My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/03/2023 Regular
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18
Date
10/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GHG emissions associated with solid waste disposal are based on the size of the Project's proposed <br />land uses, the waste disposal rate for the land uses, the waste diversion rate, the GHG emission factors <br />for solid waste decomposition, and the GWP values for the GHG emissions emitted. <br />GHG emissions related to water usage and wastewater generation are based on the size of the land <br />uses, the water demand factors, the electrical intensity factors for water supply, treatment, and <br />distribution, electrical intensity factors for wastewater treatment, the GHG emission factors for the <br />electricity utility provider, and the GWP values for the GHG emissions emitted. <br />The analysis of Project GHG emissions at buildout uses assumptions in CARB's EMFAC2021 model <br />(1.0.1) and considers actions and mandates expected to be in force when the Project is operational <br />(e.g., Pavley I Standards, full implementation of California's 33 percent RPS by 2030 and 50 percent by <br />2050 and the California LCFS). In addition, because mobile source GHG emissions are directly <br />dependent on the number of vehicle trips, a decrease in the number of project -generated trips because <br />of project features (e.g., proximity to transit) would provide a proportional reduction in mobile source <br />GHG emissions compared to a generic project without such Iocational benefits. Calculation of Project <br />GHG emissions conservatively did not include actions and mandates that are not already in place but <br />are expected to be enforced when the Project is operational (e.g., Pavley 11, which could further reduce <br />GHG emissions from use of light -duty vehicles by 2.5 percent). Similarly, emissions reductions regarding <br />Cap -and -Trade were not included in this analysis as they applied to other future reductions in non - <br />transportation sectors. As for the Cap -and -Trade program's benefits for the transportation sector, the <br />analysis utilizes CARB's assumptions in EMFAC2021 for any short-term reductions in GHG emissions. <br />By not speculating on potential regulatory conditions, the analysis takes a conservative approach that <br />likely overestimates the Project's GHG emissions at buildout, because the state is expected to <br />implement several policies and programs aimed at reducing GHG emissions from the land use and <br />transportation sectors to meet the state's long-term climate goals. <br />There are no GHG emissions thresholds adopted by the SCAQMD that are applicable to the Project. In <br />2008, SCAQMD released draft guidance regarding interim CEQA GHG significance thresholds.68 Within <br />its October 2008 document, the SCAQMD proposed the use of a percent emission reduction target to <br />determine the significance for commercial/residential projects that emit greater than 3,000 MTCO2e per <br />year. Under this proposal, such commercial and residential projects would have been assumed to have <br />a less than significant impact on climate change. However, this proposed screening threshold was not <br />adopted by the SCAQMD. <br />Consistency with Applicable Plans and Policies <br />A consistency analysis has been provided that describes the Project's compliance with or exceedance <br />of performance -based standards, and consistency with applicable plans and policies adopted for the <br />Cabrillo Town Center <br />Greenhouse. as ec <br />PAGE 30 <br />18 — 995 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />10/3/2023 July 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.