Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana Addendum to the <br />MainPlace Mall Transformation Project Fashion Square Commercial Center Final EIR <br />Table AQ-5: GHG Emissions from the Proposed Project <br />Emissions Source <br />MTCO2e per Year <br />Existing <br />Conditions <br />Originally <br />Approved <br />Plan <br />Current <br />Entitlement <br />Proposed <br />Project <br />Construction Amortized Over 30 <br />Years <br />N/A <br />227 <br />170 <br />291 <br />Area Sources <br />0.03 <br />0.11 <br />0.09 <br />20 <br />Energy <br />4,255 <br />20,565 <br />15,494 <br />15,322 <br />Mobile <br />31,043 <br />50,559 <br />39,499 <br />39,945 <br />Solid Waste <br />298 <br />938 <br />804 <br />820 <br />Water and Wastewater <br />541 <br />2,635 <br />2,495 <br />2,437 <br />Total <br />36,137 <br />74,924 <br />58,462 <br />58,835 <br />Source: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment, 2019 <br />Table AQ-5 shows that the proposed Project would have greater construction emissions <br />than those associated with the Originally Approved Plan and the Current Entitlements. <br />However, the modeling conservatively assumes no soil import/export or demolition for <br />the Originally Approved Plan and the Current Entitlements, since demolition and grading <br />details are not known for these scenarios. Thus, actual emissions with these scenarios <br />would be higher. In addition, Table AQ-5 shows that that the net GHG emissions from <br />development of the proposed Project would be 15,863 MTCO2e/yr less than the <br />development contemplated under the Originally Approved Plan. <br />Table AQ-6 compares the service population GHG emissions associated with the <br />proposed Project, the Originally Approved Plan, and the Current Entitlements. As <br />shown, the proposed Project's service population would be higher and service <br />population GHG emissions would be less than the Originally Approved Plan and the <br />Current Entitlements scenarios. The proposed Project's lower efficiency metric means <br />that it would accommodate more residents and employees at a lower overall rate of <br />emissions. Additionally, the proposed Project's GHG Efficiency of 2.84 MTCO2e per <br />service population is below the SCAQMD's 3.0 MTCO2e per service population 2035 <br />threshold. Thus, the impacts related to GHG emissions would be less than significant. <br />Also, the proposed Project would result in fewer total GHG emissions than the Originally <br />Approved Plan and would be similar to emissions from the Current Entitlements. Thus, <br />no new impacts related to GHG emissions would occur from the proposed Project. <br />Table AQ-6: Net Service Population GHG Emissions <br />Emissions Source (Net New Building Area) <br />Net <br />Emissions <br />MTCO2e/year <br />Net <br />Service <br />Population <br />MTCO2e1yea <br />r/ Service <br />Population <br />Originally Approved (1983) Plan <br />38,787 <br />5,181 <br />7.49 <br />Current Entitlement <br />22,325 <br />4,462 <br />5.00 <br />Proposed Project <br />22,698 <br />8,001 <br />2.84 <br />119 <br />