Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3. Steps in establishing oversight <br />1) You must first have a core group of citizens who are sufficiently concerned about <br />the issue and who are willing to unite and work together over an extended period <br />of time. This core group should seek out training, support, and resources prior to <br />establishing a formal planning or advisory committee. If not, the community's <br />voice risks being disregarded or marginalized once professional stakeholders <br />become involved in the process. <br />2) Begin by framing the public discussion and inviting broad public input. Emphasize <br />that the purpose is improving trust between police and the community by ensuring <br />public confidence in the agency through accountability and transparency. The <br />end goal is to deliver the most professional and effective police services possible <br />to the community. Invite police officials and union representatives to be a part of <br />the conversation from the start. Get their input and make it clear to them that their <br />suggestions and concerns are valuable to the process. <br />a. Acquire/develop and publicize data that clearly demonstrates a local need <br />for civilian oversight (e.g., costs of past lawsuits, history of injuries, high <br />ratio of use of force to arrest, or a lack of public confidence in policing <br />agency). <br />b. Make sure that meetings occur one-on-one and in public forums so that as <br />many people have the ability to participate as possible. In addition, it is <br />important that a method that assures complete transparency in the <br />process be employed. <br />3) Establish a planning or advisory committee composed of elected officials, legal <br />advisors, police officials, police union representatives, and community advocates. <br />Begin to meet regularly to educate the group on the pros and cons of various <br />oversight models, legal requirements, collective bargaining limitations, or other <br />issues. <br />a. Identify sources of resistance and issues of contention and begin to <br />address the concerns or neutralize the resistance. <br />b. A skilled negotiator or professional facilitator may be helpful if <br />communication becomes difficult or begins to break down. <br />4) Identify sources of technical assistance such as NACOLE, the Department of <br />Justice, local bar associations, and practitioners of civilian oversight in other <br />jurisdictions. Visit oversight agencies in other jurisdictions to learn from their staff <br />and observe their procedures. <br />5) Identify the proposed agency's objectives and scope. <br />a. Will the agency accept complaints of police misconduct? If so, what types <br />of complaints will be accepted, and from whom? Will the agency <br />investigate complaints, or review them? Will the agency make both <br />disciplinary and policy/training recommendations? Who shall be the final <br />decision maker for complaint disposition? What should happen when <br />12 <br />65D-141 <br />