Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESO 2017-22_421 N HarborLS 6.12.17 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2017-02 AS CONDITIONED FOR A NEW MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 421 NORTH HARBOR BOUILEVARD BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Charles Company ("Applicant') is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2017-02, as conditioned, to allow the construction of a new mixed-use residential and commercial development at 421 N. Harbor Boulevard. B. The proposed project consists of 94 residential units within a four-story residential building and a five -story parking structure. In addition, approximately 11,000 square feet of commercial space is proposed to be provided. The project also includes 18 percent of the 1.85 acre site (14,506 square feet) to be dedicated for common open space and recreational areas. C. On January 29, 2015, a meeting was held at Russell Elementary School pursuant to the Sunshine Ordinance. D. On May 22, 2017 and June 12, 2017 the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a public meeting and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral. E. In between the two public meetings, on May 30, 2017, the Planning Commission Design Review sub -committee met with the Applicant in an effort to address concerns raised at the Planning Commission meeting. F. Section 7-1 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan requires a review by the Planning Commission of all site plans where the proposed structures are over three (3) stories in height. G. The zoning designation for the subject property is Corridor (C) district in the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. Resolution No. 2017-22 Page 1 of 4 H. Based on the following review, the project has been determined to be in compliance with all applicable provisions and development standards outlined within the Corridor (C) district in the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan: 1. That the proposed development plan is consistent with and will further the objectives outlined in Section 1 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. The proposed mixed-use development project will be compatible with Section 1 (Guiding Principles) of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan as the project will be a mixed use project that will allow persons to live, work and shop in the immediate area while taking advantage of regional and local transit investments made along and around Harbor Boulevard. Further, the project will incorporate an active streetscape that will integrate the private development with the public realm and will assist in creating a distinct identity for the district. 2. That the proposed development plan is consistent with the development standards specified in Section 3 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. The proposed project is consistent with Section 3 (Land Use Plan and Development Standards) of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan zone. The project is in compliance with the various development standards for the Corridor district, including setbacks, parking, lot size and open space. 3. That the proposed development plan is designed to be compatible with adjacent development in terms of similarity of scale, height, and site configuration and otherwise achieves the objectives of the design a n d development Principles specified in Section 3 and 6 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. The project site is compatible with adjacent development and achieves the design and development principles outlined in Section 3 (Land Use Plan and Development Standards) and Section 6 (Design Guidelines) of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. Further, the project incorporates a variety of architectural materials, massing and ground floor uses that are compatible with the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. Resolution No. 2017-22 Page 2 of 4 4. That the land use uses, site design, and operational considerations in the proposed development plan have been planned in a manner that will result in a compatible and harmonious operation as specified in Section 4 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. The proposed project has been designed to be compatible and harmonious with all existing development and Mobility Goals as identified in Section 4 (Mobility Plan) of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. The project's proximity to a variety of transportation options will provide a greater choice for residents to travel. Section 2. The Applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval of this project, and any approvals associated with the project, including, without limitation, any environmental review or approval, except to the extent caused by the sole negligence of the City of Santa Ana. Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the recommended action has been determined to be within the scope of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2014-01, as that program EIR adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA, as per Sections 15162 and 15168 of the CEQA guidelines. It has been determined that no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would be required. Thus, a discretionary action can be taken on the proposed project since it is within the scope of the project covered by the previously approved program EIR. The project will comply with all mitigation measures as required by the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), as required by the environmental documentation prepared for the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. As required by the MMP, a site impact analysis was performed to analyze any potential changes in area traffic as a result of the proposed development. The site impact analysis is incorporated herein by this reference. The analysis concluded that no additional significant impacts would trigger the requirement for additional environmental review. Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public meeting, hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 2017-02 as conditioned in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said public meeting, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated June 12, 2017, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2017-22 Page 3 of 4 ADOPTED this 12" day of June, 2017. AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Bacerra, Contreras -Leo, McLoughlin, Mendoza, Verino (6) NOES: Commissioners: None (0) ABSENT: Commissioners: Nguyen (1) ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: None (0) L vette Verino Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: c,�y'�.� Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Rosa Barela, Acting Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2017-22 to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 12, 2017. Date: Ok-3/i 7 Acting Recording Secretary City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2017-22 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Conditions for Aooroval for Site Plan Review No. 2017-02 Site Plan Review No. 2017-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The Applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this site plan review. The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the site plan review. A. Planning Division 1. All proposed improvements must conform to the Development Project Review approval of DP No. 2014-51 and staff report exhibits. 2. The project shall remain in compliance with Environmental Impact Report No. 2014-01 and the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. 3. Landscaping shall be maintained per the approved landscape plan. After project occupancy, landscaping is to be maintained to include the required plant materials installed at the time of occupancy and per the approved plan. 4. All signs for the proposed project shall comply with Section 6-6 of the Harbor Corridor Mixed Use Transit Plan and Chapter 41, Article XI, of the SAMC. Signage shall be submitted to the case planner for review and approval prior to submittal into Building plan check. 5. A Public Art Plan to include a wall mural by a local artist on the northwest corner of the building must be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6. A security plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy at the project site. Exhibit "A"