Laserfiche WebLink
4.17.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or <br />substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions <br />of the Certified EIR? <br />Assembly Bill (AB) 52 went into effect on July 1, 2015, and requires that for a project for which a <br />Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a Draft EIR was filed on or after July 1, 2015, the lead agency is <br />required to consult with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally <br />affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project, if: (1) the tribe requested to the lead <br />agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic <br />area; and (2) the tribe requests consultation, prior to the release of a negative declaration, <br />mitigated negative declaration or environmental impact report for a project. The NOP for the <br />Certified EIR was released on March 10, 2006, and as such, the lead agency was not required to <br />comply with the requirements of AB 52. The Final Certified EIR was released in 2007, and thus, <br />did not include responses to the updated Appendix G questions related to tribal cultural resources. <br />AB 52 tribal consultation is also only required prior to the release of a negative declaration, <br />mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report. Because the Project relies on the <br />Certified EIR as a later activity, no negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or <br />environmental impact report will be released. Therefore, AB 52 tribal consultation is not required <br />for the Project. <br />The Certified EIR stated that according to the City of Santa Ana Land Use Element EIR, an <br />archaeological records search at the UCLA Institute of Archaeology indicated there is a single <br />recorded prehistoric site within the City. The site, near Santiago Creek in the northwest section of <br />the City, contained grinding stones and was disturbed by the development of a residential <br />subdivision in 1965. An additional six prehistoric sites are located within one mile of the City <br />boundaries. Eighteen post contact (following European contact) archaeological sites have also <br />been identified in the City. None of these known archaeological resources occur within the <br />Overlay Zone boundaries. However, the presence of historic and archaeological sites in the City <br />indicates that the City (including the Overlay Zone) has a potential for archaeological and <br />historical resources and the resources of prehistoric and historic cultures may still be intact <br />beneath existing developments. <br />An archival records search for known archaeological sites was made at the SCCIC for a study <br />area encompassing the Overlay Zone and an additional 1/2-mile "buffer zone" beyond the Overlay <br />Zone boundaries. No archaeological sites have been identified within the Overlay Zone or within <br />the 0.5-mile radius beyond the Overlay Zone included in the study area. This does not preclude <br />the potential for archaeological sites to be identified during future ground -disturbing construction <br />activities. <br />Further, it should be noted that the Native American Heritage Commission was consulted with <br />regard to the Overlay Zone, and no known Native American cultural resources are known to occur <br />in the area. <br />Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana <br />Technical Memorandum August 2023 <br />City Council 18 — 636 10/3/2023 <br />