Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25C - AGMT - ENGINEERING SRVSREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AUGUST 4, 2015 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH TTG ENGINEERS FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (PROJECT 15.6847) (ST TE IC NO. 6, 1G) Yom- lliF.2[tJ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2n° Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with TTG Engineers, subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to provide engineering services for a one -year period expiring August 3, 2016, with provision for a one -year extension exercisable by the City Manager, for a total amount not to exceed $23,900. DISCUSSION Approval of this recommended action will enable development of a Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) for City bridge structures. The BPMP involves identifying the various structures that are owned and maintained by the City of Santa Ana and developing a preventative maintenance strategy to extend the life of these structures. In addition, the BPMP will provide a priority ranking for maintenance and will also facilitate applying for grants for future design and construction of bridge improvements. On May 28, 2015, the Public Works Agency released a Request for Proposals (RFP) on the City's website and advertised in the Orange County Register. On June 11, 2015, three proposals were received by the submission deadline. They were evaluated and ranked by a review committee comprised of personnel from varlous PWA Divisions. Ranking criteria Included firm and personnel experience, understanding of need, relevant project experience, schedule, references, and fees. The table below is a summary of the ratings for the three firms submitting proposals: NAME OF FIRM RATING TTG Engineers 94 Psomas 91 Wildan Engineering 89 The proposal by TTG Engineers contains adequate man -hour effort to complete the required services. The firm's rates are reasonable and within Industry standards. Together with the total fee schedule in the amount of $21,728, the proposal was found to provide the best value, best 25C -1 Agreement with TTG Engineers for Bridge Maintenance Program August 4, 2015 Page 2 qualifications, and is appropriate for the project. Staff recommends that TTG Engineers be retained to provide these professional engineering services. The recommended award amount includes a 10 percent contingency for a total not -to- exceed contract of $23,900. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 15/16 in the Select Street Construction account (05917660- 66220, Project 15 -6847) in the amount $21,158.67 and Measure M2 Local Fairshare Street Fund account (03217662- 66220, Project 15 -6847) in the amount of $2,741.33 for a total of $23,900. Fred ousavipou Executive Director Public Works Agency MF /EWG /ML Exhibit 1. Agreement APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Francisc Guti ez Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 25C -2 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this , 2015 by and between TTG Engineers, a sole ownership entity, (hereinafter "Consultant "), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City "). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of professional engineering services. B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform those services as set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for fee of $21,728, at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference. A contingency of ten percent (10 %) shall be available, at the discretion of the Executive Director of Public Works, for services that are currently not anticipated, but may be required to complete the Project. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $23,900 during the term of this Agreement. b. Payment by City shall be made within thirty (60) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. Exhibit 1 25C -3 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate one year from date of agreement execution, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 15, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended upon a writing executed by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer- employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 5. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non - exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ( "Documents & Data "). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non - exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 6. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) E 25C -4 and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with 52,000,000 in the aggregate. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. C. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: (i) Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. (ii) Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved by the City. (iii) Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be canceled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. (iv) Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement. 3 25C -5 f If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. 7. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section l of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 8. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. ll 25C -6 9. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 10. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential infonnation disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non -use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified in Certifications, Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated in this Agreement by reference. 12. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following 5 25C -7 persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana Civic Center Plaza (M -30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 -1988 Fax 714- 647 -6956 With courtesy copies to: Fred Mousavipour Executive Director Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M -) P.O. Box 198 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax 714- 647- City Attorney City Attorney's Office City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M -29) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax 714- 647 -6515 To Consultant: A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty -four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 25C -8 13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 14. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. 15. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 16. DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities. Consultant affirms that it is 7 25C -9 an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations and as further specified in Certifications, Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated in this Agreement by reference. 17. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 18. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the tern of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Additional provisions, if any are identified as Additional Provisions, Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. b. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. 25C -10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: MARIA D. HUIZAR Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: _ Jose Sandoval Chief Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Fred Mousavipour Executive Director Public Works Agency W 25C -11 CITY OF SANTA ANA DAVID CAVAZOS City Manager CONSULTANT: Tax (Name) (Title) EXH BIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 25C -12 Appendix ATTACHMENT 1 SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM RFP NO.: 15 -047 Introduction and Background: The City of Santa Ana is issuing this Request for Proposals (RFP) from qualified professional engineering consulting firm to prepare a development of the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program listing for the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency. The purpose of the BPMP is to extend the life of local agency bridges by performing certain qualifying items of work approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) classified as preventative maintenance. Our goal is to utilize the BPMP to extend the life of City bridges and identify those that are within and/or beyond preventative maintenance countermeasures. The City of Santa Ana has applied for and received Federal HBRR funding to develop a BPMP for City owned structure bridges. Description of Work: 1. Purpose and Project Overview The City of Santa Ana is inviting qualified consulting civil and structure engineering firms to submit a proposal to provide engineering services for the preparation and development of a BPMP listing along with a cost estimate for all City maintained bridges (see location map and listing on Appendix 4). This project is funded by the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and administered by Caltrans Local Assistance. The objective of the BPMP is to identify which of City bridges qualify for bridge maintenance countermeasures. Consultant must be familiar with the guidelines and requirements of the HBP as administered by Caltrans. The City reserves the right to adjust the scope of services as deemed appropriate and necessary. The City's consultant is expected to scope the project based on descriptions provided herein, as well as its team's subsequent site inspections and required tasks associated with maintenance countermeasures. 2. Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) shall commence with a preliminary assessment of all City's maintained bridge structures. The assessment shall determine which structures require work items eligible for HBP reimbursement under preventative maintenance. The following is an abbreviated list of specific qualifying maintenance work items as defined by FHWA: 1. Expansion joint seal and assembly replacement. 2. Methacrylate deck treatment. City of Santa Ana RFP 15 -047 25113 3. Polyester concrete overlay or similar protective deck overlays. 4. Deck AC replacement/new installation. 5. Restore or replace existing bearings and repair or rehabilitate bearing supports. 6. Repair, restoration, and strengthening of major structural elements. 7. Repair, supplement, or replace timber structural elements, timber railings, timber deck runners, excluding timber piles. S. Movable bridge mechanical /electrical components may be repaired or replaced. 9. Retrofit repairs to fatigue prone details of steel girders 10. Spot painting of structural steel elements, including bridge railing where the Paint Condition Index (PCI) is greater than 65. 11. Rehabilitation/new installation of deck drainage elements. 12. Replacement and upgrade of bridge railing which has deteriorated due to environmental conditions. 13. Hydraulically engineered embankment erosion control and the repair of existing scour countermeasures related to protecting the structural integrity of the bridge. 14. Approach Slab rehabilitation/replacement and new installations. 15. Alkali- silica - reactive aggregate mitigation, corrosion management systems, and fracture critical element replacement/rehabilitation (case by case basis). 16. Development of Bridge Preventive Maintenance Plans (BPMP). 17. The Department, on a case -by -case basis, can review other scopes of work that meet Preventive Maintenance (PM) objectives. 3. Requirements and Execution Development of BPMP - Consultant shall develop objective procedures that prioritize preventative maintenance projects for all City- owned bridge structures. These procedures must be included in the project files in the form of a BPMP for review in future Caltrans audits. With this task the consultant will prepare and submit an updated BPMP that follows all Caltrans requirements for the following twenty -six (26) City bridges. Research Existing Records - The Consultant shall perform research of records held by the City that pertains to this project. They include, but are not limited to, as -built bridge plans, expansion joint retrofit plans, photographs of the site, and bridge inspection reports, which majority of the reports will be avaialbe by June 2015. It is the Consultant's responsibility to request any documents that were not readily available from the City that may prove to be useful in the evaluation of the existing bridge condition. Site Visit and Documentation - The Consultant shall perform a site visit documenting the existing bridge. This shall be performed by means and methods that will provide the Consultant with enough information to perform the bridge evaluation. If the Consultant feels that an inspection from within the interior of the bridge at the location is necessary, it shall be identified in the proposal stage, so the City can make provisions to gain access. Documentation can be made by, but not limited to, photography, video, physical measurements, and sketches. City of Santa Ana RFP 15 -047 PaGe 11 25 14 Evaluation of Existing Bridge Hinge - The Consultant shall provide an evaluation of the condition of the existing bridge by means and methods that provide for a clear understanding of the problems and issues associated with the potential damage. The Consultant shall provide details that reflect this condition on plan sheets that give the City a clear understanding of the issues. Proposed Repair Work (If Any) of the Existing Bridge - The Consultant shall provide recommendations for the repair of the existing bridge by means and methods that provide for a clear understanding of the proposed work to be done to bring the bridge up to current and acceptable standards. Preliminary Engineer's Estimate for Repair Work - If repair work is necessary, the Consultant shall provide detail cost estimate that reflect this proposed work, the Consultant shall prepare a quantity takeoff of repair work to be done to restore the bridge to current and acceptable standards. This includes, but is not limited to, bridge hinge repair, potential shoring of bridge during construction, traffic control, hazardous waste containment and disposal, and restriping. Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations - The Consultant shall prepare a report summarizing all the task items listed above in a report that clearly outlines and identifies the required work presented in this proposal. The consultant shall also submit electronic spreadsheet that will included as a minimum for each bridge the priority for funding(lowest number is highest priority), county geographic location, name of implementing agency, bridge number, facility carried, feature intersected, location, sufficiency rating, SD/FO status, all Preventive Maintenance (PM) treatment for each bridge, unit cost of PM (total deck area basis), federal funds, running summary of federal funds, local funds, and running summary of local funds (See sample spreadsheet in Appendix 4). The Consultant shall include any and all attachments that allows for this report to be a "stand alone" document. Address City Comments and Provide Final Report - The City will review the draft report and provide comments, where appropriate, with recommendations, if required. The Consultant shall address City comments and prepare a final report to the City. The Consultant shall provide the City with the following final deliverables: • Two (2) hard copies of the final report (by September 21, 2015) • One (1) electronic copy ; all documents shall be submitted in MS Word and PDF, exhibits shall be submitted in Microstation format. Additional program requirements and constraints are available at the following website: htW://www.dot.ca.govihq/LocalProgmms/ City of Santa Ana RFP 15 -047 2015 EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT PROPOSAL AND FEE SCHEDUL 25C -16 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS d. Understanding of Need It is our understanding that the City needs assistance to develop Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) for their local bridges which is an FHWA funded program to support extending bridge life by performing preventative maintenance. It is also our understanding that the scope of work is development of a BPMP which includes prioritization matrix for the bridges and cost estimate for eligible bridges. Through the study and scoping phase of BPMP determination is made to include or exclude some of the City's bridges in BPMP program and determine HBP candidate bridges in need of major rehabilitation/ replacement/widening. It is our understanding that E -76 authorization to proceed with PE phase for BPMP has been issued by Caltrans. We are familiar with the City's bridges. The table below shows the entire bridge inventory including 26 local bridges that needs to be maintained. It is our understanding that three of these bridges are not highway bridges, thus can be excluded from scope of BPMP study. In addition, one bridge (Fairview Street over Santa Ana River) is already HBP - programmed and due for widening /replacement. Therefore a total of 22 bridges in the City can be considered for inspections, study, scoping and prioritization under BPMP. The table also shows that six highlighted bridges are also eligible (as -is) for HBP rehabilitation funding. These bridges have SR less than 80 and Functionally Obsolete (FO). During the scoping phase and inspection of BPMP, determination will be made to include these as candidate for HBP funding forwidening/ rehabilitation /replacement. No. Bridge Number Facility Carried Feature Intersected Location SO /FO Sufgclerlc V Rating YEAR BUILT ADT LANES Width(ft) Length(ft) 1 55CO047 FLOWER ST SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL 0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE SD 90.5 1930 5000 2 39.37 147.64 2 55CO055 MAIN ST SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL 0.2MINOROUTESFWY SO 90.8 191843000 6 87.60 203AI 3 55CO073 FIRSTST EGARDEN GRV-WINTRBRG CH 0.2 MI E EUCLID ST 87.2 1960 22000 7 98.75 22.97 455CO083M BRISTOL ST SANTA ANA GARDENS CH 0.1 MS /O MC ARTHUR BLVD 69.8 196160000 9 49.21 5 SSC0100 EUCLID AVE E GARDEN GROVE W'BURG CH 0.1 MIN 0 MCFADDEN AVE 77.7 1960 38000 5 22.97 6 55CO115 BRISTOL ST SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL 0.3 MI MEMORY LANE 84.8 194748000 5 84.32 101.71 7 55CO132L METROUNK BNSF 1ST STREET 0.71 MI W/O 1-5 1962 72.18 81 55CO132R IMETROLINK, BNSF I IST STREET 10.7 MI W /01 -5 1962 62.34 9 55[0133 PEDESTRIAN WALKWA EAST IST SREET 0.1 MI. W/O ROUTE 5 FWY 1972 144.36 10 55CO163 MCFADDEN AVENUE ISANTA ANA RIVER 0.4 MI W/O FAIRVIEW ST 78.9 1964 18000 4 54.46 351.05 12 55C0363 DYER ROAD ISANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL 100' E/0 FLOWER ST 71.8 1971 21000 5 32.81 13 26 55C0364 55C0367 ALTON AVENUE ISANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL STEVENS AVE ISANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL 100' E/0 FLOWER ST 300'N OSUNFLOWERAVE 72.9 19701 5000 82.9 1973 2000 3 2 43.64 25.92 36.09 52.49 I8 SSCD372 5TH STREET SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL 0.6 MI E/0 HARBOR BLVD 79.5 1962 13000 4 51.84 1 321.52 20 55CO423 17TH STREET SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL 0.2 MI E/0 FAIRVIEW ST 81.3 1977 33000 6 79.72 357.61 21 SSCD429 DEMING STREET E GRDN GRVE WINTRBG CHA 200' N/0 TAMPION AVE 89.3 1951 2000 2 22.97 2255CD446MHAZARDAVE EAST GG•WIMERSBURG CHA AT NEWHOPE STREET 70.4 195032000 5 26.25 231 55CO447 15TH ST EAST GG- WINTERSBURG CHA D.2 MI W 0 NEWHOPE Si 95.6 1250,1 40DOI 2 34.45 19.69 241 5500452 IRITCHEYSTREET SANTA ANA -SANTA FE CHANL 0.1 MI5 /O MCFADDEN AVE 87.8 1965 7000 2 39.37 22.97 251 5500513 IFAIRVIEW STREET ISANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL 0.2 MI O- WESTMINSTERA SD 71.7 196334000 4 50.85 495.41 Total Bridges: 26 lNot in use:3 1 HBPRe Wlden:l sm, 25C -17 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS d. Understanding of Need TTG has in -depth knowledge of Caltrans inspection procedures, BPMP guidelines as well as LAPM and LAPG. We have performed inspections of over 1,000 highway bridges, performed similar bridge maintenance scoping, bridge load- rating and HBP eligibility determination. Additionally, we have completed the development of BPMP for several other cities and counties and successfully obtained HBP funding for major rehabilitation of their bridges resulting in more than $200M in HBP funding for replacement/ rehabilitation projects. We have FHWA - certified bridge inspectors. This allows us to perform visual inspection of bridges, verify Caltrans reports on their noted conditions and take action on behalf of the agency to make necessary corrections. This capability also provides us to advantageously change the bridge inspection report in favor of a City if warranted. We have developed a unique in -house program to perform Sufficiency Rating (SR) calculations to verify, and if necessary, correct a Caltrans- reported condition rating which is a basis for determination of bridge funding eligibility. Our proposed approach and tasks necessary for successful completion of BPMP is as following: Task #1: Research Existing Records As we have been very successful in the past, we will be able to obtain Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports (BIRIS) and the latest Condition Appraisal sheet from Structures Maintenance and Investigation (SM &I). We will also perform necessary research to find traffic data (ADT), record drawings and as -built of a bridge structure, rehabilitation /retrofit plans, roadway and channel from Caltrans, City, OCFCD and OCTA. We will review the latest inspection reports and note the important deficiencies as reported by Caltrans for planning inspections and reports of prior accidents on the bridge and their approaches. Mon TTG ... .r, 25C -18 4/ CerfijcateOfTraining A. ' Majid Sarraf We have developed a unique in -house program to perform Sufficiency Rating (SR) calculations to verify, and if necessary, correct a Caltrans- reported condition rating which is a basis for determination of bridge funding eligibility. Our proposed approach and tasks necessary for successful completion of BPMP is as following: Task #1: Research Existing Records As we have been very successful in the past, we will be able to obtain Caltrans Bridge Inspection Reports (BIRIS) and the latest Condition Appraisal sheet from Structures Maintenance and Investigation (SM &I). We will also perform necessary research to find traffic data (ADT), record drawings and as -built of a bridge structure, rehabilitation /retrofit plans, roadway and channel from Caltrans, City, OCFCD and OCTA. We will review the latest inspection reports and note the important deficiencies as reported by Caltrans for planning inspections and reports of prior accidents on the bridge and their approaches. Mon TTG ... .r, 25C -18 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS d. Understanding of Need Task #2• Site Visit and Documentation As we have FHWA- certified bridge inspection, we will perform visual inspections and document the existing bridge condition as necessary for FHWA- National Bridge Inventory(NBI) system as well as Caltrans and AASHTO- Element Level Inspection system. The method of inspection and certification we have expertise in is primarily for inspections needed in -line with condition assessment and damage investigation of in- service bridges which is significantly different from new bridge construction inspection. In certain cases such as extensive concrete deck cracking or potential delamination, we may choose to perform non - destructive testing using advanced equipment or chain- dragging to confirm extent of deterioration. We will coordinate with the City traffic and maintenance division as well as OCFCD to obtain necessary encroachment permit and access the bridges their approach roadway, channels. Our inspection work will be performed with exercising full safety precautions and no anticipation of impact to traffic. If special inspection is necessary using non - destruction testing equipment, it will be performed during very low traffic volumes and under advanced permit for partial lane closures. We have developed several field inspection forms and templates to be able to document bridge condition and easily itemize and quantify the extent of damage /deteriorations. We will take necessary field measurements, photo and videos if necessary to map/ sketch the bridge with extent of deterioration /damages to be able to quantify the repairs /rehabilitation needs. We use laser devices or other advance measuring equipment for reinforced concrete and steel sections. We will obtain sufficient field inspection data to be able to verify Caltrans report, perform structural and service condition assessments, and quantity estimates needed for BPMP. Task #3: Evaluation of Existing Bridge We will perform condition evaluation of the existing bridge regarding both structural and service /geometric conditions, based on our field inspection of noted deficiencies as well as in -depth review of Caltrans reports, field measurements of damaged joints, concrete deck cracking, section losses, corrosions, etc. as well as geometric considerations such as roadway, median and shoulder width, and traffic congestions, traffic accidents and damages to railings, flooding situations. We will a clear understanding of the problems and issues associated with the damages/ deficiencies determination of the causes and establish need to correct it. We will use our own developed Mathcad programs or special spreadsheet program to re- evaluate /confirm Sufficiency Rating (SR) for bridges that have significantly different condition than reported earlier by Caltrans, found to be "SD" or "FO" based on our inspection have SR closer to 50 that may render them eligible for major rehabilitation or replacement, as SR combined with condition flag "SD" or "FO" is a basis for eligibility for HBP funding. Our assessment will determine if maintenance work is eligible for HBP reimbursement under BPMP such as expansion joint seal and assembly replacement, methacrylate deck treatment, concrete overlays, deck AC replacement/new installation, rehab or replace existing bearings, repair, restoration and strengthening non I ... , , , , "' 25C -19 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS d. Understanding of Need of major structural elements, retrofit repairs to fatigue prone details of steel girders, spot painting of structural steel elements, rehabilitation /new installation of deck drainage elements, replacement and upgrade of deteriorated bridge railing, embankment erosion control and the repair of existing scour countermeasures related to protecting the structural integrity of the bridge and install new approach slab or rehabilitation/ replacement of the existing one, alkali - silica- reactive aggregate mitigation, corrosion management systems, and fracture critical element replacement/rehabilitation. Task #4: Propose Repair Work TTG will provide recommendations for the type of maintenance counter measures and minor repairs of the existing bridge as per BPMP guidelines to extend the life of the bridge and eliminate deficiencies per current and acceptable Caltrans standards. We will prepare draft spreadsheet of summary of the conditions and proposed repairs /maintenance work for sharing with the City to seek input before proceeding with estimates. When the extent of damages and deficiency are found to be severe, we will make recommendations regarding detailed analysis of a bridge using load rating and seismic analysis, updating and re- evaluation of SR, and preliminary recommending major rehabilitation/ replacement/ widening of a bridge using HBP funding. In case of severe structural damage or instability, we will advise the City of the issue and provide recommendations for temporary shoring and weight -limit posting, if necessary. Task #F: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate Upon confirmation of our propose solution for necessary repair /maintenance with the City, we proceed with performing detailed cost estimate. Our quantity estimates will be consistent with our propose solutions meet current standards and objectives of BPMP. The quantity estimates will include construction cost associated with bridge expansion joint or hinge repairs, deck rehabilitation and overlays, railing repairs, potential shoring of bridge during construction, traffic control, hazardous waste containment and disposal, and re- striping of the existing lanes after deck treatments. Task #6: Draft BPMP Report TTG will prepare a draft BPMP report to include: • Summary of field inspections with photos and sketches • Proposed maintenance /repairs • Proposed bridge candidates HBP funding with major retrofit/widening /replacement needs with revisions/ corrections of Sufficiency Rating "SR" using our special program for re- calculation of rating which is conforming to ASSHTO -NBI rating system. • Spreadsheet showing detailed calculations of quantities and estimates for each bridge including a score of each bridge. TTG's equation used for calculation of priority ranking score developed based on important factors such as bridge age, ADT SR, SD /FO, quantity of damages and cost to repair. • Attachments including field forms, notes, sketches, original inspection reports as part of stand -alone documents BPMP Sheet (Standard BPMP Sheet) which will be submitted to Caltrans and will include bridge priority ranking for maintenance and funding, county geographic location, name of implementing agency, bridge number, facility carried, feature intersected, location, sufficiency rating, SD /FO status, all Preventive :::TTG 25C -20 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS d. Understanding of Need BPMP Sheet (Standard BPMP Sheet) which will be submitted to Caltrans and include bridge priority ranking for maintenance and funding, county geographic location, name of implementing agency, bridge number, facility carried, feature intersected, location, sufficiency rating. SD /FO status, all Preventive Maintenance work for each bridge, unit cost of PM (total deck area basis), federal funds, running summary of federal funds, local funds, running summary of local funds, PE, Construction Management and contingencies. An example is shown below of this BPMP which our team developed for a similar BPMP project. The first 15 priority ranking of BPMP is shown below as an example. Upon submitting TTG's draft BPMP report and sheet, the City can review and provide comments to us. We will address and incorporate these comments and finalize the report including updates to the BPMP sheets that can be submitted to Caltrans for programming purposes. Our final submittal will include: Two (2) hard copies of the final report by September 21, 2015 One (1) electronic copy All documents will be submitted in MS Word and PDF, exhibits will be provided in Microstation format. eeerrG 1. , 4'''25C -21 mY w ar TWI CwiRl N4nnWq 6NY kuwY FMYtyRMVE F.Ern lnbru[bC IWUn suMWM CFO YbrXRUfpbn LpIF' r.A R.F M1Hty. Wl Rfl wGN Runlro FfeBArH Rinnp F11MIy lmiW gMmy Huibr BMq R.tlro � 9 IW M.00 CW IBHr) W. Hunmry LxY8AVn 1 d1eY �. D.�*" � � Rwppnp BAIF. A.8W00 3 r,eN S rHN i aeW l 4 bn[mNby ParcM1 rapfFm[YmwilvE� l[pakfpk. NS Ht 135A I,9L lWL4 '514 St,ra339 S I,F. m $ 218211 f EM814 2 Cry WC Wfeb BAed UM 5DT6b Ff ae %5 Krtm IbavCAmWLir R✓[- IamS�NMi,IMnSW. M? HW Sp9 itla%OAD BeH9 11%O,Sr i 9,T0,%H i Yr,rO S W.i91 3 Ry 5&RIB KM 021iFAtrvib rH Wnm �,� N-Y b's. Iowftk .— &3 npv[ncb aNap4,[gRI3Nrefhr 159 299 14,,M 9$6' Z &AS $ N2W $ 1,X;838 S IM2W $ 5f M 4 Nlq' Ca, Y.LN4 _ C'CC..A WecWa/,abl my Apm90[avYA Yqi ikt4. NA Vw YpY.ul[[e. [(�' S Cry bM ft wY Ybb"H W2 mMfM. MbAbKlAmMrl IUD V im 1.rO1W.W 1MLm 51;151,W 4 5,WM4 1191 %3 Mir SC.AV6 94H/ v- iµakuatlo enwbaMfa51, repYfpb, 6 Nw Cfy S6CN13 1kuvMm BW SPW Wq %2 SC la[YU Uyalv.Mryxfi pSevaeWWe. 119 W 1119 ISt,OW* WA 3 1LB,[(9 $ 8,113892 f S,rl 3 191119 Ffhl m[Af9b aWY�e M' W., rH 290 9p3 1R01HA0 1696 S WIM f HHr3B1 f r,1M3 $ W.M 1 Cry NMI, M1 m WatlO WKI1bo- KY.Im1im/0T<[AAfYA CvL[Wmue IYCAp50M 'FMM" 835 Sp npaFCxlo Wfpi,[p0/{eKuln 125 235 8162 231 M.M nW $ Wf f 6,MMS 4,1%3 x9.M 8 Ciy SSCDIp1 cm.=-b W.1 [v�MecwRY. A[Yl AewuWef[AYtl 0 Cry SW0905 K1YHabrW UHU.MMa 981 u� u 811 N aT31 SW,WAW 6.6 S W^ S 7NI%2 S ®5r $ MM 6W l KIM 56c03it JFR pr kia`inA59ert W WkIR1K'9T 872 w rgak crshonuhlelwW[ercrob 12 r2 1.110 359,MM BIS5 S 31842 $ ]SIA.M S 41.M $ 418.155 10 Uy CIenM LMM a'eM1 Nblmw MabE 11 CJB rCRII CuSVWKnB AW Wpb NH fmMnikYex.w'I..YUYb.lapk 1 V.? 9x1 1XMX CA 3119x15 7MB 1 16$10$ MM Clairw B RKSM Krzlo C4 56CM18 KffelWC &p Sum,metl 8bmi LNwmck8Eeel rl nPkentb nlwBUN WN'IepL'fpb' 79 45 3� 123,MA 31W $ 1W4d. f IM131 f 1(191 S I,WI,r9 12 - Cwn .B 9rlh Yoram SmOM -88bm arbb rH uWw[tlowwb NatlB.MrWYV, 85 r 2310 N,Sr.W WA s %.40 $ 1,811,511 $ 5,110 i 1H199A 19 CRY 5 16 Y,Ibn SAW CMn s C9b & umkr 11 Aa�em Cry XCWi1 g u.O FMercHSAx1 OcI MFIC Mbrin r Ip0[rsb aow aWfob, mwsa 16 914 1,T NMb.W 1059 f 4116 3 1.x R7 $ 9W f I.. ygry CAfnM LMT W., kM1vv SiNi9 AY1 K1m CWWI 024MOK % �iW[bmtlbM Wb, papb, 1H l23 8,1% 20D,1 %M ilH1 f M.8 S VIOX 9 %.r2 S 1%IHr 16 WW Ch -Pr[Ap F Upon submitting TTG's draft BPMP report and sheet, the City can review and provide comments to us. We will address and incorporate these comments and finalize the report including updates to the BPMP sheets that can be submitted to Caltrans for programming purposes. Our final submittal will include: Two (2) hard copies of the final report by September 21, 2015 One (1) electronic copy All documents will be submitted in MS Word and PDF, exhibits will be provided in Microstation format. eeerrG 1. , 4'''25C -21 2. I SCOPE OF SERVICES &SCHEDULE As project manager and lead inspector, Dr. Majid Sarraf will be managing the team assignment and coordinating all inspections, estimating, planning and reporting activities. He will also provide coordination with the City regarding scope, schedule and budget. We have formulated our proposed schedule to successfully complete this project on time and on budget (included at the end of this section). The management plan we are proposing for this project has worked extremely well for our team and clients on similar projects. We refer to our approach as the "Project Manager /Multiple Team Approach." The approach involves three main components: Employing this approach allows us to undertake the inspection and reporting in the most efficient way. This approach has proven successful on many projects, including up to 12 simultaneous project tasks as part of even larger project. Working with the Project Manager, our Principal -In- Charge begins by preparing a critical task schedule to be used by the team. The schedule indicates key time frames when all participants must exchange information and reach decisions that affect others on the project team. It includes recommendations from all members of the team including the Owner, facility user groups and any other team consultants. This tool maps out a plan that is used by TTG's senior management team to efficiently direct and monitor project progress. In addition, the project teams assemble and review weekly progress, new assignments and target dates for next completion milestones and assignments. The Project Manager is the focal point for project information. This includes reports, correspondence, shop drawings, Owner decisions and requests for information. All will be received by this leader who distributes /delegates to appropriate team members. Chronological files on all correspondence are kept for efficient reference and tracking. We take a proactive approach in communication with the entire team to communicate all project issues. We encourage bi- weekly meetings to monitor progress, confirm scope and goals and resolve any conflicts. Our approach in expediting the construction process and simplifying conflicts include: ➢ Providing timely progress reporting and budget, to ensure timely completion of tasks and on budget. ➢ Adherence to contract documents by identifying alternatives that avoid changes to the original scope. ➢ Open communication with all parties involved in inspection and continuous communication on any scope, schedule issues /items internally and with the City. ➢ Arrange immediate bridge site visit to resolve any inspection, safety concerns. Providing updated and timely schedule :::TTG 25C -22 2. I SCOPE OF SERVICES &SCHEDULE Communication is the keyto conflict resolution. Ourteam's problem - solving abilities come from knowing what questions to ask, how to listen and how to document the information received. Achievement of solutions that are responsive to the project context and budget requires members with experience relevant to the project scope and bring an understanding of how to address the issues of continued use, budgetary limitations, integration and design effectiveness. We strive for our client's to not only be pleased with the solution, but how we arrive at it. Through the process of implementing the design, we continue to clarify data received and communicate it in a manner that allows easy understanding and ability to effectively respond. We will accomplish this through a logical, orderly Project Approach and a series of document distributions during the design and construction document process. Our practice of methodology is based upon an interactive problem - solving process. All parties come together, well prepared to tackle the problems to be solved, for a continuum of intense problem - solving sessions focused on the project issues. With team members jointly creating solutions, all project aspects are addressed, ensuring detailed documents that are 100% complete. The process facilitates error -free documents, effective teamwork, timely decision making and provides a forum for the broadest participation in conflict resolution. Upon submitting TTG's draft BPMP report and sheet, the City can review and provide comments to us. We will address and incorporate these comments and finalize the report including updates to the BPMP sheets that can be submitted to Caltrans for programming purposes. Our final submittal will include: Two (2) hard copies of the final report by September 21, 2015 One (1) electronic copy • All documents will be submitted in MS Word and PDF, exhibits will be provided in Microstation format. Provided on the following page is our proposed project schedule indicating a completion date of September 21, 2015. TTG is comitted to developing the necessary time and resources to complete the City of Santa Ana's BPMP project. We have estimated approximately 135 hours and are within the allocated HBP funding budget. Based on our current workload, if awarded, we will be able to dedicate a minimum of 40% staff time (192 hrs) for the next three months ito complete the work related to this project. :C.TTG ... 25C -23 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE moo saw TTO '25C-24 ^ . �^ 'D F mom \ \ \\ (§ { {); !£)!!/ ` 9 .: 2 - . /\ \)k\2\ L: 1\ \ \)\ \/ � w � . 9 o �` - -a 0 ] CL /, =�E . k _]E ) _ ; \,!/! ) / Lu § { ! ) ■ tof 0 ! w _ / { \ ! \ § ) 2 k - - tt ca co w 5 / k \ \ - _ moo saw TTO '25C-24 ^ . �^ Q N O a V- O� CL a Z wa W LL LL CC L J son MEN En F 25C -25 h 1 N N LL .. .. .. .. .. .. T r LL L r ID O W � O G R u C 2 Q U W a cli O m o E LL w m o 0 LOO) v a � m �m U N m I a N � 25C -25 Exhibit C CERTIFICATIONS 25C -26 ' ?h 9 -1 `F pod D R x l, NON COLLUSTONAFFMAl If' I! I,RJU,q9 oN,,.N'rca; NS IR VP N l.s 65.q9µ'7 0 Ne l II W, I YMI I IJ-dIf 'Ic( I),m I 'If I' l"IbIjIl { Tom AIr I. oii 71061 I, ¢114 II r 111 Y S O I •, A rl- I A /I IN I I I l 1 - PA '1 '4 1 � t", V l I : N, 0 1 1 I I Y, i I I a 1 1, S, I (r, f, ca e� iif To., ^6 j 11, 1 4 If I -' 3 L ;, i I, d '3 & I C', ( I-, ..,I v S, I I I) I I I 12 f f, I I " 11) 1 T." 1 ., I If 611, 1 C 0'.kir P [ i T4, 71 t l ! I G1 , I I I r, , I: , I I j A L I I ,, I I I I l 1', 5 KM I I III I I CA' If I III I IT I VI I ",I r, - ''I I'll I'diffIl of. 'ITI" I I I Ti I I v ,,I , I Fm If III r"T I IT IT: I Ih 11 p , of I I I V I I :�m I fo , ON"Ail i "m I'm, eiI I P Il. In I f f I E I L Itr, 1,i,9 i w g.- i I f I ti I Aral I, i w L .,,IV I I,, I ^. c ) r nIenr, 1; II1 1 4 I I b I ) I- lI 11, 1, 11, /1 , I I I I ulltlr, kr @a I I I It x , , � I v,I "? I (" ! III I I I: I li CAI �r I R , IT l""I I l I " If I � T ,v " I " I , I "i 'l, ("I I a I',a,,r, It vI I IT ( i II I i r I�,, v k wo VVI,II J I; I I o If t i i , I% L uIr a v I nv( I eo d l I, I T y I v I IC ) r U I l t V I T I w [ I , pu I lrvI I hall I hvn I u I I I l a I I I I T; +lf1& flunllrvt I j ;I I IT ftof rl hif. 0 I!g,: I I url lne L 14 A I I- R I vms I A,I, iIl atfr;f mml I Liel Lhvc[ I, Y7 lI LA I%�k I I Y. %(fuKlfi h Im I ull m I A- col I u I I lul fc,uf 0' 11 COT; II I CKIL'O If, III 1 110, (W11' IT If ILI le hi A I I [Ile art rfm IbVd:NIII R IT r .airy ii ilUly Id f , I O f r ` I I T n � l , , ? r h " , a. 1 , pj 1-, 1 1 t , I f I' , I I , 1 , C IT " VI I I I f I ,, b I Ii : , i . ; , , I I r f ( J I I R I I Y II I r , I VIII f I S I IY L , 01 r r r, k L N , i f 1 ) 1 1 1 , , I t [ , , 1• I , i j , r if II ( I T, r I 1 0 ': I I I I I I I I , l a i n ) I.LMYTI12 41, IT,pI ,I Tli tIjC rj,)Ip0,,C,,j I'Wrx,f; IhM 1411 vIaLmycnh c)"ItAIRIC'i III II L. 'I 'l t,Iv i,fe ITO. I)Tfll '11A '.hrl B11 HA R If I, wl. A ffl,],N,11b, �Ud'- I IT VI, hr Irr Im r I, if I p I ), ., I gr II If , , , 11 [1 T,,­ III rlf' [111' J11'WIIJ Ily j"rx"I'llo'IFf of TUTI1 a fmim, rI •"", , " jh+j,'I , IH,[ , 4 I L r If q p),,, Illy L I x R, OTIT Tl P o", I ,i,l rm "i I p x, I t PIP i6' A on :II ',j :I I rL m ITT . N(l Hepwilun., ol, T If a It II H-1 r 1h II of Im-1 )I d cuo+ Lo �1 kk I TLAKU o co I wiwc I fl �homi I I Id. 'I I K, ilik I V u,IMiumn al Ww"IR r'; PAII (11 117r P1117"I'Ill rum! IlIT'l orl T Igmllwe poftm JAIIaLJY � IIII's P,rl volkv.ipun fI. U11 11 )1 VS wlit,lTe'l 11�,[ Hullang iI loke Inomr),,�rww ay, 1d,pCI i'll" "i p , I rfr ,wl, vf ( flifopnlo :ollwv ff n00 "!,t lltj�,,,C,9 I, I,j ,0"Il WfM III k„ x. i,wur, PuIAI Cikyol SafnLaAnri I IF, 11,17 2.2 n MIKE 25C-27 o RK an T T G :' , '� "( �, ;, ;, ;, - �' ;, � ;, �, � :�: '' I . . . .. . . . . . ............................. . ... . ..... . .... ... I I ii,blic ri nn-Mir ,ff c.,.7r :.r.mp I c."ire ir: cn.i ri I icm x: i!HfirN iijily I lic Id nluay ;ir II indl iI who munvT I I Ic d -x. i i n vr to ik-ii i -h Thi ci n 1I I and I I ) i k . , nLh fulri-.,, w fin, fln,11. J uuklul.e I r- CALINIFOIRINILA JURK"Ir VVIT"WAFFIiI S"W"ATIEMEMY I ' Sae kt.nsnEl D cjm 0 rl* to- cf!I nut, I I le.., a 6 3•.0-I E Fee Statement Eelmw ; fir ps '--b to to = pletad iii ly b docu -izr it &;gr: L. [s not Mao. I V `' Ao of Ca i rnia C� Alil,4 0 OnninG 3 Sit oscr. oed an J g•m to (v 9f firmcd) Iffy L nip on :h:3 Tnu,sd a V, June 04. 2'115, by Proved to me. on the basis of sat iEfau.0 i -f evidar i�H id Le J:a pei so 'I Q.•ho ap 3&areo kipflona re., And Prcfve-,,ltc- rneonthe ;Dcsi5 TD to tl c peron whD apoctl cc Dclom nu.,' 11 it !II 1, 21111, I 9 � � I N I .:Sl -12:�1 a Ur uviu f Pub FuiI D-pricripfinn of Any Atta r hpd Dmrctimerlg; iflA°vn Do�krn�-t DXP, jij-ie. 4,221F. Rummer 2f p�qe2: 1 Np. Dir rape Int Joo .. meni Non-COIL�50-Alda•dt'-ertificiTficris SynE,isl otheII-han named abcw3 Nona I "1 o.1 I'll Ao elmm I n 11, 1� 4. R 11 U 11 A. lll� Ill I'd "I I AIAI 0 IT 11, on . . .... n MIKE 25C-28 III RK an T T G :' , '� "( �, ;, ;, ;, - �, ;, � ;, �, � :�: '' I X1111111111 APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 3 -2: NON - LOBBYING CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BRIDGE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM RFP NO.: 15 -047 The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract the making of any federal giant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities ". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Firm TTG Engineers Signed and Printed Name: Majid Sarraf, PE, Ph.D. Title Director of Bridge Engineering Date .June 11, 2015 City of Santa Ana RFP 15 -047 Pace 23 C'Ia T T G L: QiY OF SANTA ANA RF]QUFST PCIM EgROPIML&ES PaOR 1m) -4 1 1:� DI W -4 WA M 'NOVA 96 The immimmagped oombracbmr o cmparmbe EdB a the porrwmmoe of flzis c� certffins ma EmEk.l - I Thm C� shall n clscon�e aBw t mny vmmjdcp3jm err wq3 h fa cmr%Dloym bye of aaa>•, color xefilpEm, s&3,, or dal axLg=L Thm CA=xkzcti3r shall bKIm allimmxzbv action to ®sac that mpphxzuxbt are mzmployod, and that ammpluyems are trembed -I-, g eniploymmmut. mrAlmout xegmxd to ihaa ma. color. ..Lqg.,. s�, . izbonal .qp. SL,.h j.U. vJ,-YI ...Ides but .t be b..dd b% ff. to llvmo= -pg-d-r_ d---U-.L. - aamdfi- -d-b&-qp_ bT.W . b ..... h...; rates of pry er elder fuom.s of cccupenmmtmm; and seloctmm fur tnKummLF_ xnciL•clmg mpFffmmtwogbzp- The Cuukmdbmr xffeea to post m omuVicouus pbmM awmilmlile m ernpg3yeot and applicamd:s fa cmqduymmut, entices to be provided setmag fizib am Provie:om of this mDn&bmm=mffbm dame. 2 Tho dm]X m all sohodmbms � adveffbAmnmats far cmqAayers phm d by ar m bi*mff of the CAmtractor, Stub! chat an cpulvEwd mFphmmuft will receive commademmtum far empanjmnEnt withoot mesKrd in race colow. ffooff— Set. — -ab—LE, Owav- 3 Th. Vcdk. 96.11 send 6. each Ib. F wn.I er wth —6—h h-&b- has c,Alimt V barfpLmmmg zgpeonmmt ar otimm czed3umt o mmwlorAbumdhnF_ a notice to be provided advasang the said labor rariom on -mPrukeW xrFffvSzoxbdtiRS of the Ccoibmm:bow I � mmhde this fiectLcm, mind Shall lonat =pmna of the nubm m vmmspcowat plamea mwmLdile Lo omvkm and UPPIDOMAR rUF OMWIOYMBem 4 Tho Gomtrza� Shull cumply with all provisions or Fmnmrftvo Ckdas 11245 of Svpbwnber 24. 1965. and of the nAm rewminuomm. mind wauvmxlt mda of the semmbixy ufxabor 5 Th. C..kk. 91,11 fm,gh all and eFcwts z.q.a d by H ..> tin mod. 11246 �Spu-d- 24, 1965, and byrroles. MEBMbffbEnr, XUAl Ordma oftle ge=wlmy Dfl-abur. o<l - thomiq and will pommt access m hisTher beets .creeds, and aaxamds by the ad�:etaiag .peg mind the 9e=mburyofIAhurfor purposes ofmmwwsbMpdKm. to asczmta ccmmplimmum vmdflbL Such rm&5ik., ffemml;mbnma.. and codas_ 6 In the eveot cKribe CI=Kbmcbw's n�eamphaeee . the mwmuliscrnmmmmbm cfioses of this ccmhmct ur . say of the said nml Y, regmiaboma, or ad� the cxmob3u± mmy be cmuorled, tmnomomated. Q suspended m whole o m pmt and the CAndractuor may be declared moligRalle far R 0 Oovemmmumut DoEtnmts ur federally at&Lmrd cczutftmmhm ccEdmm:La m zcouvdaoce wlith pmomdm mx6xm2Eed ma Fw5mmbmm Ordw 11246 uF Sophmuber 24 1965 und maw other sunchmns mnuy he imposed and rrmnmdm xmvE&md as provided m Fmmcoftr cOxder 11246 of ScFtexnber 24, I965, o 1pyrole, xrgphdnomm, err older uflho as mflaae�e Fwovmlftd by Inw- -7- Thm CkmMrmctmw shall mmchLdo the pmtmm of the mmtm= mounumbatay pffem5dmg pmmwmph Cl) and the pmvitims uf pwragrapbA (1) d-Fu& C.?) in —v maboomWCt o< purchume order -mlms examptod by xuleS, was of the S...rty of Lab. iemad to F..b. 204 t� 11246 F Pape 2• g.phm.l. 24. 1965. so each Fvvram will ]me boacluM upon each gubcxuxbruct ea FmErKh c order a the A,hmmmmhmxnE JLEPMCY mmy dunact as misma of EmLfcwcxng Such FrEruzaamna, xnckmdmg sans air nunmmxF&=x_ pwowded_ however that in the event the CA3xdroctor be involved xu. or is flurontimed vvjjbr litifftim w a subcunhmckw or vnmclow as a xwmult LEE anKdb dumcbmm by the udEmmmab==C agency, the CAHZbMCtnr IMMY XeqMOSt thMt the IJAMbMd mxk* muA bbgmb to Frahmmt the mmummus of the UmIrd st.trs- H- PLwammotto Culif® I-mborGode Secb- 1735. asxddodby C3mmptmrG43 Stabs_ 1939, mid m ammomdxxL PTO dmcrnnmmmbm Shun be nmacle m the onzpluymmmt of Perseme mpim pubbe m lu m of xue_ relqgums crowd• color mmhomml owif7m, am mm" phymmul hundivalM moubal ccndmbnn, nLmrWzA wbtmuL er � or Such persona, ezoqd as provided ma Section 1420, and any ccmdffmctow of public vmxks vmAabng this Sec mm is suffiToct to all the prnmltma unFmord fur a vmlzbm ofthe C3Lvp&w Signed III.R. E3WEK:kw cpF Bridge Engj a Fmig Fins TTG El`kgateels Jute 11. 2015 n MIKE 25C-30 o RK an T T G :' , '� "( �, ;, ;, ;, - �, ;, � ;, �, � :�: '' I