Laserfiche WebLink
Quality Assurance / Quality Control meet our clients' expectations. We place an emphasis <br /> Program on "getting it right the first time." <br /> Cannon has earned a strong reputation for product <br /> delivery and professional service. We have built and Deliverables <br /> continue to develop internal control processes that We recognize the importance of providing accurate, <br /> incorporate peer review and progress reporting to detailed, and high-quality deliverables. It is critical that <br /> help projects meet established design and review plan check redlines and the comment letter clearly <br /> guidelines, remain within budget, and stay on illustrate the necessary information to produce a <br /> schedule. We take a proactive approach to project successful project. Many of our Cannon design staff <br /> management, with an emphasis on project and review have also worked in our Construction Management <br /> process familiarity, open communication, quality Department, gaining meaningful insight on the <br /> and cost control, and project scheduling. Processes importance of well-defined plans, specifications, and <br /> include a Work Product Review (WPR) Program, bid item quantities. Our Project "Look Backs" are <br /> project "Look Backs," Project Progress Reviews, plan not only conducted from the designer perspective, <br /> check checklists, and an Earned Value Analysis (EVA) but also from our managers perspective, to further <br /> program. develop our design team's accuracy in work products. <br /> In addition, we employ cost savings strategies that We have illustrated our plan check work-flow process <br /> have been effective in managing projects for public below. <br /> and private industry clients. These strategies may <br /> include: cost benefit analysis and value engineering Schedule <br /> reviews; alternative technologies review or innovative <br /> approach analysis; and the use of plan check review We will comply with the guidelines stated in <br /> control logs. Attachment 1 of the RFP, confirming the initial plan <br /> review will be completed within a maximum of four <br /> Our work-flow incorporates quality review processes weeks, followed by a two-week period for the second <br /> to confirm compliance with standards, and that our review, and a one-week turnaround time for further <br /> engineering services are accurate, efficient, and fully reviews, if necessary. <br /> Workflow Chart <br /> recommend for <br /> Ilk k <br /> OBI llklipermit approval <br /> ' AF City issues <br /> - -- <br /> City <br /> . • A4WPR process <br /> • - If changes ? <br /> • • •• ; are required: approved grading <br /> Assigns • - - - - - - completed 'repeat review process permit•--------;-------- <br /> • Cannon <br />