Laserfiche WebLink
DocuSign Envelope ID: A8CBD79E-49CB-09A9.BE56.498AO2933D57 <br />Quality Assurance Procedures <br />Studio One Eleven has comprehensive design <br />and technical expertise, with quality assurance/ <br />quality control procedures built into our design and <br />documentation process. Quality isn't "inspected" into <br />each of our projects; it is planned for and designed <br />into them. Our quality assurance (QA) starts at <br />the beginning of each project. We begin with <br />choosing work aligned with the firm's capabilities <br />and expertise. Each project is assigned to the <br />appropriate staff and leadership. Our quality <br />management plan (QMP) identifies, corrects and <br />intends to minimize conflicts and inconsistencies <br />in the documents. As part of our corporate culture, <br />a QMP is developed for each project and included <br />as an integral part of the project work plan. The <br />project's size and complexity will generally determine <br />the magnitude of, and detail required for, the plan. <br />The project quality management plan defines which <br />documents are to be reviewed, who will review them, <br />when documents are to be reviewed, the schedule <br />and budget allotted for each review and the schedule <br />and budget allotted for making corrections and <br />coordination with consultants. The Project Manager <br />assigns the QMP responsibilities to members of the <br />project team. The plan must incorporate both the QA <br />and QMP project requirements, including scheduled <br />milestone reviews by the appropriate individuals. <br />Conceptual review — One or more persons check <br />the basic concepts on which the project is based. <br />In the early stages of the project, basic concepts <br />are developed which are then implemented <br />throughout the remainder of the document process. <br />If those concepts are not sound, the details of the <br />construction documents will not work. Someone <br />outside of the project team will review those basic <br />concepts to make sure they make sense and can <br />be achieved within the project budget and schedule <br />constraints. The reviewer(s) also ensure that the <br />constructed project will meet the client's needs as <br />specified in the contract. <br />Discipline review(s) — One or more independent <br />persons review the technical aspects of the project <br />to determine that the agreed -upon criteria and <br />procedures are being followed, client/contract <br />requirements being met, and firm QA processes are <br />being followed. Discipline review(s) may be either <br />intra-disciplinary, where an experienced person <br />from each discipline (architecture, urban design <br />or landscape architecture) checks the applicable <br />calculations, drawings and specifications prepared <br />by that discipline; inter -disciplinary, where one or <br />more individuals from the project team perform a <br />detailed review to ensure consistency and identify <br />conflicts between disciplines; or both. <br />Project manual review —This review is conducted <br />by the team member responsible for preparing the <br />initial spec check -list. Any new or edited prototypical <br />spec sections are reviewed page by page for <br />accuracy. Any corrections are brought to the <br />specifications writer who will incorporate the changes <br />into the master. <br />Drawings to Project Manual cross-check — This <br />check is conducted by the team member responsible <br />for the project manual review. This review will also <br />determine what, if any, "specification" information <br />that will need to appear on the drawings and check <br />for inconsistencies between the drawings and <br />specifications. <br />Constructibility review —A constructibility review <br />is conducted to identify potential technical or <br />construction difficulties before bidding the project to <br />contractors. <br />Final bid set review — One or more independent <br />persons conduct a review of the final set of plans <br />and specifications just prior to issuance for bid to <br />contractors. The aim here is to uncover any potential <br />inconsistencies to minimize questions, addenda and/ <br />or change orders after the contract award. <br />Conducting Effective Quality Review <br />Our most effective method for making quality <br />assurance happen is to plan for it. Studio One <br />Eleven has a comprehensive quality assurance/ <br />quality control procedure built into our design and <br />documentation process as part of our corporate <br />culture. Quality management doesn't rely solely on <br />checklists; it relies on the people and the process. <br />The normal, everyday work processes followed by <br />each and every team member determine the quality <br />of our deliverables. Additionally, we stay current <br />with laws, codes and regulations as an essential <br />part of our everyday best practices and also through <br />continuing education and related seminars for <br />licensure renewals. <br />21 <br />