Laserfiche WebLink
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2023) INITIAL STUDY <br /> <br /> <br />2023 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 5-2 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />When the City is acting as Lead Agency, the City may choose to engage in early <br />consultation with Responsible and Trustee Agencies before the City begins to prepare the Initial <br />Study. This early consultation may be done quickly and informally and is intended to ensure that <br />the EIR, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the concerns of all <br />Responsible Agencies that will issue approvals for the project and all Trustee Agencies responsible <br />for natural resources affected by the project. The City’s early consultation process may include <br />consultation with other individuals or organizations with an interest in the project, if the City so <br />desires. The OPR, upon request of the City or a private project applicant, shall assist in identifying <br />the various Responsible Agencies for a proposed project and ensure that the Responsible Agencies <br />are notified regarding any early consultation. In the case of a project undertaken by a public <br />agency, the OPR, upon request of the City, shall ensure that any Responsible Agency or public <br />agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect to the project is notified regarding any early <br />consultation. <br />If, during the early consultation process it is determined that the project will clearly have a <br />significant effect on the environment, the City, as Lead Agency, may immediately dispense with <br />the Initial Study and determine that an EIR is required. <br />(Reference: State CEQA Guidelines, § 15063.) <br />5.03 CONSULTATION WITH PRIVATE PROJECT APPLICANT. <br />During or immediately after preparation of an Initial Study for a private project, the City <br />may consult with the applicant to determine if the applicant is willing to modify the project to <br />reduce or avoid the significant effects identified in the Initial Study. If the project can be revised <br />to avoid or mitigate effects to a level of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence before <br />the City that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment, the City may <br />prepare and adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. If any significant <br />effect may still occur despite alterations of the project, an EIR must be prepared. <br />(Reference: State CEQA Guidelines, § 15063(g).) <br />5.04 PROJECTS SUBJECT TO NEPA. <br />Projects that are carried out, financed, or approved in whole or in part by a federal agency <br />are subject to the provisions of NEPA in addition to CEQA. To the extent possible, the State <br />CEQA Guidelines encourage the City, when it is a Lead Agency under CEQA, to use the federally- <br />prepared Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) or Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSI”) <br />or to prepare a joint CEQA/NEPA document instead of preparing separate NEPA and CEQA <br />documents for a project that is subject to both NEPA and CEQA. (State CEQA Guidelines, § <br />15220.) <br />For example, the City should attempt to work in conjunction with the federal agency <br />involved in the project to prepare a combined EIR-EIS or Negative Declaration-FONSI. (State <br />CEQA Guidelines, § 15222.) To avoid the need for the federal agency to prepare a separate <br />document for the same project, the Lead Agency must involve the federal agency in the preparation <br />of the joint document. The Lead Agency may also enter into a Memorandum of Understanding <br />with the federal agency to ensure that both federal and state requirements are met.