Laserfiche WebLink
The net fiscal impact to the City General Fund would consist of costs and revenues resulting from <br />buildout and stable occupancy of the different land uses on an annual basis. <br />Fiscal Costs <br />Standard fiscal analysis methodology estimates General Fund costs based on the estimated per service <br />population costs at buildout. In this case, the service population is based on residents per unit and <br />employees per square feet of the office and commercial uses. As a result, the service population and <br />service costs of the existing MEMU and the extended MEMU are assumed to generally be the same since <br />the allowable land use for each category is fixed; however, as already noted an evaluation of the <br />development potential of the exiting and extended MEMU would be needed to conduct a full evaluation. <br />The cost per service population is estimated from an analysis of the City's General Fund costs, including <br />fire, police, public works, parks, recreation, and community services among others. The redevelopment <br />of existing uses in the extended MEMU area could have positive or:negative net fiscal cost impacts. <br />Fiscal Revenues <br />Fiscal General Fund revenues are contingent on multiple factors. The' bulk of fiscal revenues would <br />consist of general property taxes generated from the various land uses. Other select General Fund taxes <br />and fees such as sales and use taxes, property transfer taxes, property tax in lieu of Vehicle License Fees <br />(VLF), business license taxes, and franchise fees comprise'the components of the fiscal revenue estimate. <br />The majority of revenues will be contingent on an estimate of the valuation of the built out allowable <br />land uses and the associated property tax, minus the development that is removed through <br />redevelopment. These valuations must be estimated through analysis of market factors such as <br />supportable rents and/or for sale costs of the different land uses over time and at buildout. Other <br />revenues such as sales tax are linked to factors such as household, expenditures captured locally, sales <br />Per square foot of retail space supported by,non-residents (which may vary depending on the retail <br />development's location and market orientation), and spending in the community by residents, <br />employees, and visitors. <br />Again, a preliminary evaluation of the proposal suggests that an extension of the MEMU would generally <br />result in similarfiscal revenues. Substantial variations in fiscal revenues would likely only result if the <br />extension of the MEMU made achieving full buildout more or less likely, and at a low opportunity cost. <br />Additionally, redevelopment of existing uses in the MEMU extension area could result in net fiscal costs <br />or benefits in comparison with new uses depending on their current economic performance and value. <br />Preliminary Fiscal Net Impact Assessment Summary <br />There is a reasonable probability that the MEMU extension would not create a meaningfully different <br />net fiscal impact in comparison to the current MEMU. Further assessment of the general feasibility of <br />the allowable development capacity potential of the existing MEMU versus the proposed extended <br />MEMU would be necessary to arrive at a quantitative estimate of the net fiscal impact. <br />75A-314 <br />