Laserfiche WebLink
RTP/SCS G7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional <br />development pattern and transportation network. <br />RTP/SCS G8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data driven solutions that <br />result in more efficient travel. <br />Hence, given the above, the Project would screen out of a full VMT analysis even if required since <br />it is within a TPA/HQTA, where existing transit service provided by OCTA provides service <br />intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak commute hours. <br />A VMT analysis is only required prospectively for CEQA documents circulated for public review <br />after implementation of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). As the Certified EIR predated the <br />implementation of the VMT requirements outlined in Senate Bill 743 and CEQA Guideline Section <br />15064.3(b), a VMT analysis was not included in the Certified EIR. Further, the CEQA findings <br />associated with the Project will not be circulated for public review. Therefore, a VMT analysis is <br />not required for the Project, and the determination of consistency with the Certified EIR is based <br />on the LOS discussion above. Nevertheless, a VMT analysis has been produced for informational <br />purposes only in response to public comments received on the topic, which, although legally not <br />required, demonstrates that, consistent with the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines <br />(dated September 2019) and based on the VMT screening methodology and findings outlined in <br />the Screening Memorandum (refer to Attachment H1), the Project would not result in VMT impacts <br />even if required due to (1) the Project Site's location within a TPA/HQTA (i.e., within '/2 mile of the <br />8 bus stop along OCTA Route 64 that has a 15-minute peak -hour service (refer to Attachment <br />H3), and (2) the Project's consistency with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS.) <br />Conflict with Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Facilities Plans <br />The Project would implement Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-1, which requires transit -related <br />improvements. Thus, the Project would not result in any new or increased significant impacts <br />related to conflict with transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities plans beyond impacts already <br />identified in the Certified EIR. <br />Design Hazards <br />In compliance with Mitigation Measure MM-OZ 4.12-2, the Project has prepared a site -specific <br />traffic study prepared by a qualified traffic engineer that analyzes the potential traffic impacts <br />consistent with the methodology in the Certified EIR (refer to Attachment G). The Project traffic <br />study analyzes the Project Site's access and internal circulation. Additionally, a sight distance <br />analysis was prepared for the Project by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, which shows that <br />the Project driveway is expected to be adequate (refer to Attachment I). Thus, the Project would <br />not result in any new or increased significant impacts related to a design hazard beyond impacts <br />already identified in the Certified EIR. <br />Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana <br />Technical Memorandum August 2023 <br />City Council 18 — 632 10/3/2023 <br />