Laserfiche WebLink
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2023) TYPES OF EIRS <br /> <br /> <br />2023 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 8-5 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />would permit consideration of additional environmental impacts, mitigation measures, or <br />reasonable alternatives to the project. <br />(Reference: State CEQA Guidelines, § 15167.) <br />8.08 PROGRAM EIR. <br />A Program EIR is an EIR that may be prepared on an integrated series of actions that are <br />related either: <br />(a) Geographically; <br />(b) As logical parts in a chain of contemplated actions; <br />(c) In connection with the issuance of rules, regulations, plans or other general criteria to <br />govern the conduct of a continuing program; or <br />(d) As individual projects carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory <br />authority and having generally similar environmental effects that can be mitigated in <br />similar ways. <br />An advantage of using a Program EIR is that it can “[a]llow the Lead Agency to consider <br />broad policy alternatives and program wide mitigation measures at an early time when the agency <br />has greater flexibility to deal with basic problems or cumulative impacts.” (State CEQA <br />Guidelines section 15168(b)(4).) A Program EIR is distinct from a Project EIR, as a Project EIR <br />is prepared for a specific project and must examine in detail site-specific considerations. Program <br />EIRs are commonly used in conjunction with the process of tiering. <br />Tiering is the coverage of general matters in broader EIRs (such as on general plans or <br />policy statements) with subsequent narrower EIRs. (State CEQA Guidelines section 15385; see <br />also Local Guidelines Sections 8.02 and 11.73.) Tiering is proper “when it helps a public agency <br />to focus upon the issues ripe for decision at each level of environmental review and in order to <br />exclude duplicative analysis of environmental effects examined in previous environmental impact <br />reports.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21093(a).) For example, the California Supreme Court has ruled that <br />“CEQA does not mandate that a first-tier program EIR identify with certainty particular sources <br />of water for second-tier projects that will be further analyzed before implementation during later <br />stages of the program. Rather, identification of specific sources is required only at the second-tier <br />stage when specific projects are considered.” (In re Bay-Delta etc. (2008) 43 Cal. 4th 1143.) <br />Subsequent activities in the program must be examined in light of the Program EIR to <br />determine whether additional environmental documents must be prepared. Additional <br />environmental review documents must be prepared if the proposed later project may arguably <br />cause significant adverse effects on the environment. <br />(Reference: State CEQA Guidelines, § 15168.) <br />8.09 USE OF A PROGRAM EIR WITH SUBSEQUENT EIRS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS. <br />A Program EIR can be used to simplify the task of preparing environmental documents on <br />later activities in the program. The Program EIR can: