Laserfiche WebLink
jmf 1/05/21 <br />II. Failure to include qualified Santa Ana residents, veterans, graduate <br />and/or certificate holders of the Santa Ana Unified School District and <br />Rancho Santiago Community College District in the project's <br />construction workforce. <br />III. Failure to ensure the maximum amount of viable commercial <br />development is provided. <br />E. On January 19, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public <br />hearing on Appeal Application No. 2020-03 and found that: <br />In approving the Central Pointe Project, the Planning Commission <br />found that it was adequately evaluated in the previously certified <br />2007 Metro East Mixed -Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone EIR and 2018 <br />Subsequent EIR (collectively "MEMU EIR") prepared for the MEMU <br />Overlay. SAFER contends that this was error, because the MEMU <br />EIR "was a programmatic EIR, not a project -level EIR," asserting that <br />the Project has never been analyzed under CEQA. While the MEMU <br />EIR was a Program EIR, SAFER is nevertheless incorrect. <br />A Program EIR is a type of EIR allowed under the California <br />Environmental Quality Act that is used to evaluate a plan or program <br />having multiple components or actions that are related either <br />geographically, through application of rules or regulations, or as <br />logical parts of a long-term plan. Subsequent activities called for by <br />the Program EIR are compared against the Program EIR and, when <br />consistent with the Program EIR, may be approved without the need <br />for further environmental review. <br />Once a project is approved, CEQA does not require that it be <br />analyzed anew every time another discretionary action is required to <br />implement the project. Quite the opposite, where an EIR has <br />previously been prepared for a project, CEQA expressly prohibits <br />agencies from requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR, except <br />in specified circumstances provided in Public Resources Code <br />21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Specifically, an agency <br />may not require a subsequent or supplemental EIR unless: <br />(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which <br />will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to <br />the involvement of new significant environmental <br />effects or a substantial increase in the severity of <br />previously identified significant effects; <br />(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the <br />circumstances under which the project is undertaken <br />which will require major revisions of the previous EIR <br />due to the involvement of new significant <br />Resolution No. 2021-XXX <br />Page 2 of 12 <br />