My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/03/2023 Regular
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18
Date
10/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and Local Planning. Together, the CARB and SCAQMD guidelines recommend siting distances <br />for both the development of sensitive land uses in proximity to TAC sources and the addition of <br />new TAC sources in proximity to existing sensitive land uses. <br />The primary sources of potential air toxics associated with Project operations include diesel PM <br />from delivery trucks (e.g., truck traffic on local streets and idling on adjacent streets) and to a <br />lesser extent, facility operations (e.g., natural gas -fired boilers). However, these activities and the <br />land uses associated with the Project, are not considered land uses that generate substantial <br />TAC emissions. It should be noted that the SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments <br />(HRAs) be conducted for substantial individual sources of diesel PM (e.g., truck stops and <br />warehouse distribution facilities that generate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 <br />trucks with operating transport refrigeration units) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile <br />source diesel emissions.4 Based on this guidance, the Project would not include these types of <br />land uses and is not considered to be a substantial source of DPM warranting a refined HRA <br />since daily truck trips to the Project Site would not exceed 100 trucks per day or more than 40 <br />trucks with operating transport refrigeration units. Further, Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.6-1 of <br />the Certified EIR requires that an HRA for diesel exhaust be prepared for future residential uses <br />that are developed within the Overlay Zone and within 500 feet of an existing freeway. However, <br />the Project Site is more than 500 feet from the nearest freeway, and as such, Mitigation Measure <br />MM-OZ 4.6-1 does not apply to the Project. In addition, the CARB-mandated airborne toxic control <br />measures (ATCM) limit diesel -fueled commercial vehicles (delivery trucks) to idle for no more <br />than five minutes at any given time, which would further limit diesel particulate emissions. <br />As the Project would not contain substantial TAC sources and is consistent with the CARB and <br />SCAQMD guidelines, the Project would not result in the exposure of off -site sensitive receptors <br />to carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that exceed the maximum incremental cancer risk of 10 <br />in one million or an acute or chronic hazard index of 1.0, and potential TAC impacts would be less <br />than significant. <br />While long-term operations of the Project would add traffic to local roads that produces off -site <br />emissions, these would not result in exceedances of CO air quality standards at roadways in the <br />area due to three key factors. First, CO hotspots are extremely rare and only occur in the presence <br />of unusual atmospheric conditions and extremely cold conditions, neither of which applies to this <br />Project Site area. Second, auto -related emissions of CO continue to decline because of advances <br />in fuel combustion technology in the vehicle fleet. Finally, the Project would not contribute to the <br />levels of congestion that would be needed to produce emissions concentrations needed to trigger <br />a CO hotspot, as it would add 875 vehicle trips to the local roadway network on weekdays when <br />the development could be leased and operational in 2027.5 However, peak hour vehicle travel <br />would generally reduce from existing conditions, as traffic to and from Project Site would reduce <br />by 50 trips and zero trips during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively.6 This would represent <br />4 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer <br />Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, 2002. <br />Linscott Law & Greenspan, Memorandum: Vehicle Miles Traveled Assessment for the Proposed <br />Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Project; June 27, 2023. <br />6 Ibid. <br />Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana <br />Technical Memorandum August 2023 <br />City Council 18 — 515 10/3/2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.