Laserfiche WebLink
counted at feeders. However, Kummer and Bayne (2015) found that experimental <br />installment of birdfeeders at homes increased bird collisions with windows 1.84-fold. <br />(15) Relative abundance. —Collision rates have often been assumed to increase with local <br />density or relative abundance (Klem 1989), and positive correlations have been <br />measured (Dunn 1993, Hager et al. 2008). However, Hager and Craig (2014) found a <br />negative correlation between fatality rates and relative abundance near buildings. <br />(16) Season of the year. —Borden et al. (2010) found go% of collision fatalities during <br />spring and fall migration periods. The significance of this finding is magnified by 7-day <br />carcass persistence rates of 0.45 and 0.35 in spring and fall, rates which were <br />considerably lower than during winter and summer (Hager et al. 2012). In other words, <br />the concentration of fatalities during migration seasons would increase after applying <br />seasonally -explicit adjustments for carcass persistence. Fatalities caused by collisions <br />into the glass facades of the project's building would likely be concentrated in fall and <br />spring migration periods. <br />(17) Ecology, demography and behavior.—Klem (1989) noted that certain types of birds <br />were not found as common window -caused fatalities, including soaring hawks and <br />waterbirds. Cusa et al. (2015) found that species colliding with buildings surrounded by <br />higher levels of urban greenery were foliage gleaners, and species colliding with <br />buildings surrounded by higher levels of urbanization were ground foragers. Sabo et al. <br />(2o16) found no difference in age class, but did find that migrants are more susceptible <br />to collision than resident birds. <br />(18) Predatory attacks. —Panic flights caused by raptors were mentioned in 16% of <br />window strike reports in Dunn's (1993) study. I have witnessed Cooper's hawks chasing <br />birds into windows, including house finches next door to my home and a northern <br />mocking bird chased directly into my office window. Predatory birds likely to collide <br />with the project's windows would include Peregrine falcon, red -shouldered hawk, <br />Cooper's hawk, and sharp -shinned hawk. <br />(19) Aggressive social interactions. —I found no hypothesis -testing of the roles of <br />aggressive social interactions in the literature other than the occasional anecdotal <br />account of birds attacking their self-images reflected from windows. However, I have <br />witnessed birds chasing each other and sometimes these chases resulting in one of the <br />birds hitting a window. <br />For most of the known or suspected collision risk factors, the proposed project's design <br />would either contribute amply to collision risk, or its contribution remains unknown <br />(Table 2). <br />Window Collision Solutions <br />Given the magnitude of bird -window collision impacts, there are obviously great <br />opportunities for reducing and minimizing these impacts going forward. Existing <br />structures can be modified or retrofitted to reduce impacts, and proposed new <br />12 <br />