Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 73 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 14, 2019 <br /> <br />with mandatory applicability to all communities, but rather as advisory exposure levels below which <br />there would be no risk to a community from any health or welfare effect of noise. <br /> <br />In 1981, EPA administrators determined that subjective issues such as noise would be better <br />addressed at lower levels of government. Consequently, in 1982 responsibilities for regulating noise <br />control policies were transferred to State and local governments. <br /> <br />State <br /> <br />State of California General Plan Guidelines 2017 <br /> <br />Though not adopted by law, the State of California General Plan Guidelines 2017, published by the <br />California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) (OPR Guidelines), provides guidance for <br />the compatibility of projects within areas of specific noise exposure. OPR Guidelines identify the <br />suitability of various types of construction relative to a range of outdoor noise levels and provide each <br />local community some flexibility in setting local noise standards that allow for the variability in <br />community preferences. The OPR Guidelines include a Noise and Land Use Compatibility Matrix that <br />identifies acceptable and unacceptable community noise exposure limits for various land use <br />categories. <br /> <br />California Environmental Quality Act <br /> <br />The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Appendix G) establishes thresholds for noise <br />impact analysis. Two of these standards apply to what is referred to as a "substantial increase" in <br />ambient noise levels. The City does not have a definition of a substantial increase, nor does CEQA <br />establish a numerical value for this threshold. Noise generated by transportation sources propagates <br />differently than noise generated by point sources. Therefore, for purposes of this analysis, the following <br />thresholds were used to evaluate the project's potential to result in substantial increases in ambient <br />noise levels. <br /> <br />Traffic Noise Threshold <br /> <br />The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) developed guidance to be used for the <br />assessment of project-generated increases in noise levels that consider the ambient noise level <br />(FICON 1992). The FICON recommendations are based on studies that relate aircraft noise levels to <br />the percentage of persons highly annoyed by aircraft noise. Although the FICON recommendations <br />were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise impacts, these recommendations are often used in <br />environmental noise impact assessments involving the use of cumulative noise exposure metrics, such <br />as the average-daily noise level (CNEL) or hourly logarithmic average noise levels (Leq). <br /> <br />For example, if the ambient noise environment is quiet (<60 dBA) and the new noise source greatly <br />increases the noise levels, an impact may occur if the noise criteria may be exceeded. Therefore, for <br />this analysis, FICON identifies a readily perceptible 5 dBA or greater project -related noise level <br />increase is considered a significant impact when the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded. In <br />areas where the ambient noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA, a perceptible noise level increase of 3 <br />dBA is appropriate for most people. When the ambient noise level exceeds 65 dBA, any increase in <br />community noise of 1.5 dBA or greater is considered a significant impact if the noise criteria for a given <br />land use is exceeded, since it likely contributes to an existing noise exposure exceedance. Table 15 <br />below provides a summary of the potential noise impact significance criteria, based on guidance from <br />FICON. <br />6-95