My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-040 - Mainplace Mall Transformation
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-040 - Mainplace Mall Transformation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 10:01:52 AM
Creation date
6/20/2019 8:39:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-040
Date
6/4/2019
Destruction Year
P
Document Relationships
2019-041 - Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-01
(Amended By)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\2011 -\2019
NS-2967 - Approving Development Agreement No. 2018-02 Between City of Santa Ana and Mainplace ShoppingTown, LLC for Mainplace Mall Transformation Project
(Amended By)
Path:
\Ordinances\2011 - 2020 (NS-2813 - NS-3000)\2019 (NS-2963 - NS-2978
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2935
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana Addendum to the <br />MainPlace Mall Transformation Proiect Fashion Square Commercial Center Final EIR <br />5.2 SOILS AND GEOLOGY <br />Summary of Impacts Identified in the 1983 EIR <br />The 1983 EIR described that onsite soils consist of artificial fill that overlies alluvial <br />deposits that consist of compact to dense, fine to course sands and gravels. The 1983 <br />EIR determined that no soils or geologic constraints were anticipated and that proper <br />engineering techniques through the City's standard permitting process would reduce <br />any potential impacts to a less than significant level. The 1983 EIR did not include any <br />mitigation related to soils and geology and determined that no cumulative effects related <br />to soils and geology would occur. <br />Summary of Impacts Identified in the 1996 Addendum <br />The 1996 Addendum determined that no soils or geologic constraints have been <br />identified and that the development of new structures on the Project site would not <br />result in any adverse soils or geologic impacts. No mitigation was required. <br />Impacts Associated with the Proposed a Project <br />No New Impact: A geotechnical exploration and seismic hazards review study was <br />completed for the proposed Project, as prepared by Leighton and Associates in 2019 <br />(Geo 2019) and included as Appendix B. <br />Fault Rupture and Seismic Shaking <br />The seismic hazards review study states that there are no known active faults within or <br />adjacent to the Project site and that the site is not mapped within an Alquist-Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zone (Geo 2019). The closest active fault to the site is the San <br />Joaquin Hills blind thrust fault, which is 5.8 miles away. Thus, fault rupture would not <br />occur on the Project site. However, the site could experience moderate to strong ground <br />shaking from earthquakes along the major active and potentially active faults in the <br />region. <br />As a result, new structures in the City are required to be built in compliance with the <br />California Building Code (CBC [California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2]), as <br />included in the City's Municipal Code as Chapter 8, Article 2, Division 1, which regulates <br />all building and construction projects within the City and implements a minimum <br />standard for building design and construction. The CBC includes specific requirements <br />for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls and site demolition. The <br />Main Place Project's seismic hazards review study (Geo 2019) provides CBC seismic <br />structural design criteria that are specific to the onsite soils and potential for seismic <br />ground shaking and that apply specifically to excavation, recompaction, and foundation <br />systems to occur on or be built on the Project site. Because the proposed Project would <br />be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal <br />Code, verified through the City's plan check and permitting process, the proposed <br />53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.