My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
examples. The San Francisco Planning Department's (2011) building design guidelines <br />are more comprehensive than those of New York City, but they could have gone further. <br />For example, the San Francisco guidelines probably should have also covered scientific <br />monitoring of impacts as well as compensatory mitigation for impacts that could not be <br />avoided, minimized or reduced. Monitoring and the use of compensatory mitigation <br />should be incorporated at any new building project because the measures recommended <br />in the available guidelines remain of uncertain effectiveness, and even if these measures <br />are effective, they will not reduce collision fatalities to zero. The only way to assess <br />effectiveness and to quantify post -construction fatalities is to monitor the project for <br />fatalities. <br />Thank you for your attention, <br />Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D. <br />REFERENCES CITED <br />Barton, C. M., C. S. Riding, and S. R. Loss. 2017. Magnitude and correlates of bird <br />collisions at glass bus shelters in an urban landscape. Plos One 12. (6): eo178667. <br />https://doi.org/lo.1�71/journal.pone.0178667 <br />Basilio, L. G., D. J. Moreno, and A, J. Piratelli. 2020. Main causes of bird -window <br />collisions: a review. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 92(1): e2o180745 DOI <br />10.1590/0001-3765202020180745• <br />Borden, W. C., O. M. Lockhart, A. W. Jones, and M. S. Lyons. 2010. Seasonal, <br />taxonomic, and local habitat components of bird -window collisions on an urban <br />university campus in Cleveland, OH. Ohio Journal of Science 110(3):44-52• <br />Brown, B. B., L. Hunter, and S. Santos. 2020. Bird -window collisions: different fall and <br />winter risk and protective factors. PeerJ 8:e9401 http://doi.org/lo.Z717/peerj.9401 <br />City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services and Portland Audubon. 2020. <br />Collisions at the Columbia Building: A synthesis of pre- and post -retrofit <br />monitoring. Environmental Services of City of Portland, Oregon. <br />Bracey, A. M., M. A. Etterson, G. J. Niemi, and R. F. Green. 2016. Variation in bird - <br />window collision mortality and scavenging rates within an urban landscape. The <br />Wilson Journal of Ornithology 128:355-367• <br />City of Santa Ana. 2007. Metro East Mixed Use Overlay Zone Final Environmental <br />Impact Report SCH No. 2006031041, Volume I: Metro East Mixed Use Overlay <br />Zone. Prepared by EIP Associates, a Division of PBS&J. Santa Ana, California. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.