m
lO
rn
W
V
m
Co
v
Co
to
W
V
m
LO
v
W
N
m
lO
N
n
cm
w
W
W
O
M
V
O
N
V
1p
O
u1
O
W
W
W
O
m
V
Il
O
N
V
lO
O
I—y
W
m
H
O
O
O
N
N
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
W �
IA
M
H
m
l0
M
N
In
V
In
1p
V
W
V
M
M
In
O
l0
al
O
V
V
V
M
M
t0
N
W
M
O
O1
N
W
V
N
W
Cl
W
al
ci
N
N
n
Ol
H.
m
l0
.-I
In
N
01
Ol
O
N
N
N
W
N
N
m
rc1
m
V1
l0
W
O
O
N
H
N
N
N
m
M
M
m
N
N
N
r-I
ei
N
.-V
N
N
N
N
e-I
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
e-I
a-I
ei
rl
Q�
>
W
.--i
M
N
V
N
l0
I,
W
lO
W
tD
ul
Ill
N
W
N
l0
M
.--I
to
n
n
W
W
0/
.-I
�
N
Vi
M
l0
W
O
N
V
c-I
N
LO
m
H
O
N
In
M
10
W
O
N
V
rj
W
W
N
0
01
O
O
O
H
c-I
c-I
N
m
V
l0
W
01
0
01
O
O
o
ti
.--i
H
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Q
3�
rN
n
n
n
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
w
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
H
H
N
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
01
T
O W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
n
r
r
N
N
N
co
CoCo00Cq
M�Lqn�Lqn
W
Co
Co
W
W
1l
n
n
n
n
N
11r,
r
n
r
n
NN
n
n
1,N
n
N
Ili
I(1
to
to
to
In
Vl
U
l0
O
W
W
l0
l0
l0
LD
lD
l0
t0
l0
lD
tD
l0
l0
l0
lD
l0
l0
l0
lO
lD
l0
lD
0
0
0
0
o
W
m
W
m
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
W
m
W
ni
M
m
R
N
O
O
UI
O
V
W
O
N
M
M
N
N
T
N
O
O
Q
O
V
W
O
N
m
m
Y
0
V
N
N
V
N
M
V
l0
1l
W
O
01
I,
01
V
I,
N
W
N
0)
Ili
00
N
N
m
N
V
N
0
N
I,
N
W
N
O
m
N
w
N
W
01
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
m
V
ill
a4�
0
0
l0
>
Y
f6
16
f0
f0
N
w
N
N
i'
N
N
T
t+
N
f0
N
10
f6
OJ
w
3
N
?
T??
N
N
N
3
f0
?
?
?
>>
T
T
..Q
N
T
.ti
N
M
V
Ili
0)
T
0)
T
O!
T
T
T
V1
T
O)
>
r i
N
M
V
Vi
O!
T
CL
In
N
O
Ill
O
H
�n
Q
A
ci
-i
-4
r4
.-i
N
m
m
O
N
0
0
in
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ol
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
W
W
00
W
W
W
K N
Ol
m
ONl
ONl
001
OOl
001
001
001
m
m
m
001
001
001
001
001
w
w
25F -196
N
O
Z
E
7
C
0
Q
0
r
d
C)
a
cm
al
T
>_
0
C
.0
a`
25F -197
w
ID
n
n
n
w
N
H
m
m
lD
lO
lA
lO
w
.
.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ii U
m
w
N
a
m
m
..
H
v
w
m
v
m
w
m
w
a
m
ry
w
v
w
n
m
ry
a
n
w
In
oo
a
N
o
a
to
w
n
0
4
ry
m
In
I�
,�
�
v
In
I�
lO
Q
m
ID
H
�
w
M
.-i
a
m
H
00
m
.-i
N
.-�
H
to
N
of
M
ri
m
m
w
m
I�
m
n
H
n
m
V
w
m
H
N
w
m
H
v
n
m
3 x
w
m
0
H
N
N
N
n
N
n
n
ry
w
m
cr
0
V
O
N
M
n
V
i.
m
.
o a
lL v
C
m
m
m
't
O
m
m
lO
r,
n
w
m
m
In
In
Ill
1l
m
H
w
N
N
m
m
Lq
O
Il
to
m
M
0
O
N
m
It
m
lO
w
V
O
r,
k6
w
M m
0
O
Iyj
m
a
u N
V
to
to
w
tD
n
n
M
M
M
M
M
M
m
V
Ill
In
lO
n
M
M
M
w
w
N
M
m
N
m
N
V
V
M
m
w
m
N
lD
N
H
m
m
H
w
N
m
H
V
w
CL
n
w
m
0
H
H
H
o
V
V
V
0
m
In
O
w
m
0
H
H
H
m
V
V
V
p
0
0
0
H
H
o
H
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
H
H
H
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
O
x
O
0
O
o
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
O
x
0
0
0
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
N
d'
l
H
H
m
H
w
lD
N
m
w
w
N
m
N
m
w
H
m
I�
l0
H
d'
w
to
O
w
w
w
O
m
V
P�
O
N
V
w
O
In
O
00
N.
n
O
N
V
Il
O
N
�y
M
In
lD
w
m
H
O
0
0
H
H
H
H
N
M
V1
w
w
m
H
0
O
O
H
H
N
N
N
N
N
m
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
N
N
W�
N
3
Y
N
N
in
lO
LO
en
i,
H
m
H
N
lD
In
N
n
H
m
V
N
lD
H
m
m
H
N
m
V
N
lD
N
iL+
O
In
N
O
N
V
lD
m
�T
Il
w
M
N
m
lD
lD
m
H
(n
O.
In
lD
w
O
H
N
H
H
N
m
m
M
M
m
In
lD
H
O
H
N
H
N
N
m
M
>
Ill
m
V
to
n
m-t
m
w
V
LO
h
m
m
[f
N
m
V
Ln
N
N
N
LD
V
m
w
N
t0
M
H
O
H
u
m
p
w
m
H
O
H
In
M
p
w
O
L
M
D
w
m
O
m
O
O
H
m
V
w
w
m
O
m
O
N
O
H
w
w
w
w
co
co
co
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
w
w
w
w
46
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
w
w
w
CO
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
lO
lD
lD
lD
am
W
In
In
In
In
IA
In
l!1
Ct
CY
d'
d'
d'
V
a
a
V
V
V
V
V
V'
N
N
N
N
t
u
lD
to
w
w
w
w
w
lD
lD
LO
lD
lD
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
lO
lD
lD
lO
lD
lD
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
w
m
w
m
H
m
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
w
m
w
(p
H
m
m
N
0
0
V1
0
V
w
O
N
m
m
H
m
m
N
0
0
m
O
C'
w
0
M
V
N
N
w
m
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
n
w
N
N
F N
w
m
V
M
m
w
N
N
ar
0
0
w
w
w
w
w
`m
w
w
w
m
m
w
?
w
?
w
>
>>
m
m
m
w
w
w
>.
m
O
T?
O
O
T
H
M
V
In
N
M
O.
M
n
Q
H
H
H
M
In
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
> m
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
v
a
v
�
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
25F -197
N
O
Z
E
a
c
U
a
a
Q
L
Q
d
Q)
.N
GJ
T
L
C
.0
d
YF
M
un
lN D
w
N
N
N
.--I
H
H
.
"O
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7
IL U
d'
V
N
V
00
P,
Ol
V
.--I
N
W
to
V1
lD
N
Ol
111
V1
Ol
Ol
N
O0
V
V
Ln
N
Ol
O
lD
N
H
H
N
M
M
N
l0
M
W
V
Ol
O
Ot
O
D
O
d'
Ol
Q
V
IA
I�
00
00
i�
tO
M
lD
Lo
N
n
N
r-1
W
O
V
n
W
al
n
V1
V1
O
V1
N
n
M
N
n
n
Ln
r
lD
n
n
n
n
O
00
00
00
l0
M
O
o
I�
n
n
00
Ol
r-I
ei
.N-I
a
lY v
m
N
01
In
N
.�
'0'0'
Ol
I�
N
LO
0)
V
V1
Ol
t0
ti
.ti
m
r
M
V
C
m
I'i
V
O
I�
V
Ni
O
-M
N
V1
I�
7
O1
Ir.,,
7
I�
N
Ol
M
L
U N
m
or
m
M
V
Vl
ul
lD
tD
I�
lD
M
M
M
M
M
4*
V
V
lD
lD
1�
tO
N
� w
W
V1
V
01
Ol
c
M
Ol
lD
N
h
V
M
V1
1�
Ot
M
n
r
W
.-1
O
lO
O
m
00
0
N
O
C
CL
V
0
LO
n
Ol
O
0
.--I
N
0
I�
00
c-I
0-
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0~
0
0
.-+
0
.�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
O
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
�+
Wv
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
t!1
u1
N
M
V1
N
I�
00
lD
tD
In
ri
m
V
m
N
00
Op
V
M
W
V
V
00
r,
n
m
N
V
n
N
N
V
t0
01
M.
Ol
n
n
01
N
V
ID
00
6
O
O
O
O
.y
.-i
c-I
c-I
M
V
N
00
M
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
W �
V
M
3
D'
Y �
U �
W
l0
H
V1
m
m
V
�D
00
M
Ol
lD
M
N
N
01
V
dl
n
n
00
dl
ti
l0
m
to
1�
V
M
Ol
l0
V
M
d'
I�
O
V1
n
M
N
l0
O
n
M
V,`
N
G
M
m
L!1
lD
00
O
e-I
N
e--I
N
M
N
m
M
e-i
V
V1
n
00
O
�--�
N
e-I
7
.-.
ci
H
ri
ri
N
N
N
N
N
N
r1
ci
H
rf
ri
H
N
N
N
N
H
0
>
N
M
0
H
N
V
Ot
to
w
N
V
n
N
lD
M
.--I
O
N
V1
M
ul
00
O
N
V
I�
N
U,
H
O
ti
V
M
W
ci
H
14
M
V
lD
00
0l
O
Ol
w
N
N
m
N
N
00
Ol
O
Ot
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
3�
W
W
oo
m
m
w
m
m
m
o0
0o
ao
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
M
m
m
m
tD
o
w
w
w
in
Ln
�
UQ
in
m�
LQ
m
0 W
I,
n
n
n
n
r
n
r
n
n
N
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
r
r
r
n
n
r
tD
N
Y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
'O D
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
t
t D
tD
tD
0
O
lO
O
D
D
6
U
C_
M
H
on
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
W
M
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
N
N
m
on
0)
Ol
N
O
O
V)
O
V
00
O
N
M
Ol
Ot
N
O
O
In
O
N
N
O
N
N
M
M
V
ul
It
00
m
00
N
N
N
N
M
M
V
to
I�
00
Ol
00
N
N
f w
C v
pO
16
(6
l0
R
Y
L
L
l
l
L
L
L
L
fO
?
N
?
?
T
T
C?
V
Vl
T>
OJ
al
T
d
>
.-I
N
M
d'
Ln
>
T
T
O
tf1
O
DI
T
d
r-1
a-I
N
M
lA
O
rl
V)
N
O
N
O
e-I
Q
H
N
N
c-I
ti
o4
N
M
I.!)
H
N
In
'-I
Q
e-I
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
001
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
1O �
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
11
N
W
W
W
W
W
00
aN0
W
00
co
25F -198
N
0
z
a
c
N
a
a
Q
0
CL
M
.N
d
D
T
m
r_
C
.0
Z
j�
ci
N
N
N
M
M
Ln
lD
n
Ol
N
.--1
N
N
N
N
-i
N
H
N
N
N
N
M
N
M
N
Vl
N
LD
N
W
H
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C5
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O t
W u
N
n
N
N
N
n
lD
N
M
LQ
N
n
O
n
O
00
H
H
v
N
m
n
Ln
M
fn
n
O
t0
CO
N
n
'cY
N
O1
N
lO
to
�
Ol
N
ci
In
d'
n
M
0
01
Ln
N
Q
Ol
Llf
ul
n
m
W
m
0
N
00
m
n
m
N
m
m
v
V
n
n
N
H
O
n
O
V
w
m
V
n
00
00
H
O
M
N
0
n
N
N
O
00
3 c
rn
m
rn
o
.-L
0
0
N
m
n
rn
m
m
m
o
0
M
0
c-1
N
M
ti
o c
.H
LL N
M
v
ll1
Ln
V
LO
H
n
Ot
n
N
m
Ln
v
Ol
tO
v,
n
o
W
m
Ln
n
m
v
d'
m
ul
v
Ln
0
7
Lo
N
n
Ol
n
m
m
n
v
LD
Ot
LD
m
s
Li
Ln
U N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
V
Vl
Vl
Ln
Ln
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
M�
to
d
N
N
N
V
m
w
W
m
It
to
m
n
H
00
N
.-I
N
N
w
00
to
N
m
W
CL
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
m
0
O
0
V
0
Ln
0
Ln
0
Lo
0
to
0
o
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
M
0
V
0
O
0
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
N
n
n
01
N
N
ci
lD
LD
Ot
lb
d'
M
m
M
n
n
W
Ln
l0
tD
lb
N
N
n
M
to
tO
w 00
a-I
N
M
ci
Vl
M
00
n
N
00
to
N
O
c-I
Ln
q
to
O0
m
O
O
O
O
O
4
N
N
a-1
M
Zt
tD
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
l0
V
00
Ln
n
N
Lb
H
Ot
lT
O
m
W
N
Ln
V
n
M
or
OD
m
Cl
N
v
v
V �
n
LQ
N
00
M
O
7
N
M
d'
n
n
N
V
LD
n
M
H
N
V
-i
m
N
N
l0
01
N
LD
Ln
00
N
O
N
N
Lit
M
m
n
m
O
Ln
m
M
C1
W
tD
CL .-.
V
d'
Ln
In
Ln
Ln
n
00
O
N
M
d'
M
V
d'
a
.--1
N
V1
Ln
In
n
(b
Ol
>
N
M
tD
n
00
Ot
O
M
Ol
zt
M
00
m
m
m
V
rl
N
N
m
M
W
lD
W
N
m
t!1
m
n
.-1
N
N
W
M
N
n
lb
O
M
N
01
n
N
W
O
O
N
N
N
H
ni
N
V
N
lD
lb
A
N
O
tT
0
0
0
N
N
a--I
.-I
M
cr
V1
n
Ui
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3�
LD
0
to
0
LD
0
LD
0
LD
0
LD
0
tD
0
lD
0
tD
0
LD
0
lD
0
lD
0
tD
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
rn
m
m
M
m
m
rn
m
m
m
(Ti
m
Oi
c
LD
LO
LD
to
Lo
tp
Lp
LD
LD
to
to
LA
In
LA
Ln
IA
Ln
Ln
Lri
V1
V1
In
E
maw
W
Lo
O
to
O
LD
O
to
O
to
O
LD
O
Lo
O
Lo
O
LD
O
to
O
LD
O
to
O
to
O
m
Ot
Ol
Ol
Ot
m
Ot
Ot
Ot
Ot
m
Cl
m
Ot
Ot
O1
m
O1
T
Ot
m
(Ti
u
LD
LO
lD
l0
lD
to
to
LD
ID
LD
W
LD
LD
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
M
Ln
Ln
cC_ �
C
LO
m
It
m
00
m
O
m
N
M
m
M
o
a--I
0
Ol
0
Ol
0
N
0
O
0
O
0
2
0
00
m
oo
O
m
N
.1
M
m
M
o
2
o
m
0
Ol
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
to
n
00
O1
00
N
N
N
M
N
V
N
LD
N
n
N
W
N
O
to
Ol
M
n
d'
Ol
m
n
F N
w
>
C
u'
3
0
w
m
m
cu
m
m
w
m
N
m
N
m
L°
>
±+
`m
m
m
m
m
i
N
m
N
?
T
T
?
N
w
N
W
N
N
T
T
T
3
4
N
N
>
T
>
>
>
R
N
N
N
N
N
T
T
N
N
M
V
Lll
T
T
T
O
Ll/
O
O
�'
`�
N
M
V
ul
T
T
T
O'
N
d
e-I
e-I
N
N
N
N
M
6
L"I
N
V1
N
Q
N
N
N
e-1
N
e-I
N
m
In
e-I
N
d
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o O
O
O
O
N
w
00
CO
w
00
w
W
w
w
W
w
00
w
W
00
t%1
co W
00
00
00
W
00
W
cO
co b
0
W
0
0
co
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
co
0
0
W
0
0
tb
0
0
tb
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
0
W
0
a
00
25F -199
N
O
z
C
C
m
Q
d
O
N
O
0
T
w
C
a.
�
N
.-I
.-i
ul
Vl
lD
lD
lD
n
n
N
�-1
V
lD
n
w
n
d'
ul
IA
lD
lD
lD
n
m
'O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
u` U
m
IA
H
N
N
m
Vl
m
w
00
"
n
N
N
ll1
M
N
n
w
r-I
m
w
Ill
y
Vl
O
(Ti
w
V
O
1l1
M
O
W
0J
00
m
O
(n
N
w
n
cq
0
V
N
m
n
w
Q
m
Vl
N
m
V
n
w
m
m
lD
w
d'
IA
N
.-I
V
n
n
N
Ill
Ifl
lD
lD
n
n
w
lD
m
V
n
w
m
'tt
n
LM�
M
N
n
d'
n
Ill
n
l0
n
n
n
w
n
O
w
w
m
M
o
M
w
N
.-+
O
�
M
n
n
n
n
n
n
w
w
w
o v
LL �
Ill
w
m
m
m
lD
lD
w
m
m
n
M
w
N
Ifl
lD
lD
N
V
M
w
l0
O
q
�--�
N
M
V
Vl
n
V
Zt
O
uj
Ill
m
7
m
Ti
N
M
V
Vl
Lq
n
d:
L
U N
to
Vl
to
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
ti'
Vl
lD
lD
n
rl
n
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
:
>
a
N
w
m
n
V
w
n
tl1
0)
lM O
m
V
w
CL
LO
l0
w
O
V
l
w
m
.-1
m
V
d'
V
D
O
O
co
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
W �+
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
N�
lD
d'
00
c-I
c-I
M
V
kD
n
N
lD
.-I
m
.-i
I(1
M
n
m
m
m
M
V
0)
O
N
I!1
M
lD
w
�4
M
c4
w
N
In
N
O
O
ri
✓1
m
lD
w
O
-y
V
w
N
W
m
O
m
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
M
V
lD
w
m
O
Ot
O
O
O
ci
N
H
ti
m
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
W .r
3
w
m
lD
m
m
m
m
.�
m
to
w
r
o
lD
m
m
w
v
n
w
w
n
n
In
lD
o
w
ni
m
ul
n
m
ry
In
n
cn
N
w
m
m
m
ry
v
lD
w
0
o
m
.
V
N
>
n
w
tl1
N
m
N
N
N
nl
N
V1
n
n
m
V1
N
N
N
w
N
N
N
m
.-I
V
a
V1
lD
O
N
V
n
m
li
a-4
U�
M
N
m
n
N
V
n
m
N
N
tD
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
V1 ,�
3�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
v
v
v
a
v
v
v
v
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
f+'1
M
M
M
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
� W
V1
Lll
Ill
n
n
r
n
I�
n
n
n
n
h
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
m3�
m
m
m
w
co
co
w
w
w
w
co
0o
w
w
co
00
0o
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
W
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m .
w
.
w
.
w .
w
.
w
.
w
.
w
.
OO
t
N
M
N
N
M
.
M
.
M
.
.
.
M
.
m
M
N
In
M
M
M
u
O
o
o
O
w
m
w
m
.ti
m
o
O
O
o
0
o
O
O
w
m
w
m
ti
m
O
m
0
0
In
O
V
w
O
N
M
m
.-i
m
m
ry
0
0
vl
O
V
w
O
N
m
M
ti
�+
N
N
Ill
N
M
V
l0
n
w
O
m
n
m
V
N
N
N
m
lD
n
w
O
m
F
w
m
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
m
V1
n
w
m
w
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
H
w
C,
O
O
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
>
v
v
v
6
�.
..o
a
a
a
a
>>
0
a
>
r4
N
M
V
In
>
T
CL
0
I!1
0
N
Q
e4
r4
c4
e4
r4
'4
N
M
V1
N
N
0
Vl
e-1
in
Q
H
N
N
H
N
H
N
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Ono
ono
0n0
0n0
N
w^
w
K N
W
W
W
W
W
000
000
25F -200
N
O
Z
E
a
c
m
a
a
Q
C
C
d
O
N
d
T
L
C
.0
.E
a`
:m
H
m
N
LD
00
n
V
N
N
Lo
lD
LD
n
m
H
M
N
w
n
tD
V
V
N
N
LO
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
H
'O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3
:E
IY
l0
m
n
00
N
V
H
N
H
N
n
w
M
n
m
N
m
LD
w
V
m
n
H
m
M
N
y
N
ni
LD
m
w
et
n
M
m
In
H
ao
N
N
a
v
m
N^
O
.+
r,
m
N
Q
LD
N
-zt
O
m
M
w
w
m
V
ui
H
V1
O
lD
N
n
V
w
N
m
V
O
N
u1
w
H
n
w
N
m
0'1
n
O
H
N
3
m
n
n
n
n
n
w
N
w
m
w
m
N
o
V
m
N
N
N
n
lD
n
w
n
m
n
O
w
o c
C
N
LD
N
N
N
m
N
m
H
N
N
N
0)
n
w
N
H
m
w
N
N
LD
w
m
m
L
O
n
N
m
It
O
m
O
N
M
V
N
LD
M
m
n
N
m
0
m
O
H
N
m
(,) N
N
N
ID
LD
n
n
N
m
m
M
ni
M
m
V
V
N
lD
n
n
N
M
f+Y
rfi
M
O!
w
m
M
00
N
m
lD
N
n-CT
N
V
Lo
N
N
n
H
N
N
N
V'
a
to
m
H
m
O
n
m
O
H
N
m
M
0
V
V
V
O
LD
n
m
O
H
H
m
m
M
V
V
O
O
O
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
O
O
O
O
O
W ....
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
N
N
d
w
to
w
N
w
m
w
N
m
m
w
H
w
m
r,
00
N
�
O
m
H�
M
w
w
O
00
N
N
H
O
m
H
M
l0
w
O
N
W
v
N
w
w
O
m
O
O
O
H
H
m
-t
w
w
w
O
m
O
O
O
H
H
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
ui �.
vi
3
N
N
m
H
H
ID
LD
N
w
H
N
N
m
N
a
1p
w
n
M
N
m
LD
N
N
1p
N
r
m
N
0
V
H
M
LD
w
O
H
N
w
O
N
N
.--I
N
N
N
N
n
m
H
6_
tD
w
O
N
H
M
M
M
M
V
V
V
N
n
w
O
H
N
H
m
M
M
M
V
`J
LD
m
n
V
m
n
H
n
n
H
H
w
H
m
N
n
LO
N
m
w
H
n
n
H
H
w
H
lD
M
N
ai
C
N
V
p
m
H
N
lD
m
H
l0
M
N
N
1p
N
d'
o
m
'y
W
e('
N
n
w
N
N
O
O
N
O
H
H
H
N
d'
N
n
w
m
w
O
O
N
O
N
IA _
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3�
a
v
a
v
v
a
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
m
m
m
m
O W
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
LO
w
lD
O
l0
N
m3_
W
m
w
m
m
m
m
m
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
v
v
v
v
v
w
w
w
w
w
O
l0
to
LO
O
lD
l0
lD
lD
lD
lD
1p
l0
LD
N
N
N
N
N
u
c
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
m
w
m
H
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
m
w
m
f0
m
m
N
O
O
N
O
ct
w
O
N
M
M
H
m
m
N
O
O
N
O
V
w
O
N
0
n
V
m
N
V
n
N
w
N
m
N
w
N
N
M
a'
Lo
n
w
O
m
n
m
a
N
N
N
N
M
V
LD
n
N
w
N
N
N
N
N
M
m
N
n
w
m
w
N
N
N
N
N
crF
O
O
L
W
L
N
L
N
IO
w
Y
@
R
L
L
L
L
(O
W
Y
m
N
R
m
>
>
>
O!
>>
T
O>
r
O
N
O
O
>
H
N
m
V
N
T
T>
O
>
H
N
M
V
O.
N
H
N
N
H
Q
H
H
H
H
.--I
H
N
M
N
O
N
N
Q
H
H
H
N
N
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
> m
w
w
w
w
w
Lo
LD
LD
LD
ID
D
W
D
W
V
V
V
-It
ct
iR �
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
25F -201
N
O
Z
C
O
a
c
a
a
i
Q.
d
c
2n
N
to
in
T
L
C
ii
tD
d'
d'
11
m
1
01
tN D
M
V
N
N
N
H
.
N
N
O
N
N
N
N
r-1
'O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7
O L
LL U
O1
tD
n
r-I
M
N
r•
M
Ol
I�
N
V
V
N
a--I
N
m
I�
lD
M
00
W`
Ol
mm
M
N
lD
tD
W
r-I
CO
n
00
r`
V
l0
M
O
n
N
00
N
.-I
lD
A
N
A
M
.-I
u1
M
Q
N
D1
N
.-I
00
V
M
d'
O
.-I
lD
00
0
O
O
A
N
.4
N
00
Ot
lD
M
00
.
N
O
n
t/1
O
m
H
O
N
W
N
M
N
tD
r•
Il
I-
00
n
O
00
N
00
00
.
(71
00
"1
w
O
to
N
r-I
N
n
N
M
N
r•
n
3.'
00
00
m
m
O Q
Ol
M
V
00
r•
lD
d'
N
T
N
t!1
lD
tD
u1
N
01
01
V
N
N
Ol
tD
W
M
C
7
tD
M
O1
lD
V
00
M
O
00
O
N
N
M
dt
tD
N
d:
tD
V
W
N
M
00
L
U N
m
m
a
of
ul
lD
lD
r`
r
N
m
m
m
m
m
M
V
ul
Ol
y
m
M
V
t0
P
1
0m
M
H
00
N
M
0
0o
V
CL
v
0
N
m
m
m
m
m
0
0
0
-1
.O
0
.O
�
0
0 O
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O O
O
O O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
6
6
6
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
n
r-1
N
N
lD
Ol
M
ci
m
m
.--I
m
r•
n
tD
W.
N
ut
a
n
ci
00
V
N
tD
V
00
N
1(1
r-1
T
T
O
V
M
lD
W
O
N
V
„y
M
d.
ti
m
Ol
O
Cr;
M
O
W
r-1
r1
m
d'
tD
n
m
m
T
O
O
O
.--I
ti
.--�
N
N
N
tD
r•
00
O
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
N
ui
W ....
to
3
Y �
u �
m
m
r•
m
N
m
u1
N
N
.--i
n
m
.-i
.ti
w
w
m
V
w
V
v1
C
1D
a
t0
m
ut
to
.-I
00
.L.
m
tD
m
-i
r•
m
N
m
n
v
tD
m
.�
m
v
.�
m
Oo
ri
a
v
v
vi
n
o0
o
ri
ri
'-i
Ili
m
.-1
v
v
v
ti
to
r;
m
o
N
N
ri
m
m
>
00
t0
N
7
w
t
N
1,
r
N
tD
m
Ol
.-i
r•
01
N
M
of
m
Ol
m
ut
N
LD
N
N
�y
m
N
tD
M
O
N
tD
O
W
tD
O
N
N
m
Ol
N
1p
M
-!
N
W
O
V
m
n
N
of
00
N
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
u1
I�
W
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Nm
N
Nw
N
N
3�
M
V1
ul
u1
m
M
m
m
m
O1
m
m
m
01
Ol
m
m
m
m
01
r•
O1
n
Cl
o
M
n
m
tD
m
to
.�
01
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
n
n
n
r•
r�
r,
1�
n
1�
o w
t6
t6
t6
t6
td
td
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
k6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
t6
E @
y
m 3�
c
v
a
a
m
oD
m
m
co
oD
co
m
m
oo
m
o
a
v
u1
m
ul
m
u)
m
111
m
1t1
m
M
M
M
m
M
m
m
M
M
m
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
t
Vi
Vi
ul
u1
N
ui
ui
Ili
ui
111
V1
m
m
Ili
111
m
u1
m
Vi
Ili
u1
ut
u1
m
m
v
c_
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
m
a
m
m
o
0
2
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
4
m
m
.--I
N
O
O
m
O
+'
00
O
01
n
Ol
V
N
N
ut
N
M
V
l0
n
00
O
m
r`
m
a
N
N
m
N
m
FN
w
N
M
M
V
M
n
00
Ol
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
m
d'
m
r
00
Ol
00
N
N
Cr
O
O
T
T>
A
O!
Ol
OJ
Ol
T
T>
N
1
m
4J
T?
N
N
T
O
lA
O
6
O
>
•-i
N
M
V
m
T
T>
O
of
O
O
vi
T
ti
N
V)
.--I
Q
N
N
N
.--I
N
N
N
M
Ul
N
N
m
a-1
Q
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
0)
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
-ZT
p
O
O
i2 N
n
^
n
r•
r•
n
r
n
r•
r`
r•
n
r•
r•
r�
r
n
r.
1-
r�
I�
,
25F -202
N
O
z
C
Q
0
0
O_
W
m
.N
0
T
O
C
C
:F
V
Vl
Ill
lD
1p
w
N
N
V
Ill
I,
ID
m
-q
IA
IA
L!1
tp
00
N
N
V
II1
1p
lD
'p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7
� L
IL u
m
v
l0
w
ry
ry
m
m
m
m
w
N
v
l0
O
N
In
m
m
H
w
H
w
w
m
w
.�
y
N
ri
M
m
lD
Il
n
M
m
m
lD
uj
H
1p
V
to
w
ul
I,
N
w
1p
N
0.l
Q
w
m
O
w
w
H
I
N�
Ill
w
H
r
w
V
I,
m
w
w
H
m
h
V
N
I�
1l
H
O
0
H
N
I
m
N
Ill
N
I,
L
n
Ill
3 ,�
n
w
w
w
m
m
O
H
H
n
m
n
w
w
w
M
w
0
w
m
m
m
w
0
I
N
w
N
0 c
H
LL �
C
N
H
M
N
M
M
N
V
m
ul
W
N
W
w
1p
m
M
00
I,
l!1
N
N
m
m
w
1l
m
m
N
M
m
IA
N
N
w
V
V
H
w
L
m
o
Hl
fj
M
In
N
w
tll
M
I,
N
w
N
N
M
M
M
V
V
1l1
l0
l0
I�
w
Ol
y
m
m
m
H
a
M
V
lD
Cl'
w
O
H
I�
I.n
w
m
m
w
o
V
H
h
0
H
m
w
w
I
N
Ill
m
I,
m
n
V
N
to
G
p
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
H
H
H
m
o
m
0
m
0
m
0
0
0
V
0
�
0
Ill
0
O
0
w
0
m
o
O
H
H
H
0
H
vl
0
o
0
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
O
o
o
O
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
O
0
o
0
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
V
w
lD
O
lD
N
Vl
V
m
I�
m
H
w
N
H
If1
m
m
w
Vl
O
w
N
m
M
w
V1
u1
V
w
I�
H
n
H
N
lD
M
lD
W
m
M
t!1
0
N
V
Il
m
w
O
M
yl
0
H
H
H
H
M
V
Ip
I,
w
0
m
O
O
O
H
M
'
O
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
m
N
U
W�
Vf
3
Y ^
V
V
V
N
l0
V
Ol
1p
N
1�
V
m
m
l0
1p
N
m
m
m
lD
l
w
m
w
W
w
I*
N
w
N
N
Il
I!
m
m
M
l
O
p
lD
H
1p
Il
H
G
V
IT
11
lD
w
0
m
m
m
N
H
N
ry
4
d
m
tD
00
m
O
1�
N
m
ul
H
m
N
H
lD
w
H
M
h
H
N
V
1p
m
Hlzt
V1
w
1p
m
w
w
O
lD
w
ul
m
H
H
N
lD
M
1p
H
N
N
.
N
N
^
N
lD
w
W
O
O
H
H
H
NIt
Ill
1-�
w
m
w
O
O
O
O
H
H
H
N
V
Ill
N
w
m
w
Vf -.
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3�
m
lD
V1
lD
IA
lD
I!1
lD
IA
1p
lfl
l0
N
tD
IA
l0
IA
lD
m
l0
Vl
lD
m
lD
V1
Vl
ul
Ill
IA
N
u1
ul
Ill
M
M
to
N
to
.�
p W
w
w
w
l0
1p
w
1p
w
w
tD
ID
tp
l0
l0
lD
l0
lD
l0
1p
lD
1p
l0
tp
lD
lD
lD
om
W
v
v
v
v
v
a
v
a
v
v
v
a
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
L
u
Ifl
ll'I
VI
l!1
L!1
L(1
Ill
111
IA
Ill
t(1
1l1
V1
I(1
Ill
V1
VI
lfl
lA
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
ll/
ll1
Ill
is
m
w
w
O
m
N
H
m
m
m
o
H
o
m
O
m
o
N
0
0
0
0
0
Ill
0
O
00
V
m
w
w
O
m
N
H
m
o
H
0
0
0
N
O
o
0
m
v
N
N
u1
N
M�
w
I�
m
w
m
O
m
m
I,
m
m
t
0
N
0
N
ul
Ill
F N
w
N
N
N
N
M
M
V
m
Il
w
m
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
M
d'
Ill
n
w
m
w
cr
O
O
w
T?
T
T
N
N
W
T
T
w
T
L
O)
T
T
T
T
T
m
m
m
T>
w
p
N
M
V
to
?
>
?
O
o
>
.-i
N
M
V
Ill
?
?
>
O
IA
O
O
vI
CL
H
H
H
H
ry
m
Ill
H
N
V1
H
Q
N
H
H
H
H
H
N
M
V1
H
N
IA
H
Q
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
c
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
9 f0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
w
n
n
n
w
Ip
Lfl
to
W
W
lD
w
to
O
w
w
to
W
25F -203
N
0
z
C
0
Q
O.i
0
T
cc
R
C
Y0
M
V
V
V
N
tp
00
N
N
V
In
tp
Vi
V
V
m
V1
lD
lD
lD
m
N
N
Vl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7
O uIa
u
W
00
N
N
Iq
n
V
1p
N
eel
tp
W
m
N
l0
V
y
rl
tp
1p
.-I
tl>
Ui
N
00
V
00
(t'1
N
7
It
7
m
W
N
tD
H
7�
4
n
m
M
to
1p
m
M
lD
w
00
L
IA
m
N
m
V
M
0
0
Ili
O
M
O
M
N
M
a
I;t
N
lD
M
M
O
0
O
m
00
W
lD
W
M
M
O
m
00
M
m
M
m
tD
00
n
O
eo
m
00
00
00
m
m
oo
m
o
o
d
o a
W
V
tp
I�
LD
N
N
m
m
m
N
V
Ill
V
M
m
d'
M
1p
M
C
N
m
O
ci
N
M
Vi
-i
1l
to
�6
tD
1
00
m
a-I
N
M
d'
Ili
IJR
M
m
1p
d'
m
U N
N
M
M
M
M
M
V
V
Ill
1�
lD
N
M
M
m
M
M
M
ct
d'
lfl
tD
01
y
M
N
m
V
I�
00
N
m
M
m
M
V1
W
r-I
N
tf1
m
p
O
M
m
m
M
0
-ZT
m
w
m
O
m
m
m
't
m
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
O
0
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
a
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W ....
.-I
W
N
V
a
M
n
w
to
m
m
V
O
m
.--I
CO
N
C
V
N
tD
to
Vl
W
m
m
IA
QD
O
N
V
Il�
�--�
V
O^
W
m
M
m
Ili
W
O
N
V
r�
r-I
V
O
00
V
LO
N
W
m
0
0
0
m
V
tD
h
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W_
3
Y
V
N
m
M
M
m
N
d'
Vi
l0
V
m
tD
tD
N
m
Vl
Ili
N
d'
Ill
tD
i�
7
r
00
�
m
Ill
Il
V
N
Vi
n
N
m
Il
00
N N
W
.-I
M
Vl
Il
m
N
IA
Il
N
m
C
M
.--I
V
V
V
.--I
Vl
tD
1"
m
O
.-I
N
N
M
T
V
V
V
V
IA
w
m
O
..-.
>
m
V1
m
00
W
Ill
n
m
m
tD
LD
1p
m
m
w
h
m
Ill
0/
N
7
tD
W
O
N
I:)
00
1p
N
N
N
l0
H
V
1p
00
O
N
IA
W
O
Ill
N
W
0
0
0
0
N
W
m
w
Ili
I-:
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
lA
3=
m
ri
ri
m
m
ri
Ci(i
rq
rq
m
m
ti
m
ri
ri
cq(n
C9
C9
m
M
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
W
tD
1p
1p
tD
lO
1p
lD
tD
tp
t0
t0
lD
ID
1p
lD
t0
tD
tp
LD
LD
<0
w
w
lD
lD
E m Y
co
v
a
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
W
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
7
V
V
V
C
V
7
d'
V
C
o
m
m
m
m�
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
co
m
m
m
.-+
M
o
0
0
0
A
o
It
w
o
N
m
m.
m
m
N
o
o
In
m
m
m
ui
n
o0
w
w
v
v
Y
N
M
d"
w
r
00
O
m
m
-t
N
N
L!1
M
IT
lD
n
00
m
rl
o
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
m
V
II1
I�
00
m
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
V
V
lD
I�
F N
w
3
0
Io
m
>
T
T
?>
N
N
(0
N
?
N
?
O!
>
T
N
N
?
?
>?
T
N Ul
@
N
UJ
w
N
�`
N
:r`
U!
01
Ol
N
V1
Q
ci
e-1
14
14
N
M
IA
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
v
wt
a
v
v
v
c
v
v
v
I0
tD
tp
LD
lD
tD
tD
tD
to
0
1p
lD
tD
tp
tO
Ili
Ill
vi
to
In
vi
In
IIi
Ill
V1
1I1
N
tD
W
lD
1p
lD
lD
tD
to
0
lD
tD
tD
tD
LD
tD
lD
lD
tp
lD
lD
1p
LD
tp
lD
tD
25F -204
N
0
z
E
W
0
Q
0
0
Q
d
N
41
T
i
N
C
a`
25F -205
.
.
'O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
O t
W u
m
m
0)
lD
N
V
m
N
N
LD
.-I
n
.-I
IA
l0
N
V
m
n
n
V1
N
tf1
M
V
N
y
n
�-1
m
-i
Vl
o
m
0
m
W
M
N
V
m
V
w
O
l0
O
Vl
w�
O
Lq
N
L
Q
't
O
N
tD
Ot
0
.--I
O
W
e-I
O
w
ti
0
0
l0
O
V1
n
00
V
Ol
LD
O
3 x
m
��
m
lD
ti
m
n
O
w
w
m
w
V
w
IIl
w
w
V
m
H
0
m
0
m
V
0
m
w
O
w
ti
w
N
w
M
w
w
0
w
n
w
m
rn
0 Cr
,.-+-i
ti
LL �
N
CO
Ot
m
m
V
l0
w
m
w
n
m
w
L
w
N
0
Ol
M
N
(+Y
d'
M
lD
M
Ot
lO
6
n
N
O1
Ot
O
-i
N
M
V
l0
N
M
m
m
m
v
v
m
m
m
m
m
M
m
v
W
m
M
m
M
w
w
V'
N
n
l0
H
V
n
V
N
n
N
o
n
O1
N
M
lO
w
CL
m
m
m
o
v
v
v
o
n
w
m
0
H
o
m
m
m
m
v
v
�n
O
.,
.,
.-�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
..
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W ....
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
>
m
m
N
M
n
.-1
M
M
N
V1
m
M
n
w
H
w
rl
Ol
n
w
N
m
y
w
01
m
Vl
w
O
N
V
n
-1
V
O
w
w
M.
m
N
VI
D
O
N
V
�y
w
0)
Ot
N
O
O
H
N
H
H
m
d'
lD
n
w
O1
01
O
O
N
H
H
H
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
u
W_
vi
3
V �
w
lO
m
ID
m
m
%D
m
m
a
tD
'D
n
Ol
lD
In
N
00
N
N
N
w
Lr1
rl
r
H
w
N
O1
N�
tD
w
O
M
lO
w
M
0
'-I
O1
M
.--I
M
lD
w
0
N
w
G
N
N
N
m
d'
cp
It
t
tl1
m
w
n
m
.-I
N
N
N
cp
d'
d'
d'
m
m
7
.-1
n
LO
w
M
m
LO
V1
m
V
w
LO
n
V
H
w
0
w
N
V1
V1
m
N
a
m
d
li
-!
Vl
H
V
w
w
O
N
m
w
0
U/
N
6
.--1
Vt
-i
V
lO
w
O
N
m
w
W
w
m
w
0
0
0
0
.--i
ti
N
N
V
t!1
n
N
rn
w
O
O
O
O
.--i
r-I
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3�
V
v
v
d'
V
d'
m
m
m
ko
�o
w
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O W
tD
l0
t0
lD
t0
t0
lD
lO
l0
lD
lO
E
Y3x
m
W
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
rn
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
V
7
V
n
n
n
n
n
I�
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
lD
l0
lD
l0
t0
tD
t0
lO
t
U
v
v
v
v
a
o
<r
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
It
O
O
O
O
w
m
w
m
H
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
w
m
w
m
c-I
m
0
10
1!1
Vl
n
lfl
07
m
m
n
w
w
w
V
V
n
m
lfl
n
Ill
Ol
m
If1
n
w
w
lD
M
w
M
Ol
n
00
M
N
V
N
lD
N
n
N
w
N
m
N
H
m
0
d'
m.
V
lO
m
n
m
w
m
m
n
w
M
N
V
N
l0
N
n
N
w
N
Ot
N
H
m
0
d'
F N
w
cr
O
O
N
>
N
QI
Ul
QI
QI
N
N
T
d
U)
QI
QI
d
>
J
d
?
?
?
?
T
N
W
t0
0)
N
N
O)
T
0!
>
>
J
f0
QI
?
Jr-
>
:r-
>
N
N
c6
i
0
0
Q
v>
>
a-I
N
m
a
V
>
T>
O
ul
O
O
.O
>
.-i
N
M
V
Ill
T
N
T
O.
IA
c-I
Q
N
N
N
N
H
H
N
M
V1
.-I
N
Vf
.
Q
N
N
N
H
N
H
N
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
Val
Vii
Vii
V
V
O
V
a
V
V
V
V
�
V
O
V
V
O
O
O
O
N
O
0
0
C' u1
lO
tD
lD
lD
lD
tD
lO
lD
lD
lO
t0
t0
l0
l0
l0
l0
tD
lN0
tND
tN0
lD
lN0
lD
lND
25F -205
N
0
zC
C
O
a
c
a�
a
a
Q
i
O
a.
d
C
m
d
T
Y
C
d
j�
N
N
d'
Vl
t0
l0
M
V
d'
Vl
Vl
Ifl
l0
00
N
N
d'
�(t
t0
u1
M
V
d'
Vl
V1
N
'O
O
6
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O t
o
W u
00
N
M
V
H
M
N
Ql
Vl
H
c0
Ol
00
N
Ol
M
m
Ol
Ol
Vl
lD
M
00
V
1D
y
n
O1
01
I�
M
H
V
O1
N
W
M
W
n
H
N
H
00
H
V
00
N
lD
Ol
Q
00
7
Ot
00
O
V
00
N
V
lD
lD
t0
M
n
1p
N
H
n
0
Vl
1p
H
00
N
00
M
m
V
lD
W
H
O
Ol
V
M
n
O
N
m
V
IA
l0
�
W
�
m
N
o
ti
O
�--�
ao
w
o c
.N-
LL .fir
n
Ol
d'
H
V
H
d'
V1
tp
V
l0
Vl
m
�Il
N
n
n
01
N
V'
V
C
00
tll
MW
M
n
N
Ol
01
O
H
N
m
M
V
�.j
N
00
M
H
c0
w
O
H
N
N
M
L
U N
d'
Ul
O
W
n
l0
N
m
m
m
m
M
V
V
�/1
tO
n
N
M
M
M
M
y
l
OC,
N
n
H
m
vo
N
a
tm
o
0m
o
V
N
va
l
n
a
a
m
o
0
m
m
o
v
0
�
0
0
0
H
H
H
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
o
0
.0
o t0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W ....
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
V1
lD
Ol
to
00
01
tD
DJ
H
N
V
m
N
7
m
m
n
M
lD
00
N
1p
Ol
n
H
O
H
N
c0
n
Ol
N
N
Vl
w
O
N
n
H
a
0
co
n
Ol
N
�l1
y�
d'
l0
n
00
Ol
Ol
O
O
N
N
H
N
H
M
N
lO
I�
c6
Ol
Ol
O
O
O
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W ...
Y �
W
MN
V
v1
V
�--�
m
a
V
ul
H
1p
DJ
O
N
Y
O
to
H
O
M
V
N
Vl
n
m
H
M
lq
Ot
H
1p
M
N
M
t!t
0. ..
W
Ol
H
N
M
Vl
H
H
N
N
N
H
H
H
H
H
H
as
V
C
O
H
ul
H
d'
O
W
V
V1
n
c0
Ol
W
O
O
O
O
H
H
H
N
7
tl1
n
DJ
01
00
O
O
O
(D
O
�--�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3�
'7
d'
V
V
V
V
O)
Ol
Ol
m
Cl
Cl
Ol
Ol
O1
01
O1
Ol
al
Ol
m
m
m
m
m
o
o
O
O
O
vl
L(i
m
v1
m
tti
vl
�(1
Vl
l!1
u1
V1
ul
ill
00
c0
c0
W
W
OO
W
"i
10
1p
1p
l0
l0
V1
V1
111
Vl
ill
m3�
m
m
M
m
M
M
m
01
Ol
Ol
m
01
01
Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol
O1
Ol
01
N
N
N
N
N
v,
v
s
a
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
a
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
a
v
u
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
c0
m
m
m
H
cn
0
0
Co
0
0
0
0
O
c0
m
00
M
A
a
v
n
ul
�n
n
vl
m
m
vl
n
ao
ao
v
v
n
vl
ul
n
vl
rn
-
m
'"o
vl
n
n
Cfl
Y
F N
Ql
V
H
1p
r l
n
m
W
m
01
10-0
m
N
I'
N
N
n
N
N
dl
N
H
M
o
V
Qi
�'
�
rm
n
m
00
m
Ol
n
00
m
N
N
N
N
w
cf
O
O
L
L
L
L
f0
W
Y_
IO
N
(6
N
f0
U!
f0
N
f0
N
L
L
L
f0
cu
++
L
L
0
N
L
m
N
L
m
d
L
m
N
f0
N
d
N
>
(0
f0
t0
t0
G!
U!
U!
>
f0
�'
O
ul
0
0
�n
�'
^�
N
M
V
m
T
T>
O
LA
O
O
vi
T
H
N
M
V
Lo
Ln
H
N
�A
H
Q
H
e-I
H
H
H
L
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
w
C fm
O
25F -206
N
0
z
O
a
c
a
a
Q
i
O
O.
d
C
O)
N
d
T
C
a`
ik
Vl
lD
00
N
N
ul
lD
u7
M
V
V
u1
ul
ul
lD
CO
N
N
C
u1
l0
u1
M
V
'0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
02
LL u
A
N
W
N
LD
m
N
m
m
N
V
I�
N
1l.
m
V
N
I�
Ln
Vl
t!1
m
LD
-T
ti
I�
`
N
M
ul
m
m
W
ul
W
ui
N
n
N
T.
e-I
t0
N
O
6
m
O
M
1p
N
n
a
0
w
w
m
u1
O
m
m
oo
W
m
O
u1
lD
w
0
1l
W
N
l0
m
O
.+
.--i
0
0
lD
w
CO
00
CO
m
m
N
O
c-I
.--I
N
r-1
N
.ti
00
w
N
o0
M
00
00
00
00
00
00
m
ci
ci
.--I
.-I
W
N
00
w
00
00
N
o a
a--
..-1
.--
.m-
c-
.--I
.M-
LL �
C
M
m
m
.--I
M
m
m
m
m
m
N
V
V
V
N
c0
m
N
m
m
co
ul
c0
m
N
t
V
u1
N
W
ul
to
lO
-i
W
W
O
�-i
N
m
V
ul
N
00
Lq
1p
1-1
W
W
O
u N
M
m
V
V
0
ID
n
l0
N
m
m
M
m
m
M
V
V
to
l0
n
N
N
m
v
> _
y
e-I
V
O
l0
m
N
m
lD
N
.-i
M
ID
00
m
N
l0
lD
m
N
00
W
N
ti
m
SZ
C
T
M
W
N
m
m
0
0
m
m
m
m
m
v
In
l0
n
m
m
0
0
m
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0".
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
ti
o
0
_
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Wv
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
M
ati
V
N
m
w
N
m
00
u1
m
.-i
H
m
M
.-I
V
N
N
O
ti
N
W
m
y
M
Il
ci
O
W
I"
m
N
N
Ln
n
O
N
m
Il
N
a
0
W
Il
m
N
N
u1
m
N
lD
W
m
m
O
O
O
c0
m
m
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
W_
V1
N
D
m
3
Y �
�x
CO
I�
H
H
N
00
v
m
00
m
m
N
N
N
m
m
m
m
m
m
Y
M
O
N
n
m
N
N
l0
M
u1
cq
O
N
M
1l
O
N
n
M
Nrfi
lD
M
Ln
0. „
Ln
ti
n
00
m
H
N
M
N
V
V
V
Ln
0
Ln
Ln
r
W
m
N
N
N
IT
v
m
.-,
n
N
H
M
H
v
a
a
H
m
v
v
0
H
lD
N
H
Ln
r+
OJ
N
V)
W
O
LA
N
O
ci
M
.ti
V
m
00
O
N
m
W
O
0
N
N
e-I
N
V
Ln
n
W
m
W
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
00
M
00
m
00
m
00
m
m
00
m
00
m
00
M
00
N
m
N
m
N
00
N
00
N
W
N
c0
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
m
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
co
y.,
W
u1
ul
VI
u)
w
m
m
m
u1
ul
u1
u1
u)
u1
Ln
u1
ul
ul
ul
Ln
ul
Ln
Lo
N
ul
u1
m
m3_
r
u
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
a
v
v
v
v
a
v
v
v
a
a
v
a
a
v
v
v
a
c_
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
m
m
m
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
(0
00
00
l0
V
V
I�
Ln
to
n
L
m
m
ul
n
CO
00
lD
V
V
I
V
L
n
m
m
+�
F
m
N
.-i
M
O
V
m
V
.ti
l0
Ln
n
m
CO
m
m
n
00
m
N
y
N
lD
N
n
N
W
N
m.
N
M
O
V
m
V
lD
m
n
m
00
m
m
n
m
m
N
y
N
y
w
O
O
�
w
i
w
N
m
m
m
0
N
0
m
>�
.
m
m
01
m
O)
m
0J
0!
01
m
m
m
N
W
m
0)
01
01
?
>
>
01
?
5.
T
T
d
W
O)
>
T
T
0
v
u)
>
>
>
O
Ln
O
O
O
.
.-.
N
.
.
u.
T
>
T
O
u)
O
O
O
d
N
N
M
N
N
N
ul
N
Q
N
H
H
N
N
N
N
M
Ln
H
N
LP
N
Q
N
H
v
v
v
v
a
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
It
a
v
v
v
a
v
v
M
M
o
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
O
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
d' VI
of
VI
u1
u1
N
LA
u1
Ln
ul
ut
N
In
LA
u1
ul
ut
of
ul
V1
V1
N
ul
u1
V1
u1
25F -207
N
O
z
E
CD
CD
Q
Y
O
O_
C)
c
D7
y
N
T
C
a`
7t
V
l!1
Ill
Ill
lD
W
N
N
V
In
lO
Ill
lD
lO
w
w
I�
n
n
n
W
lO
lO
lO
lD
lD
lD
lO
lO
tD
lD
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3
Ii U
N
n
on
to
In
m
V
00
In
on
a
W
Im
d
W
m
.�
n
W
.�
W
N
a
.�
lD
ti
o
o
v
m
o
M
lD
v
ill
In
lD
W
In
lD
n
In
m
a
m
O
.ti
O
W
N
M
lD
.-I
O
O
Vl
W
m
m
O
N
W
M
lm
m
In
N
O
M
t!1
lO
1�
W
lD
O
r-I
ti
l0
N
W
I�
�
m
ci
O or
IL v
cl
r
N
W
M
N
M
M
W
0
W
V
M
m
d'
I�
m
V
M
V
I�
l0
C
.-I
N
m
7
In
N
W
Ill
to
LD
H
W
V
lD
I�
m
O
rl
O;
N
m
Il
N
L
U N
M
M
M
M
M
It
d'
Ili
lD
04
LD
W
W
W
W
&
m
0
0
H
H
W
l0
W
m
c-i
V
lD
lO
0)
N
co
lD
N
lD
Vi
✓1
ul
ul
In
Ill
✓1
V
ul
V
O.
m
m
m
v
a
ul
m
m
0
0
n
n
r
n
r
n
n
n
n
n
n
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
'-I
n
O
n
O
n
O
n
O
�
O
n
O
n
O
O
O
O
O
LA
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�+
W ...
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
>
m
N
.--I
m
M
.-I
V
N
N
lD
.-1
Ill
V
m
N
N
H
W
m
lD
I�
O
N
M
1�
ci
O
00
V.
Co
N
In
1�
O
N
V
to
N
N
V
O
I�
M
N
w
n
W
m
m
d'
m
W
L
W�
�
Vl
Ul
ID ID
In
I�
lD
W
O
9
G-
m
lD
lD
LD
lO
V1
1�
N
M
0
O
N
O
3
a;
m
m
m
Y �
v�
m
m
M
m
N
cm
N
I�
N
LD
N
W
I�
to
m
t
W
O
N
M
1l
O
N
n
M
N
N
m
lq
Of
W
O
H
m
-'
N
n
r
O
V
Q
V
In
Ill
Ill
In
I,
W
Co
H
N
N
N
V'
d'
Lfl
In
Vl
Vl
V1
lD
I�
m
O
.-.
Q
>
7
7
d'
.-I
m
y
V
m
N
ID
N
N
M
lY
N
co
M
I�
M
m
W
lD
M
W
lD
W
O
N
In
W
O
Ill
N
O
N
Ill
V
lO
W
m
N
N
In
In
In
W
U;
0
0
0
0
H
VI „
3x
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ti
ti
ci
c-I
w
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
00
W
W
Oq
O�
00
O-
W
O-
W
W
W
W
W
O W
Ill
Vl
l!1
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
In
In
Ili
Ill
In
In
Ill
Ill
Ill
m
to
Ill
ca
H
H
H
�.,
vvvvavvv,v�ry
I++
v
v
v
v
v,
v,
v,
v,
v
v
v
v,
a
a
v
v
a
v
v
a
v
v
v
u
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
a
M
W
m
ti
M
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
o
W
m
W
M
.w
M
o
0
0
0
m
M
In
N
W
W
lD
V
V
N
m
to
n
to
m
M
Vl
N
W
W
lD
V
"r
I�
+�
lD
N
W
m
N
O
m
r-I
to
m
m
n
U
m
It
lO
N
W
m
.-�
O
m
O
N
N
N
N
M
V
V
lD
N
W
m
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
V
V
lD
N
C .ur
N
3
0
W
W
W
W
w
m
W
N
m
W
m
W
m
W
L
m
m
>
>
T
?
m
m
m
W
?
W
?
W
?
>
J
W
T
>
>
>
>
m
W
m
N
m
W
W
>
W
?
N
M
V
V1
W
>
W
T
W
T
O
In
O
6
O
-?
>
•--I
N
M
V
Ill
>
T
T
O
m
d
rl
N
c4
H
N
M
ul
H
N
Vl
H
Q
H
N
.--I
N
c-I
N
m
m
on
m
on
on
on
m
m
on
M
m
W
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
W
o
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
o
m
Co
W
Co
W
CO)
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
> m
K
Vl
w
In
M
ul
V1
N
0
0
m:
In
to
Lo
m
to
ul
ul
IA
m
IA
an
VI
ul
V1
25F -208
N
O
Z
E
a
W
d
a
a
0
0_
c
N
co
0
T
L
Z
CL`
as
n
Io
n
Lo
n
to
�o
to
tD
to
ID
kD
n
n
Lq
n
Lq
n
Lq
n
kq
n
Lq
n
Lq
n
1p
n
Lq
n
Lq
n
�q
ko
1p
Lo
Lq
w
1p
ko
1p
n
1p
n
Lq
n
�q
n
y
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
LL u
m
v
m
N
m
v,
rv�
v
n
m
n
v�
n
in
(n
a
v
iD
.�
v,
v
m
.�
m
m
m
m
.�
n
N
a
Lq
00
1p
Ln
It!
0
n
oo
m
m
Lq
N
n
w
ao
y
L6
V
m
v
lD
ao
n
N
N
m
m
O
0
m
M
N
N
m
M
m
M
1n
w
N
N
o
O
ni
V
m
m
y
to
o0
n
w
W
m
m
0�
O
N
N
m
m
m
m
l0
CD
t0
N
N
M
m
m
V
t!1
tD
lD
tD
1p
N
N
N
M
m
M
M
M
M
O O'
LL w
c
M
n
v,
N
a
m
oo
v
m
n
o
m
H
v
v
ry
m
m
n
v
N
v
a
N
Io
m
n
m
m
0
m
N
t
u N
m
n
H
o0
00
0o
m
m
m
o
o
N
oo
w
w
00
of
m
o
vi
a
v
v
v
v
C
CL
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
N
n
n
n
n
N
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�+
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
>
co
�D
N
oo
tD
n
a,
N
VI
m
In
V
m�
H
M
oo
V
n
m
V
m
m
lD
V
n
m
o
H
m
w
Ln
m
m
m
W
H
M
n
10
00
m
y
.�
�
.!
.�
�
m
y �
m
o
o
�-i
ci
a-1
N
N
N
N
d'
to
w
W.
O
O
N
c l
N
H
N
N
N
M
L
W ...
N
3
e}
N
m
ci
V
O
N
lD
N
W
M
n
.--I
N
to
lD
14:
N
n
n
n
n
n
V
0
00
V
CT
N
00
N
CY
lD
M
lD
m
W
N
O
n
ti
N
M
lD
V
N
n
W
n
as+
O. ^
.--I
N
ci
V
d'
M
ul
m
LD
n
m
O
.-I
N
c-I
V
V
V1
t!1
Vl
M
V1
.
O
W
� v
>
of
O
m
m
V1
w
M
w
Vl
V
n
.--I
m
w
O
N
M
V
r-I
ul
r-I
to
W
n
N
N
W
m
N
m
W
M
.-1
N
r-I
V
m
M
itt
n
m
V
0
M
t0
M
w
W
n
n
n
O
o
0
0
ti
i4
e-i
o
�y
3�
.�
m
m
m
�-It
n
n
-1
n
It
n
-It
n
't
n
-It
n
14
n
4"1
n
n
�IZT
n
n
lzr
n
-IT
n
w
Lq
w
Lq
w
LQ
w
Lq
w
m
w
Lq
w
U�
w
vi
W
tf1
U)
to
In
m
to
In
In
If1
Ln
N
V1
lf1
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
In
Ln
N
N
In
l!1
VI
t!1
E_
o
w
v
v
It
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
(n
m
m
m
m
m
M
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
n
H
n
ti
n
H
n
N
n
.�
n
r i
n
.-�
n
ti
r
d:
a
v
v
v
T
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
c
m
0
m�
0
0
n
0
�
0o
m
m
m�
oo
m
n
H
m
m
m
o
w
0
v
0
v
0
n
0
m�
0
0
n
O
0
oo
m
m
m
oo
m
m.
n
oo
m
m�
0
+"
M
W
M
n
W
M
dt
CD
n
00
0)
H
O
m
H
to
M
n
M
M
m
n
00
m
V
w
n
w
m
N
O
H w
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
V
d'
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
a'
U v
O
O
>
O)
0J
N
01
?
T
T
UJ
w
w
O
O
.O
vi
?
N
N
M
V
VI
>
?>
O
Vl
O
O
in
�`
N
N
M
V
m
>>
O.
111
rl
Q
e-I
N
e-I
a--I
c-I
c-I
N
M
to
r-I
N
In
'-I
Q
N
e-I
a-I
N
e-I
H
N
M
M
m
M
m
M
m
0000008888
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
W
> m
00
W
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
W
Poolo-COMOD
W
W
W
W
W
N
t0
CD
w
O
lD
w
l
C V 1
V1
V1
to
M
M
vl
to
to
M
M
M
m
M
m
M
N
v
N
m
M
N
o
25F -209
N
O
Z
a
c
Q
O
O_
C
N
d
0
T
L.
LB
d
x
n
n
n
n
n
n
O
O
O
LO
lO
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
D
O
O
O
O
D
D
O
lO
O
W
O
O
O
000000
00000000000000
3
u` U
n
N
.�
m
m
lO
ul
w
lO
In
m
v
m
w
a.y
oo
,y
w
a
0
w
m
rn
o
N
m
Q
r-1
O
N
m
d'
lO
W
n
Oi
w
Oi
Ol
01
O
r
v
N
Ol
M
m
N
O
m
w
l0
�'
d'
N
Vl
l0
l0
w
T
l0
lO
N
N
N
m
m
M
M
M
m
M
lA
l0
lO
w
l0
w
t0
O Q
= 4.
E
d'
Ol
n
n
m
Ill
m
Ol
l0
V
N
M
V
r-I
l0
w
n
N
Cl
0
n
m
N
m
l0
m
m
w
m
m
Iyj
Vl
V
n
M
n
M
n
M
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
m
n
N
n
m
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
N
n
CL
O
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
_
in
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
w r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
.,
V1
✓1
Ol
V
lO
w
0
111
w
0
lO
m
N
n
N
n
c{
.-I
N
w
m
O
m
u
W r
V1
w
w
Ol
N
.--I
Vl
N
n
m
w
<r
w
l0
N
tl1
lD
N
1p
N
Ill
M
N
Ol
N
t0
N
06
w
m
m
m
m
m
O
H
N
M
M
V
V
V �
n
In
m
ul
m
y
m
m
w
m
n
m
w
w
In
m
In
H
l0
tD
w
0
.--i
M
V
n
n
n
g O
6 p
N
e-I
1p
C
n
m
O
V
V
ui
In
Vl
Ili
M
W
n
N
c-I
.-.
cNi
•~-i
.ti-I
cN-I
D �
`J
IA
m
l0
m
O
m
w
�
n
N
II1
O
tlf
N
M
V
lO
V1
n
Ol
w
Ill
.--i
N
N
n
d'
N
Ol
n
t0
ti
l0
n
O
y
M
N
p
r.i
m
W
m
V
lO
lO
n
n
O
O
O
.-I
0
0
c-I
.--I
.-I
V
Ill
l0
n
n
N
r-1
N
ci
H
H
N
N
N
ci
ci
N
ei
ci
c-I
H
H
VI „�
3�
w
w
w
w
ul
w
In
w
vl
N
v
N
v
N
v
N
v
N
v
N
v
N
a
N
v
N
v
N
v
N
v
N
N
v
N
v
O W
In
il)
In
L!1
In
Ill
IIl
Ill
Vl
Ill
ul
Vl
ul
ul
Ill
Ill
Vl
Ill
Ill
Ill
v
Ill
m
0
EA
Y
W
.--I
e-I
'i
.-I
e•-I
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
d'
C
V
V
V
V
'7
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
w
m
w
m
.--I
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
a
v
n
vl
vl
n
In
m
m
In
n
w
w
lO
v
v
n
In
ul
n
n
w
m
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
w
w
a�
0
0
N
?
N
N
Ol
N
d
m
N
N
T
m
W
N
3
m
t0
m
N
7
L
O
Ill
O
O
O
IA
O
O
h
M
Ill
.--I
N
to
'i
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
y
O
O
O
lO
O
lO
O
lO
O
lO
O
a
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
a
O
a
O
a�
O
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
a
� R
lO
lO
25F -210
N
O
z
E
c
a
c
a
a
Q
0
0
CD
C
0
a
8 �
s
a a
m
E 2
a a
u 8 a
8
(Y) ualenel3 (tl)uo4enel3
25F -211
N
O
Z
E
c
d
Q
O
O_
Q�
N
d
L
cc
c
E
d
L
D
0
r
L
V
CI
O
O
a`
R
CG
O
�k
:r]
n
N
Q
N
b0
O O 0
m rn m
11 II II
19 K 53 w s
m C C
2 $ t F t 8
>n° g ,h°
mg mg m
e II e it s
°
Z 2 Z
N Ul 1/1
II II II
> >
> > >
tt
0 0
18 11 FJ R m m v .N m m R 11 g R m T 7 P m R 11 Ri R m m m m
(Y) m w.13 (8) u01lena13 (Y) U01lene13
8 I I
p N Q O
m m U+
n n
a
$ U
O O 0
m rn m
11 II II
19 K 53 w s
m C C
2 $ t F t 8
>n° g ,h°
mg mg m
e II e it s
°
Z 2 Z
N Ul 1/1
II II II
> >
> > >
tt
0 0
18 11 FJ R m m v .N m m R 11 g R m T 7 P m R 11 Ri R m m m m
(Y) m w.13 (8) u01lena13 (Y) U01lene13
8 I I
p N Q O
m m U+
n n
25F -212
it
ld
�
c
c
=5
II U
II
U
R
W
N
W
N
❑
R
❑
R
❑
R
Z
LJ
II
Z
!A
II
Z
N
II
>
>
>
lz
£8 11 p R ro w � v o
°
(Y) uo9enal3
(4) uopene l3
N) Mle-13
25F -212
N
O
Z
7
C
Q
L
Q
N�
C
Qi
.N
ai
i
C
a
25F -213
} ID
}
O
IO
O
0
II
m
II
O
K
53
K
A
II
rc
A
d
C
pi
d
C
d
C
d
d
d
2
2
2
t�
R b
t 8gg
p b
t$g
R 5
o
R
o
R
o
R
z
z
z
II
II
z
y
II
d
d
d
a
�
a
0
R FJ R �R `r° m
0
(y) uo11enal3
(y) uoyena13
(y) uo!Rna13
25F -213
} ID
}
II
11
II
pi
d
d
d
2
2
2
x
z
z
z
II
II
II
a
a
a
0
R FJ R �R `r° m
d°
(y) uoyen013
openal3
y) uoyanal3
25F -213
N
O
z
E
Q
Y
C
Q
W
C
N
d
0
i
a.
J��m (N(QQIU�•� ��N (�m�•N _�U}•�J �It� m �Ur•�
O O
m W W
II II a
W
W
c_
U _ U
II o Pi 6 II (b Q1 9
ry 8 5 rg N $' UIDi II II' N
N
W
z z R o R
n n a
n z
u,
>
a � v
0
(y) uoyenal3 (Y) uopenal3 (y) uoyenal3
W m
II II o
m
c c
m`5 m`6 z rn°6 f�
II U ,r II U U I ^
5 L c m e
F fl II 'pn _L ID
p p �
R
N z R o R
n z
>
a a d
a
0
xaR W �� nom m ApRmmsvg
(y) uopen813 (Y) uopen913 (y) uoyenal3
25F -214
j
E
§
\
k
&
.%
±
E
/
25F-215
{ 0 \,
�e2/ �
!; . z ^� £1; {\\ •7
\�
;E 25?
m_o *_w m_w
IN
{ 0 \,
�e2/ �
!; . z ^� £1; {\\ •7
\�
;E 25?
m_o *_w m_w
IN
\,
\;
�
\/
\
.!
\a
)
CE
<
w =
=
a
ma,aa,mZZZ
,�ai2vir
m_e
m_e
m_m
N
O
z
E
cc
O
C
O
Q
O
N
c
N
d
i
C
E
25F -216
a
� {IIII
I1II`I1I yIII x
CIS
c
yiII
IIII{ JIII
�I�
o
t
� x
r�� �•A
r�
�p
5 �•A
�p �p @
5
0
m
m5151
0
m
o
0
a
r
5
r
r
11
n
II
w
c
r
c
K
o
o
�
o
U
c
Y
R 5
U
t&
F
A 6
U
t
r
R fi
m
c
m
c
2
2
o
R
v
R
o
R
z
�
—u°fr
z
-S
II
II
II
a
a=
R 5
na10j u'1
�
(y) Uopene13
(y) 001Iene13
�w
(y) u0pene13
25F -216
a
� {IIII
I1II`I1I yIII x
CIS
c
yiII
IIII{ JIII
�I�
o
t
� x
r�� �•A
r�
�p
5 �•A
�p �p @
5
o
m5151
o
�IS Im•�
o
5
r
r
K
K
�
ry
c
m
c
m
c
2
2
2
ufr
S
us
S
—u°fr
-S
R 5
na10j u'1
�
�w
w
�w
p
g
o
g
o
g
N
vZj
II
N
II
II
i
>
>
(y) u0pene13
(y) uopene13
(y) Uo!Ienel3
25F -216
N
O
z
E
cm
7
a
C
O
a
a
Q
i
Q
d
c
.N
0
i
a`
25F -217
JII x.111I E y
N
O
�
n
II
r
II
au
II
v
v
c
m
c
11
N
o�
o�
II
N
o
II
11
N
II
S'
N
N
t
z
z
p
R
p
R
p
R
z
$
II
II
c ro
z
II
c n
mfr
d
rc
mfr
R m m; °
(y) u09ene13
(y) MR-13
(4) uaUenal3
25F -217
11
N
II
Vl
II
N
N
W
C
N
t
z
z
z
'c `ro
c ro
c n
mfr
mfr
mfr
z
z
z
rn
u
rn
n
rn
n
>
>
>
A FA Rm �4 �
Rm`�°. -�� '°
rFJRmmo�om�o v°
(y) oou '.13
(y) Uogen013
(Y) Uogenei3
25F -217
N
O
z
7
C
O
Q
O
Q�
N
N
0
a
25F -218
m
O
(p
V
N
�
<
tp
m
m
II
II
K
8r
II
K
�i
K
8i
N
C
d
II
m
�
U N
N Q
vii
N$
m
W$
In
o
g
o
R
❑
g
II U
II U
N
N
uZj
n
v
o
K
�
K
N ELI RI m tP0 < v OO 0 N
4
N iY is 0 so v m
Q
lg iy tV m b b b
V
(Y) eollena13
(Y) -Wp -13
Z
II
(Y) uo!lenel3
25F -218
II
II
II
ro
f
II U
�_
II U
II U
A_
Z
II
Z
II
Q
Z
II
j
a
O
>
a
ry
>
a
(y) uoyenal3
lY) uoyenal3
(Y) uo!lenel3
25F -218
N
O
z
E
c
a�
CL
C
07
d
L
E
W
a`
m o
N o W
II II II
d m v
c c c
o g o o $
II Uqq .0 II U C II U C
Q Q Q
z z z
m
°
d v v
o! a rc
r4 am_ r5! Vm,t omm
(y)uoyena13 (y) uopenel3 (y) oopena13
o � 5 5 �Im•� o � 5 � IQC�•A a �I� � IQI Ce•R
m m m
m N m
� K K
W N N
C C
2 2 2
mfi mfr mfi
Lill
Q Q Q
2 Z } Z
m m m
11 II II
N N N
(y) uopenel3 (y) uopene13 (y) uopenel3
25F -219
N
O
z
O
a
C
d
a
a
O
Q
cm
co
N
d
0
L
E
0
l Ij}y}II yyyy 9 JIj Ij}j}III
m m
o m m
m m m
� N N
II II
fL
p1 N
a
0
II �9
K
Q Q �
Z Z Q
y � Z
II II (n
y`I `y II
a
(Y)uogenal3 (Y7 uopenal3 (Y) uopenal3
25F -220
S.U.0
l Ij}y}II yyyy 9 JIj Ij}j}III
m m
o m m
m m m
� N N
II II
fL
p1 N
a
0
II �9
K
Q Q �
Z Z Q
y � Z
II II (n
y`I `y II
a
(Y)uogenal3 (Y7 uopenal3 (Y) uopenal3
25F -220
N
O
z
7
c
\y
L
C
Q
Na)
ccm
cu
ai
Q
E
d
25F -221
�
��5
$��
� �•�
�•�
5
m
N
�
o
N
Sm l�l�•�
0
N
�I�I
II
II
II
N
C
W
C
N
.O
.O
.O
w
m
m
G
2
2
g
C
2
0
°5
o
R
o
R
o
R
¢
C
II w
�
11 U
z
m
II
z
z
In
II
z
N
II
ui
0
I- �
ti
K
fL
K
U
U
U
(Y) oogen813
(y) uopenal3
(y) uopena13
25F -221
�
��5
$��
� �•�
�•�
5
a
�
o
Sm l�l�•�
o
�I�I
u
N
u
N
u
N
K
K
K
w
m
m
G
2
2
g
C
2
0
°5
m
m5
m`5
II w
C
II w
�
11 U
ui
�i
I- �
ti
aw,
poi
Kw
U
U
U
z
z
z
N
II
N
II
N
II
(yf uopenal3
(y) uogene13
(y) uogene13
25F -221
N
O
Z
E
O
a
c
a
a
O
CL
c
rn
.N
d
im
T
co
L
L
a
25F -222
0
0
8
N
II
f/1
K
�
N
2
�
t5 fi
- b
mfi
�
11 U
p �
ID
Z
3
(/J
II
N
W) ua�enel3
25F -222
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Appendix A- 3
Diversion Facility Hydraulic Calculation
25F -223
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
25F -224
jJOh Ne. 38001549 ICa1c
Na.
_�
Computation
M
Pr,i
Both Charnel Dlvendn Facility
J. IDao
_ sygo„
not, 712312014
5.68
Hnobablik, Prefilis for 04 CFSIntercept FlowlDrv� )
re,-.ea J. taw
Taro
System Hydraulics, _ 1.
u-n. Fmw
Destgn Flow Condition, Head LOSS
FLOW CONDIPON CFS MOD
limeminvideol Flavc6 0.4 1 026
Oos9n HGL
Head ion
HDL
Invert M.
100 cfs
100 cfs
ft
Inlet Pipe Intake Point
000
6.06
5.63
Imm PDR
Pre ComseScemn Chamber
000
6.06
Post Course- screen Chamber
000
6.05
Pre Finescreen Chamber
0.09
6.05
Fine -smeen Weir Crest
002
6.02
fi.W
Post Finescreen Effluent Chamber
000
5.66
1.66
Note: 4 feel
min submergence
Oubet Pipe Dachage Point
000
6w--
0 Wet Pipe Discharge Point
am PDR
Total Headman, 0.00
Gi'.en
M1eaipllon Vdlua
Design C-lactor 120
L., raw
URS proposed deader design details
Head Loa
Head
Los
�m�ioo��n
Pipe O
(N1000 R)
K
V
V.I.
(ft of
H2O)
SlzelDeacripbon Dia. Length
Head
(In) (ft) (mgd)
C Values
(fps)
Of
C Values
Total 02fi
1110 120
IDO
120
SaMChamberto Meter Box
Entrance
48
0.26
0
0
0.50
0.03183
0,00002
0.000008
0.000009
Exit LOSS
4a
026
0
0
LW
003183
0.00002
O.GOOD16
0000016
Data (open)
48
026
0
0
0.00
003183
0.00002
0.0000W
OOOOOW
Pipe
48
5p
026
0
0
003183
0.00002
0.000010
OOOOW]
Total Head Loa=
0.000034
0.000031
Description Mechanical Bar $men (Course Screen)
Max Velocity (fps) through open area 4
Obggirg Factor 05
Clear Spacing BeMeen Bare (in) 3
Wldtb ofcourse bar (M 20
thickness of bar (I.) 0.5
imea of lnflumit Chamber (4) 583
Water Depth in Influent Chamber (ft) 038 had and co enge
to K1] -56 0.38
Velocity thmugh Impips) 0.12
Heaaoss through the course bar (0) 0.00 h=00]29(V^MV), where v in m e, h in nl
Description BsMe Wall
NumbazofbaMuewalis
Numbermusifices
Orifice Haight(it)
MQ=O.R'A'epf2,,h)
Orifice Width (0)
Velocity through Defoe (fps)
Headoss ibroigh cafice(fl)
25F -224
5.68
25F -224
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Figure A -24. Hydraulic Profile for 0.4 cfs Intercept Flow (Dry- weather)
25F -225
Description
Broad Created Weir
War Widlh(ft)
20
Warre,doleht
3.33
Hescloss though Weir (it)
0.02
Description
Fine Screen
Max Velmity (Iles) though open area
4.0
Clogging Facfor
015
Clear Specin, Belwe,n Bans(in)
0.5
Milan of muree bar (it)
20
3MOkne.a of her (in)
0.375
]need of Fine Screen Chamber (it)
6
Water Depthln Fine Screen Chaober(0)
0.055
tnatantlmmeyeto K19-L20
=
00599,1069
Velocity through bar(fpa)
1.27
Hairdos. though the course bur (it)
0101
h= 00]29(V^ -N^2). where in roles, h in in
Head Loss
Heed Lose
File,
D (W1000 fl)
K
V
V.I.
(8 of H2O)
Sizeloescdption of..
Length
Head
(in)
(a)
(o9d) CVaWas
(flea)
(a)
CValues
Total
1 0.26 1 100 1 120
100 120
SaMChamberto
Meter Sm
Ent2nce
98
026
0
0
O.W
003183
0.00002
0.000008
0.000008
Ezgt.oss
48
0.26
0
0
100
0.03183
0.00002
0.000016
0.000016
Gffie(open)
a0
0.26
0
0
0.00
0.03183
0.00002
0.000000
0.000000
Pipe
48
50
1 0.26
0
0
0.03183
0.00002
0.000010
0.110000]
Total Head Los.=
0.000039 0.000031
Figure A -24. Hydraulic Profile for 0.4 cfs Intercept Flow (Dry- weather)
25F -225
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
25F -226
taro xe. 38001549 Isomer.
i.fi]
Computation
n
10.09
i.Oi
980
a
NIN Charnel DI 'n Famflity J. 2hao
pet. 1I2N2014
Hydraulic Profile br 100 CFS Max Intention Flow (Wet - weather) IHe.een J. LOIg
System Hydraulics _ I Oare
Design Flow Cartoons Head Lose
O8I
0.62
].W
,ley.—
lcom ocn
o,
Oevae Fbn
16>
FLOW CONDDION CFS MGD
Inters eC Flmycls 100.0 64.63
Dswam HGL
Head LOSS
HGL
Invert EL.
100 cfs
100 Ch
Inlet Pipe Intake Point
fipm PDR
Pre Coumescmen Chamber
Post Course screen Chamber
Pre Fine - screen Chamber
g
Finescmen Wea Crest
Past Fine screen Effluent Chamber
Outlet Pipe Discharge Point
Outlet Pipe Discharge Point
firm PDR
Total Heabloss 6.06
Garen
6acriptlon Yalue
Design C -kctor 120
Leycar
DRS proposed Ganfiertlesign details
Head Loss
Head Loss
carouraeeoa
Pipe 0
(N1000 R)
K
V
V.I.
Bt of H2O)
SlxelDescri Dia. Length
Head
(In) (ft) (mgd)
CValues
(fps)
(ft)
0Values
Total 64.63
100 120
Sa wmar b it to Meter Box
Entrance
48
64.63'
6
4
0.50
].95P5
0.96332
659
Exit LOSS
64.fi3
6
4
I.Op
].95P5
898332
"O.NnI90.�19
319
Gate(open)
4B
6463
6
4
000
].9l
098332
00o
Pipe
48
50
64.63
6
4
'!.95175
098332
202
Total Head Lon=
1.752689 1.673180
Naeripilan Mechaniesl Bar Semen(COUrse SCmen)
Max Velocity (fps) thine lb open area 4
Clogging Factor 0.5
Gear Spacing Between eam(in) 3
Width of course bar (ft) 20
Thickness of bar (in) 0.5
Imert of Influent Chamber (11) 5'83
Water Depth in Influent Chamber (ft) 4
Velocity through bar (fps) 2.92
Heedless though the course bar (ft) 0.21 Iw0.0]29 V"2-vla2), wliero V N thal h in m
Denriptlon Baffia Wall
Number of ball walls
Numberefoefice,
Onfice Height (ft)
It0=162-iWalt(29h)
Orifice With (ft)
Velocity through Coffee (fps)
Headley through edfice(ft)
25F -226
i.fi]
11 ]6
0.21
10.09
i.Oi
980
0.90
O8I
0.62
].W
0.00
7.35
16>
].35
Description
Weir Width (ft)
Weir CoePlcient
Headloss through Weir (ft)
Oescrlptlon
M. Velocity (tps) though open area
Clogging Fisher
Clear Spacing Between Bars (in)
Width of course bar(a)
Thickness of bar (in)
In ert of Fine Screen Clambar(t)
Water Depth in Fine Screen Chamber
Velocity thmugh bar (ens)
Headloss though the course bar (111)
Pipe
Sizelm Wi peon Oia. Length
(in) fat
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Broad Crested Weir
P 0. 2g
3.33
62
Ent arce
Exit Loss
Gate (open)
Pipe
end con,"" t0 K19 -L20 =
2.87490157
48
.0]29(VMMv ), satieee vin naps, hinm
6
4
0.5A
Head Loss
0.96332
0.491659
Head Loss
Q (N1g60 ft) K
V
V.I.
(ft of H2O)
4
1.00
Head
0.90332
(mad) C Values
frael
fftl
C Values
Total I I 64.63 100 120 100 120
Sandchamber to Meter Box
48
6463
6
4
0.5A
T.95P5
0.96332
0.491659
0.491659
48
64.63
6
4
1.00
T.95T]5
0.90332
0.963319
0.983319
48
64.63
6
4
1 0.00
7.95T15
0.96332
0.000000
0.000000
48
o„g
61.63
6
4
1
195P5
0.96332
0.277711
0.196202
Figure A -2 -5. Hydraulic Profile for 100 cfs Intercept Flow (Wet - weather)
25F -227
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Appendix A- 4
Routing Analysis Force Main Construction Cost Estimation
25F -228
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Cost Calcillations for Pipe: Santa Ana Delhi Diversion FM Route No.
1
Printed date: 06/2012014
Project year: 2014
The estimated constniction cost below, which includes contactor overhead
and profit, is forplanning purposes only. The output does NOT include
contingency, sales tax, or allied costs (design, permitting, construction
management, etc. ).
Constriction Year: 2014
Length: 9392 ft
Conduit Type: Force Main
Depth of Cover: 6 ft
Trench Backfill Type: Imported
Disposal Type: No Disposal Cost
Manhole Spacing: None
Existing Utilities: Complex
Dewatenng: None
Pavement Restoration: Trench Width
Traffic: Light
Land Acquisition: None
Required Easements: None
Land Adjustment Factor: King County Average
Trench Safety: Standard
Pipe Diameter: 8 in.
Outer Diameter
0.754 ft
Trench Width
3.48 ft
Excavation Depth
7.75 ft
Complete Surface Rest. Width
5.48 ft
Unit Costs (Basis 2008)
Ttem
Qunnfi4r
TTnk Unit
Cud Tte+n
Cn4
Excavation
9,390.0
CY
13.00
12200
Backfill
6,050.0
CY
34.00
206,000
Complete Pavement Restoration
5,720.0
SY
86.00
492,000
Trench Safety
146,000.0
SF
0.53
77,200
Spoil Load and Haul
9,390.0
CY
16.00
150,000
Pipe Unit Material Cost
9,390.0
If
30.00
282,000
Pipe Installation
9,390.0
If
22.00
207,000
Place Pipe Zone Fill
3,180.0
CY
34.00
108,000
Existing Utilities
9,390.0
If
32.00
301,000
Traffic Control
9.390.0
If
8.00
75. 100
25F -229
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Year 2008 Subtotal $2,020,000
Mobilization'Demobilization at 6% 1.06
Multiplier from ENRCCI 8815 (2008) to 9552 (2014) 1.08
Effective Multiplier 1.15
Construction Year 2014 Subtotal $2,320,000
Sub Items
Name •type Year Lost— M "1T M1..4 rn�t
Delhi Channel (HDD), 300 feet, 30 feet depth
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 91,700 1.00 91,700
Newport Beach Golf Cow-se continue through 2031 Irvin Ave. (HDD), 600 feet, 10 feet del
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 219,000 1.00 219,000
Santa Ana Ave (Jack & Bore), 150 feet. 10 feet depth
Jack and Bore 2014 268,000 1.00 168000
Year 2008 Subtotal $579,000
Year 2014 Total: $2,900,000
25F -230
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Cost Cakulations for Pipe: Santa Ana Delhi Diversion FM Route No.
2
Printed date : 06/20/2014
Project year: 2014
The estimated construction cost below, which includes contractor overhead
and profit, is for planning purposes only. The output does NOT include
contingenc14 sales tax, or allied costs (design, permitting, construction
management etc. ).
Construction Year: 2014
Length: 9730 ft
Conduit Type: Force Main
Depth of Cover: 6 ft
Trench Backfill Type: Imported
Disposal Type: No Disposal Cost
Manhole Spacing: None
Existing Utilities: Complex
Dewatering: None
Pavement Restoration: Trench Width
Traffic: Light
Land Acquisition: None
Required Easements: None
Land Adjustment Factor: King County Average
Trench Safety: Standard
Pipe Diameter: 8 in.
Outer Diameter
0.754 ft
Trench Width
3.48 ft
Excavation Depth
7.75 ft
Complete Surface Rest. Width
5.48 ft
Unit Costs (Basis 2008)
Item
QJigntity
TTnit Unit
Cmt Ttem
Cnct
Excavation
9,730.0
CY
13.00
126,000
Backfill
6,270.0
CY
34.00
213,000
Complete Pavement Restoration
5,920.0
SY
86.00
510,000
Trench Safety
151,000.0
SF
0.53
80,000
Spoil Load and Raul
9,730.0
CY
16.00
156,000
Pipe Unit Material Cost
9,730.0
If
30.00
292,000
Pipe Installation
9.730.0
If
22.00
214,000
Place Pipe Zone Fill
3.290.0
CY
34.00
112,000
Existing Utilities
9,730.0
If
32.00
311,000
Traffic Control
9.730.0
If
8.00
77.800
25F -231
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Year 2008 Subtotal $2,090,000
Mobilization/Demobilization at 6% 1.06
Multiplier from ENRCCI 8815 (2008) to 9552 (2014) 1.08
Effective Multiplier 1.15
Construction Year 2014 Subtotal $2,400,000
Sub Items
NnnlP Tjl= P V021. rnQt M"ltiPUPT In 1,1 rnct
Delhi Channel (HDD), 300 feet. 30 feet depth
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 91,700 1.00 91,700
Newport Beach Golf Course continue through 2031 In-in Ave. (HDD). 600 feet, 10 feet del
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 219,000 1.00 219,000
Santa Ana Ave (Jack S Bore), 150 feet, 10 feet depth
Jack and Bore 2014 268,000 1.00 26R 000
Year 2008 Subtotal $579,000
Year 2014 Total: $2,980,000
25F -232
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Cost Cakulations for Pipe: Santa Ana Delhi Diversion FM Route No.
3
Printed date: 06/1312014
Project year: 2014
The estimated construction cost below, which includes contactor overhead
and profit, is for planning purposes only. The output does NOT include
contingency, sales toy, or allied costs (design, permitting, construction
management, etc. ).
Construction Year: 2014
Length: 1000 ft
Conduit Type: Force Main
Depth of Cover: 6 ft
Trench Backfill Type: Imported
Disposal Type: No Disposal Cost
Manhole Spacing: None
Existing Utilities: Complex
Dewatering: None
Pavement Restoration: Trench Width
Traffic: Light
Land Acquisition: None
Required Easements: None
Laud Adjustment Factor: King County Average
Trench Safety: Standard
Pipe Diameter: 8 in.
Outer Diameter
0.754 ft
Trench Width
3.48 ft
Excavation Depth
7.75 ft
Complete Surface Rest. Width
5.48 ft
Unit Costs (Basis 2008)
Ttem
Quantity
1 Tnit Unit
C'nct
Ttem Cnct
Excavation
1.000.0
CY
13.00
13.000
Backfill
645.0
CY
34.00
21.900
Complete Pavement Restoration
609.0
SY
86.00
52.400
Trench Safety
15,500.0
SF
0.53
8,220
Spoil Load and Hard
1,000.0
CY
16.00
16.000
Pipe Unit Material Cost
1,000.0
If
30.00
30.000
Pipe Installation
1,000.0
if
22.00
22,000
Place Pipe Zone Fill
338.0
CY
34.00
11.500
Existing Utilities
1.000.0
if
32.00
32,000
Traffic Control
1.000.0
if
8.00
3.000
25F -233
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Year 2008 Subtotal $215,000
Mobilization/Demobilization at 6% 1.06
Multiplier from ENRCCI 8815 (2008) to 9552 (2014) 1.08
Effective Multiplier 1.15
Construction Year 2014 Subtotal $247,000
Sub Items
u' ^"' T3i" Yeaz Lost_ M111 ti er 7014 rmt
Delhi Channel (HDD), 300 feet, 30 feet depth
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 91,700 1.00 91,700
Newport Beach Golf Course continue through 2031 Irvin Ave. (HDD), 600 feet, 10 feet del
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 222,000 1.00 11? wo
Year 2008 Subtotal $314,000
Year 2014 Total: $561,000
25F -234
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Cost Calculations for Pipe: Santa Ana Delhi Diversion FM Route No.
4
Printed date: 07107/2014
Project year: 2014
The estimated construction cost below, which includes contractor overhead
and profit, is forplanning purposes only. The output does NOT include
contingency, sales tax, or allied costs (design, permitting, construction
management, etc. ).
Construction Year: 2014
Length: 5982 ft
Conduit Type: Force Main
Depth of Cover: 6 ft
Trench Backfill Type: Imported
Disposal Type: No Disposal Cost
Manhole Spacing: None
Existing Utilities: Complex
Dewatering: Minimal
Pavement Restoration: Trench Width
Traffic: Light
Land Acquisition: None
Required Easements: None
Land Adjustment Factor: King County Average
Trench Safety: Standard
Pipe Diameter: 8 in.
Outer Diameter
0.754 ft
Trench Width
3.48 ft
Excavation Depth
7.75 ft
Complete Surface Rest. Width
5.48 ft
Unit Costs (Basis 2008)
Tt�n
Qwantit�[
1113ii TTnit
Cnct Ttem
Cnct
Excavation
5,980.0
CY
13.00
77,700
Backfill
3,860.0
CY
34.00
131,000
Complete Pavement Restoration
3,640.0
SY
86.00
313,000
Trench Safety
92,800.0
SF
0.53
49,200
Spoil Load and Hard
5,980.0
CY
16.00
95,700
Pipe Unit Material Cost
5,980.0
If
30.00
179,000
Pipe Installation
5,980.0
If
22.00
132,000
Place Pipe Zone Fill
2.020.0
CY
34.00
68,800
Existing Utilities
5,980.0
If
32.00
191,000
Dnvaterin¢
5,980.0
If
24.00
144,000
25F -235
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Traffic Control 5,980.0 if 8.00 47,900
Year 2008 Subtotal $1,430,000
Mobilization/Demobilization at 6% 1.06
Multiplier from ENRCCI 8815 (2008) to 9552 (2014) 1.08
Effective Multiplier 1.15
Construction Year 2014 Subtotal $1,640,000
Name Type Y= COO Mid ' liee ?014 C nct
Ne- ;port Beach Golf Course (HDD). 1.000 feet, 10 feet depth
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 257,000 1.00 257,000
Campus Drive (Jack h Bore), 150 feet, 10 feet depth
Jack and Bore 2014 268,000 1.00 268,000
Birch St (Jack & Bore). 60 feet. 10 feet depth
Jack and Bore 2014 225.000 1.00 x,000
Year 2008 Subtotal $751,000
Year 2014 Total: $2,390,000
25F -236
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Cost Calculations for Pipe: Santa Ana Delhi Diversion FM Route
No.5
Printed date : 06/20/2014
Project year: 2014
The estimated construction cost below, which includes contractor overhead
and profit, is for planning purposes only. The output does NOT include
contingency, sales tax, or allied costs (design, permitting, construction
management, etc. ).
Construction Year: 2014
Length: 6566 ft
Conduit Type: Force Main
Depth of Cover: 6 ft
Trench Backfill Type: Imported
Disposal Type: No Disposal Cost
Manhole Spacing: None
Existing Utilities: Complex
Dewatering: Minimal
Pavement Restoration: Trench Width
Traffic: Light
Land Acquisition: None
Required Easements: None
Land Adjustment Factor: King County Average
Trench Safety: Standard
Pipe Diameter: 8 in.
Outer Diameter
0.754 ft
Trench Width
3.48 ft
Excavation Depth
7.75 ft
Complete Surface Rest. Width
5.48 ft
Unit Costs (Basis 2008)
Item
Quantity
Unit Tint
CnO Ttem
Cod
Excavation
6,560.0
CY
13.00
85,300
Backfill
4,230.0
CY
34.00
144,000
Complete Pavement Restoration
4,000.0
SY
86.00
344,000
Trench Safety
102,000.0
SF
0.53
54,000
Spoil Load and Haul
6,560.0
CY
16.00
105,000
Pipe Unit Material Cost
6,570.0
If
30.00
197,000
Pipe Installation
6,570.0
If
22.00
144,000
Place Pipe Zone Fill
2,220.0
CY
34.00
75,600
Existing Utilities
6,570.0
if
32.00
210,000
Dewateuius
6,570.0
If
24.00
158,000
25F -237
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Traffic Control 6.570.0 if 8.00 52.500
Year 2008 Subtotal $1,570,000
Mobilization/Demobilization at 6% 1.06
Multiplier from ENRCCI 8815 (2008) to 9552 (2014) 1.08
Effective Multiplier 1.15
Construction Year 2014 Subtotal $1,800,000
Name Tae js' 3L Cnct MA1tjg11cT 2014 Cast
Newport Beach Golf Course (HDD), 1,000 feet, 10 feet depth
Horizontally Drilled Pipe 2014 257.000 1.00 257.000
Year 2008 Subtotal $257.000
Year 2014 Total: $2,060,000
25F -238
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
Appendix A- 5
Routing Analysis Hydraulic Calculation
25F -239
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2
JdS Nn.
Total Flow
I Calc NO.
Computation
UN
I Frojece Santa Ana Delhi Diversion FM Routing Analysis
(Computed J. Zhao
ISy&.,n
jDate 611312014
Icomponent
110
IRaWewad J. Long
Task System Hydraulics
110
IDate
1
300
ughness Values, Hazen- Wtl§arm Form la
IJ�rMer of Wraps Total 2
74
2.6
GFacWr
Normal On 1
2
w Lined=
Rated
130
Stand -By 1
75
=
110
2.4
3
Results:
21
Q= mad go-
Total 0.4 300
C Values
X12 I 8 I 10442 I 300 I 3:21 I 2.69 I 229 I 1.91 0.06 33.58 26.14 23.95
Nd Loss R 300 3.21 Fes 2.29 1.00 1.81 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
IIROe 1 R 1 10762 1 300 1 3.21 1 2.69 1 2.29 1 1 1.91 1 0.06 1 1 34.66 1 29.05 1 24.73 1
1900
MON
FAWI
Low Lift Pumps Dynamic Head= 5104 59.32 56.46 n
Route No.
Total Flow
System Cum
Pump Horse Power each
C Woes
C values
m
100
110
120
100
110
120
1
300
84
78
74
2.6
2.5
2.3
2
300
85
79
75
2.7
2.5
2.4
3
300
21
20
19
0.7
0.6
0.6
4
300
62
59
56
2.0
1.9
1.8
5
300
63
59
1 56
2.0
1.9
1.8
Pump Motor horse power = QH /(396O`eff)
a: Q faom): H (ft of head), 80% efficiency
25F -240