My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 37 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
Item 37 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 8:57:39 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 12:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
37
Date
12/7/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dale Helvig <br />2536 N. Valencia St. Santa Ana CA 92706 <br />714-541-7254 helvig_denny@msn.com <br />ITEM 14 <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br />The Land Use Element does not address the absence of 200 acres of parkland and the profound impact <br />this will have on the physical, social, mental, and economic health and well-being of Santa Ana <br />residents. <br />ITEM 15 <br />GENERAL COMMENTS <br />Why were areas north of the 1-5 Freeway excluded from the environmental justice consideration? <br />Homes next to the freeway in the communities of Mabury Park, Grand Sunrise and Park Santiago are <br />areas that have environmental issues as well. There is lead in the soil, as well as other pollutants. Heavy <br />particulates and noise concerns are also an issue due to the proximity to the freeway. <br />In summary, I see don't see much meat in General Plan. Although a tremendous amount of effort has <br />been spent on this project, I see the General Plan as a blueprint for development rather than a vision <br />for the City of Santa Ana. The draft vision of the city to strive to maintain the parkland space is not <br />even met. With the buildout population increase of over 96,000 people, just to maintain the current <br />deficient ratio of 1 acre per 1000 residents we need to have a vision of 192 of additional parkland <br />space. Notice the 2045 vision for increased parkland space is ZERO. <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />2021-12-07 Letter to City Council - GP Comments on Land Use Element <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.