Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />with the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street. <br />Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or <br />policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) <br />9.10.3 Habitat Conservation Plans <br />Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural <br />community conservation plan? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 46.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed and located within an urban and developed <br />area. The project site is not subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community <br />Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Thus, impacts <br />related to such a plan would not occur from the Project. (Initial Study, p. 46.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />46.) <br />9.11 Mineral Resources <br />9.11.1 Known and Locally Important Resources <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that <br />would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral <br />resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 47.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: No active mining operations exist in the City of Santa Ana. The mapping <br />by the California Geological Survey does not indicate that any significant mineral deposits are present <br />within the City. The Project area is developed with urban office uses and has no history of mining. <br />Implementation of the Project would not cause the loss of availability of mineral resources valuable to the <br />region or state. Moreover, the Project site and its surrounding vicinity is not in or near a mining site <br />identified by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Initial Study, p. 47.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />47.) <br />Resolution No. <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-77 <br />Page 39 of 71 <br />