My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - ZOA No. 20204-01 South Coast Technology Center
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
08/06/2024
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - ZOA No. 20204-01 South Coast Technology Center
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2024 9:17:46 AM
Creation date
8/6/2024 8:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
8/6/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
South Coast Technology Center Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />In addition, according to Figure 5.8-5, John Wayne Airport Safety Compatibility Zones, of the GPU <br />PEIR, the Project Site is not within an airport safety zone. Similarly, according to Figure 5.12-6, <br />John Wayne Airport Noise Contours, of the GPU PEIR, the Project Site is not within the 60 dBA <br />CNEL aircraft operation noise contours. Thus, the Project would not conflict with the Airport <br />Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport. Moreover, as the Project Site is not located <br />near the study intersections for the OCTA Congestion Management Program (i.e., Harbor <br />Boulevard and 1 st Street and Harbor Boulevard and Warner Avenue) the proposed Project would <br />not impair implementation of the OCTA Congestion Management Program. As such, the Project <br />would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulations adopted for the purpose <br />of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant. <br />Based on the above, the proposed Project would not result in new or substantially more severe <br />impacts compared to the determinations of the GPU PEIR, which concluded that impacts related <br />to physically dividing an established community, and conflicting with applicable land use plan, <br />policy, or regulation would be less than significant. Therefore, no new project -specific mitigation <br />measures are required. <br />4.11.3 Conclusion <br />The Project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR LU-1 identified <br />in the GPU PEIR, the proposed Project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to <br />the Project or the Project Site. There are no Project specific impacts or potentially significant off - <br />site or cumulative impacts that the GPU PEIR did not analyze, and there are no new significant <br />or substantially more severe impacts to land use and planning than anticipated by the GPU PEIR. <br />4.11.4 Applicable GPU PEIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: <br />RR LU-1 Development associated with the General Plan Update would be designed and <br />constructed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) <br />of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Development within specific plan areas, <br />overlay areas, and specific development districts would implement zoning and <br />development standards that are applicable within these subareas in addition to <br />those in the underlying zoning district. <br />4.12 Mineral Resources <br />4.12.1 GPU PEIR Findings <br />According to the GPU PEIR, the City is mostly mapped as Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which <br />is an area where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from available data. <br />The area in the southeast portion of the City is mapped as MRZ-1, which means an area where <br />no significant mineral resources are present or there is little likelihood that significant mineral <br />resources are present. A small area in the northeast corner of the City is mapped as MRZ-2, <br />which means significant mineral resources are known or very likely. However, the City does not <br />have mineral resource sectors or active or inactive mines. Thus, implementation of the General <br />Plan Update would not cause a loss of availability of known mineral resources, and impacts would <br />be less than significant. <br />July 2024 Page 75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.