Agenda Packet_2022-10-18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. + staff would be conducting interviews for consultants and was anticipating taking a recommendation to City Council in November. Comments from the City Attorney. Ms. Cristine Shaw. Deputy City Attorney, clarified that a maker and a seconder of a motion could vote against a motion. However, the maker of the motion could not speak against the motion and the seconding of a motion was to allow discussion on the item. In addition, she informed the Commission that all absences were unexcused unless the Commission took an action to excuse the absences; that no motions were needed if the absences were not going to be excused. 6. Comments from the Historic Resources Commission. Commissioner Chinn • commented that it was a great meeting. ® informed the Commission that the State would be commencing a new stamp and that there would be a celebration on Monday at noon. Commissioner Cor in • asked who would be deciding the wording for the plaques. Madam Chair Kings indicated that the Committee would be bringing a proposal to the Commission. Commissioner Gartner • commented that he had reviewed the minutes and was distressed that he had received an unexcused absence when he had informed the Commission Secretary that he would be absent from the meeting ahead of time; he further expressed that he believed being on the Commission was an honorable position, however he was a business owner and conflicts did arise at times; and that he would assume that the commission was trying to make a statement to the fellow Commissioners regarding the importance of attendance. Commissioner Brenes • commented that he agreed with Commissioner Gartner and that setting a policy would help define excused absences. • commented that he had a great time in Costa Rico and was conducting business with clients. Bibtc&uRedources Commission 6 18;—M 109Y8/2022