My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 44 - Public Hearing Regarding Impasse Pursuant to Government Code 3505.7
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
12/20/2022 Special & Regular
>
Item 44 - Public Hearing Regarding Impasse Pursuant to Government Code 3505.7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2023 4:06:55 PM
Creation date
8/11/2023 4:06:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
44
Date
12/20/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
53 <br />strike the first name. Once the arbitrator is selected, the parties will contact the <br />arbitrator to schedule a hearing. <br /> <br />b. Hearing Process: During the hearing, the formal rules of evidence do not apply. <br />The cost of the list of arbitrators, the arbitrator themselves, and the court <br />reporter shall be split evenly (50% and 50%) between the City and the <br />Association. Once the arbitrator issues their advisory recommendation, the <br />Executive Director of Human Resources or designee will submit the advisory <br />recommendation to the City Manager. <br /> <br />1) The Arbitrator’s Decision: The arbitrator shall issue their advisory <br />recommendation within thirty (30) calendar days from the conclusion of <br />the hearing. <br /> <br />c. The City Manager’s Role: Within thirty-five (35) calendar days of receipt of <br />the advisory arbitrator’s recommendation, the City Manager shall issue and <br />send their final written decision to the parties. The City Manager may accept, <br />reject, or modify the arbitrator's advisory recommendation or any part thereof. <br />In no case, however, may the City Manager increase the penalty above that <br />imposed by the Chief of Police. The City Manager's decision shall be final and <br />binding. In reaching their decision, the City Manager shall review the <br />arbitrator's advisory recommendation and the evidence, both documentary and <br />testimonial, and arguments presented to the advisory arbitration. <br /> <br />d. Right to File in Court: The employee has the right to appeal the City Manager’s <br />decision in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 <br />that provides a ninety (90) day statute of limitations. <br /> <br />16.3 Informal Appeals Procedures. <br /> <br />The Informal Appeals Procedure, as opposed to the formal procedures, will be used for <br />written reprimands. <br /> <br />a. Appeal to the Chief of Police <br /> <br />1) The appeal is an opportunity for the employee to present information and <br />arguments why a punitive action should not occur or offer alternatives to the <br />action. <br /> <br />2) Notice of Appeal: Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt by an employee of <br />the written reprimand, the employee shall notify the Executive Director of <br />Human Resources or Designee in writing that they intend to appeal the punitive <br />action. The Executive Director of Human Resources or designee shall contact <br />either the employee or their identified representative within ten (10) calendar <br />days of receipt of the notice of appeal to schedule the appeal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.