My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - ZOA No. 20204-01 South Coast Technology Center
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
08/06/2024
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - ZOA No. 20204-01 South Coast Technology Center
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2024 9:17:46 AM
Creation date
8/6/2024 8:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
8/6/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
South Coast Technology Center Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />Based on the Cultural Memorandum, the Project Site does not contain any historical resources <br />as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a). Three buildings would be demolished as part <br />of the proposed Project, but they are not historic in age (i.e., 50 years old). As discussed in the <br />Cultural Memorandum, aerial photographs indicate that the two buildings on the Project Site east <br />of Susan Street were constructed between 1980 and 1987. The third building was constructed <br />between 1987 and 1992. Thus, no impacts would occur with regards to historical resources. <br />A records search of the Project Site and a half -mile search radius identified five resources within <br />the Project area, none of which are located within or adjacent to the Project Site. An <br />archaeological field survey conducted in February 2024 identified two marine shell scatters along <br />the northeast of the Project Site's vacant parcel; none of the shell observed on -site showed any <br />sign of burning or other cultural modification. No prehistoric artifacts were observed, either within <br />or outside the shell scatters anywhere on the Project Site. Based on the results of the field survey, <br />a follow-up visit occurred to conduct limited subsurface testing to understand the origin of the shell <br />scatters and determine whether the shell is an archaeological resource. Based on the collective <br />evidence from the geotechnical trenching and the archaeological shovel test pits, it was concluded <br />that the shell scatters do not constitute an archaeological site. All the observed shell and shell <br />fragments are unmodified. All the documented shell and shell fragments were located at or within <br />10 cm of the surface, within artificial fill. No prehistoric artifacts were observed anywhere in the <br />Project Site. The collective evidence is that the shells and shell fragments were brought in with <br />imported fill and dumped at the site relatively recently. Thus, the shell scatters are not part of a <br />prehistoric deposit and are not historical resources as defined by CEQA Section 15064.5(a). <br />The Project would redevelop a 10.2-acre office park and develop an approximately 5.6-acre <br />vacant field. Construction activities would include excavation and grading, which could disturb <br />unknown archaeological resources. The majority of the excavation for the proposed buildings <br />would require over -excavation for the building pads at a depth of approximately 5 to 8 feet. <br />Trenches for utility connections would require a maximum excavation depth of 14 feet. Based on <br />the Cultural Memorandum, sensitivity for cultural resources consisting of archaeological sites is <br />considered low at and near the surface, but increases to moderate with depth. Geologic and soils <br />maps indicate that the Project area contains surficial deposits of younger Quaternary alluvial <br />sediments. These sediments have the potential to contain buried archaeological deposits. The <br />late nineteenth to early twentieth century bed of the Santa Ana River was located approximately <br />0.6 miles to the northwest and would have provided abundant resources to area inhabitants. As <br />the river meandered and changed its course, it or its tributaries may have been located closer to <br />the Project area at times. These conditions heighten the sensitivity of the Project area for buried <br />cultural resources. <br />However, the Project area has an extensive history of recent disturbances. East of Susan Street, <br />the Project Site is entirely developed by the construction of multi -storied office buildings, a pond, <br />and parking lots. Building methods at the time, and the installation of associated utilities, would <br />have resulted in the disturbance of archaeological sites buried at shallow depths. West of Susan <br />Street, geotechnical testing indicates that a layer of imported fill, ranging from 3 to 4.5 feet thick, <br />covers the entire Project Site. Nevertheless, buried resources may remain in areas where <br />developments such as parking lots or structures with shallow foundations have required only <br />minimal ground disturbance, or below the existing imported fill. Therefore, the sensitivity of the <br />Project area at the surface and near surface is low due to past disturbances. However, <br />excavations for the Project are anticipated to disturb a large part of the Project Site to points below <br />the level of existing artificial fill and other disturbances and the sensitivity for potential buried <br />prehistoric archaeological sites is moderate in these undisturbed soils. Therefore, consistent with <br />the GPU PEIR, the proposed Project would implement GPU PEIR MM CUL-7 which would require <br />July 2024 Page 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.