HomeMy WebLinkAbout161012_ZAReso2016-05_5321WFirstResolution No. 2016-05
Page 1 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING MINOR
EXCEPTION NO. 2016-02 AS CONDITIONED FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5321 WEST FIRST STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. The applicant, Danny Nguyen, is requesting approval of Minor Exception No.
2016-02 to allow the installation of an overhead feeder at the property
located at 5321 West First Street.
B. Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41 -626, approval
of a minor exception is required to allow an overhead electrical feeder
when otherwise required to be placed underground for new developments.
C. Minor Exception No. 2016-02 came before the Zoning Administrator of the
City of Santa Ana on October 12, 2016, for a duly noticed public hearing.
D. For Minor Exception No. 2016-02, the Zoning Administrator of the City of
Santa Ana determines that the following findings have been established:
1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings,
that the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive
the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the
intent and purpose of the provisions of this Chapter.
The project site has a special circumstance related to its location and
surroundings. The power pole currently servicing the surrounding
residences is at maximum capacity and power from this pole is not
feasible; to obtain power from this pole, the owner must upgrade
three nearby power poles to allow for increasing capacity. These
upgrades will be extremely costly to the applicant and are beyond the
typical range of cost experienced by most developers of single-family
residences in Santa Ana.
2. That the granting of a minor exception is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property
rights.
Resolution No. 2016-05
Page 2 of 5
The granting of the minor exception is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The granting of the
minor exception will preserve the property owner’s ability to complete
construction of a new single-family residence and to provide power to
the new residence and for the enjoyment of future occupants.
3. That the granting of a minor exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property.
The granting of this minor exception will not be detrimental to the
public or surrounding properties. There are existing overhead feeders
throughout this segment of First Street. Undergrounding the electrical
feeder from this location will require trenching through seven lanes of
First Street, which will result in the closure of First Street for
numerous days creating traffic and inconveniences to the
surrounding neighborhoods and the general public. Moreover, the
undergrounding would impact two adjacent properties, requiring
trenching through their sidewalk frontage. Approving this minor
exception to allow the overhead electrical feeder will not have any
negative impacts to the surrounding properties or general public
welfare and will be the most feasible option to the applicant, SCE,
and the City
4. That the granting of a minor exception will not adversely affect the
General Plan of the City.
The project will not adversely affect the General Plan as the proposed
minor exception is consistent with Goals 1, 2 and 3 of the Land Use
Element of the General Plan. These goals encourage the
development and occupation of single-family residences. Policy 1.4
supports the development of single-family residential lots, Policy 2.10
supports new development which is harmonious in scale and
character with existing development in the area, Policy 3.1 supports
development which provides a positive contribution to neighborhood
character and identity, and Policy 3.5 encourages new development
and/or additions to existing development that are compatible in scale,
and consistent with the architectural style and character of the
neighborhood.
E. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The recommendation is
exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This Class 3
exemption applies to projects consisting of construction and location of
limited numbers of new, small facilities, or structures of up to 10,000 square
feet in floor area insofar as the project and site meet the following criteria:
that the project site is zoned for such use, that the project note involve the
use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary
Resolution No. 2016-05
Page 3 of 5
public services and facilities are available, and the surrounding area is not
environmentally sensitive. Moreover, the project and its location meet the
test for exceptions as outlined in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA guidelines;
the project site is not located in an environmentally sensitive area and will
not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern.
Based on these criteria and on staff’s analysis, Categorical Exemption
Environmental Review No. 2016-103 will be filed for this project.
Section 2. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the
City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all liability,
claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval of this
project, and any approvals associated with the project, including, without limitation, any
environmental review or approval, except to the extent caused by the sole negligence of
the City of Santa Ana.
Section 3. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana after conducting
the public hearing hereby approves Minor Exception No. 2016-02 as conditioned in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for the project located at 5321 West
First Street. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid
hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Zoning Administrator
Action dated October 12, 2016, and exhibits attached thereto; and, the public testimony,
written and oral , all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 12th day of October, 2016.
_______________________
Verny O. Carvajal, AICP
Zoning Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:________________________
Lisa Storck
Assistant City Attorney
Resolution No. 2016-05
Page 4 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jocelyn Magalona, Clerk of the Zoni ng Administrator, do hereby attest to and certify
the attached Resolution No. 201 6-05 to be the original resolution adopted by the Zoning
Administrator of the City of Santa Ana on October 12, 2016.
Date: ________________ ____________________________________
Clerk of the Zoning Administrator
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2016-05
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval for Minor Exception No. 2016-02
Minor Exception 2016-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana
Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards
Code and all other applicable regulations.
The applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to
exercising the rights conferred by this minor exception.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the minor exception. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in
the revocation of the minor exception.
A. Planning Division
1. All proposed site improvements must conform to the site plan review
approval of Res. No. 2015-2131 and No. 2016-1080.
2. Any amendment to this minor exception must be submitted to the Planning
Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is
available or if the minor exception must be amended