My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY EXPENDITURES <br />RSG estimated the additional population that would move into the Project to estimate the total <br />added expenditures to the City General Fund for servicing the new residents. Consistent with <br />other recent analyses prepared by RSG on projects in Santa Ana, RSG assumed that each studio <br />would house 1.25 residents, each one -bedroom unit would house 1.75 residents, each two - <br />bedroom unit would house 3.25 residents, and each three -bedroom unit would house 4 residents. <br />Overall, this works out to an average household size of 2.41 residents per unit, which RSG <br />considers reasonable for this particular Project. <br />RSG estimates at full occupancy the Project could hold 1,550 residents. Taking into account that <br />a small percentage of the units will normally be vacant due to turnover, we estimate the fiscal <br />impacts based on residents' time spent in the City. This is done by calculating the full-time <br />equivalent (FTE) residents, defined as those who spend a vast majority of their daily consumption <br />in Santa Ana. The assumption being that new residents who work out of the City, do not consume <br />products in the City during the time they are gone. <br />RSG gathered data from the US Census and ESRI Business Analyst Online to estimate the FTE <br />residents of the Project. Approximately 13 percent of Santa Ana residents work within Santa Ana, <br />which, in effect means that the City is servicing these resident -employees 100 percent of the time. <br />Another 37 percent of Santa Ana residents work outside the city. Assuming the residents that <br />work outside of the city are outside City limits from 9 am to 5 pm, Santa Ana is servicing these <br />residents approximately 73 percent of the time. The city's remaining residential population (about <br />51 percent), is serviced by the City 100 percent of the time. Accounting for all residents and <br />employees based on the percent of time spent in the city, the Project would generate a daily (24/7) <br />population of 1,399 persons. <br />RSG identified variable costs, as opposed to fixed costs, by department in the City of Santa Ana <br />FY 2019-20 Adopted Budget. Variable costs are City expenditures that increase or decrease <br />based on the resident and employee population. The City Manager and City Attorney offices, for <br />example, are fixed costs that would not vary based on population, but the Police and Fire <br />departments would vary based on population. With that said, RSG estimates expenditure <br />increases of $353,986 during the first full year of operations. Over a 25-year projection period, <br />the Project would add $7 million in City expenditures (net present value, discounted at 4 percent). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.