My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 39 - Ordinance Prohibiting the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/21/2021 Regular
>
Item 39 - Ordinance Prohibiting the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 3:53:23 PM
Creation date
8/16/2023 3:52:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
39
Date
12/21/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FDA Actions on Electronic Cigarettes and Other Nicotine Products: The FDA has taken significant <br />actions that have resulted in the removal of a substantial number of flavored electronic nicotine delivery <br />system (ENDS) products from the market. These strong measures should be allowed to work to further <br />reduce youth access to and use of electronic nicotine vapor products. <br />Specifically, in February 2020, the FDA adopted a ban on the sale of all flavored cartridge-based and pod- <br />based electronic cigarettes, except for tobacco and menthol flavored products. This action removed <br />hundreds of ENDS products from the market. In addition, the FDA required that manufacturers of all <br />electronic cigarette products file what is known as a pre-market tobacco product application(PMTA)with <br />the agency by September 9, 2020, to keep their products on the market. <br />The FDA was required to process those PMTAs within one year. That year elapsed in September 2021, and <br />the Food and Drug Administration has thus far completed about 99% of the reviews of the Pre-Market <br />Tobacco Applications it received by its September 2020 deadline.Most of the applications are for electronic <br />smoking devices and products used with them. The FDA has thus far rejected over 6 million electronic <br />smoking devices and has granted exactly one application for an e-cigarette,Vuse Solo,and for two tobacco- <br />flavored cartridges used with that device. <br />The FDA has also granted marketing applications for four flavored modern nicotine products,Verve Discs <br />and Verve Chews in Blue Mint and Green Mint flavors. These are the first non-tobacco flavored products <br />that have been granted marketing authority by the FDA. The significance of the Vuse and Verve decisions <br />should not be lost on the Council. For the FDA to grant those applications, it was required to and did find, <br />after exhaustive scientific studies, that the marketing of those products was "appropriate for the protection <br />of the public health." By granting these applications, for the first time the FDA has stated that electronic <br />smoking devices and modern oral nicotine products, including non-tobacco flavored versions of the latter, <br />could protect public health. As the FDA is still working on the remaining 1% of applications (covering <br />about 55,000 products) filed by the September 2020 deadline, it would be premature for the City to issue a <br />blanket ban on all flavored tobacco products as the FDA may well grant marketing approval of other <br />products,some of which may be flavored,that are"appropriate for the protection of the public health." The <br />city's ban on those products would work against the public health benefits of those products. <br />Voters Want to Decide Whether Flavor Bans Make Sense: California Senate Bill 793, which would <br />have banned most flavored tobacco products statewide, has been referred to the voters who will vote in <br />November 2022 whether to allow the statewide flavor ban bill to go into effect. Voters want their say on <br />flavor bans.We respectfully suggest that deferring action until the voters have spoken is in the best interests <br />of Santa Ana and its retailers. <br />Store Closures and Layoffs May Follow the Proposed Ban: Our convenience store members recently <br />experienced losses of up to 45%in gasoline sales and 20%or more in grocery,snack,beverage,and tobacco <br />product sales during the recent market disruptions, significant numbers because convenience stores usually <br />rely on tobacco product sales for approximately 36% of in-store sales. Tobacco specialty stores that rely <br />on tobacco product sales for up to 90%of total sales will be devastated by the loss of hundreds of products. <br />Additionally, retailers have recently found it difficult to attract and retain employees and combined with <br />the effects of inflation,payroll costs continue to rise. <br />If Santa Ana retailers must remove hundreds of products from their shelves, it will be very difficult to <br />compete with retailers in neighboring localities or with illicit sellers who do not care to whom they sell their <br />products. Employee layoffs and even store closures are real possibilities. <br />National Association of Tobacco Outlets,Inc.,17595 Kenwood Trail,Minneapolis,MN 55044 952-683-9270 <br />www.natocentral.org
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.