My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
10/05/2021 Regular and Special
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 5:40:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2021 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rent Control Leads to Unintended Consequences, and an overall negative impact on the <br />Community <br />In a 2016 report on "Perspectives on Helping Low -Income Californians Afford Housing" by the <br />California Legislative Analyst's Office, researchers found that "many housing programs - <br />vouchers, rent control, and inclusionary housing - attempt to make housing more affordable <br />without increasing the overall supply of housing [and] this approach does very little to address <br />the underlying problem." <br />Another unintended consequence is the perception it gives businesses that the City is raising <br />fees/taxes to pay for another program without looking for alternative solutions. This negative <br />perception will only exacerbate the current perception that Santa Ana is not business friendly. <br />Rent Control Infrastructure <br />Staff currently does not have a full understanding of the cost of administration of rent control for <br />Santa Ana. San Francisco is under rent control and has an annual budget of more than $4 Million <br />for the rent control of 28,000 units. Santa Ana has been using San Francisco as a "Benchmark." For <br />a city that is already in a financial deficit, what will be the source of funding? San Monica has at <br />least 28 staff members for administration of rent control. Estimating salary and benefits, @ <br />100,000 / person on the low side and $150,000 / person on the high side, salaries could range <br />from $2.8 Million to $4.2 Million, plus facilities burden rate and any other overhead factor. With <br />more than 200,000 units in Santa Ana, it's reasonable to expect the costs are going to be <br />consistent and maybe higher. <br />We strongly urge the City Council to reconsider moving forward with these proposed <br />Policy measures that will only undermine the goal of improving housing conditions. If you do <br />move ahead. however. we strongly sueeest it be on a temoorary basis until the end of 2021 (at <br />that time, to revote and consider it a city referendum). <br />If the Council is interested in good governance and serving those they were elected to <br />represent, highly consequential proposals, such as rent control, must be fully vetted with <br />community input via a transparent and open process. <br />Sincerely, <br />S " � Z�C�- <br />David Elliott <br />President/CEO <br />Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce <br />1631 W. Sunflower Ave #C-35, Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714) 541-5353 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.