Laserfiche WebLink
South Coast Technology Center Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />RR HYD-5 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the <br />requirements detailed in Chapter 18 Article IV of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. <br />4.11 Land Use and Planning <br />4.11.1 GPU PEIR Findings <br />The GPU PEIR concluded that the General Plan Update's policies would encourage the <br />preservation or enhancement of the existing residential communities through infill development, <br />open space opportunities, and development of compatible uses that would enhance the existing <br />character of the City. A primary goal of the General Plan Update is to preserve and improve the <br />character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts; specific policies would reduce the <br />conflict between contrasting land uses and enhance neighborhoods by responsibly integrating <br />new development into existing communities. The General Plan Update would not divide <br />established communities; rather, implementation of the policies in the General Plan Update would <br />ensure the development of cohesive communities. As such, the GPU PEIR concluded that <br />impacts would be less than significant. <br />Additionally, none of the changes in the General Plan Update would affect plans, policies, or <br />regulations of other agencies that have jurisdiction within the City, including the Airport Environs <br />Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) <br />Congestion Management Plan, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) <br />2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). As <br />individual projects are considered by the City, each would be subject to a variety of federal, state, <br />and locally adopted plans designed to mitigate environmental impacts or to preserve important <br />resources. As such, the GPU PEIR concluded that the General Plan Update would not conflict <br />with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation and impacts would be less than significant. <br />4.11.2 Project Analysis <br />The proposed Project would demolish three buildings and a parking structure to construct three <br />new industrial buildings for office, manufacturing, and/or warehouse use entirely within SD-58. <br />Similar to existing conditions, the Project Site would remain accessible from driveways along Lake <br />Center Drive and South Susan Street. Per RR LU-1, the Project must comply with the applicable <br />provisions of SAMC Chapter 41 (Zoning). Permitted uses in the SD-58 District are professional <br />and business offices and commercial/retail uses. To allow the development of the proposed <br />buildings for industrial use, an amendment to the SD-58 District would be required to allow for <br />industrial uses. In addition, the development standards would be updated to include standards for <br />perimeter fencing and revise parking standards to remove reference to specific numbers. <br />Operational standards would also be included for Limited Light Industrial uses. Additionally, the <br />proposed Project would require a lot merger and site and development plan approval. Although <br />the proposed Project would amend SD-58 to allow for industrial uses, the Project Site's zoning <br />would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Industrial. Additionally, the infill <br />development of the portion of the Project Site west of Susan Street would enhance SD-58 by <br />making it more cohesive. The three buildings would be designed in accordance with the updated <br />development standards governing the SD-58 District. Upon approval of the above entitlements, <br />the proposed Project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and <br />Project Site's zoning. Furthermore, the Project Site is not within a residential community; it is <br />surrounded by office, commercial, and recreational uses. Therefore, the Project would not divide <br />an established community and impacts would be less than significant, consistent with the <br />conclusion in the GPU PEIR. <br />July 2024 Page 72 <br />