My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(1A) Marking windows. —Whereas Klem (1990) found no deterrent effect from decals on <br />windows, Johnson and Hudson (1976) reported a fatality reduction of about 69% after <br />placing decals on windows. In an experiment of opportunity, Ocampo-Peiiuela et al. <br />(2016) found only 2 of 86 fatalities at one of 6 buildings — the only building with <br />windows treated with a bird deterrent film. At the building with fritted glass, bird <br />collisions were 82% lower than at other buildings with untreated windows. Kahle et al. <br />(2016) added external window shades to some windowed facades to reduce fatalities <br />82% and 95%. Brown et al. (2020) reported an 84% lower collision probability among <br />fritted glass windows and windows treated with ORNILUX R UV. City of Portland <br />Bureau of Environmental Services and Portland Audubon (2020) reduced bird collision <br />fatalities 94% by affixing marked Solyx window film to existing glass panels of <br />Portland's Columbia Building. Many external and internal glass markers have been <br />tested experimentally, some showing no effect and some showing strong deterrent <br />effects (Klem 1989, 1990, 2009, 2011; Klem and Saenger 2013; R6ssler et al. 2015). <br />Following up on the results of Johnson and Hudson (1976), I decided to mark windows <br />of my home, where I have documented 5 bird collision fatalities between the time I <br />moved in and 6 years later. I marked my windows with decals delivered to me via US <br />Postal Service from a commercial vendor. I have documented no fatalities at my <br />windows during the 8 years hence. <br />(2) Siting and Designing to minimize impacts <br />(2A) Deciding on location of structure <br />(213) Deciding on facade and orientation <br />(2C) Selecting type and sizes of windows <br />(2D) Designing to minimize transparency through two parallel facades <br />(2E) Designing to minimize views of interior plants <br />(2F) Landscaping to increase distances between windows and trees and shrubs <br />(3) Monitoring for adaptive management to reduce impacts <br />(3A) Systematic monitoring for fatalities to identify seasonal and spatial patterns <br />(3B) Adjust light management, window marking and other measures as needed. <br />Guidelines on Building Design <br />If the project goes forward, it should at a minimum adhere to available guidelines on <br />building design intended to minimize collision hazards to birds. The American Bird <br />Conservancy (ABC) produced an excellent set of guidelines recommending actions to: <br />(1) Minimize use of glass; (2) Placing glass behind some type of screening (grilles, <br />shutters, exterior shades); (3) Using glass with inherent properties to reduce collisions, <br />such as patterns, window films, decals or tape; and (4) Turning off lights during <br />migration seasons (Sheppard and Phillips 2015). The City of San Francisco (San <br />Francisco Planning Department 2011) also has a set of building design guidelines, based <br />on the excellent guidelines produced by the New York City Audubon Society (Orff et al. <br />2007). The ABC document and both the New York and San Francisco documents <br />provide excellent alerting of potential bird -collision hazards as well as many visual <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.