My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 2:22:53 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 2:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 26, 2018 <br />Comment on Environmental Impact Report, 2525 N. Main Street Multi-Family Residential Project <br />(aka Magnolia at the Park) SCH 2018021031, DP No. 2017-34 <br />page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />LEGAL STANDARD <br /> <br />CEQA requires that an agency analyze the potential environmental impacts of <br />its proposed actions in an environmental impact report (“EIR”) (except in certain <br />limited circumstances). See, e.g., Pub. Res. Code § 21100. The EIR is the very heart <br />of CEQA. Dunn-Edwards v. BAAQMD (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 644, 652. “The ‘foremost <br />principle’ in interpreting CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be read so <br />as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable <br />scope of the statutory language.” Comms. for a Better Env’t v. Calif. Resources <br />Agency (2002) 103 Cal. App. 4th 98, 109. <br /> <br />CEQA has two primary purposes. First, CEQA is designed to inform decision <br />makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a <br />project. 14 Cal. Code Regs. (“CEQA Guidelines”) § 15002(a)(1). “Its purpose is to <br />inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of <br />their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR ‘protects not only the <br />environment but also informed self-government.’” Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board <br />of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564. The EIR has been described as “an <br />environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible <br />officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no <br />return.” Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay v. Bd. of Port Comm’rs. (2001) 91 Cal. <br />App. 4th 1344, 1354 (“Berkeley Jets”); County of Inyo v. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d <br />795, 810. <br /> <br />Second, CEQA requires public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental <br />damage when “feasible” by requiring “environmentally superior” alternatives and all <br />feasible mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(2) and (3); see also <br />Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of <br />Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564. The EIR serves to provide agencies and the <br />public with information about the environmental impacts of a proposed project and to <br />“identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” <br />CEQA Guidelines §15002(a)(2). If the project will have a significant effect on the <br />environment, the agency may approve the project only if it finds that it has <br />“eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where <br />feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are <br />“acceptable due to overriding concerns.” Pub.Res.Code (“PRC”) § 21081; CEQA <br />Guidelines § 15092(b)(2)(A) & (B). <br /> <br />The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. Dunn-Edwards v. BAAQMD (1992) 9 <br />Cal.App.4th 644, 652. CEQA requires that a lead agency analyze all potentially <br />significant environmental impacts of its proposed actions in an EIR. PRC §
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.