Laserfiche WebLink
■ Jail Use: Includes expanded rehabilitative services including transitional community <br />reentry treatment programs. <br />■ General Community Space Use: Includes offices I staff work stations, public lobby I <br />restrooms, staff lounge and other ancillary spaces <br />• Other Institutional Use: Includes homeless shelter housing and supportive services <br />space. <br />• Commercial Option Use: Includes development of data center with support space for <br />specialized automated equipment and related required staff offices and other <br />dedicated space. <br />The follow-up analysis and evaluation work directed to the five of the reuse options <br />focused on the following areas: <br />■ Detailed Description of Jail Reuse Options: A written comprehensive narrative <br />description was developed for each draft jail reuse option the consultants identified <br />and analyzed during the scope of the project work. Each description included <br />graphic layouts highlighting the design plans and concepts incorporated into the <br />reuse option. <br />■ Facility Building / Systems Modifications: The analysis was also directed at clearly <br />understanding facility impacts and identified modifications to key building elements I <br />systems required to implement each Jail reuse option. <br />Functional Use Area Space Impacts: Major functional use floor space changes and <br />other significant considerations which would be effected through the implementation <br />of each Jail reuse option were also identified and analyzed by the consultant team. <br />The assessment of the building's floor space modifications focused on factors <br />covering (a) participants I occupants, (b) functional activities, (c) space requirements, <br />(d) special requirements, (e) planning considerations I adjacencies, and (f) furniture <br />equipment. <br />■ Fiscal Analysis: A fiscal analysis was also prepared which included information <br />showing the overall fiscal impact the City would likely incur if the jail reuse option was <br />pursued and ultimately implemented. The analysis included a summary conceptual <br />cost statement for each jail reuse option. The information covered factors that <br />included (a) estimated range of building design changes, (b) escalated construction <br />costs, and (c) other project -related expenses. <br />• Maior Implementation Observations: As part of the assessment evaluation process, <br />the consultant team also utilized an SWOT analysis strategic planning technique to <br />identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and negative impacts associated <br />with each jail reuse option. The SWOT analysis is intended to take the objectives of <br />each reuse option or project and identify the internal and external factors that are <br />favorable and unfavorable for achieving individual project objectives. <br />• Consultant Recommendations: Based on the results of the SWOT analysis process, <br />the consultant team developed a summary ranking from best to worst for the <br />proposed five jail reuse options which were examined in this Study. Analysis of this <br />information and related fiscal impact data was used to form the recommendations the <br />consultant team prepared and presented to the City Council. <br />65A-43 <br />