Laserfiche WebLink
11/12. How will the project preserve and protect designated <br />trees? Consider requiring reimbursing the City for having a <br />contract arborist onsite/monitoring compliance. <br />15. Unclear what happens if City Council does not approve <br />Santiago Park Entrance and Interface. <br />23. Requires "review and applicability by the Planning and <br />Building Agency" for a property maintenance plan. I believe <br />this should be "review and approval" (not "applicability"). This <br />should be vetted and approved by Council. <br />Utilities: <br />***25: Undergrounding service lines crossing the property <br />and feeding other properties must be undergrounded. <br />However, undergrounding of third party service may require <br />that utilities (such as SCE) secure replacement easements <br />and/or require third party property owners to make changes <br />to their intake systems (meters, receiving points for utilities) <br />which subjects other residents to added cost. Other utilities <br />such as SCE, Time Warner, and ATT should be consulted to <br />see how this would be implanted and whether or not it <br />would be feasible. <br />***26. Why does the requirement for a "composite utility <br />plan" only apply to above ground appurtenances when the <br />preceding clause requires undergrounding? I believe the <br />intent is for a "consolidated" utility plan showing all utilities. <br />