Laserfiche WebLink
evaluation is the sole basis pursuant to CEQA for determining the significance of a project's GHG-related <br />impacts on the environment. <br />The analysis also calculates the amount of GHG emissions from the Project using recommended air <br />quality models. The primary purpose of quantifying the Project's GHG emissions is to satisfy CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15064.4(a). The estimated emissions inventory is also used to determine if there <br />would be a reduction in the Project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions because of compliance <br />with regulations requirements adopted to implement plans for reducing or mitigating GHG emissions. <br />However, the significance of the Project's GHG emissions is not based on the amount of emissions from <br />the Project. <br />Consistency with Applicable Plans and Policies <br />A consistency analysis has been provided that describes the Project's compliance with or exceedance <br />of performance -based standards, and consistency with applicable plans and policies adopted for the <br />purpose of reducing GHG emissions, included in the applicable portions of the 2022 Climate Change <br />Scoping Plan, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's CAP. <br />As part of the Climate Change Scoping Plan, a statewide emissions inventory was developed as required <br />by AB 32 which directs CARB to develop and track GHG emissions reductions to document progress <br />towards the state GHG target. The emissions inventory also takes into account GHG emissions <br />reduction measures developed by CARB to achieve state targets. Consistency with the Climate Change <br />Scoping Plan is evaluated by comparing the Project's GHG emissions reduction measures to those <br />contained in the Scoping Plan. <br />As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(b)(3), consistency with such plans and policies "must <br />reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of greenhouse gas emissions." To demonstrate <br />such incremental reductions, this chapter estimates reductions of Project -related GHG emissions <br />resulting from consistency with plans. Consistent with evolving scientific knowledge, approaches to GHG <br />emissions quantification may continue to evolve in the future. <br />While there are many ways to quantify the efficiency of the GHG reduction measures provided for in the <br />plans and policies, this analysis compares the Project's GHG emissions to the emissions that would be <br />generated by the Project in the absence of any GHG emissions reduction measures (i.e., the Project <br />Without Reduction Features Scenario. This approach is consistent with the concepts used in CARB's <br />2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan. This methodology is used to analyze consistency with applicable <br />GHG emissions reduction plans and policies and demonstrate the efficacy of the measures contained <br />therein, but it is not a threshold of significance. <br />The analysis in this section includes potential emissions under the Project Without Reduction Features <br />scenarios and from the Project at build -out based on actions and mandates expected to be in force in <br />2026. Early -action measures identified in the Climate Change Scoping Plan that have not been approved <br />were not credited in this analysis. By not speculating on potential regulatory conditions, the analysis <br />takes a conservative approach that likely overestimates the Project's GHG emissions at build -out. The <br />Project Without Reduction Features scenario is used to establish a comparison with project -generated <br />Cabrillo Town Center <br />Greenhouse. as ec <br />PAGE 25 <br />••1 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />10/3/2023 July 2023 <br />