Laserfiche WebLink
In Re <br /> <br />Statement of <br /> <br />Joseph P. Smith. <br /> <br /> While I do not feel that the improvement is a pressing <br />need ! am convinced that within a comparatively short time <br />the State Department of Public Works will consider it <br />desirable that Nain Street be widened to conform to the State <br />Highway ~stem plan and requirements, and will take steps to <br />dQ this as provided by regulations and an existing agreement <br />with the city, using funds accumulated in our State Highway <br />~ cent ~und. <br /> Obviously then it is my opinion that we, the city council, <br />~ould be derelict to our duty if we do not cooperate with <br />the State Department of Public Works to the end that we <br />avail the city of some $33,000.00 now being offered as an <br />outright grant towards this widening project purpose, thus <br />helping the labor situation in the city and preventing the. <br />diversion of these Federal funds to other communities. This <br />especially in view of the fact that wherever the money goes <br />we must ultimately help to repay it. <br /> Every conceivable purpose lying within the prescribed <br />scope of this Works Progress Highway Fund has been studied <br />but each one, excepting the Nain Street project mentioned <br />above, would entail prohibitive inroads on our City Street ~ <br />cent Gas Tax Fund for our contribution towards its cost. Im <br />this connection I wish to say that it is my emphatic belief <br />that our City Street ~ cent Gas Tax Fund, sometimes called <br />the Second Quarter Cent Gas Tax, should be used as far as <br />possible to effect reduction of taxes and not so much towards <br />opening new traffic a~teri~ or ot--~facilities for a <br />possible future traffic need. <br /> I am further impressed by the permanent, useful nature of <br />this project which is not a so called boondogling pro~ <br />such as we have so often criticized and also by it's hand- <br />labor nature which tends to minimize the amount of money <br />required from our State Highway ~ cent Gas Tax Fund. <br /> The project also bears aDvery.definite relation to the <br />South Nain Street - Corona el Nar Highway extension which <br />has been included in the State Highway ~ystem and towards <br />which some funds have been allocated. <br /> Having in mind these facts I move that the resolution now <br />before us concerning this matter be approved." <br /> <br />At the request of Trustee ~oseph P. Smith, the following <br /> <br />statement, with reference to the widening of South Nain <br /> <br />Street as proposed by State Highway Department, was ordered <br /> <br />spread on the records: <br /> <br /> "As a member of the committee appointed to investigate <br />the proposed widening of South Nain ~treet in this City as <br />proposed by the State Highway Department, I wish to present <br />this report as my conclusions concerning the proposed work: <br /> The fundamental facts back of this proposed improvement <br />are as follows: <br /> The Federal Government has allocated several million dol- <br />lars to the State of California for the improvement of #Farm <br />to N~ket Highways~ within this State and has specified that <br />not less than twenty-five (~§%) per cent of this s~mbe <br />expended upon streets of m~Jor importance within cities. <br /> From the tax upon gasoline there has accumulated and is <br />accumulating a considerable sum of money in the hands of the <br />State Highway Department. The sum received from a one- <br />quarter cent tax upon gasoline must be expended by the State <br />Highway Department upon State Highways wit~u municipalities~ <br /> The Federal funds allocated to the State of California <br />have been placed under the Jurisdiction of the State Highway <br />Department. The said Highway Department now proposes to <br />allocate $~3,000.00 of Federal funds and $1§,§~.00 from the <br />one-quarter cent highway gas tax fund to the widening of <br />South Nain ~treet. <br /> I am opposed to this Council taking any action ratifying <br />the proposal of the State Highway Department for the follow- <br />ing reasons: <br /> ~l) The improvement is not necessary. <br /> ~) The improvement will not remedy the down-town traffic <br />condition. <br /> ~) The improvement is only a first step, and will re~ <br />th~ expenditure of thousands of dollars additional before <br />improvement is completed. <br /> ~) The improvement will destroy the trees now growing <br />along South Nain Street. <br /> (§) There is no popular demand for such widening. <br /> ~8) The moneys allocated to this improvement should be <br />used for the improvementof other State Highways and streets <br />of major importance within the ~ity. <br /> The improvement is ~uecessary for the reason that South <br />Nain Street is now of ample width to carry easily and <br />all traffic flowing thereon and all traffic which may or <br />in f~$ure years flow thereon. It may be true that on one or <br />two public holidays during the year there is a sufficient <br />amount of traffic upon this highway to cause a light amount <br />of traffic congestion. This traffic congestion however, is <br />~never of sufficient volume to warrant the injury to our city <br /> <br /> <br />