HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-12-17 PC PACKETCity of Santa Ana
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
JUNE 12, 2017
City Council Chamber
22 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, California
5:30 P.M.
LYNNETTE VERINO
Chair, Ward 2 Representative
MARK McLOUGHLIN
Vice Chair, Citywide Representative
ERIC ALDERETE
Ward 1 Representative
KENNETH NGUYEN
Ward 3 Representative
PHIL BACERRA
Ward 4 Representative
CYNTHIA CONTRERAS-LEO
Ward 5 Representative
BEATRIZ MENDOZA
Ward 6 Representative
The Planning Commission Agenda can be found online at
http://www.ci.santa- ana.ca.us/pba/documents/agenda_pc.pdf\
Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Narcee Perez al (714) 667-2260.
Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Tony Lai số (714) 565-2627.
If you wish to submit a comment on any item on the Agenda, please submit to eComments@santa-ana.org by 3 p.m. the day of
the meeting; emails received after said time will be on file for public viewing the day after the meeting.
If you need special assistance to participate in this Planning Commission meeting, please contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA
Program Coordinator, at (714) 647-5624. Please call prior to the meeting date, to allow the City time to make reasonable
arrangements for accessibility to this meeting. [Americans with Disabilities Act, Title II, 28 CFR 35.102]
Lisa E. Storck
Legal Counsel
Hassan Haghani, AICP
Executive Director
Sarah Bernal
Recording Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 1 June 12, 2017
Basic Planning Commission Meeting Information
Five-Year Strategic Plan (2014-2019) Detailed information at: http://www.santa-ana.org/strategic-planning/
Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles - The City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and its
community. The vision, mission and guiding principles (values) are the result of a thoughtful and inclusive process designed to set the
City and organization on a course that meets the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Vision - The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: •Investment in youth •Safe and healthy community
•Neighborhood pride •Thriving economic climate •Enriched and diverse culture •Quality government services
Mission – “To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensures public safety, a prosperous economic
environment, opportunities for our youth, and a high quality of life for residents.”
Guiding Principles
•Collaboration •Efficiency •Equity •Excellence •Fiscal Responsibility •Innovation •Transparency
Strategic Plan Goals/Objectives/Strategies:
Goal 1 - Community Safety
Goal 2 - Youth, Education, Recreation
Goal 3 - Economic Development
Goal 4 - City Financial Stability
Goal 5 - Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability
Goal 6 - Community Facilities & Infrastructure
Goal 7 - Team Santa Ana
*********
Code of Ethics and Conduct - The people of the City of Santa Ana, at an election held on February 5, 2008, approved an amendment
to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards,
commissions, and committees to assure public confidence. A copy of the City’s Code can be found on the Clerk of the Council’s
webpage. The following are the core values expressed: Integrity · Honesty · Responsibility · Fairness · Accountability · Respect ·
Efficiency
Agenda Information - The agenda descriptions provide the public with a general summary of the items of business to be considered by
the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is not limited in any way by the “Recommended Action” and may take any
action which the Commission deems to be appropriate on an agenda item. Except as otherwise provided by law, no action shall be
taken on any item not listed on the agenda.
Public Comments/Public Input - Pursuant to Government Code Sec. 54954.3, the public may address the Planning Commission on
any and all matters within the Commission’s jurisdiction.
At the discretion of the Chair, at the first Public Comment portion of the meeting, all comments may be considered jointly. The
public will be given the opportunity to speak on any and all matters contained on any of the Consent Calendar and Business
Calendar items and/or on issues of public interest within the jurisdiction of the Commission. Members of the public shall be given
three (3) minutes for each duly noticed hearing (unless the matter is continued prior to taking public testimony). All reques ts to
speak shall be submitted in writing to the Commission Secretary at the beginning of the meeting and before Public Comments
begin. Speaker forms will be available at the meeting.
REQUESTS TO SPEAK SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED AFTER THE PUBLIC COMMENT SESSION BEGINS WITHOUT
PERMISSION OF THE CHAIR. When speaking, all persons addressing the Planning Commission shall follow the rules of decorum
as detailed on the back of the speaker form. The presiding officer shall have the power and responsibility to enforce decoru m and
order of the meeting as set forth in Section 2-104(c) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.
Consent Calendar - All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be
enacted by one motion without discussion unless a member of the Commission “pulls” an item(s) from the consent calendar for a
separate vote.
Senate Bill 343 - As required by Senate Bill 343, any non-confidential writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning
Commission members regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Planning & Building
Agency during normal business hours.
Agenda & Minutes - Staff reports and documents relating to each agenda item are on file in the office of the Planning & Building Agency
and are available for public inspection during regular business hours, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday and
alternate Fridays. The Planning & Building Agency is located in City Hall Ross Annex, 20 Civic Center Plaza, 2nd Floor, Santa Ana,
California, (714)667-2700. Council meeting agendas, staff reports, and minutes are available the Friday before a Planning
Commission meeting at the following website address: www.santa-ana.org
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 June 12, 2017
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2017
5:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER CHAIR VERINO
COMMISSION MEMBERS ALDERETE,
BACERRA, CONTRERAS-LEO, MCLOUGHLIN,
MENDOZA, NGUYEN
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS (on non-agenda items)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve staff recommendation on the
following Consent Calendar Item: A - B.
A. MINUTES FROM THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 22, 2017 {STRATEGIC PLAN
NO. 5, 1}
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Minutes.
B. EXCUSED ABSENCES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Excuse absent commission members.
* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 3 June 12, 2017
1. SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2017-02 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 421 NORTH HARBOR BOULEVARD
{STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3, 2} – Ann Ni, Case Planner
Consideration of the matter continued from the May 22, 2017 meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No.
2017-02 as conditioned.
2. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-16 TO RENEW THE
ENTITLEMENTS OF AN EXISTING 60-FOOT HIGH MONO-POLE MAJOR
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR T-MOBILE WEST LLC LOCATED
AT 3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE –SMARTLINK, APPLICANT {STRATEGIC
PLAN NO. 3, 2} – Jerry Guevara, Case Planner
Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on June 1, 2017 and notices
mailed on June 1, 2017.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 2017-16 as conditioned.
* * * END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR * * *
3. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE, Scott Kutner & Margarita
Macedonia – Senior Community Planners
***END OF WORK STUDY SESSION***
4. STAFF COMMENTS – Candida Neal, Planning Manager
General Plan Update Status
BUSINESS CALENDAR ITEMS
WORK STUDY ITEMS
COMMENTS
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 4 June 12, 2017
5. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT - The next meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Monday, June 26, 2017 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 22 Civic
Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Modify Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-09 to allow the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on
premise consumption at Mariscos Zamora located at 3701 W. Mcfadden Avenue, Unit G
This page left blank intentionally.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 MAY 22, 2017
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
MAY 22, 2017
CALLED TO ORDER COUNCIL CHAMBER
22 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
5:33 P.M.
ATTENDANCE COMMISSIONERS Present:
LYNNETTE VERINO, Chair
MARK MCLOUGHLIN, Vice Chair
ERIC ALDERETE (arrived at 6:15 p.m.)
PHIL BACERRA
CYNTHIA CONTRERAS-LEO
BEATRIZ MENDOZA
KENNETH NGUYEN
COMMISSIONERS Absent:
None.
STAFF Present:
CANDIDA NEAL, Planning Manager
LISA STORCK, Assistant City Attorney
VERNY CARVAJAL, Principal Planner
SELENA KELAHER, Associate Planner
ANN NI, Associate Planner
IVAN OROZCO, Assistant Planner II
SARAH BERNAL, Recording Secretary
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Verino
PUBLIC COMMENTS (on non-agenda items) - None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Approve staff recommendation on Consent Calendar Items A - B.
MOTION: McLoughlin SECOND: Nguyen
VOTE: AYES: Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, McLoughlin, Mendoza, Nguyen,
Verino (6)
NOES: None (0)
A-1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 MAY 22, 2017
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: Alderete (1)
A. MINUTES FROM THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 8, 2017
MOTION: Approve Minutes.
B. EXCUSED ABSENCES
MOTION: Excuse absent commission member(s): None.
* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * *
BUSINESS CALENDAR ITEMS
1. SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2017-02
(Applicant: Tom Lo representing Charles Company)
Associate Planner Ni provided a presentation which included a project description, site
description and project analysis. Discussion ensued regarding location, security, building
height, design and materials. Kevin Tsai, Architect, answered questions regarding
security, parking and design.
Commissioner Bacerra motioned to approve the matter as recommended and then
rescinded the motion; expressed concerns regarding the proposed architecture and
finishes at the corner of Harbor Boulevard and Fifth Street and Fifth and Figueroa Streets.
Commissioner Mendoza motioned to approve the matter as recommended and it was
seconded by Commissioner Nguyen.
A substitute motion was introduced by Commissioner Contreras-Leo to refer the matter to
the Design Review Committee and it was seconded by Commissioner Bacerra.
Commissioner Nguyen rescinded his second on the original motion citing that the project
design needed be reviewed.
The original motion was then seconded by Vice Chair McLoughlin.
Chair Verino requested consideration for original motion.
A-2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 MAY 22, 2017
ORIGINAL MOTION: Adopt a Resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2017-
02 as conditioned.
MOTION: Mendoza SECOND: McLoughlin
VOTE: AYES: McLoughlin, Verino, Mendoza (3)
NOES: Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, Nguyen (3)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: Alderte (1)
*Motion tied by a 3:3 vote.
Chair Verino requested consideration of substitute motion.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Refer the matter to the Design Review Committee and
continue consideration to the next meeting.
MOTION: Contreras-
Leo
SECOND: Bacerra
VOTE: AYES: Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, McLoughlin, Nguyen (4)
NOES: Mendoza, Verino (2)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: Alderte (1)
2. REVIEW OF PUBLIC ART PLAN FOR THE 301 DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 301
EAST JEANETTE LANE
(Applicant: Wood Partners)
Principal Planner Carvajal provided a presentation which included a project description,
site description, art piece description and project analysis.
MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-19 approving the Public Art Plan for The
301.
MOTION: Bacerra SECOND: Contreras-Leo
VOTE: AYES: Alderete, Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, McLoughlin, Mendoza,
Nguyen, Verino (7)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: None (0)
A-3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 MAY 22, 2017
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-10
(Applicant: Brian Boyle representing Do Lunch Deli)
Commissioner Bacerra disclosed that he spoke with applicant in regards to the matter.
Planning Technician Mar provided a presentation which included a project description, site
description and project analysis. Discussion ensued regarding Health Department
requirements. The applicant spoke in support of the matter, answered questions regarding
hours of operation and explained reason for requesting a permit to allow the sale of
alcoholic beverages.
Chairperson Verino opened the Public Hearing. There were no speakers and the Public
Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-20 approving Conditional Use Permit No.
2017-10
MOTION: McLoughlin SECOND: Mendoza
VOTE: AYES: Alderete, Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, McLoughlin, Mendoza,
Nguyen, Verino (7)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: None (0)
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-15
(Applicant: John Bitterly representing American Tower Corp.)
Assistant Planner II Orozco provided a presentation which included a project description,
site description and project analysis. Discussion ensued regarding fronds and approval
period for major wireless communication facilities. The applicant spoke in support of the
matter.
Chairperson Verino opened the Public Hearing. There were no speakers and the Public
Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-21 approving Conditional Use Permit No.
2017-15.
MOTION: Nguyen SECOND: McLoughlin
VOTE: AYES: Alderete, Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, McLoughlin, Mendoza,
Nguyen, Verino (7)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: None (0)
A-4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5 MAY 22, 2017
5. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW NO. 2017-24, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-01
AND AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2017-01.
(Applicant: Brian Hendricks representing Community Development Partners)
Associate Planner Kelaher provided a presentation which included a project description,
site description and project analysis. Discussion ensued regarding onsite support services
provided to tenants, parking and building design. Commission expressed concern with the
building’s bare wall along freeway. The applicant addressed concern regarding the wall
along the freeway and answered questions regarding building design, building materials
and supportive services to be provided.
Chairperson Verino opened the Public Hearing. There were no speakers and the Public
Hearing was closed.
MOTION:
Recommend that the City Council 1.) Approve and adopt Negative Declaration,
Environmental Review No. 2017-24, 2.) Adopt a resolution approving General Plan
Amendment No. 2017-01, 3.) Adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application
No. 2017-01 for Specific Development No. 91 with the condition that the applicant
work with the Planning Division to address concern with the bare wall along the
freeway.
MOTION: Bacerra SECOND: Contreras-Leo
VOTE: AYES: Alderete, Bacerra, Contreras-Leo, McLoughlin, Mendoza,
Nguyen, Verino (7)
NOES: None (0)
ABSTAIN: None (0)
ABSENT: None (0)
COMMENTS
6. STAFF COMMENTS -
Planning Manager Neal:
General Plan Advisory Group meeting was held on May 17, 2017.
Code Enforcement is working with the City Attorney’s Office to address the reported
safety concerns at the California Lodge Hotel.
o Commissioner Bacerra requested that police data on this property be
presented to the Commission.
Zoning Administrator made a determination to approve a five-foot high wall for
Minor Exception 2017-01; if appealed, the matter will come before the Planning
Commission.
A-5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6 MAY 22, 2017
7. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Chair Verino & Commissioner Mendoza:
Wished everyone a Happy Memorial Day Weekend.
Commissioner Nguyen:
Inquired about name badges for Commissioners.
ADJOURNED 7:14 P.M. - The next meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Monday, June 12, 2017 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 22 Civic
Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California.
Sarah Bernal
Recording Secretary
A-6
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
EXHIBIT 3
1-7
EXHIBIT 4
1-8
1-9
1-10
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
EXHIBIT 51-11
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
1-12
1-13
1-14
1-15
EXHIBIT 6
1-16
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 1 of 4
LS 5.22.17
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-xx
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN
REVIEW NO. 2017-02 AS CONDITIONED FOR A NEW
MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 421
NORTH HARBOR BOUILEVARD
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A. Charles Company (“Applicant”) is requesting approval of Site Plan
Review No. 2017-02, as conditioned, to allow the construction of a new
mixed-use residential and commercial development at 421 N. Harbor
Boulevard.
B. The proposed project consists of 94 residential units within a four-story
residential buildings and a five-story parking structure. In addition,
approximately 11,000 square feet of commercial space is proposed to be
provided. The project also includes 18 percent of the 1.85 acre site
(14,506 square feet) to be dedicated for common open space and
recreational areas.
C. On January 29, 2015, a meeting was held at Russell Elementary School
pursuant to the Sunshine Ordinance.
D. On May 22, 2017 and June 12, 2017 the Planning Commission of the City
of Santa Ana held a public meeting and at that time considered all
testimony, written and oral.
E. On May 30, 2017, the Planning Commission Design Review sub-
committee met with the applicants in an effort to address the concerns
raised at the Planning Commission hearing.
F. Section 7-1 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan requires a
review by the Planning Commission of all site plans where the proposed
structures are over three (3) stories in height.
G. The zoning designation for the subject property is Corridor (C) district in
the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan.
EXHIBIT 7
1-17
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 2 of 4
H. Based on the following review, the project has been determined to be in
compliance with all applicable provisions and development standards
outlined within the Corridor (C) district in the Harbor Mixed Use Transit
Corridor Plan:
1.That the proposed development plan is consistent with and will
further the objectives outlined in Section 1 of the Harbor Mixed Use
Transit Corridor Plan.
The proposed mixed-use development project will be
compatible with Section 1 (Guiding Principles) of the
Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan as the project will
be a mixed use project that will allow persons to live, work
and shop in the immediate area while taking advantage of
regional and local transit investments made along and
around Harbor Boulevard. Further, the project will
incorporate an active streetscape that will integrate the
private development with the public realm and will assist in
creating a distinct identity for the district.
2.That the proposed development plan is consistent with the
development standards specified in Section 3 of the Harbor Mixed
Use Transit Corridor Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with Section 3 (Land
Use Plan and Development Standards) of the Harbor Mixed
Use Transit Corridor Plan zone. The project is in
compliance with the various development standards for
the Corridor district, including setbacks, parking, lot size and
open space.
3.That the proposed development plan is designed to be
compatible with adjacent development in terms of similarity of
scale, height, and site configuration and otherwise achieves the
objectives of the design and development Principles
specified in Section 3 and 6 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit
Corridor Plan.
The project site is compatible with adjacent development
and achieves the design and development principles
outlined in Section 3 (Land Use Plan and Development
Standards) a n d S e c t i o n 6 ( D e s i g n
G u i d e l i n e s ) of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor
Plan. Further, the project incorporates a variety of
architectural materials, massing and ground floor uses that
are compatible with the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor
Plan.
1-18
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 3 of 4
4. That the land use uses, site design, and operational considerations
in the proposed development plan have been planned in a
manner that will result in a compatible and harmonious operation
as specified in Section 4 of the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor
Plan.
The proposed project has been designed to be compatible
and harmonious with all existing development and Mobility
Goals as identified in Section 4 (Mobility Plan) of the
Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. The project’s
proximity to a variety of transportation options will provide a
greater choice for residents to travel.
Section 2. The Applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the
City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all
liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval
ofthis project, and any approvals associated with the project, including,
withoutlimitation, any environmental review or approval, except to the extent caused by the
sole negligence of the City of Santa Ana.
Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the recommended action has been determined to be within the scope of the
previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2014-01, as that program
EIR adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA, as per Sections
15162 and 15168 of the CEQA guidelines. It has been determined that no new
effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would be required. Thus, a
discretionary action can be taken on the proposed project since it is within the scope
of the project covered by the previously approved program EIR.
The project will comply with all mitigation measures as required by the approved
Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), as required by the environmental documentation
prepared for the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Plan. As required by the MMP, a
site impact analysis was performed to analyze any potential changes in area traffic
as a result of the proposed development. The site impact analysis is incorporated
herein by this reference. The analysis concluded that no additional significant
impacts would trigger the requirement for additional environmental review.
Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the
public meeting, hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 2017-02 as conditioned in Exhibit
A attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is
based upon the evidence submitted at the above said public meeting, which includes,
but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated June 12,
2017, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of
which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 12th day of June 2017.
1-19
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 4 of 4
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:
_______________________
Lynnette Verino
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:________________________
Lisa Storck
Assistant City Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Sarah Bernal, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the
attached Resolution No. 2017-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 12, 2017.
Date:
Planning Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
1-20
Exhibit “A”
EXHIBIT A
Conditions for Approval for Site Plan Review No. 2017-02
Site Plan Review No. 2017-02 is approved subject to compliance, to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa
Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), the California Administrative Code, the California Building
Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the
following conditions of approval:
The Applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below prior to
exercising the rights conferred by this site plan review.
The applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may
result in the revocation of the site plan review.
A. Planning Division
1. All proposed improvements must conform to the Development Project
Review approval of DP No. 2014-51 and staff report exhibits.
2. The project shall remain in compliance with Environmental Impact Report
No. 2014-01 and the Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
3. Landscaping shall be maintained per the approved landscape plan. After
project occupancy, landscaping is to be maintained to include the required
plant materials installed at the time of occupancy and per the approved
plan.
4. All signs for the proposed project shall comply with Section 6-6 of the Harbor
Corridor Mixed Use Transit Plan and Chapter 41 and Article XI of the SAMC.
Signage shall be submitted to the case planner for review and approval prior
to submittal into Building plan check.
5. A Public Art Plan must be submitted to the Planning Division for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
6. A 24-hour security guard shall be provided at the project site.
1-21
This page left blank intentionally.
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 1 of 6
6.12.17 LS
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2017-16, AS CONDITIONED, TO
ALLOW CONTINUED USE OF A 60-FOOT HIGH
WIRELESS FACILITY ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
A.Smartlink, LLC. (“Applicant”), representing T-Mobile West, LLC., is
requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-16 to renew the
entitlements of an existing 60-foot high mono-pole major wireless
communications facility located at 3308 West Warner Avenue.
B.Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-198.10, a
conditional use permit (CUP) is required for major wireless communications
facilities established in the City of Santa Ana.
C.SAMC Section 41-198.13 states that major wireless communications
facilities shall be approved for a period not to exceed five (5) years, although
subsequent legislative acts have required that such facilities be approved for
a period of not less than ten (10) years.
D.On January 10, 2005, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 to approve a new60-foot
mono-pole wireless communication facility. The applicant was approved at a
5-1 vote.
E.As the current facility’s entitlements are now over its 10 year timeframe, the
Applicant is required to apply for a new CUP in order to maintain the
entitlements of the facility current.
F.On June 12, 2017, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-16.
G.Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-638 authorizes the Planning
Commission to grant a conditional use permit upon making certain findings:
2-5
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 2 of 6
1. The proposed use will provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the
community.
The existing 60-foot high wireless communications facility
will continue to provide a service which will contribute to the
community. The facility will provide a service to Santa Ana
residents, businesses and motorists who subscribe to
Applicant’s providers by providing cellular service and data
coverage for its users.
2. The proposed use under the circumstances of the particular case
will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity.
The issuance of a conditional use permit to re-entitle this
existing wireless communication facility located at 3308
West Warner Avenue will not be detrimental to persons
residing or working in the area as the facility will remain in
compliance with Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety
regulations. Furthermore, Federal law exempts local
jurisdictions from regulating health-related issues as these
issues are covered by Federal laws.
3. The proposed use will not adversely affect the present economic
stability or future economic development of properties surrounding
the area.
The existing mono-pole will be compatible with the
surrounding area and will not adversely affect the economic
viability in the area as the mono-pole has a stealth design
that will maintain the appearance of a light standard. In
addition, due to its location at the rear southwest corner of
an industrial site and setback approximately 200-feet from
Warner Avenue, it is not expected to create any adverse
economic impacts for the surrounding properties.
4. The proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in Chapter 41 for such use.
The use will continue to comply with all provisions pertaining
to the construction and installation of wireless facilities in
Chapter 41 (Zoning Code) of the SAMC. Additional on-site
improvements will bring the site into closer compliance with
SAMC standards.
2-6
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 3 of 6
5. The proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan or any
specific plan of the City.
The wireless facility will not adversely affect the intent of the
General Plan as cellular facilities that are designed to be
compatible with the surrounding environment are consistent
with the goals and objectives of the City’s Land Use
Element. Goal 1 promotes a balance of land uses to address
community needs, which includes means of communication
that will be served by the mono-pole. In addition, Goals 3
and 5 require preservation of neighborhood character and
integrity as well as mitigation of development impacts. The
mono-pole’s location minimizes visual impact on the area
and assists with the screening of the equipment. Further,
Policy 2.2 encourages land uses that accommodate the
City’s needs for services. Enhancing a cell phone provider’s
coverage in the area adds to the services that are readily
available for business owners, workers, and residents in the
immediate vicinity.
H. In accordance with the California Building Code Section 3108, the subject
telecommunication facility will be designed, constructed, and/or maintained
in accordance with the provisions of TIA-222, which is a set of nationally
recognized standards for the constructions of telecommunication and
broadcast towers.
Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
the recommended action is exempt from CEQA per Section 15061(b)(3). This exemption
applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The project proposes
to renew an existing major wireless facility through the issuance of a new CUP. No
expansion of square footage or physical land disturbances are proposed as part of the
project. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2015-85 will be filed for this
project.
Section 3. The applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the
City of Santa Ana, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all liability,
claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval of this
project, and any approvals associated with the project, including, without limitation, any
environmental review or approval, except to the extent caused by the sole negligence of
the City of Santa Ana.
2-7
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 4 of 6
Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana after conducting
the public hearing hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-16 as conditioned
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for the project located at 3308
West Warner Avenue. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above
said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission
Action dated June 12, 2017, and exhibits attached thereto; and, the public testimony,
written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2017.
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:
_______________________
Lynnette Verino
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:________________________
Lisa Storck
Assistant City Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, SARAH BERNAL, Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached
Resolution No. 2017-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Santa Ana on June 12, 2017.
Date: ________________ ____________________________________
Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
2-8
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 5 of 6
EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-16
Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-16 is approved subject to compliance, to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the
Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building
Standards Code and all other applicable regulations.
The Applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to
exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit.
The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the
life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may
result in the revocation of the conditional use permit.
Planning Division
1. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning
Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is
available or the conditional use permit must be amended.
2. The proposed facility shall be maintained as per approved plans and any existing
landscaping shall be protected in place while any required improvements are
installed for the 60-foot wireless facility.
3. The permit Applicant shall provide a 24-hour phone number to which interference
problems may be reported. This condition will also apply to all existing facilities in
the City of Santa Ana.
4. The permit Applicant will provide a “single point of contact” in its Engineering and
Maintenance Departments to insure continuity on all interference issues. The name,
telephone number, fax number and e-mail address of that person shall be provided
to the City’s designated representative upon activation of the facility.
5. The permit Applicant shall insure that lessee or other user(s) shall comply with the
terms and conditions of this permit, and shall be responsible for the failure of any
lessee or other users under the control of permit applicant to comply.
6. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that the permit is expressly conditioned on the
applicant maintaining the subject property in a well-maintained condition, including
the surrounding landscape.
7. Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-16 expires 10 years from the date of City Council
approval.
2-9
Resolution No. 2017-xx
Page 6 of 6
8. The following on-site improvements shall be conducted prior to the release of this
resolution:
a. The parking lot shall be restriped in accordance to Sec. 41-1303 of the
SAMC. Parking stalls shall be double striped and shall not be less than
eight (8) feet six (6) inches wide and eighteen (18) feet long.
b. Fill in pavement cracks with a layer of slurry seal as needed.
c. Repaint equipment building and shelter.
d. Install landscape to the existing planter along the front façade of the
main building that fronts Warner Avenue, as noted on the approved
plans.
Once the conditions and improvements have been addressed, contact the case
planner to schedule an inspection. The case planner will verify that all conditions
and improvements have been met and will release the resolution to the applicant.
9. In the event of graffiti markings, applicant shall eliminate all such graffiti within
twenty four (24) hours, with or without notice from the City, as a condition of the
permit.
2-10
PLANNING AND BUILDING AGENCY
EXHIBIT 2
VICINITY MAP
A1 GENERAL AGRICULTURAL†
-B PARKING MODIFICATION
C-SM COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN
C1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
C1-MD COMM. COMMERCIAL/MUSEUM DISTRICT
C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL
C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS
C3-A CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE
C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER
C5 ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL
R1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE
R3 MULTIPLE DENSITY MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE
R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENTS
RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
SD SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT
SP SPECIFIC PLAN
CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
GC GOVERNMENT CENTER
M1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
MO MILITARY OPERA TIONS
O OPEN SPACE
P PROFESSIONAL
PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
MONO-POLE WIRELESS FACILITY
3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE
CUP 2017-16
1" = 1000 FEET
= 500 FEET
HA
R
B
O
R
BL
V
D
.
GR
E
E
N
V
I
L
L
E
S
T
.
286'
175'
229'280'
143.2'
544'
1115'
M1
M1
M1
C4
R2-PRD
R4
R1
R1
R1
M1
M1
M1
M1
O.
C
.
F
.
C
.
D
AN
N
E
S
T
.
YA
L
E
S
T
.
KNOX AV.GL
E
N
A
R
B
O
R
S
T
.
SU
S
A
N
S
T
.
CENTRAL AV.
EV
E
R
G
L
A
D
E
S
T
.
MANLY AV.
CENTRAL AV.
ADAMS ST.
CENTRAL AV.
HALL AV.
City of
Fountain Valley
O.
C
.
F
.
C
.
D
M1
M1
M1M1
M1M1
M1 M1
AN
N
E
S
T
.
YA
L
E
S
T
.
PENDLETON AV.
OT
I
S
S
T
.
WARNER AV.
S
U
S A N S T .
PENDL E T O N A V .
22-5-10
SA
N
T
A
A
N
A
R
I
V
E
R
20
0
'
209'
232'
R4M1 R1R1P
C1
243'
375'
15
0
'
43
6
.
9
'
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
R1
M1
M1
M1
R1
R3
R3
R3
R3
M1
R1
M1
M1
M1M1
M1
M1
PENDLETON
HU
R
O
N
D
R
.
FORDHAM AV.
MAYWOOD AV.
HARVARD ST.
SU
S
A
N
S
T
.
AN
N
E
S
T
.
SU
L
L
I
V
A
N
S
T
.
CAMDEN PL.
PENDLE
T
O
N
AVE.EV
E
R
G
L
A
D
E
S
T
.
GL
E
N
A
R
B
O
R
S
T
.
MAYWOOD AV.
ANAHURST PL.
ST. GERTRUDE PL.
CAMDEN PL.
AV.
O
.
C
.
F
.
C
.
D
27-5-10
PROJECT SITE
SEGERSTROM AVE.
2-11
PLANNING AND BUILDING AGENCY
LAND USE MAP EXHIBIT 3
CUP 2017-16
MONO-POLE WIRELESS FACILITY
3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE
PROJECT
SITE
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
ST
R
E
E
T
IN
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
IN
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
IN
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
O.
C
.
F
.
C
.
D
.
WARNE
R
AVENU
E
CENTRAL AVE.
ADAMS ST.
CENTRAL AVE.
SU
S
A
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
SU
S
A
N
S
T
.
SEGERSTROM AVENUE
IN
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
YA
L
E
S
T
.
YA
L
E
S
T
.
2-12
CUP 2017-16
MONO-POLE WIRELESS FACILITY
3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE
EXHIBIT 4
SITE PHOTOS
2-13
CUP 2017-17
MONO-POLE WIRELESS FACILITY
3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE
EXHIBIT 5
SITE PLAN
2-14
CUP 2017-16
MONO-POLE WIRELESS FACILITY
3308 WEST WARNER AVENUE
EXHIBIT 6
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
2-15
This page left blank intentionally.
2-16