Correspondence - Non-Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

which were complete mysteries to the majority of the people in attendance. I produce events for a living, and I would have loved to know that the Pacific Park Neighborhood Association had an Events Committee prior to last month, when I helped start one. These are areas in which Selica is also regarded as abusing her position, and areas in which you defended her by saying a process was followed, and decisions were presented and approved by to the residents. 1, for one, do not have recollection of either of these being presented for approval at the Neighborhood Association meeting. As such, I am requesting that you provide me with all documentation regarding: • THE STREET TOPPERS, including agendas, notes of discussion, presentation of artwork, selection of artist, process for selection of artist, and approval of budget. • THE SECOND EVENTS COMMITTEE, including official roster, decisions made by this committee, funds spent by this committee, history of meeting times, locations and agendas, and proof that these decisions were presented to and approved by residents at a Pacific Park Neighborhood Association meeting. These issues will be discussed during our meeting on Friday, and it would be appreciated if you can provide the requested documentation in advance of our meeting for review. SELICA'S VIOLATION OF DUTIES AS A LEADER Among the numerous problems that arose at yesterday's meeting, at the heart of it all were serious failures regarding Selica's role as a co-leader. As was exceptionally clear, it was Selica's small contingent of aggressive, lying and bullying friends who instigated and prolonged the attacks against community input. It is a role they have played faithfully for several meetings now. Additionally, numerous other concerns regarding Selica's co-leadership were addressed to you, which I will include in bullet form, as we have already discussed them at length. • Selica's failure to inform or involve her co-leader in Pacific Park decisions and opportunities • Selica's failure to inform residents about Pacific Park decisions and opportunities • Selica's decisions regarding use of Pacific Park Neighborhood Association funds without informing the co-leader or the residents • Selica's engaging in and enabling stifling of community input and discussion • Selica's misrepresenting the residents' desires in key issues involving the City • Selica's complicity in the lies and attacks against co-leaders, including Sandra and Mr. N., which are documented and resulted in Mr. N. resigning as a co-leader 5