My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet_8-22-22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2022
>
8-22-22
>
Packet_8-22-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2022 2:43:39 PM
Creation date
8/23/2022 2:40:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Plan Exemption Checklist <br />City of Santa Ana Gary Avenue Business Park Project <br /> <br />26 <br />4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED <br /> <br />The subject areas checked below were determined to be new significant environmental effects or to be <br />previously identified effects that have a substantial increase in severity either due to a change in project, <br />change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance, as indicated by the checklist and <br />discussion on the following pages. <br /> Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry <br />Resources <br /> Air Quality <br /> Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy <br /> Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous <br />Materials <br /> Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources <br /> Noise Population/Housing Public Services <br /> Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources <br /> Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of <br />Significance <br /> <br />4.3 DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) <br /> <br />On the basis of this initial evaluation: <br /> <br /> I find that the proposed project WOULD NOT result in: 1) a peculiar impact that was not identified <br />as a significant impact under the prior EIR; 2) a significant impact that was not analyzed as <br />significant in the prior EIR; 3) a potentially significant offsite impact or cumulative impact not <br />discussed in the prior EIR; or 4) a more severe impact due to substantial new information that was <br />not known at the time the prior EIR. NO FURTHER ACTION is required, and a Notice of Determination <br />(Section 15094) will be filed indicating that the project IS ELIGIBLE for an EXEMPTION under State <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. <br /> <br /> I find that the proposed Project would result in: 1) a peculiar impact that was not identified as a <br />significant impact under the prior EIR; 2) a significant impact that was not analyzed as significant in <br />the prior EIR; 3) a potentially significant offsite impact or cumulative impact not discussed in the <br />prior EIR; or 4) a more severe impact due to substantial new information that was not known at the <br />time the prior EIR. I find that FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW is necessary to analyze those <br />effects that are subject to CEQA, and therefore, this Project is NOT ELIGIBLE for an EXEMPTION <br />under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Signature Date <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Printed Name Title <br /> <br />8/22/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 – 65
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.