My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75A - PH AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2019 7:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 7:11:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
75A
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 5 <br />DBA No. 2018-01 <br />January 14, 2019 <br />Page 6 <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis <br />Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified in 2010 in order to address the potential <br />environmental impacts associated with the Transit Zoning Code. However, development of the <br />Legacy Square project would have potential environmental impacts to an eligible but unlisted <br />historical resource (Sanctuary and Anderson Court Complex, 1964-1966, and the Educational <br />Building, 1928-1929) which was not addressed in the 2010 EIR. Therefore, an Initial Study and <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of CEQA <br />and has been attached to this report as Exhibit 11. The project was found to have a less than <br />significant impact on the following environmental categories when proposed mitigation measures are <br />implemented: <br />• Aesthetics • Noise <br />• Biological Resources • Public Services <br />• Cultural Resources • Tribal Cultural Resources <br />• Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />The IS/MND's analysis determined that the above-mentioned environmental categories would cause <br />no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of environmental commitments, <br />or other enforceable measures, that would be adopted by the City. All mitigation measures in the <br />original EIR and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) have been <br />enforced and are carried over within the IS/MND, with exception of Tribal Cultural Resources and <br />Cultural Resources which required new mitigation measures. <br />Tribal Cultural Resources <br />Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) requires meaningful consultation with California Native American Tribes on <br />potential impacts on tribal cultural resources (TCRs), as defined in Public Resources Code Section <br />21074. TCRs are sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural <br />value to a California Native American tribe that are either eligible or listed in the California Register of <br />Historical Resources or local register of historical resources. In order minimize impacts on potential <br />TCRs, the IS/MND outlined mitigation measure TCR -1 requiring consultation of a qualified <br />archaeologist and the local Native American representative, if unanticipated discoveries are made <br />during construction activities. With implementation of mitigation measure TCR -1, potential project <br />impacts on TCRs would be less than significant. <br />Guttural Resources <br />The City has determined the Educational Building to be a "historical resource" for CEQA-compliance <br />purposes and determined that it requires proper mitigation of potential impacts from the proposed <br />demolition. In addition, because the Sanctuary and Anderson Court Complex has also reached the <br />commonly recognized 50 -year age threshold for potential "historical resources," and the two buildings <br />are integral parts of the same religious establishment, the IS/MND recommends that the Sanctuary <br />and Anderson Complex should also be considered a component of the "historical resource." <br />75A-84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.