My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (OPPOSED)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A (OPPOSED)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2019 12:29:36 PM
Creation date
10/14/2019 12:45:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
happening. The crack is from the ceiling to the floor. Since then I have found more cracks inside my <br />building. None of these cracks were there before the demolition. The disruption from the demolition <br />was so loud and caused such extreme vibrations and shaking inside my building that I could not see <br />patients at times, and I had to close my business early. My tenants own a massage business and had <br />the same problems during the demolition —they could not take clients at times and had to close early. <br />I have sent several emails to the City and to Mr. Russell expressing concerns over how the car <br />wash will harm my dental practice. The demolition of the restaurant was happening much farther <br />away from my building than the car wash tunnel construction and operation would be. During the <br />demolition, the workers removed several full-grown palm trees from what I thought was my property. <br />During the restaurant demolition, the workers destroyed my fence that ran the entire length of <br />my property. The fence was starting to collapse into my parking lot at the back of my property, so we <br />could not use the parking spaces there. When I complained to Mr. Russell, he demolished my fence <br />and removed it. I am also concerned that the car wash is being built onto my property because there is <br />no longer a boundary marking between my property and 301 N. Tustin Avenue. I asked Mr. Russell to <br />do a property line marking since the car wash tunnel is planned to be built so close to my building, but <br />he has not. <br />It will be a big problem if I cannot treat my patients because of this car wash business. I am <br />worried I will be forced to close my business during the construction, and after because of the impact <br />of the noise, movements, and vibrations. I also have a tenant who has a massage business. Massage <br />place has to be very calm, peaceful and relaxing for his customers. With all the noise, movements and <br />vibrations from car wash, they may not be able to give proper treatments to their customers. They said <br />they may lose their customers and may have to close their business. <br />We don't need another car wash. There is already one a block away in each direction on N. <br />Tustin and Fourth Street. I oppose the car wash project. I approve the retail center project with the <br />restaurant. <br />Sincerely, <br />Yoon Hee Choe, DDS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.