My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDANCE - 11A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
12/03/2019
>
CORRESPONDANCE - 11A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:35:28 PM
Creation date
12/2/2019 12:26:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
12/3/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit E should provide criteria/metrics for how impact fee <br />credits would be determined. <br />Exhibit I (Development Conditions) <br />General Conditions: <br />(1) No project description provided (space filler provided). <br />(3) No provision made for financial penalties for non- <br />compliance. <br />(5) Why is the City waiving the right to indemnification <br />should it settle a lawsuit or abandon the approvals? <br />Project Design and Operations: <br />***2. Recognizes the owner's ability to convert to <br />condominium ownership. No discussion of condominium <br />ownership was made before Council/analyzed previously. <br />***7. Unclear who reviews and approves the developer's <br />parking plan. No financial penalties provided for non- <br />compliance. Section 7 states, "The approved PMP [Parking <br />Management Plan" shall be adhered to and enforced by the <br />Project at all times." Why does the City not take an <br />enforcement right? <br />8. How will good neighbor policy be enforced? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.