Laserfiche WebLink
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br /> <br />The City should define the geographic scope of the area affected by the cumulative effect <br />and provide a reasonable explanation for the geographic limitation used. <br />7.22 A NALYSIS OF M ITIGATION M EASURES. <br />The discussion of mitigation measures in an EIR must distinguish between measures <br />proposed by project proponents and other measures proposed by Lead, Responsible or Trustee <br />Agencies. This discussion shall identify mitigation measures for each significant environmental <br />effect identified in the EIR. <br />Where several measures are available to mitigate an impact, each should be disclosed and <br />the basis for selecting a particular measure should be identified. Formulation of mitigation <br />measures shall not be deferred until some future time The specific details of a mitigation <br />measure, however, may be developed after project approval when it is impractical or infeasible <br />to include those details during the project's environmental review provided that the Lead Agency <br />(1) commits itself to the mitigation, (2) adopts specific performance standards the mitigation will <br />achieve, and (3) identifies the type(s) of potential action(s) that can feasibly achieve that <br />performance standard and that will be considered, analyzed, and potentially incorporated in the <br />mitigation measure. Compliance with a regulatory permit or other similar process may be <br />identified as mitigation if compliance would result in implementation of measures that would be <br />reasonably expected, based on substantial evidence in the record, to reduce the significant impact <br />to the specified performance standards. <br />If a mitigation measure would cause one or more significant effects in addition to those <br />that would be caused by the project as proposed, the effects of the mitigation measure shall be <br />disclosed but in less detail than the significant effects of the project itself. <br />If a project includes a housing development, the City may not reduce <br />proposed number of housing units as a mitigation measure or project alternative if the City <br />determines that there is another feasible specific mitigation measure or project alternative that <br />would provide a comparable level of mitigation without reducing the number of housing units. <br />Mitigation measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or <br />other legally binding instruments. In the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or <br />other public project, mitigation measures can be incorporated into the plan, policy, regulation, or <br />project design. Mitigation measures must also be consistent with all applicable constitutional <br />i.e., there must be an <br />essential nexus between the mitigation measure and a legitimate governmental interest, and the <br /> <br />Where maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, <br />conservation or reconstruction of a historical resource will be conducted in a manner consistent <br />Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring an <br />considered mitigated below a level of significance and thus not significant. <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 7-17 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br /> <br />