Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 2016-08_2639 W Edinger Ave (Yo Sushi)LS 2.4.16 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-02 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A TYPE 41 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AT YO! SUSHI RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 2639 WEST EDINGER AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-02 to allow a Type 41 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license for the property located at 2639 West Edinger Avenue. B. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-196 requires a conditional use permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption of beer and wine service that is ancillary to the primary restaurant use. C. On February 22, 2016, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-02. D. The Planning Commission determines that the following findings, which must be established in order to grant this Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-638, have been established for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-02 to allow for a Type 41 ABC license: 1. Will the proposed use provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community? The proposed Type 41 ABC license will provide an ancillary service to the restaurant's customers by allowing them the ability to purchase a variety of alcoholic beverages with their food. This will thereby benefit the community by providing a restaurant with an additional and complementary food - related amenity. Standards are applicable to the alcoholic beverage control license which will mitigate any potential impacts created by the use and ensure that the use will not negatively affect the surrounding community. Resolution No. 2016-08 Page 1 of 5 2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity? The proposed Type 41 ABC license for the on -sale consumption of beer and wine at this location will not be detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity because operational standards to the alcoholic beverage control license will mitigate any potential negative or adverse impacts created by the use. This is a restaurant use and the addition of alcohol will be ancillary to the main use. The sale of alcohol in the restaurant is intended to be incidental to the primary use as an eating establishment. 3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? The proposed use will not adversely affect the economic stability of the area, but will instead allow the restaurant to compete with other nearby restaurants in the general vicinity and citywide that also offers a full selection of alcoholic beverages for sale to their guests and other visitors. Moreover, the offering of alcoholic beverages will allow Yo! Sushi, a small business, to remain economically viable and contribute to the overall success of the commercial area. 4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use? The proposed project will be in compliance with all applicable regulations and conditions imposed on a restaurant selling beer and wine pursuant to Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The facility will be maintained as a full-service, bona -fide eating establishment, having suitable kitchen facilities and supplying an assortment of foods commonly ordered at various hours of the day. Additionally, the restaurant will utilize less than one percent of the gross floor area for the display and storage of alcoholic beverages, which is below the maximum threshold established by the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan. The granting of this conditional use permit supports several policies contained in the General Plan. Policy 2.2 of the Land Use Element encourages land uses that accommodate the City's needs for goods and services. Providing a variety Resolution No. 2016-08 Page 2of5 of full-service restaurants that feature alcoholic beverages on their menus offers additional dining options for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Furthermore, Policy 2.9 of the Land Use Element supports developments that create a business environment that is safe and attractive. Operational standards for the proposed Type 41 ABC license will maintain a safe and attractive environment for the City of Santa Ana. Finally, Policy 5.5 of the Land Use Element encourages development that is compatible with and supporting of surrounding land uses. Yo! Sushi will be located in a commercial area and its operations will be compatible with the surrounding commercial businesses. E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the recommended action is exempt from CEQA per Section 15061(b)(3). This exemption applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The project proposes to allow the on -premise sale of beer and wine at a full-service restaurant within an existing structure. No expansion of square footage or interior reconfigurations of square footages are proposed as part of the project. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2016-2 will be filed for this project. Section 2. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval of this project, and any approvals associated with the project, including, without limitation, any environmental review or approval, except to the extent caused by the negligence of the City of Santa Ana. Section 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-02 as conditioned, as set forth in Exhibit A. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated February 22, 2016, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2016-08 Page 3 of 5 ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Bacerra, Bauer, McLoughlin, Mill, Verino (6) NOES: Commissioners: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioners: Gartner (1) ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, KAREN GERARDO, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2016-08 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on February 22, 2016. Date: 2-12-211,�a Planning Commission Secretary City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2016-08 Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-02 Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations. The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this approval. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. A. Planning Division 1. The applicant must submit and obtain approval of a sign permit in conjunction with removing any unpermitted signs on the exterior of the building. Resolution No. 2016-08 Page 5 of 5