My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - The Bowery
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
05-11-20
>
3 - The Bowery
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 9:59:32 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:57:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Redhill Development <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Prepared for: City of Santa Ana <br /> <br />AECOM <br />24 <br /> <br />3. Development Feasibility <br />AECOM estimated the residual land value (RLV) of the land uses according to the development scenarios of both the <br />Project and Industrial Prototype and considered the projected market demand for these land uses in the City of Santa <br />Ana and representative comparable districts of Orange County. This analy sis allows a comparison of the highest and <br />best use for the Site, from a development perspective, and the financial implications of development under current <br />market conditions. The use of the Industrial Prototype is to compare the impact of the Project to that of the Industrial <br />Prototype. <br /> <br />The feasibility analysis of the various land uses is based on a static pro forma model, which simulates the economic <br />conditions a developer would consider in deciding whether to pursue a project. As such, the model includes typical <br />direct and indirect costs a developer would incur, market revenue potential, and a standard rate of return a developer <br />would expect as compensation. Total estimated project costs (including the assumed return) are subtracted from <br />estimated project revenue to arrive at a net residual land value. Figure 14 details a simplified infographic of RLV. If the <br />net value is positive and high enough to pay for land at current market rates, the project is considered financially <br />feasible. Otherwise, the proposed project is considered infeasible. This approach generates a broad estimate of <br />development feasibility, which is acceptable for planning-level analysis. <br /> <br />Figure 14: Residual Land Value <br /> <br />Table 15 shows the summary results of the pro-forma analysis and estimation of RLV for both the Project and <br />Industrial Prototype. Assumptions about rents for the various land uses were derived from the market assessment <br />and selection of representative projects in Orange County. RLV calculations are sensitive to fluctuations in the market <br />for both rents and development costs (hard and soft) and offer only a broad estimate of actual market prices. <br />Table 15: Residual Land Value Summary <br />Residual Land Value Summary <br /> The Project Industrial Prototype <br />Site Acres 14.7 14.7 <br />Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) 1.80 0.45 <br />Gross Building Area (GBA) 1,150,000 355,000 <br />Estimated Total Value $509,000,000 $65,406,977 <br />Estimated Total Costs $444,000,000 $48,490,005 <br />Residual Land Value (RLV) $65,000,000 $16,916,972 <br />RLV per Land SF $100 $26 <br />RLV per GBA SF $55 $56 <br />Feasible Yes Yes <br />Note: Numbers are rounded and my not sum <br />Sources: Costar, CBRE, RS Means, Orange County Register, AECOM <br />3-251
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.