My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
jmf 1/05/21 <br />program EIR' ... would be directly contrary to one of <br />the essential purposes of program EIR's, i.e., to <br />streamline environmental review of projects within the <br />scope of a previously completed program EIR. <br />Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) <br />234 Cal.AppAth 214, 239 [explaining, in a case involving a program <br />EIR that disclosed significant and unavoidable impacts, "CEQA does <br />not require the Department to engage in a public process when it <br />determines whether the impacts from a site -specific project were <br />addressed and adequately mitigated in the program EIR. And if the <br />Department finds the impacts were addressed, it need not prepare a <br />new environmental document at all"]. <br />Since, the Central Pointe Project is within the scope of the MEMU <br />EIR and will not have any new or more severe impacts than those <br />disclosed therein, the City is not required to prepare a new CEQA <br />document. <br />F. On January 19, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public <br />hearing on Appeal Application No. 2020-04 and found that: <br />The Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO) Chapter 41, Article XVI I I.I <br />was amended on September 1, 2020. While previously, Section 41- <br />1902(b)(4) applied the HOO to any new project in an overlay zone site <br />plan permitting residential land uses, the recent amendments remove <br />this reference. As amended, the HOO now only applies when a <br />residential project which proposes a residential density above the <br />General Plan permitted density (Sections 1902(a) and (b)). The <br />Central Pointe Mixed -Use project is consistent with the General Plan <br />District Center land use designation. No General Plan Amendment is <br />required for the Project. Therefore, the HOO does not apply. <br />II. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-1607, entitled "Deviations from <br />density bonus and affordable housing provisions," applies to projects <br />seeking a density bonus or waivers and modifications from <br />development standards. The project does not seek a density bonus <br />and complies with the development standards of the Metro East <br />Mixed -Use overlay zone. <br />III. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 states that when an EIR has been <br />certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that <br />project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of <br />substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of <br />the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project <br />which would require major revisions of the previous EIR or SEIR due <br />to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a <br />Resolution No. 2021-XXX <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.