CORRESPONDENCE - CS -1A - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

homelessness in our community of Santa Ana. Despite voting to proceed with litigation, the city decided only to serve 3 cities (Orange, Tustin, Anaheim) and the county. Subsequently, the cities have been released due to prior settlements in the Catholic Worker case and only the county remains. By not serving the other cities, I believe that the city is allowing South County cities to continue to do what they have been doing which is to continue to disproportionately impact our city with quality of life issues as well as fiscal obligations. It has been almost 20 months since the city council voted to proceed with litigation yet no service of the suite on any South County city has occurred. It is time for the council to follow through on its vote to sue or to have a public discussion in an open forum on its decision not to proceed. This is even more important now in light of the 7 cities' comments about operating a shelter in another jurisdiction. There likely are reasons for the council to not follow through on its prior vote... some of those reasons may be valid while others may not be in the public's eye, but the residents and businesses have a desire to know what is going on. I would say that we have a reasonable right to know what is going on since it has been almost 20 months since this vote happened. Additionally, the city has chosen to delay indefinitely the responses from the county in the case. So essentially, we have spent the time and resources to prepare the suit, serve 4 jurisdictions, not serve any of the South County cities, released 3 of the cities (likely rightfully so) and even chosen to allow the one jurisdictions that was served, and not released, to not even respond to the lawsuit. The timeline for these matters is as follows: • April 25, 2018: During Closed Session, city council voted unanimously (6-0, 1 absent) to file a cross complaint against all cities in Orange County and the County of Orange over the impact of homelessness in our city of Santa Ana • April 26, 2018: The filing actually happened in federal court. See attached document #158. • May 1, 2018: The county of Orange and the cities of Tustin, Anaheim, and Orange were served the lawsuit (no other cities including those in South County have been served). See attached document #232 indicating the service date of May 1, 2018. • May 17, 2018: The cities of Santa Ana, Tustin, Anaheim, Orange and the county of Orange agree to a response date of July 23, 2018 for the defendants to respond to the Santa Ana cross -complaint. See attached document #232. • July 11, 2018: The cities of Santa Ana, Tustin, Anaheim, Orange and the county of Orange agree to delay the response date indefinitely until such a time that the court issues an order that a responsive pleading must be filed. See attached document #246. 1 urge the council to consider serving the suit against South County cities in order to protect the interests of Santa Ana's residents, businesses, and visitors. There may be concerns about whether Judge Carter is able to preside or whether serving the suit will allow other cities and their leaders to look down upon our city or its leadership, yet that is not what you are tasked with doing. Instead, I ask that you do what is best for the city of Santa Ana. If it is determined to be best not to pursue this course of action, you owe it to the residents to provide an explanation or at a minimum a vote to reverse action on this item because the last vote that happened was on April 25, 2018 where the then current council voted unanimously (6-0, 1 absent) to file the suit which would presumably include serving and progressing forward with litigation. The task at hand is a big one. I trust that you will do what is best for our city. Thank you for the time you devote to this topic. Blessings, Tim Johnson Rosenberger I Pam Johnson, CPA CM.FeJWdie At,...